Arthur Fine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Arthur Fine
Born (1937-11-11) November 11, 1937 (age 84)
Alma materUniversity of Chicago
Era20th-century philosophy
RegionWestern philosophy
SchoolAnalytic
Main interests
Philosophy of science
Pragmatism · Interpretations of quantum mechanics
Notable ideas
Natural ontological attitude
Influences
Influenced

Arthur Isadore Fine (born November 11, 1937) is an American philosopher of science now emeritus at the University of Washington.

Education and career[edit]

Having studied physics, philosophy, and mathematics, Fine graduated from the University of Chicago in 1958 with a Bachelor of Science in mathematics. He then, in 1960, earned a Master of Science in mathematics from the Illinois Institute of Technology with a thesis supervised by Karl Menger,[1]

Fine earned his Ph.D. from the University of Chicago in 1963 under the direction of Henry Mehlberg.[2] Before moving to the University of Washington, Fine taught for many years at Northwestern University and, before that, at Cornell University and the University of Illinois at Chicago. He is a past president of the American Philosophical Association and the Philosophy of Science Association and has for many years been on the editorial board of the journal Philosophy of Science, one of the leading publications in the field.

In 2014, Fine was elected a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences.[3]

Philosophical work[edit]

Fine famously proposed the natural ontological attitude (NOA) as a resolution to the debates over scientific realism. This philosophy takes on a neutral stance of realist and antirealist attitudes of acceptance in the industry's best theories, and calls out mistakes across existing theories.[4]

Fine also developed one of the possible interpretations of quantum mechanics yet to be decided between and has contributed to the probabilistic understanding of Bell's theorem.

In 2001, Fine gave the following re-counting of the birth of NOA and its important relationship to Bas van Fraassen's antirealism:

The Scientific Image arrived in 1980 like a breath of fresh air. Although in the introduction van Fraassen counts me among the realist foot soldiers, at just that time Micky Forbes and I were engaged in rethinking the whole realism/antirealism issue. The result was NOA. Van Fraassen's powerful and enlightening monograph encouraged us in that project. If Micky and I are parents of NOA, then Bas is perhaps a godfather. Paul Teller too, since he was among the people then who helped us refine our ideas as they developed.[5]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Ehrlich, Philip (2010), "Fine, Arthur Isadore", The Dictionary of Modern American Philosophers, Continuum, doi:10.1093/acref/9780199754663.001.0001, ISBN 978-0-19-975466-3, retrieved March 11, 2021
  2. ^ "Philosophical Genealogy". faculty.washington.edu. Retrieved March 11, 2021.
  3. ^ AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES NEWLY ELECTED MEMBERS, APRIL 2014
  4. ^ plato.stanford.edu
  5. ^ Fine, Arthur (2001) "The Scientific Image 20 Years Later" Philosophical Studies. p.207.

External links[edit]