Asset integrity management systems
|This article needs additional citations for verification. (October 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
||This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. (August 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
Asset Integrity Management Systems (AIMS) outline the ability of an asset to perform its required function effectively and efficiently whilst protecting health, safety and the environment and the means of ensuring that the people, systems, processes, and resources that deliver integrity are in place, in use and will perform when required over the whole lifecycle of the asset.
An Integrity Management System should address the quality at every stage of the asset life cycle, from the design of new facilities to maintenance management to decommissioning. Inspections, auditing/assurance and overall quality processes are just some of the tools designed to make an integrity management system effective.
The AIMS should also endeavour to maintain the asset in a fit-for-service condition while extending its remaining life in the most reliable, safe, and cost-effective manner. The AIM programs (in the US) attempt to meet API-580, API-581, and PAS 55 requirements, as applicable. (However local legal requirements may differ, please refer to a competent, experienced local professional for advice).
The AIMS document will stipulate the requirements for subsequent Integrity Management Plans.
Asset Integrity management improves plant reliability and safety whilst reducing unplanned maintenance and repair costs.
But an asset integrity management system does not exist in isolation. In order to successfully implement an asset integrity management system in a dynamic operating environment, it is essential that all stakeholders have a consistent and a unified understanding of what the essentials of asset integrity are and how they can be applied in their day-to-day operations, yet this is often cited as among the most significant challenges in achieving an integrity culture within an organisation.
- DEVELOPMENT OF PLANS TO ENSURE THE LONG-TERM INTEGRITY OF A PIPELINE OR PIPELINE SYSTEM https://web.archive.org/web/20060312070312/http://www.gepower.com/prod_serv/serv/pipeline/en/downloads/tpi_sales/imp.pdf
- Integrity Management Plan, Sunoco Pipeline, L.P http://www.sunocologistics.com/Public-Awareness/Pipeline-Integrity/Integrity-Management-Plan/111/
- Pipeline Integrity Management Plan: Atlanta Gas and Light, http://www.atlantagaslight.com/Universal/NaturalGasSafety/PipelineIntegrityManagementPlan.aspx
- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 49 CFR Parts 192 and 195 [Docket No. RSPA–04–16855; Amdt. 192–101 and 195–85]Federal Register /Vol. 70, No. 205 /Tuesday, October 25, 2005 /Rules and Regulations http://www.wutc.wa.gov/webdocs.nsf/b8da29aede8fdd67882571430005a9c1/b9bc43effc07ff6388256fe10062a0a2/$FILE/70%20FR%2061571.pdf
- Asset Integrity Engineering http://www.assetintegrityengineering.com/Asset-Integrity/index.html
- Oil and Gas Fundamentals The Fundamentals of Asset Integrity
- Egan, F. Responsibilities in Asset Integrity Management[permanent dead link]
|This engineering-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|