Associated Press v. United States

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Associated Press v. United States
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Argued December 5–6, 1944
Decided June 18, 1945
Full case name Associated Press v. United States; Tribune Company v. United States; United States v. Associated Press
Citations 326 U.S. 1 (more)
Prior history Certiorari to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York
The Associated Press violated the Sherman Antitrust Act by prohibiting member newspapers from selling or providing any new to nonmember organizations as well as making it very difficult for nonmember newspapers to join the AP.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Harlan F. Stone
Associate Justices
Owen J. Roberts · Hugo Black
Stanley F. Reed · Felix Frankfurter
William O. Douglas · Frank Murphy
Robert H. Jackson · Wiley B. Rutledge
Case opinions
Majority Black, joined by Reed, Douglas, Rutlegde (in full); Stone, Roberts, Frankfurther, Murphy (in parts)
Concurrence Douglas
Concurrence Frankfurter (in judgment)
Concur/dissent Roberts, joined by Stone
Concur/dissent Murphy
Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

Associated Press v. United States, 326 U.S. 1 (1945), was a United States Supreme Court case on U.S. antitrust law.


The Associated Press (AP) had prohibited member newspapers from selling or providing news (whether that news was supplied by the AP, or was authored by the member newspaper - called "spontaneous" news) to nonmember organizations as well as making it very difficult for nonmember newspapers to join the AP.

Originally there were three separate cases (Associated Press et al. v. U.S., Tribune Company et al. v. U.S. and U.S. v. Associated Press et al.) that were joined into one when heard at the Supreme Court.


The Supreme Court held that Associated Press had violated the Sherman Act. The bylaws of AP at that time, as written, constituted restraint of trade. The fact AP had not achieved a complete monopoly was irrelevant. The First Amendment did not excuse newspapers from violating the Sherman Antitrust Act. News, traded between states, counts as interstate commerce, and thus makes the issue relevant for the Sherman Antitrust Act. Finally, Freedom of the press from governmental interference under the First Amendment does not sanction repression of that freedom by private interests (326 U.S. 20).

See also[edit]


External links[edit]