This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)(Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Ayanamsa (Sanskrit ayanāṃśa: ayana "movement" + aṃśa "component"), also ayanabhāga (Sk. bhāga "portion"), is the Sanskrit term in Indian astronomy for the amount of precession.[failed verification] In astrology, this is the longitudinal difference between the Tropical (Sāyana - with precession) and Sidereal (Nirayana - without precession) zodiacs. In astronomy too, this is the difference between the length of a tropical year (365.2422 rotations of the earth) and a sidereal year (365.2563 rotations) required to complete one orbit relative to the sun (tropical) or stars (sidereal).
Ayanamsa is now defined[by whom?] as the angle by which the sidereal ecliptic longitude of a celestial body is less than its tropical ecliptic longitude. Ayanamsa is mostly assumed to be close to 24° today, according to N. C. Lahiri, 23.85° as of 2000. This value would correspond to a coincidence of the sidereal with the tropical zodiac in or near the year 285 AD, roughly compatible with the assumption that the tradition of the tropical zodiac as current in Western astrology was fixed by Ptolemy in the 2nd century.
To be precise, the so-called "Lahiri Ayanamsha" is a misnomer because N. C. Lahiri borrowed this Chitra-pakshiya Ayanamsha from its inventors, the Ketkar brothers, who propounded this idea three decades before him, and Lahiri never claimed any credit for it. But he popularized it due to his influence on Pundit Jawaharlal Nehru who allowed Lahiri's ideas to dominate in reforming the national calendar of India. According to this theory, the sidereal position of Spica (alpha-Virginis, assumed to be the ancient Chitra) should be exactly 180 degrees, as stated in the Suryasiddhaanta, while both the sidereal and tropical zodiacs should coincide at the time of zero ayanamsha. Although the Suryasiddhaanta, and other ancient texts, state that the ayanamsha was zero in 499 AD (Mesha Sankranti), N C Lahiri insisted on Spica's identification as Chitra and concluded that Spica was the nearest bright star adjacent to 180 degrees hence, resting on Spica, he concluded that the tropical position of Spica being zero in 285 AD must be the zero point of Ayanamsha too.
S.K Kar– Sept 1954
"Actually the current orthodox Panchangas (the Chaitra Panchangas also) or Panjikas Show Apr 13 or Apr 14 as the beginning of the sidereal Nirayana year. Due to the accumulated error of about 3 1⁄2 degrees in the motion of the sun, i.e. 3 1⁄2 days in the calendar date; but if we are to correct the position, the Nirayana sidereal year should begin on Apr 10 or 11 i.e. a concession of 20 degrees should be given instead of 23 degrees.
Astrological Magazine, February 1955
"The Calendar Reform Committee has proposed the adoption of 23d 15m 0s as Ayanamsa in order to avoid opposition from the public. The Chaitra school too has come into being in order to avoid public opposition. Neither of these, however, is in conformity with the truth." S.K.Kar on Chitra paksha Ayanamsa
"The followers of Chitra Paksha Ayanamsa have no valid and authoritative document in their favour for accepting a precessional concession of about 23d 15m for the present."
Sri Lahiri and Professor Vaidya pointed out that if any change is introduced in the ayanamsa at this stage, The calendar for Four years so far calculated will require a thorough revision involving a great amount of labour and time. It was, however, agreed that if the difference be small such as one or two minutes of arc, the labour involved in the revision would not be much.
"If Sri N.C Lahiri Ayanamsa is correct, then why did Sri N.C Lahiri agree to change one or two minutes of Arc in his Ayanamsa? Why did he mention about Labour and recalculation of Panchangas?"
- The sidereal ecliptic longitude of a celestial body is its longitude on the ecliptic defined with respect to the "fixed" stars.
- The tropical ecliptic longitude of a celestial body is its longitude on the ecliptic defined with respect to the vernal equinox point.
Since the vernal equinox point precesses westwards at a rate of about 50".29 per year (the rate has been accelerating) with respect to the fixed stars, the longitude of a fixed body defined with respect to it will increase slowly. On the other hand, since the stars "do not move" (this ignores the effect of proper motion) the longitude of a fixed body defined with respect to them will never change.
Traditional Vedic astrology (Jyotisha) uses a system of sidereal longitude. When the practitioners of these schools of astrology use modern astronomical calculations to determine the position of celestial bodies, they need to take into account the difference caused by the different reference point used in specifying the longitude, and this they call the ayanamsa.
Some orthodox schools of Vedic astrology reject modern astronomy and still base their computations upon traditional texts and treatises, mostly following the Surya Siddhanta or treatises based on it. They use ayanāmsa according to Surya Siddhānta, in which ayanāmsa rises from 0° to +27° during 1800 years, then decreases to 0° and further to −27°, thereafter rising again, thus oscillating within a range of ±27° instead of cyclically moving in a circle as modern concept of ayanāmsa suggests.
Manjula advocated a cyclical concept of ayanāmsa, but it could not gain currency among almanac makers. In West Theon (ca. 4th century AD) was the earliest known advocate of Surya Siddhāntic type of ayanāmsa (although Theon said trepidation varied within a range of ±8° only : Surya Siddhāntic trepidation was deduced by multiplying 90° with 0.3, Theon multiplied 27° again with 0.3 to get 8° ). This oscillating type of ayanāmsa, known as trepidation, was a favourite of Indian, Arab and European astrologers and astronomers till the time of Copernicus. Modern science does not support the idea of trepidation or oscillating ayanāmsa. 490 AD is regarded as the zero date of this type of ayanāmsa according to Surya Siddhānta, Aryabhatiya and other ancient treatises. Thus the present value of traditional ayanāmsa is nearly +22.64°, which is less than modern the value of about +24°.
After 2299 AD, the traditional ayanāmsa will start decreasing from the maximum value of +27°, while modern value will keep on increasing. Equations of sunrise and ascendant (lagna) need accurate value of ayanāmsa, upon which all important components of religious almanac and horoscopes are based in India.
The ayanamsha describes the increasing gap between the tropical and sidereal zodiacs. The ayanamsa, changes continually through the Precession of the Equinoxes at the rate of approximately 50" a year, is currently about 24° (Lahiri).
Western Astrologers Fagan and Bradley computed it at 24 degrees in 1950; however, there are various values in use in India. While the general consensus among Western siderealists is that the star Alcyon represents the first point of Aries, differences arise because of the indefinite ancient boundaries of the constellation of Aries. Indian definition of astrological signs is not based on constellations but on equal angular division of sky, which makes it difficult to define signs in terms of stars and constellations. This is the source of controversy about ayanamsha and because of this there exists many ayanamsas such as Lahiri, Krishnamurthy, Raman, Yukteswar, True Chitra Paksha, True Pushya Paksha, and etc. As a conclusion, this is the major weakness of Indian Sidereal Astrology whereby many Indian astrologers failed multiple times in giving an accurate prediction because no ayanamsas are accurate.