Bacterial phyla

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Euryarchaeota Nanoarchaeota Crenarchaeota Protozoa Algae Plantae Slime molds Animal Fungus Gram-positive bacteria Chlamydiae Chloroflexi Actinobacteria Planctomycetes Spirochaetes Fusobacteria Cyanobacteria Thermophiles Acidobacteria Proteobacteria
Phylogenetic tree showing the diversity of bacteria, compared to other organisms.[1] Eukaryotes are colored red, archaea green and bacteria blue.

The bacterial phyla are the major lineages (phyla or divisions) of the domain Bacteria.

In the scientific classification established by Carl von Linné,[2] each bacterial strain has to be assigned to a species (binary nomenclature), which is a lower level of a hierarchy of ranks. Currently, the most accepted mega-classification system is under the three-domain system, which is based on molecular phylogeny. In that system, bacteria are members of the domain Bacteria[3] and "phylum" is the rank below domain as the rank "kingdom" is disused at present in bacterial taxonomy.[4][Note 1] When bacterial nomenclature was controlled under the Botanical Code, the term division was used, but now that bacterial nomenclature (with the exception of cyanobacteria) is controlled under the Bacteriological Code, the term phylum is preferred.

In this classification scheme, Bacteria is (unofficially)[Note 2] subdivided into 30 phyla with representatives cultured in a lab.[5][6][7] Many major clades of bacteria that exist but cannot currently be cultured are known solely via metagenomics and are called candidate phyla. If these are included, the number of phyla is 52 or higher. Therefore, the number of major phyla has increased from 12 identifiable lineages in 1987, to 52 as of 2003.[8] The total number has been estimated to exceed 1,000 bacterial phyla.[9]

Regarding the precise phylogeny at the base of the clade Bacteria, some scientists believe there may be a branching order, whereas other scientists, such as Norman Pace, believe the various bacterial phyla represent a large hard polytomy (a simultaneous multiple speciation event).[10]

Molecular phylogenetics[edit]

For historical classifications of bacteria, see Bacterial taxonomy.

Traditionally, phylogeny were inferred and taxonomy established based on studies of morphology. Recently molecular phylogenetics has been used to allow better elucidation of the evolutionary relationship of the species by analysing their DNA/protein sequences, for example their ribosomal DNA.[11] The lack of easily accessible morphological features, such as those present in animals and plants, hampered early efforts of classification and resulted in erroneous, distorted and confused classification, an examples of which, noted Carl Woese, is Pseudomonas whose etymology ironically matched its taxonomy, namely "false unit".[12]

Initial sub-division[edit]

Atomic structure of the 30S ribosomal Subunit from Thermus thermophilus of which 16S makes up a part. Proteins are shown in blue and the single RNA strand in orangeish.[13]

In 1987, Carl Woese, regarded as the forerunner of the molecular phylogeny revolution, divided Eubacteria into 11 divisions based on 16S ribosomal RNA (SSU) sequences:[12][14]

New cultured phyla[edit]

New species have been cultured since 1987, when Woese's review paper was published, that are sufficiently different that they warrant a new phylum. Most of these are thermophiles and often also chemolithoautotrophs, such as Aquificae, which oxidises hydrogen gas. Other non-thermophiles, such as Acidobacteria, a ubiquitous phylum with divergent physiologies, have been found, some of which are chemolithotrophs, such as Nitrospira (nitrile-oxidising) or Leptospirillum (Fe-oxidising).,[8] some proposed phyla however do not appear in LPSN as they were insufficiently described or are awaiting approval or it is debated if they may belong to a pre-existing phylum. An example of this is the genus Caldithrix, consisting of C. palaeochoryensis[25] and C. abyssi,[26] which is considered Deferribacteres,[27] however, it shares only 81% similarity with the other Deferribacteres (Deferribacter species and relatives)[26] and is considered a separate phylum by Rappé and Giovannoni.[8] Additionally the placement of the genus Geovibrio in the phylum Deferribacteres is debated.[28]

Uncultivated Phyla and metagenomics[edit]

With the advent of methods to analyse environmental DNA (metagenomics), the 16S rRNA of an extremely large number of undiscovered species have been found, showing that there are several whole phyla which have no known cultivable representative and that some phyla lack in culture major subdivisions as is the case for Verrucomicrobia and Chloroflexi.[8] The term Candidatus is used for proposed species for which the lack of information prevents it to be validated, such as where the only evidence is DNA sequence data, even if the whole genome has been sequenced.[29][30] When the species are members of a whole phylum it is called a candidate division (or candidate phylum)[31] and in 2003 there were 26 candidate phyla out of 52.[8] A candidate phylum was defined by Hugenholtz and Pace in 1998, as a set of 16S ribosomal RNA sequences with less than 85% similarity to already-described phyla.[32] More recently an even lower threshold of 75% was proposed.[9] Three candidate phyla were known before 1998, prior to the 85% threshold definition by Hugenholtz and Pace:

Since then several other candidate phyla have been identified:[8])

  • OP1, OP3, OP5 (now Caldiserica), OP8, OP9, OP10 (now Armatimonadetes), OP11 (obsidian pool, Yellowstone National Park)
  • WS2, WS3, WS5, WS6 (Wurtsmith contaminated aquifer)
  • SC3 and SC4 (from arid soil)
  • vadinBE97 (now Lentisphaerae)
  • NC10 (from flooded caves)
  • BRC1 (from bulk soil and rice roots)
  • ABY1 (from sediment)
  • Guyamas1 (from hydrothermal vents)
  • GN01, GN02, GN04 (from a Guerrero Negro hypersaline microbial mat)
  • NKB19 (from activated sludge)
  • SBR1093 (from activated sludge)
  • TM6 and TM7 (Torf, Mittlere Schicht ["peat, middle layer"])

Since then a candidate phylum called Poribacteria was discovered, living in symbiosis with sponges and extensively studied.[34] (Note: the divergence of the major bacterial lineages predates sponges) Another candidate phylum, called Tectomicrobia, was also found living in symbiosis with sponges.[35] And Nitrospina gracilis, which had long eluded phylogenetic placement, was proposed to belong to a new phylum, Nitrospinae.[36]

Other candidate phyla that have been the center of some studies are TM7,[31] the genomes of organisms of which have even been sequenced (draft),[37] WS6[38] and Marine Group A.[8]

Two species of the candidate phylum OP10, which is now called Armatimonadetes, where recently cultured: Armatimonas rosea isolated from the rhizoplane of a reed in a lake in Japan[39] and Chthonomonas calidirosea from an isolate from geothermally heated soil at Hell's Gate, Tikitere, New Zealand.[40]

One species, Caldisericum exile, of the candidate phylum OP5 was cultured, leading to it being named Caldiserica.[41]

The candidate phylum VadinBE97 is now known as Lentisphaerae after Lentisphaera araneosa and Victivallis vadensis were cultured.[42]

More recently several candidate phyla have been given provisional names despite the fact that they have no cultured representatives:[43]

  • Candidate phylum ACD58 was renamed Berkelbacteria[44]
  • Candidate phylum CD12 (also known as candidate phylum BHI80-139) was renamed Aerophobetes
  • Candidate phylum EM19 was renamed Calescamantes
  • Candidate phylum GN02 (also known as candidate phylum BD1-5) was renamed Gracilibacteria
  • Candidate phylum KSB3 was renamed Modulibacteria[45]
  • Candidate phylum NKB19 was renamed Hydrogenedentes
  • Candidate phylum OctSpa1-106 was renamed Fervidibacteria
  • Candidate phylum OD1 was renamed Parcubacteria
  • Candidate phylum OP1 was renamed Acetothermia
  • Candidate phylum OP3 was renamed Omnitrophica
  • Candidate phylum OP8 was renamed Aminicenantes
  • Candidate phylum OP9 (also known as candidate phylum JS1) was renamed Atribacteria
  • Candidate phylum OP11 was renamed Microgenomates
  • Candidate phylum PER was renamed Perigrinibacteria[46]
  • Candidate phylum SAR406 (also known as candidate phylum Marine Group A) was renamed Marinimicrobia
  • Candidate phylum TM6 was renamed Dependentiae[47]
  • Candidate phylum TM7 was renamed Saccharibacteria[48]
  • Candidate phylum WS3 was renamed Latescibacteria
  • Candidate phylum WWE1 was renamed Cloacimonetes
  • Candidate phylum ZB1 was renamed Ignavibacteriae[49]

Despite these lineages not being officially recognised (due to the ever-increasing number of sequences belonging to undescribed phyla) the ARB-Silva database lists 67 phyla, including 37 candidate phyla (Acetothermia, Aerophobetes, Aminicenantes, aquifer1, aquifer2, Atribacteria, Calescamantes, CKC4, Cloacimonetes, GAL08, GOUTA4, Gracilibacteria, Hyd24-12, Hydrogenedentes, JL-ETNP-Z39, Kazan-3B-09, Latescibacteria, LCP-89, LD1-PA38, Marinimicrobia, Microgenomates, OC31, Omnitrophica, Parcubacteria, PAUC34f, RsaHF231, S2R-29, Saccharibacteria, SBYG-2791, SHA-109, SM2F11, SR1, TA06, TM6, WCHB1-60, WD272, and WS6),[50] the Ribosomal Database Project 10, lists 49 phyla, including 20 candidate phyla (Acetothermia, Aminicenantes, Atribacteria, BRC1, Calescamantes, Cloacimonetes, Hydrogenedentes, Ignavibacteriae, Latescibacteria, Marinimicrobia, Microgenomates, Nitrospinae, Omnitrophica, Parcubacteria, Poribacteria, SR1, Saccharibacteria, WPS-1, WPS-2, and ZB3),[51] and NCBI lists 120 phyla, including 90 candidate phyla (AC1, Acetothermia, Aerophobetes, Aminicenantes, Atribacteria, Berkelbacteria, BRC1, CAB-I, Calescamantes, CPR1, CPR2, CPR3, EM 3, Fervidibacteria, GAL15, GN01, GN03, GN04, GN05, GN06, GN07, GN08, GN09, GN10, GN11, GN12, GN13, GN14, GN15, Gracilibacteria, Hyd24-12, Hydrogenedentes, JL-ETNP-Z39, KD3-62, kpj58rc, KSA1, KSA2, KSB1, KSB2, KSB3, KSB4, Latescibacteria, marine group A, Marinimicrobia, Microgenomates, MSBL2, MSBL3, MSBL4, MSBL5, MSBL6, NC10, Nitrospinae, NPL-UPA2, NT-B4, Omnitrophica, OP2, OP4, OP6, OP7, OS-K, Parcubacteria, Peregrinibacteria, Poribacteria, RF3, Saccharibacteria, SAM, SBR1093, Sediment-1, Sediment-2, Sediment-3, Sediment-4, SPAM, SR1, TA06, TG2, TM6, VC2, WOR-1, WOR-3, WPS-1, WPS-2, WS1, WS2, WS4, WS5, WS6, WWE3, WYO, ZB3, and Zixibacteria).[52]


Despite the unclear branching order for most phyla, several groups of phyla have clear clustering and are referred to as superphyla.

The FCB Group[edit]

Main article: FCB group

The FCB group includes Bacteroidetes, the unplaced genus Caldithrix, Chlorobi, candidate phylum Cloacimonetes, Fibrobacteres, Gemmatimonadates, Ignavibacteriae, candidate phylum Latescibacteria, candidate phylum Marinimicrobia, and candidate phylum Zixibacteria.[43][45]

The PVC Group[edit]

Main article: PVC group

The PVC group includes Chlamydiae, Lentisphaerae, candidate phylum Omnitrophica, Planctomycetes, candidate phylum Poribacteria, and Verrucomicrobia.[43][45]


The proposed superphylum, Patescibacteria, includes candidate phyla Gracilibacteria, Microgenomates, Parcubacteria, and Saccharibacteria[43][45] and possibly Dependentiae.[47] These same candidate phyla, along with candidate phyla Berkelbacteria, CPR2, CPR3, Kazan, Perigrinibacteria, SM2F11, WS6, and WWE3 were more recently proposed to belong to the larger CPR Group.[46] To complicate matters, it has been suggested that several of these phyla are themselves actually superphyla (see the section on cryptic superphyla below).


The proposed superphylum, Terrabacteria, includes Actinobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Deinococcus–Thermus, Chloroflexi, Firmicutes, and candidate phylum OP10.[43][45]


It has been proposed that several of the classes of the phylum Proteobacteria are phyla in their own right, which would make Proteobacteria a superphylum.[9]

Cryptic Superphyla[edit]

Several candidate phyla (Microgenomates, Omnitrophica, Parcubacteria, and Saccharibacteria) and several accepted phyla (Elusimicrobia, Caldiserica, and Armatimonadetes) have been suggested to actually be superphyla that were incorrectly described as phyla because rules for defining a bacterial phylum are lacking. For example, it is suggested that candidate phylum Microgenomates is actually a superphylum that encompasses 28 subordinate phyla and that phylum Elusimocrobia is actually a superphylum that encompasses 7 subordinate phyla.[9]

Overview of phyla[edit]

For the origin of each phylum name, see Bacterial taxonomy#Phylum endings.

As of January 2016, there are 30 phyla in the domain "Bacteria" accepted by LPSN.[7] There are no fixed rules to the nomenclature of bacterial phyla. It was proposed that the suffix "-bacteria" be used for phyla,[53] but generally the name of the phylum is generally the plural of the type genus, with the exception of the Firmicutes, Cyanobacteria, and Proteobacteria, whose names do not stem from a genus name (Actinobacteria instead is from Actinomyces).


Main article: Acidobacteria

The Acidobacteria (diderm Gram negative) is most abundant bacterial phylum in many soils, but its members are mostly uncultured. Additionally, they phenotypically diverse and include not only acidophiles, but also many non-acidophiles.[54] Generally its members divide slowly, exhibit slow metabolic rates under low-nutrient conditions and can tolerate well fluctuations in soil hydration.[55]


Main article: Actinobacteria

The Actinobacteria is a phylum of monoderm Gram positive bacteria, many of which notable secondary metabolite producers. There are only two phyla of monoderm Gram positive bacteria, the other being the Firmicutes; the actinobacteria generally have higher GC content so are sometimes called "high-CG Gram positive bacteria". Notable genera/species include Streptomyces (antibiotic production), Propionibacterium acnes (odorous skin commensal) and Propionibacterium freudenreichii (holes in Emmental)


Main article: Aquificae

The Aquificae (diderm Gram negative) contains only 14 genera (including Aquifex and Hydrogenobacter). The species are hyperthermophiles and chemolithotrophs (sulphur). According to some studies may be one of the most deep branching phyla.


Main article: Armatimonadetes


Main article: Bacteroidetes

The Bacteroidetes (diderm Gram negative) is a member of the FBC superphylum. Some species are opportunistic pathogens, while other are the most common human gut commensal bacteria. Gained notoriety in the non-scientific community with the urban myth as a bacterial weight loss powder.[56]


Main article: Caldiserica

This phylum was formerly known as candidate phylum OP5, Caldisericum exile is the sole representative.


Main article: Chlamydiae

The Chlamydiae (diderms, weakly Gram negative) is a phylum of the PVC superphylum. It is composed of only 6 genera of obligate intracellular pathogens with a complex life cycle. Species include Chlamydia trachomatis (chlamydia infection).


Main article: Chlorobi

Chlorobi is a member of the FBC superphylum. It contains only 7 genera of obligately anaerobic photoautotrophic bacteria, known colloquially as Green sulfur bacteria. The reaction centre for photosynthesis in Chlorobi and Chloroflexi (another photosynthetic group) is formed by a structures called the chlorosome as opposed to phycobilisomes of cyanobacteria (another photosynthetic group).[57]


Main article: Chloroflexi (phylum)

Chloroflexi,diverse phylum including thermophiles and halorespirers, known colloquially as Green non-sulfur bacteria.


Main article: Chrysiogenetes

Chrysiogenetes, only 3 genera (Chrysiogenes arsenatis, Desulfurispira natronophila, Desulfurispirillum alkaliphilum)


Main article: Cyanobacteria

Cyanobacteria, major photosynthetic clade believed to have caused Earth's oxygen atmosphere, also known as the blue-green algae


Main article: Deferribacteres



Main article: Deinococcus–Thermus

Deinococcus–Thermus, Deinococcus radiodurans and Thermus aquaticus are "commonly known" species of this phylum.


Main article: Dictyoglomi



Main article: Elusimicrobia

Elusimicrobia, formerly candidate phylum Termite Group 1


Main article: Fibrobacteres

Fibrobacteres, member of the FBC superphylum.


Main article: Firmicutes

Firmicutes, Low-G+C Gram positive species most often spore-forming, in two/three classes: the class Bacilli such as the Bacillus spp. (e.g. B. anthracis, a pathogen, and B. subtilis, biotechnologically useful), lactic acid bacteria (e.g. Lactobacillus casei in yoghurt, Oenococcus oeni in malolactic fermentation, Streptococcus pyogenes, pathogen), the class Clostridia of mostly anaerobic sulphite-reducing saprophytic species, includes the genus Clostridium (e.g. the pathogens C. dificile, C. tetani, C. botulinum and the biotech C. acetobutylicum)


Main article: Fusobacteria



Main article: Gemmatimonadetes

Gemmatimonadetes, member of the FBC superphylum.


Main article: Lentisphaerae

Lentisphaerae, formerly clade VadinBE97, member of the PVC superphylum.


Main article: Nitrospirae



Main article: Planctomycetes

Planctomycetes, member of the PVC superphylum.


Main article: Proteobacteria

Proteobacteria, contains most of the "commonly known" species, such as Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa


Main article: Spirochaetes

Spirochaetes, notable for compartmentalisation and species include Borrelia burgdorferi, which causes Lyme disease


Main article: Synergistetes

The Synergistetesis a phylum whose members are diderm Gram negative, rod-shaped obligate anaerobes, some of which human commanals.[58]


Main article: Tenericutes

The Tenericutes includes the class Mollicutes, formerly/debatedly of the phylum Firmicutes (sister clades). Despite their monoderm Gram-positive relatives, they lack peptidoglycan. Notable genus: Mycoplasma.


Main article: Thermodesulfobacteria

The Thermodesulfobacteria is a phylum composed of only three genera in the same family (Thermodesulfobacteriaceae: Caldimicrobium, Thermodesulfatator and Thermodesulfobacterium). The members of the phylum are thermophilic sulphate-reducers.


Main article: Thermotogae

The Thermotogae is a phylum of whose members possess an unusual outer envelope called the toga and are mostly hyperthermophilic obligate anaerobic fermenters.


Main article: Verrucomicrobia

Verrucomicrobia is a phylum of the PVC superphylum. Like the Planctomycetes species, its members possess a compartmentalised cell plan with a condensed nucleoid and the ribosomes pirellulosome (enclosed by the intracytoplasmic membrane) and paryphoplasm compartment between the intracytoplasmic membrane and cytoplasmic membrane.[59]

Branching order[edit]

The branching order of the phyla of bacteria is unclear.[10] Different studies arrive at different results due to different datasets and methods. For example, in studies using 16S and few other sequences Thermotogae and Aquificae appear as the most basal phyla, whereas in several phylogenomic studies, Firmicutes are the most basal.

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Past editions of Brock Biology of Microorganisms have referred to the phyla as kingdoms.[5]
  2. ^ For historical reasons, taxa above the rank of class are not covered by the Rules of the Bacteriological Code (1990 Revision),[12][4] consequently there is no "official" nomenclature, but there are several authorities in the field, such as Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, which contains a taxonomy outline[6] and the journal International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology/International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (IJSB/IJSEM), on which the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) repository is based.[60]
  3. ^ Until recently, it was believed than only Firmicutes and Actinobacteria were Gram-positive. However, the candidate phylum TM7 may also be Gram positive.[16] Chloroflexi however possess a single bilayer, but stain negative (with some exceptions[17]).[18]
  4. ^ Pasteuria is now assigned to phylum Bacilli, not to phylum Planctomycetes.
  5. ^ It has been proposed to call the clade Xenobacteria[21] or Hadobacteria[22] (the latter is considered an illegitimate name[23]).


  1. ^ Ciccarelli FD; et al. (2006). "Toward automatic reconstruction of a highly resolved tree of life". Science 311 (5765): 1283–7. Bibcode:2006Sci...311.1283C. doi:10.1126/science.1123061. PMID 16513982. 
  2. ^ Carl Linnaeus (1735). Systemae Naturae, sive regna tria naturae, systematics proposita per classes, ordines, genera & species. 
  3. ^ Woese, C. R.; Kandler, O.; Wheelis, M. L. (1990). "Towards a Natural System of Organisms: Proposal for the Domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 87 (12): 4576–9. Bibcode:1990PNAS...87.4576W. doi:10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576. PMC 54159. PMID 2112744. 
  4. ^ a b Lapage SP, Sneath PHA, Lessel EF, Skerman VBD, Seeliger HPR, Clark WA, ed. (1992). International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria, 1990 Revision. Washington (DC): American Society for Microbiology. ISBN 1-55581-039-X. PMID 21089234. 
  5. ^ a b Michael Madigan (2009). Brock Biology of Microorganisms. San Francisco: Pearson/Benjamin Cummings. ISBN 0-13-232460-1. 
  6. ^ a b Garrity GM, Lilburn TG, Cole JR, Harrison SH, Euzéby J, Tindall BJ. "Taxonomic Outline of the Bacteria and Archaea, Release 7.7". Michigan State University Board of Trustees. doi:10.1601/TOBA7.7. 
  7. ^ a b Bacterial phyla entry in LPSN [Euzéby, J.P. (1997). "List of Bacterial Names with Standing in Nomenclature: a folder available on the Internet". Int J Syst Bacteriol 47 (2): 590–2. doi:10.1099/00207713-47-2-590. ISSN 0020-7713. PMID 9103655. ]
  8. ^ a b c d e f g Rappe, M. S.; Giovannoni, S. J. (2003). "The Uncultured Microbial Majority". Annual Review of Microbiology 57: 369–94. doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090759. PMID 14527284. 
  9. ^ a b c d Yarza P; et al. (2014). "Uniting the classification of cultured and uncultured bacteria and archaea using 16S rRNA gene sequences". Nature Reviews Microbiology 23: 635–645. doi:10.1038/nrmicro3330. 
  10. ^ a b Pace, N. R. (2009). "Mapping the Tree of Life: Progress and Prospects". Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 73 (4): 565–576. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00033-09. PMC 2786576. PMID 19946133. 
  11. ^ Olsen GJ, Woese CR, Overbeek R (1994). "The winds of (evolutionary) change: breathing new life into microbiology". Journal of Bacteriology 176 (1): 1–6. doi:10.2172/205047. PMC 205007. PMID 8282683. 
  12. ^ a b c Woese, CR (1987). "Bacterial evolution". Microbiological reviews 51 (2): 221–71. PMC 373105. PMID 2439888. 
  13. ^ Schluenzen F; et al. (2000). "Structure of functionally activated small ribosomal subunit at 3.3 angstroms resolution". Cell 102 (5): 615–23. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00084-2. PMID 11007480. 
  14. ^ Holland L. (22 May 1990). "Carl Woese in forefront of bacterial evolution revolution". The Scientist 3 (10). 
  15. ^ Stackebrandt; et al. (1988). "Proteobacteria classis nov., a name for the phylogenetic taxon that includes the "purple bacteria and their relatives"". Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 38: 321–325. doi:10.1099/00207713-38-3-321. 
  16. ^ Hugenholtz, P.; Tyson, G. W.; Webb, R. I.; Wagner, A. M.; Blackall, L. L. (2001). "Investigation of Candidate Division TM7, a Recently Recognized Major Lineage of the Domain Bacteria with No Known Pure-Culture Representatives". Applied and Environmental Microbiology 67 (1): 411–9. doi:10.1128/AEM.67.1.411-419.2001. PMC 92593. PMID 11133473. 
  17. ^ Yabe, S.; Aiba, Y.; Sakai, Y.; Hazaka, M.; Yokota, A. (2010). "Thermogemmatispora onikobensis gen. nov., sp. nov. and Thermogemmatispora foliorum sp. nov., isolated from fallen leaves on geothermal soils, and description of Thermogemmatisporaceae fam. nov. and Thermogemmatisporales ord. nov. within the class Ktedonobacteria". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 61 (4): 903–910. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.024877-0. PMID 20495028. 
  18. ^ Sutcliffe, I. C. (2011). "Cell envelope architecture in the Chloroflexi: A shifting frontline in a phylogenetic turf war". Environmental Microbiology 13 (2): 279–282. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02339.x. PMID 20860732. 
  19. ^ a b Stackebrandt, E.; Rainey, F. A.; Ward-Rainey, N. L. (1997). "Proposal for a New Hierarchic Classification System, Actinobacteria classis nov.". International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 47: 479–491. doi:10.1099/00207713-47-2-479. 
  20. ^ J.P. Euzéby. "List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature: classification of Deinococcus–Thermus". Retrieved 30 December 2010. 
  21. ^ Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology 1st Ed.
  22. ^ Cavalier-Smith, T (2002). "The neomuran origin of Archaebacteria, the negibacterial root of the universal tree and bacterial megaclassification". International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology 52 (Pt 1): 7–76. doi:10.1099/00207713-52-1-7. PMID 11837318. 
  23. ^ "List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature—Class Hadobacteria". LPSN.  Euzéby, J.P. (1997). "List of Bacterial Names with Standing in Nomenclature: a folder available on the Internet". Int J Syst Bacteriol 47 (2): 590–2. doi:10.1099/00207713-47-2-590. ISSN 0020-7713. PMID 9103655. 
  24. ^ Boone, David R; Castenholz, Richard W. (May 18, 2001) [1984 (Williams & Wilkins)]. George M. Garrity, ed. The Archaea and the Deeply Branching and Phototrophic Bacteria. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology 1 (2nd ed.). New York: Springer. p. 721. ISBN 978-0-387-98771-2. British Library no. GBA561951. 
  25. ^ Miroshnichenko ML; et al. (2009). "Caldithrix palaeochoryensis sp. nov., a thermophilic, anaerobic, chemo-organotrophic bacterium from a geothermally heated sediment, and emended description of the genus Caldithrix". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 60 (Pt 9): 2120–3. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.016667-0. PMID 19854873. 
  26. ^ a b Miroshnichenko ML; et al. (2003). "Caldithrix abyssi gen. nov., sp. nov., a nitrate-reducing, thermophilic, anaerobic bacterium isolated from a Mid-Atlantic Ridge hydrothermal vent, represents a novel bacterial lineage". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 53 (Pt 1): 323–9. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.02390-0. PMID 12656191. 
  27. ^ J.P. Euzéby. "List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature: Caldithrix". Retrieved 30 December 2010. 
  28. ^ J.P. Euzéby. "List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature: Deferribacterales". Retrieved 30 December 2010. 
  29. ^ Murray, R. G. E.; Schleifer, K. H. (1994). "Taxonomic Notes: A Proposal for Recording the Properties of Putative Taxa of Procaryotes". International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 44 (1): 174–6. doi:10.1099/00207713-44-1-174. PMID 8123559. 
  30. ^ "Judicial commission of the international committee on systematic bacteriology: Minutes of the meetings, 2 and 6 July 1994, Prague, Czech Republic" (PDF). Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 45 (1): 195–196. 1995. doi:10.1099/00207713-45-1-195. 
  31. ^ a b Hugenholtz P et al. (1998). "Impact of culture-independent studies on the emerging phylogenetic view of bacterial diversity". Journal of Bacteriology 180 (18): 4765–74. PMC 107498. PMID 9733676. 
  32. ^ Hugenholtz P et al. (1998). "Novel division level bacterial diversity in a Yellowstone hot spring". Journal of Bacteriology 180 (2): 366–76. PMC 106892. PMID 9440526. 
  33. ^ Geissinger O et al. (2009). "The Ultramicrobacterium Elusimicrobium minutum gen. nov., sp. nov., the first cultivated representative of the Termite Group 1 Phylum". Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75 (9): 2831–40. doi:10.1128/AEM.02697-08. PMC 2681718. PMID 19270135. 
  34. ^ Fieseler L et al. (2004). "Discovery of the Novel Candidate Phylum "Poribacteria" in Marine Sponges". Applied and Environmental Microbiology 70 (6): 3724–32. doi:10.1128/AEM.70.6.3724-3732.2004. PMC 427773. PMID 15184179. 
  35. ^ Wilson MC et al. (2014). "An environmental bacterial taxon with a large and distinct metabolic repertoire". Nature 506 (7486): 58–62. doi:10.1038/nature12959. PMID 24476823. 
  36. ^ Lucker S et al. (2013). "The genome of Nitrospina gracilis illuminates the metabolism and evolution of the major marine nitrite oxidizer". Front. Microbiol. 4: 27. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2013.00027. PMC 3578206. PMID 23439773. 
  37. ^ Marcy Y et al., "Dissecting biological "dark matter" with single-cell genetic analysis of rare and uncultivated TM7 microbes from the human mouth.", Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2007 Jul 9; 104(29):11889-94
  38. ^ Dojka MA et al. (2000). "Expanding the known diversity and environmental distribution of an uncultured phylogenetic division of bacteria". Applied and Environmental Microbiology 66 (4): 1617–21. doi:10.1128/AEM.66.4.1617-1621.2000. PMC 92031. PMID 10742250. 
  39. ^ Tamaki H et al. (2010). "Armatimonas rosea gen. nov., sp. nov., a Gram-negative, aerobic, chemoheterotrophic bacterium of a novel bacterial phylum, Armatimonadetes phyl. nov., formally called the candidate phylum OP10". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 61 (Pt 6): 1442–7. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.025643-0. PMID 20622056. 
  40. ^ Lee KCY et al. (2010). "Chthonomonas calidirosea gen. nov., sp. nov., an aerobic, pigmented, thermophilic microorganism of a novel bacterial class, Chthonomonadetes classis. nov., of the newly described phylum Armatimonadetes originally designated candidate division OP10". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 61 (Pt 10): 2482–90. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.027235-0. PMID 21097641. 
  41. ^ Mori K et al. (2009). "Caldisericum exile gen. nov., sp. nov., an anaerobic, thermophilic, filamentous bacterium of a novel bacterial phylum, Caldiserica phyl. nov., originally called the candidate phylum OP5, and description of Caldisericaceae fam. nov., Caldisericales ord. nov. and Caldisericia classis nov". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 59 (Pt 11): 2894–8. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.010033-0. PMID 19628600. 
  42. ^ Cho JC et al. (2004). "Lentisphaera araneosa gen. nov., sp. nov, a transparent exopolymer producing marine bacterium, and the description of a novel bacterial phylum, Lentisphaerae". Environmental Microbiology 6 (6): 611–21. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00614.x. PMID 15142250. 
  43. ^ a b c d e Rinke C et al. (2013). "Insights into the phylogeny and coding potential of microbial dark matter". Nature 499 (7459): 431–7. doi:10.1038/nature12352. PMID 23851394. 
  44. ^ Wrighton KC et al. (2014). "Metabolic interdependencies between phylogenetically novel fermenters and respiratory organisms in an unconfined aquifer". The ISME Journal 8: 1452–1463. doi:10.1038/ismej.2013.249. 
  45. ^ a b c d e Sekiguchi Y et al. (2015). "First genomic insights into members of a candidate bacterial phylum responsible for wastewater bulking". PeerJ 3: e740. doi:10.7717/peerj.740. PMC 4312070. PMID 25650158. 
  46. ^ a b Brown CT et al. (2015). "Unusual biology across a group comprising more than 15% of domain Bacteria". Nature 523 (7559): 208–11. doi:10.1038/nature14486. PMID 26083755. 
  47. ^ a b Yeoh YK et al. (2015). "Comparative Genomics of Candidate Phylum TM6 Suggests That Parasitism Is Widespread and Ancestral in This Lineage". Mol Biol Evol: msv281. doi:10.1093/molbev/msv281. 
  48. ^ Albertsen M et al. (2013). "Genome sequences of rare, uncultured bacteria obtained by differential coverage binning of multiple metagenomes". Nat Biotechnol. 31 (6): 533–8. doi:10.1038/nbt.2579. PMID 23707974. 
  49. ^ Podosokorskaya OA et al. (2013). "Characterization of Melioribacter roseus gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel facultatively anaerobic thermophilic cellulolytic bacterium from the class Ignavibacteria, and a proposal of a novel bacterial phylum Ignavibacteriae". Environ Microbiol. 15 (6): 1759–71. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.12067. PMID 23297868. 
  50. ^ "ARB-Silva: comprehensive ribosomal RNA database". The ARB development Team. Retrieved January 2, 2016. 
  51. ^ "Hierarchy Browser". Ribosomal database project. Retrieved January 2, 2016. 
  52. ^ "Taxonomy Browser". NCBI. Retrieved January 2, 2016. 
  53. ^ Murray, R. G. E. 1984. The higher taxa, or, a place for everything…?, p. 33. In N. R. Krieg and J. G. Holt (ed.), Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, vol. 1. The Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore.
  54. ^ Kielak, A.; Pijl, A. S.; Van Veen, J. A.; Kowalchuk, G. A. (2008). "Phylogenetic diversity of Acidobacteria in a former agricultural soil". The ISME Journal 3 (3): 378–382. doi:10.1038/ismej.2008.113. PMID 19020558. 
  55. ^ Ward NL; et al. (2009). "Three genomes from the phylum Acidobacteria provide insight into the lifestyles of these microorganisms in soils". Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75 (7): 2046–2056. doi:10.1128/AEM.02294-08. PMC 2663196. PMID 19201974. 
  56. ^ Duncan SH; et al. (2008). "Human colonic microbiota associated with diet, obesity and weight loss". International Journal of Obesity 32 (11): 1720–1724. doi:10.1038/ijo.2008.155. PMID 18779823. 
  57. ^ Oostergetel GT, Amerongen H, Boekema EJ (2010). "The chlorosome: A prototype for efficient light harvesting in photosynthesis". Photosynthesis Research 104 (2–3): 245–255. doi:10.1007/s11120-010-9533-0. PMC 2882566. PMID 20130996. 
  58. ^ Marchandin HLN; et al. (2010). "Phylogeny, diversity and host specialization in the phylum Synergistetes with emphasis on strains and clones of human origin". Research in Microbiology 161 (2): 91–100. doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2009.12.008. PMID 20079831. 
  59. ^ Lee, K. C.; Webb, R. I.; Janssen, P. H.; Sangwan, P.; Romeo, T.; Staley, J. T.; Fuerst, J. A. (2009). "Phylum Verrucomicrobia representatives share a compartmentalized cell plan with members of bacterial phylum Planctomycetes". BMC Microbiology 9: 5. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-9-5. PMC 2647929. PMID 19133117. 
  60. ^ J.P. Euzéby. "List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature". Archived from the original on 30 December 2010. Retrieved 30 December 2010.