Banned Books Week

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Banned Books Week
Bannedbooksweek.png
SignificanceCelebrates the freedom to read, draws attention to banned and challenged books, and highlights persecuted individuals.
Frequencyannual

Banned Books Week is an annual awareness campaign promoted by the American Library Association and Amnesty International, that celebrates the freedom to read,[1] draws attention to banned and challenged books,[2] and highlights persecuted individuals.[3] Held during the last week of September since 1982, the United States campaign "stresses the importance of ensuring the availability of those unorthodox or unpopular viewpoints to all who wish to read them"[4] and the requirement to keep material publicly available so that people can develop their own conclusions and opinions. The international campaign notes individuals "persecuted because of the writings that they produce, circulate or read."[3] Some of the events that occur during Banned Book Week are The Virtual Read-Out and The First Amendment Film Festival.[5][6]

History[edit]

Banned Books Week was founded in 1982 by prominent First Amendment and library activist Judith Krug.[7] Krug said that the Association of American Publishers contacted her with ideas to bring banned books "to the attention of the American public" after a "slew of books" had been banned that year.[8] Krug relayed the information to the American Library Association's Intellectual Freedom Committee, and "six weeks later we celebrated the first Banned Books Week."[8]

The event is sponsored by a coalition of organizations dedicated to free expression, including American Booksellers Association; American Library Association; American Society of Journalists and Authors; Association of University Presses; Authors Guild; Comic Book Legal Defense Fund; Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE); Freedom to Read Foundation; Index on Censorship; National Coalition Against Censorship; National Council of Teachers of English; PEN America; People For the American Way Foundation; and Project Censored. It is endorsed by the Center for the Book in the Library of Congress. Banned Books Week also receives generous support from DKT Liberty Project and Penguin Random House.[9]

Since 2011, the American Association of School Librarians (AASL) has designated the Wednesday of Banned Books Week as Banned Websites Awareness Day.[10] Their goal is "to bring attention to the overly aggressive filtering of educational and social websites used by students and educators."[11] In the AASL's 2012 national longitudinal survey, 94% of respondents said their school used filtering software, with the majority of blocked websites relating to social networking (88%), IM or online chatting (74%), gaming (69%), and video services like YouTube (66%).[12] The AASL's position is that "the social aspect of learning" is important for students in the 21st century and that many schools go "beyond the requirements set forth by the Federal Communications Commission in its Child Internet Protection Act."[12]

United States event[edit]

A Banned Books Week "read out" at Shimer College

The event has been held during the last week of September since 1982.[13] Banned Books Week is intended to encourage readers to examine challenged literary works and to promote intellectual freedom in libraries, schools, and bookstores. Its goal is "to teach the importance of our First Amendment rights and the power of literature, and to draw attention to the danger that exists when restraints are imposed on the availability of information in a free society."[14] Offering Banned Books Week kits, the ALA sells posters, buttons, and bookmarks to celebrate the event.

Educational facilities celebrate banned and challenged books during this week, often creating displays and programs around the awareness campaign. Additionally, booksellers sponsor activities and events in support of Banned Books Week. Some retailers create window displays, while others invite authors of banned and challenged materials to speak at their stores, as well as funding annual essay contests about freedom of expression. Educational facilities and booksellers also sponsor "read outs," allowing participants to read aloud passages from their favorite banned books.[15]

International event[edit]

Amnesty International celebrates Banned Books Week by directing attention to individuals "persecuted because of the writings that they produce, circulate or read."[3][16] Its web site documents "focus cases" annually which show individuals who have been reportedly killed, incarcerated, or otherwise harassed by national authorities around the world, and urge people to "take action" to help it in partnership with its "Urgent Action Network" by contacting authorities regarding human rights violations.[17] They also provide updates to cases from previous years, giving a history and current status of people who have been allegedly persecuted for their writings. The cases include individuals from Azerbaijan, China, Cuba, Egypt, Gambia, Iran, Myanmar, Russia, and Sri Lanka.[16]

Reception and criticism[edit]

The event has been praised for celebrating the freedom provided by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.[18] Public events where banned and challenged books are read aloud are commonly held to celebrate the event.[19][20][21][22][23] The international event held by Amnesty International has also been praised for reminding people about the price that some people pay for expressing controversial views.[24]

Boston Globe columnist Jeff Jacoby observed that the overwhelming number of books on the list were books that were simply challenged (primarily by parents for violence, language, sexuality, or age-appropriateness), not actually removed.[25]

Mitchell Muncy, writing in The Wall Street Journal, has alleged that the censorship being protested in the event does not exist, and that books are not banned in the United States.[26] Camila Alire, a former president of the ALA, responded that Banned Books Week highlights "the hundreds of documented attempts to suppress access to information that take place each year across the U.S.," and that "when the library is asked to restrict access for others, that does indeed reflect an attempt at censorship."[27]

Former ALA Councilor Jessamyn West said:

It also highlights the thing we know about Banned Books Week that we don't talk about much—the bulk of these books are challenged by parents for being age-inappropriate for children. While I think this is still a formidable thing for librarians to deal with, it's totally different from people trying to block a book from being sold at all.[28]

Doug Archer, librarian and past chair of the ALA's Intellectual Freedom Committee, responds that such criticisms do not fairly address the threat of censorship:

The argument goes thusly. Most books on the annual ALA list of banned and challenged books were "only" challenged, never banned. Even if some were removed from libraries, they are still available for purchase in bookstores. Therefore, censorship hasn't really happened because the government hasn't banned the books. .... Just because libraries and librarians have been so good at defending the freedom of the public to read as they choose, means that we're being dishonest? No, it just means we're doing our job.[29]

Focus on the Family, a conservative Christian organization, regularly challenges Banned Books Week, claiming that books are not really banned, and that libraries' policies are anti-family.[30][31][32][33][34][35] Tom Minnery, vice president of public policy, said, "The ALA has irresponsibly perpetrated the 'banned' books lie for too long...Nothing is 'banned,' but every year this organization attempts to intimidate and silence any parent, teacher or librarian who expresses concern about the age-appropriateness of sexually explicit or violent material for schoolchildren."[36] Candi Cushman, Focus on the Family's education analyst, said that "parents have every right and responsibility to object to their kids receiving sexually explicit and pro-gay literature without their permission, especially in a school setting";[37] pointing out that the children's book And Tango Makes Three, about same-sex penguin parents, was one of the books at the top of ALA's most-challenged list, she criticized the event for its "promotion of homosexuality to...6- or 7-year-old [children] against their will."[38] The anti-gay group Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays and Gays (PFOX) has similarly criticized the ALA for not using the event to champion ex-gay books or books opposing same-sex marriage in the United States.[39][40]

Banned Books Week was criticized by Ruth Graham in Slate, who argued that the rhetoric surrounding the event often conflates issues such as banning books in a public library versus a school library.[41] She wrote that it confuses failure to include material in curricula to overall availability in a library.[41] She believes that, while it may be worthwhile to highlight cases of censorship, the emphasis should be on a celebration of the minimal number of banned books.[41]

In response, Maddie Crum of The Huffington Post wrote in defense of Banned Books Week, saying that the celebration of Banned Books Week raises consciousness of the importance of free expression in society.[42] She praised librarians' role, writing that "They do the behind-the-scenes work that ensures challenges don’t turn into bans."[42]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "About Banned Books Week". Library Journal. Archived from the original on June 7, 2011. Retrieved September 23, 2009.
  2. ^ "About Banned and Challenged Books". American Library Association. Archived from the original on July 27, 2009. Retrieved September 8, 2009.
  3. ^ a b c "Banned Books Week". Amnesty International, USA. Archived from the original on August 30, 2009. Retrieved September 23, 2009.
  4. ^ "Banned Books Week: Celebrating the Freedom to Read". American Library Association. Archived from the original on October 5, 2009. Retrieved September 23, 2009.
  5. ^ "ALA Office for Intellectual Freedom". July 28, 2017. Archived from the original on August 27, 2017. Retrieved August 27, 2017.
  6. ^ "BANNED BOOKS WEEK 2018: Sept. 23 – Sept. 29". American Library Association. December 11, 2012. Archived from the original on April 22, 2018. Retrieved April 24, 2018.
  7. ^ Samuels, Dorothy (April 14, 2009). "Appreciations: Judith Krug". The New York Times (Editorial). Archived from the original on April 15, 2009. Retrieved April 15, 2009.
  8. ^ a b "Marking 25 years of Banned Books Week: an interview with Judith Krug". Curriculum Review. 46 (1). September 1, 2006 – via Academic OneFile.
  9. ^ "Banned Books Week | September 26 – October 2, 2021". Retrieved October 9, 2021.
  10. ^ Luhtala, Michelle (September 4, 2014). "What You Should Know About Banned Websites Awareness Day, September 24". www.thedigitalshift.com. Archived from the original on November 1, 2016. Retrieved September 19, 2016.
  11. ^ "AASL designates Wednesday, September 28, 2011, as Banned Websites Awareness Day". American Library Association. August 9, 2011. Archived from the original on December 20, 2016. Retrieved September 19, 2016.
  12. ^ a b JHABLEY (October 1, 2012). "Filtering in Schools". Archived from the original on September 29, 2016. Retrieved September 19, 2016.
  13. ^ Office for Intellectual Freedom (2010). Intellectual Freedom Manual. American Library Association. p. 406. ISBN 978-0838935903. Archived from the original on December 8, 2016. Retrieved September 27, 2016.
  14. ^ "Banned Books Week". American Library Association. Archived from the original on July 27, 2009. Retrieved September 8, 2009.
  15. ^ Kepler, Ann (2011). The ALA Book of Library Grant Money. p. 176. ISBN 978-0838910580. Archived from the original on December 8, 2016. Retrieved September 27, 2016.
  16. ^ a b "Banned Books Week: Amnesty International calls attention to the plight of people who are persecuted because of what they write or publish - in print and online". IFLA. September 20, 2021. Retrieved February 28, 2022.
  17. ^ "Urgent Action Network". Amnesty International, USA. Archived from the original on June 24, 2009. Retrieved October 9, 2009.
  18. ^ Dzwonkowski, Ron (October 1, 2009). "Banned Books Week is a good time to read one". Detroit Free Press. Archived from the original on October 25, 2014. Retrieved April 1, 2015.
  19. ^ "4 Ways You Can Celebrate Banned Books Week". I love libraries. September 27, 2021. Retrieved February 28, 2022.
  20. ^ "Banned Books Week 2021". UC San Diego. September 15, 2021. Retrieved February 28, 2022.
  21. ^ "VC, UHV celebrate freedom with Read Out". Victoria Advocate. September 26, 2009. Archived from the original on June 9, 2011. Retrieved October 22, 2009.
  22. ^ Mertz, Kevin (October 12, 2009). "A stand against banned books". Milton Daily Standard. Retrieved October 22, 2009.
  23. ^ "'Banned Books Week' at Gulf Coast Community College". Panama City, FL: WJHG-TV. October 2, 2009. Archived from the original on July 17, 2011. Retrieved October 22, 2009.
  24. ^ Mattoon, Nancy (September 29, 2009). "Books Banned, Author Imprisoned". Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Archived from the original on July 8, 2012. Retrieved October 22, 2009.
  25. ^ Jacoby, Jeff (September 27, 2001). "Book-Banning, Real and Imaginary". The Boston Globe.
  26. ^ Muncy, Mitchell (September 24, 2009). "Finding Censorship Where There Is None". The Wall Street Journal. p. W13. Archived from the original on February 1, 2015. Retrieved September 25, 2009.
  27. ^ "Letters to the Editor:Librarians Work to Protect Free Access to Information". Wall Street Journal. October 1, 2009. Archived from the original on March 11, 2016. Retrieved October 8, 2009.
  28. ^ West, Jessamyn (September 21, 2006). "Banned Books Week is Next Week". Librarian.net. Archived from the original on January 12, 2010. Retrieved August 11, 2009.
  29. ^ Doug Archer (June 17, 2009). "A Pet Peeve". OIF Blog. Office for Intellectual Freedom. Archived from the original on February 3, 2011. Retrieved September 18, 2009.
  30. ^ Reid, Carol (June–July 1999). "On My Mind: 'Challenge', and Other Politely Empowering Euphemisms". American Libraries. 30 (6): 60. JSTOR 25637199.
  31. ^ Lee, Earl (1998). Libraries in the age of mediocrity. McFarland. p. 106. ISBN 9780786405480. Retrieved September 27, 2016.
  32. ^ "From banned to challenged?". Library Journal. 122 (1–7). 1997. Archived from the original on December 8, 2016. Retrieved September 27, 2016.
  33. ^ "ALA under attack". College & Research Libraries News. 56: 687. 1995. Archived from the original on November 8, 2015. Retrieved September 27, 2016.
  34. ^ "Focus on the Family Focuses on ALA". American Libraries. 28 (10): 9. November 1997. JSTOR 25634684.
  35. ^ "Special Report: Christian Conservatives Organize to Criticize ALA". American Libraries. 26 (10): 983. November 1995. JSTOR 25633767.
  36. ^ "Focus on the Family Exposes the "Banned" Books Lie". Charity Wire. September 23, 2002. Archived from the original on October 30, 2010. Retrieved December 12, 2010.
  37. ^ Shepard, Stuart (September 29, 2009). "Responding to Banned Books Week". Focus on the Family. Archived from the original on October 5, 2010. Retrieved December 12, 2010.
  38. ^ Snow, Catherine (September 29, 2010). "Library Association Pushes Anti-Family Agenda through 'Banned Books Week'". Focus on the Family. Archived from the original on December 20, 2010. Retrieved December 12, 2010.
  39. ^ Chandler, Michael Alison (October 3, 2008). "Banned Books, Chapter 2; Conservative Group Urges Libraries to Accept Collection". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on November 15, 2010. Retrieved November 11, 2010.
  40. ^ Macedo, Diane (October 22, 2009). "Gay Reversal Advocates Say School Libraries Banning Their 'Ex-Gay' Books". Fox News. Archived from the original on October 25, 2009. Retrieved October 22, 2009.
  41. ^ a b c Graham, Ruth (September 28, 2015). "Banned Books Week Is a Crock". Slate. ISSN 1091-2339. Archived from the original on October 1, 2015. Retrieved October 2, 2015.
  42. ^ a b "This Is Why You Should Celebrate Banned Books Week". The Huffington Post. September 28, 2015. Archived from the original on October 2, 2015. Retrieved October 2, 2015.

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]