Baptist successionism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Baptist successionism (or Baptist perpetuity) is one of several theories on the origin and continuation of Baptist churches. The tenet of the theory is that there has been an unbroken chain of churches since the days of John the Baptist, who baptized Christ, which have held beliefs similar (although not always the same) to those of current Baptists. Ancient anti-paedobaptist groups, such as the Montanists, Paulicians, Cathari, Waldenses, Albigenses, and Anabaptists, have been among those viewed by Baptist successionists as the predecessors of modern-day Baptists.[1]

Articulation of the theory[edit]

Diagram representing The Trail of Blood as presented by James Milton Carroll

The perpetuity view is often identified with The Trail of Blood, a pamphlet by James Milton Carroll published in 1931.[2] Other Baptist writers who held the perpetuity view are John T. Christian, Thomas Crosby, G. H. Orchard, J. M. Cramp, William Cathcart, Adam Taylor and D. B. Ray.[3]

This view was once commonly held among Baptists.[4] Since the end of the 19th century, however, the theory has increasingly come under attack and today has been largely discredited.[5][page needed] Nonetheless, the view continued to be the prevailing view among Baptists of the Southern United States into the latter 20th century.[6] It is now identified primarily with Landmarkism, though not exclusively so.[7] The concept finds its parallels in the Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and Anglican doctrine of apostolic succession and stands in contrast to the restorationist views of Latter Day Saints and the Stone-Campbell Restoration Movement.[8]

Modern rejection of the theory[edit]

Since the end of the 19th century the trend in academic Baptist historiography has been away from the successionist viewpoint to the view that modern day Baptists are an outgrowth of 17th-century English Separatism.[9] This shift precipitated a controversy among Southern Baptists which occasioned the forced resignation of William H. Whitsitt, a professor at Southern Baptist Seminary, in 1898 from the seminary for advocating the new view, though his views continued to be taught in the seminary after his departure.[10]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Patterson 1969, p. 9.
  2. ^ McBeth 1987, pp. 59–60.
  3. ^ McBeth 1987, pp. 59–60; Torbet 1975, p. 18.
  4. ^ Torbet 1975, p. 18.
  5. ^ Brackney 2004; McGoldrick 2000.
  6. ^ Patterson 1969, p. 6.
  7. ^ McBeth 1987, p. 58; Patterson 1969, p. 6.
  8. ^ Torbet 1975, p. 19.
  9. ^ Cross 1990, p. 174.
  10. ^ McBeth 1987, pp. 457–458.

Bibliography[edit]

Brackney, William H. (2004). A Genetic History of Baptist Thought: With Special Reference to Baptists in Britain and North America. Macon, Georgia: Mercer University Press. ISBN 978-0-86554-913-5. 
Cross, I. K. (1990). The Battle For Baptist History. Columbus, Georgia: Brentwood Christian Press. ISBN 978-0-89211-337-8. 
McBeth, H. Leon (1987). The Baptist Heritage: Four Centuries of Baptist Witness. Nashville, Tennessee: Broadman Press. ISBN 978-0-8054-6569-3. 
McGoldrick, James Edward (2000). Baptist Successionism: A Crucial Question in Baptist History. Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-3681-5. 
Patterson, W. Morgan (1969). Baptist Successionism: A Critical View. Valley Forge, Pennsylvania: Judson Press. ISBN 978-0-8170-0420-0. 
Torbet, Robert G. (1975). A History of the Baptists (3rd ed.). Valley Forge, Pennsylvania: Judson Press. ISBN 978-0-8170-0074-5.