Barnes G-function
In mathematics, the Barnes G-function G(z) is a function that is an extension of superfactorials to the complex numbers. It is related to the Gamma function, the K-function and the Glaisher–Kinkelin constant, and was named after mathematician Ernest William Barnes.[1] Up to elementary factors, it is a special case of the double gamma function.
Formally, the Barnes G-function is defined in the following Weierstrass product form:
where
is the Euler–Mascheroni constant, exp(x) = ex, and ∏ is capital pi notation.
Contents
Functional equation and integer arguments[edit]
The Barnes G-function satisfies the functional equation
with normalisation G(1) = 1. Note the similarity between the functional equation of the Barnes G-function and that of the Euler Gamma function:
The functional equation implies that G takes the following values at integer arguments:
(in particular,
) and thus
where
denotes the Gamma function and K denotes the K-function. The functional equation uniquely defines the G function if the convexity condition:
is added.[2]
Reflection formula 1.0[edit]
The difference equation for the G function, in conjunction with the functional equation for the Gamma function, can be used to obtain the following reflection formula for the Barnes G function (originally proved by Hermann Kinkelin):
The logtangent integral on the right-hand side can be evaluated in terms of the Clausen function (of order 2), as is shown below:
The proof of this result hinges on the following evaluation of the cotangent integral: introducing the notation
for the logtangent integral, and using the fact that
, an integration by parts gives
Performing the integral substitution
gives
The Clausen function – of second order – has the integral representation
However, within the interval
, the absolute value sign within the integrand can be omitted, since within the range the 'half-sine' function in the integral is strictly positive, and strictly non-zero. Comparing this definition with the result above for the logtangent itegral, the following relation clearly holds:
Thus, after a slight rearrangement of terms, the proof is complete:
Using the relation
and dividing the reflection formula by a factor of
gives the equivalent form:
Ref: see Adamchik below for an equivalent form of the reflection formula, but with a different proof.
Reflection formula 2.0[edit]
Replacing z with (1/2) − z'' in the previous reflection formula gives, after some simplification, the equivalent formula shown below (involving Bernoulli polynomials):
Taylor series expansion[edit]
By Taylor's theorem, and considering the logarithmic derivatives of the Barnes function, the following series expansion can be obtained:
It is valid for
. Here,
is the Riemann Zeta function:
Exponentiating both sides of the Taylor expansion gives:
Comparing this with the Weierstrass product form of the Barnes function gives the following relation:
Multiplication formula[edit]
Like the Gamma function, the G-function also has a multiplication formula:[3]
where
is a constant given by:
Here
is the derivative of the Riemann zeta function and
is the Glaisher–Kinkelin constant.
Asymptotic expansion[edit]
The logarithm of G(z + 1) has the following asymptotic expansion, as established by Barnes:
Here the
are the Bernoulli numbers and
is the Glaisher–Kinkelin constant. (Note that somewhat confusingly at the time of Barnes [4] the Bernoulli number
would have been written as
, but this convention is no longer current.) This expansion is valid for
in any sector not containing the negative real axis with
large.
Relation to the Loggamma integral[edit]
The parametric Loggamma can be evaluated in terms of the Barnes G-function (Ref: this result is found in Adamchik below, but stated without proof):
The proof is somewhat indirect, and involves first considering the logarithmic difference of the Gamma function and Barnes G-function:
where
and
is the Euler–Mascheroni constant.
Taking the logarithm of the Weierstrass product forms of the Barnes function and Gamma function gives:
A little simplification and re-ordering of terms gives the series expansion:
Finally, take the logarithm of the Weierstrass product form of the Gamma function, and integrate over the interval
to obtain:
Equating the two evaluations completes the proof:
References[edit]
- ^ E. W. Barnes, "The theory of the G-function", Quarterly Journ. Pure and Appl. Math. 31 (1900), 264–314.
- ^ M. F. Vignéras, L'équation fonctionelle de la fonction zêta de Selberg du groupe mudulaire SL
, Astérisque 61, 235–249 (1979). - ^ I. Vardi, Determinants of Laplacians and multiple gamma functions, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 19, 493–507 (1988).
- ^ E. T. Whittaker and G.N.Watson, "A course of modern analysis", CUP.
- Askey, R.A.; Roy, R. (2010), "Barnes G-function", in Olver, Frank W. J.; Lozier, Daniel M.; Boisvert, Ronald F.; Clark, Charles W., NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0521192255, MR 2723248
- Adamchik, Viktor S. "Contributions to the Theory of the Barnes function" (PDF). Retrieved 2003.







![{\begin{aligned}Lc(z)&=\int _{0}^{z}\pi x\cot \pi x\,dx\\&=z\log(\sin \pi z)-\int _{0}^{z}\log(\sin \pi x)\,dx\\&=z\log(\sin \pi z)-\int _{0}^{z}{\Bigg [}\log(2\sin \pi x)-\log 2{\Bigg ]}\,dx\\&=z\log(2\sin \pi z)-\int _{0}^{z}\log(2\sin \pi x)\,dx.\end{aligned}}](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/d/8/a/d8ac06f5a13c237cea6695e123905fdf.png)









![{\begin{aligned}G(1+z)&=\exp \left[{\frac {z}{2}}\log 2\pi -\left({\frac {z+(1+\gamma )z^{2}}{2}}\right)+\sum _{k=2}^{\infty }(-1)^{k}{\frac {\zeta (k)}{k+1}}z^{k+1}\right]\\&=(2\pi )^{z/2}\exp \left[-{\frac {z+(1+\gamma )z^{2}}{2}}\right]\exp \left[\sum _{k=2}^{\infty }(-1)^{k}{\frac {\zeta (k)}{k+1}}z^{k+1}\right].\end{aligned}}](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/3/5/9/3597039a72a87c05c2bd9397e269e819.png)
![\exp \left[\sum _{k=2}^{\infty }(-1)^{k}{\frac {\zeta (k)}{k+1}}z^{k+1}\right]=\prod _{k=1}^{\infty }\left\{\left(1+{\frac {z}{k}}\right)^{k}{\text{exp}}\left({\frac {z^{2}}{2k}}-z\right)\right\}](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/f/2/e/f2efb23fbdcd44a377806d332e163e9e.png)







![-z\left[\log z+\gamma z+\sum _{k=1}^{\infty }{\Bigg \{}\log \left(1+{\frac {z}{k}}\right)-{\frac {z}{k}}{\Bigg \}}\right]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/4/4/2/442b99e681ec02b3ad0e4c3ca88f0a0d.png)
![-\left[{\frac {z}{2}}\log 2\pi -{\frac {z}{2}}-{\frac {z^{2}}{2}}-{\frac {z^{2}\gamma }{2}}+\sum _{k=1}^{\infty }{\Bigg \{}k\log \left(1+{\frac {z}{k}}\right)+{\frac {z^{2}}{2k}}-z{\Bigg \}}\right]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/5/f/d/5fdec0481b628af338dacd8fc59b1186.png)





, Astérisque 61, 235–249 (1979).