This is a good article. Click here for more information.

Battle of Baia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Battle of Baia
Part of Moldavian-Hungarian Wars
Localizare
Date 15 December 1467
Location Baia, present-day Romania
Result Decisive Moldavian victory;[1][2][3][4][5]
Belligerents
MoldaviaMoldavia Coat of arms of Hungary.svgKingdom of Hungary
Commanders and leaders
Humorstefan.jpg
Stephen the Great
Corvinus.JPG
Matthias Corvinus
Strength
12,000[6] 40,000; 500 cannons[7] 15,000-20,000 (modern estimate[8])
Casualties and losses
Unknown, possibly 10,000[6] 4,000[6]

The Battle of Baia (Romanian: Bătălia de la Baia) was fought on 15 December 1467 between the Moldavian Prince, Stephen the Great and Hungarian King, Matthias Corvinus. The battle was the last Hungarian attempt to subdue the independent Moldavia, as previous attempts had ended in failure. Corvinus invaded Moldavia as a consequence of Stephen's annexation of Chilia—a fortress and harbour at the coast of the Black Sea, which at the time was controlled by Hungarian and Wallachian forces, though it had belonged to Moldavia centuries earlier.

The conflict ended with a defeat for the Hungarians. This put an end to all Hungarian claims on Moldavia.

Background[edit]

In 1359, Bogdan I of Moldavia rebelled against Hungary and founded an independent Moldavia. However, the Hungarian attempts to seize control over Moldavia did not end there, and in 1429, Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor, and also King of Hungary, met with Władysław Jagiełło, King of Poland to try to persuade him to launch a common attack on Moldavia and divide the country in two equal parts—Polish and Hungarian.[9] Sigismund argued that the Moldavian nation did not "owe allegiance to anyone, is accustomed to live by theft and brigandage and so is everyone's enemy." He also complained about not receiving any help for his struggle against the Turks.[9] In the Annals of Jan Długosz, the Polish chronicler wrote the following on Władysław’s reply to Sigismund:

Wladislaw replies that it would not be right to wage war on the Wallachians, who confess the Christian faith and have given him and his kingdom obedience and submission; indeed, to do this would be an act of savagery. Though some may live by brigandage, they cannot all be tarred with the same brush, nor can they be blamed for not helping King Sigismund against the Turks, because they had gone with the Poles to the given rendez-vous on the Danube and got there on time, yet had to waste two months waiting there, and then return home. Rather does the blame for this attach to King Sigismund, who failed to turn up at the appointed time. The squabbling continues for several days, at the end of which Wladyslaw stubbornness compels Sigismund to abandon the plan and seek other ventures.[9]

In 1442, Hungary again had to renounce its claims on Moldavia.[10] On 17 October 1451, Prince Bogdan II was assassinated by Petru Aron, a pretender to the Moldavian throne. The country was thrown into civil strife which lasted until 1457, when Stephen, son of Bogdan, gained the throne and ousted the boyars loyal to Aron. The latter fled to Poland, but was later forced to seek asylum in Transylvania, after Moldavia and Poland concluded a new treaty. Stephen’s objective was to regain the region of Budjak with the castles of Chilia and Cetatea Albă. The region had previously belonged to Wallachia, but had been incorporated into Moldavia in the late 14th century.[11] Due to the decline of Moldavia during the civil war, the region reverted to Wallachia, with Chilia being co-ruled by Hungary and Wallachia.

Foreign relations[edit]

In 1462, Stephen sent a letter to his cousin, Prince Vlad III Dracula of Wallachia, asking him to return Chilia back to Moldavia—a demand that was most likely refused.[12] On 22 June, when Vlad was fighting Sultan Mehmed II of the Ottoman Empire, Stephen launched an attack on Chilia, with some Turkish assistance, with the objective of capturing the fortress.[13] The Wallachians rushed to the scene with 7,000 men, and together with the Hungarian garrison, battled the Moldavians and the Turks for eight days. The Turks were defeated and Stephen was wounded by a piece of shrapnel[13] — an injury which would hasten his death. In 1465, when Dracula was imprisoned in Hungary, Stephen again advanced towards Chilia with a large force and siege weapons; but instead of besieging the fortress, he showed the garrison, who favoured the Polish King, a letter in which the King requires them to surrender the fortress. The garrison complied with the King's demand and Stephen entered the fortress escorted by Polish troops where he found “its two captains, rather tipsy, for they have been to a wedding.”[14] Mehmed was furious about the news and claimed Chilia as being a part of Wallachia, which now was a vassal to the Porte, and demanded Stephen relinquish ownership. However, Stephen refused and recruited an army, forcing Mehmed, who was not yet ready to wage war, to accept the situation, if only for the time being.[14] Długosz recalls that in the beginning of his reign, Stephen reformed his army by extending rights for men to bear arms:

This Stephen's rule has been so strict and just that no crime has gone unpunished and people now obey his every order. He has insisted that not only the knights and nobility should bear arms, but that farmers and villagers do so as well, for everyone has a duty to defend his fatherland. If the Voivode learns that a farmer does not have a bow, arrows and a sword, or has mustered without a spear, the culprit is condemned to death.[15]

In 1466, Stephen regained Khotyn from Poland in a diplomatic victory, but in the same year, Corvinus became on bad terms with King Casimir IV Jagiellon of Poland,[16] which frustrated the Hungarian king further, knowing that Moldavia was a Polish fief. One year later, in 1467, the locals of Transylvania started an uprising in which Corvinus had a difficult time quelling the riots.[17] He later found out that Stephen had supported the rioters, — probably in order to find and kill Aron. Długosz writes in his ‘’Annals’’ that in 1467, a certain "Berendeja" went to the court of Corvinus and promised to make Moldavia his vassal, if the King would in turn make him Prince of Moldavia.[15] This was denounced by Romanian historian Nicolae Iorga, who argued that Corvinus started recruiting troops and took Aron with him to put him on the Moldavian throne.[17] This is disputed by Długosz though, who in ‘’Historiae Polonicae’’, adds that Corvinus brought with him both Aron and Berendeja,[7] making unknown whom the king considered more worthy of the Moldavian throne.

Preparations for war[edit]

The Hungarians recruited an army of 40,000,[7] many drawn locally from Transylvania. Many knights and Hungarian aristocrats followed, one of them being Stefan Báthory.[18] With them, they brought 500 cannons[7] and other heavy siege equipment.[19] The Moldavians, being fewer in number and seeing that the Hungarians were determined to wage war, started to evacuate the population close to the Hungarian border and blockaded the passages by cutting down trees and placing them on the roads.[17]

Battle[edit]

Map of the battle, showing the Moldavian attack

The Hungarians departed in the middle of October[7] and reached the realm of Moldavia at the beginning of November, using a passage near Bacău.[18] On 19 November,[18] the Hungarians arrived at the Trotuș River where they met some Moldavian resistance, but Corvinus, to ensure the "loyalty of his troops, avoids a pitched battle and limits his efforts to surprise attacks and ambushes, yet is himself prevented from foraging or doing further damage."[15]

The town was destroyed and the Hungarians headed for Bacău, which they also burned down; then they continued to Roman and stayed there between 29 November and 7 December. According to a chronicle, Stephen sent envoys to negotiate a peace treaty, but the two factions could not agree and the war continued.[6] Roman was put to flames and the Hungarians killed everyone they encountered, “without considering their sex, age, or looks.”[7] After three days of marching and more pillaging, they reached Baia where Corvinus met with a Hungarian by the name of Sythotus, who revealed to him the Moldavian position, their numbers (12,000), and their plan to attack before dusk.[6] The Moldavians were encamped further north, between Moldova River and Șomuz creek. Corvinus ordered the city to be fortified with “ramparts, ditches and a ring of wagons,”[15] as the men were told to be prepared for battle and guards were sent to guard strategic points.

A peculiar report mentions that Stephen himself was captured by the Hungarians on 14 December, but that he managed to trick them into releasing him.[20] On 15 December, when dusk was approaching, Stephen sent smaller detachments that set the town on fire from three different places: thereafter, noise and confusion set in.[6] Stephen ordered his men to dismount and soon after they launched their attack[7] and made battle until dawn. Descriptions of the battle say that the fire made the night equally light as the day and that many Hungarians were consumed by the flames.[6] The two armies started to butcher each other at the gate of the city; then the fighting continued onto the streets "with such a wrath, that nothing could be seen as more horrible than this."[6] The Moldavians got the upper hand of the battle and launched another attack against the royal guard, which consisted of 200 heavily armed knights, the aristocrats and Corvinus. Many Moldavians were killed in the tumult that followed, as Báthory and the rest of the knights tried to defend the entrance to the market.[6] Corvinus was wounded by three arrows in the back and had to be “carried from the battlefield on a stretcher, to avoid him falling into the hands of the enemy.”[15]

The retreating Hungarian army, on its way to Transylvania, was stopped by a blockade; there they decided to bury the 500 cannons and other treasures, so the Moldavians would not be able to capture them. According to Długosz, Corvinus escaped the Moldavians due to the assistance of another Vlach (Romanian), whom Stephen found and had executed because of treachery.[7] The Moldavian-German Chronicles say that someone named Isaia failed to launch the cavalry attack which would have blocked the path for the Hungarian retreat; for this, he and others were later executed.[20] Around 10,000 Hungarians were said to have been killed; most of the barons escaped with their king.[7] A Hungarian chronicle mentions 7,000 casualties for the Moldavians.[6] This chronicle is disputed though, due to it being the only one mentioning the Moldavian casualties in numbers; and because the Hungarians did not have the opportunity to calculate the numbers of their fallen enemy. The entire conflict, with the Hungarian invasion and retreat, took around forty days.[7]

Aftermath[edit]

Some of the Hungarian standards that were captured came with a "huge booty of tents, waggons and guns," which were sent to Casimir as proof of Stephen's victory.[15] Upon his return to Brașov on Christmas day, Corvinus took revenge on the people who had rebelled against him by torturing them to death; thereafter he fined the Transylvanians a sum of 400,000 florins, which they had to pay immediately, in gold.[15] With this money he raised an army of foreign mercenaries, which would prove more loyal to him.[7] In 1468, Stephen campaigned in Transylvania, found Aron and had him executed.[21] Stephen and Corvinus would later negotiate a peace treaty and become allies; in 1475, Corvinus sent 1,800 soldiers that assisted Stephen in his victory at the Battle of Vaslui.

Footnotes[edit]

  1. ^ Descrierea Călătoriei lui Ercole Dalmatul în Transilvania si în Moldova
  2. ^ Regni Hungarici Historia
  3. ^ Kronika Polska
  4. ^ Chronica Polonorum
  5. ^ Chronicorum […]Partem Posteriorem
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Historia Pannonica ab Origine Gentis AD Annum 1495
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Historiae Polonicae
  8. ^ Ferenc Julier, Magyar hadvezérek [Hungarian Military Leaders]
  9. ^ a b c Długosz, p. 449
  10. ^ Długosz, p. 487
  11. ^ Spinei, p. 218
  12. ^ Cârciumaru, p.221
  13. ^ a b Florescu, p. 149
  14. ^ a b Długosz, p. 552
  15. ^ a b c d e f g Długosz, p. 566
  16. ^ Iorga, p. 91
  17. ^ a b c Iorga, p. 94
  18. ^ a b c Iorga, p. 95
  19. ^ Sfântul Voievod Ștefan cel Mare, Letter of Stephen to Casimir, January 1, 1468
  20. ^ a b Moldavian-German Chronicle, The
  21. ^ Iorga, p. 99

References[edit]

  • Cârciumaru, Radu. Vlad Țepeș și Ștefan cel Mare - prieteni sau duşmani? Magazin Istoric, January 2004.
  • Długosz, Jan. The Annals of Jan Długosz ISBN 1-901019-00-4
  • Florescu, R. Radu; McNally, T. Raymond. Dracula: Prince of many faces - His life and his times ISBN 978-0-316-28656-5
  • Iorga, Nicolae. Istoria lui Ștefan cel Mare, 1904 (new edition 1966), Bucharest.
  • Sfântul Voievod Ștefan cel Mare, Chronicles. (Romanian)
    • Letter of Stephen to Casimir, January 1, 1468;
    • Bonfinius, Antonius. Historia Pannonica ab Origine Gentis AD Annum 1495
    • Descrierea Călătoriei lui Ercole Dalmatul în Transilvania si în Moldova
    • Długosz, Jan. Historiae Polonicae, Leipzig 1712
    • Isthuanffius (Istvánffy), Nicolaus. Regni Hungarici Historia
    • Maciej Stryjkowski; Bielski. Kronika Polska
    • Maciej Miechowski. Chronica Polonorum.
    • Wapowski, Bernard. Chronicorum […]Partem Posteriorem
    • Moldavian-German Chronicle, The
  • Spinei, Victor. Moldavia in the 11th-14th Centuries, 1986 Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste România