Battle of Le Cateau

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
For the battle during the War of the First Coalition, see Battle of Le Cateau (1794).
Battle of Le Cateau
Part of the Great Retreat on the Western Front of World War I
British casualties at Le Cateaua.jpg
British dead at the Battle of Le Cateau.
Date 26 August 1914
Location Le Cateau-Cambrésis, France
50°06′15″N 03°32′40″E / 50.10417°N 3.54444°E / 50.10417; 3.54444Coordinates: 50°06′15″N 03°32′40″E / 50.10417°N 3.54444°E / 50.10417; 3.54444
Result German victory
 United Kingdom
France France
 German Empire
Commanders and leaders
United Kingdom Sir Horace Smith-Dorrien German Empire Friedrich Bertram Sixt von Armin
German Empire Georg von der Marwitz
Units involved
II Corps IV Corps
II Cavalry Corps
40 infantry battalions
12 cavalry regiments
2 divisional cavalry squadrons
246 guns (41 batteries)
c. 80 machine-guns
23 infantry battalions
18 cavalry regiments (9 of which at half strength)
6 divisional cavalry squadrons
162 guns (27 batteries)
84 machine-gunss
Casualties and losses
7,812 (700 killed, 2,500–2,600 captured)
38 guns

The Battle of Le Cateau was fought on 26 August 1914, after the British and French retreated from the Battle of Mons and had set up defensive positions in a fighting withdrawal against the German advance at Le Cateau-Cambrésis.


On the morning of 26 August, the Germans arrived and heavily attacked II Corps (General Sir Horace Smith-Dorrien). Unlike the Battle of Mons, where the majority of casualties inflicted by the British were from rifle fire, Le Cateau was an artilleryman's battle, demonstrating the devastating results which modern quick-firing artillery using shrapnel shells could have on infantry advancing in the open.[2] The British deployed their artillery in the open, about 50–200 metres (55–219 yd) behind their infantry, while the German artillery used indirect fire from concealed positions.[3] With the guns so close to their infantry, the British had unintentionally increased the effectiveness of the German artillery-fire, because shells aimed at the British infantry could just as easily hit the British artillery.[4]

Modern map of the Le Cateau area (commune FR insee code 59136)

The British 5th Division was positioned on the British right flank, on the southern side of the Le CateauCambrai road between Inchy and Le Cateau. The 3rd Division was to its left, holding the ground between Caudry and Inchy. The 4th Division was on the left, on the northern bank of the Warnelle. This was a poor choice of terrain on the part of the British. The road was sunken in places, providing inadequate long-range firing positions. In fact, in most cases, the Germans could march close up to the British positions, which is what they often did. This was especially true at the weakest point in the British line, the right flank west of Le Cateau, where the Germans simply marched straight down the road from the north all the way to Le Cateau. The British position was on the forward slope, and consequently, casualties were heavy during the withdrawal.[5]

At 03:30, Smith-Dorrien decided to "strike the enemy hard, and, after he had done so, continue the retreat". The purpose of the operation was unclear to his subordinates. A "hold at all costs-mentality" was evident in the 5th Division on the British right flank. The commander of the 2nd Battalion King's Own Yorkshire Light Infantry was given a written order that "There will now be NO retirement for the fighting troops; fill up your trenches, with water, food and ammunition as far as you can." The order was confirmed by a colonel from the II Corps staff, who, upon arriving, repeated it.[6]

Smith-Dorrien's delaying operation never occurred because the order to defend arrived at the front line about the same time the Germans did, sometimes later. Nor were the conditions of a doctrinal delay observed, such as refusing to let British units become decisively engaged with the enemy. He did not choose positions with adequate fields-of-fire and with prepared and hidden routes of withdrawal.[6]

According to the German official history the IV Corps commander, Sixt von Armin, issued an order at 11:15 that turned the regimental- and brigade-level fights into a centrally coordinated battle but there is no evidence of German command and control above the divisional level. 75 percent of IV Corps troops were in contact before they received this order and the rest never made it to the battlefield. The IV Corps commander did not control the other half of the German forces, II Cavalry Corps, which fought independently.[6]

Holding their ground despite many casualties, the British right and then the left flank began to break around midday, under unrelenting pressure from the Germans. The arrival of Sordet's French cavalry acted as a shield for the British left flank, and supported a highly co-ordinated tactical withdrawal, despite German attempts to infiltrate and outflank the retreating British forces.[7][8]

That night, the Allies withdrew to Saint-Quentin. Of the 40,000 British troops fighting at Le Cateau, 7,812 British casualties were incurred, including 2,600 taken prisoner.[9] Thirty-eight guns were abandoned, most having their breech blocks removed and sights disabled by the gunners first.[10]


Modern map of the St. Quentin area (commune FR insee code 02691)

II Corps retreated on the morning of 27 August, and in two days of continuous marching broke contact with the Germans.[6] Having lost 7,000 of its infantry at Le Cateau and 2,500–3,000 footsore and exhausted men who had to be evacuated to Le Mans for recuperation, II Corps was not battleworthy for at least two days.[6] Smith-Dorrien was later criticised for his decision to stand at Le Cateau by Field Marshal Sir John French.[11]

The Germans were pleased with their victory. The 93rd Infantry Regiment historian said "The battle of Beaumont-Inchy will always be one of the most glorious days in the history of the regiment, which demonstrated that in a frontal attack against an enemy that was heretofore considered unbeatable, the crack troops of the British Army, the 93rd was not merely their equal, it was superior." 75th Field Artillery Regiment said that the battle "strengthened the self-confidence of the German troops … all the more so because the British army was made up almost exclusively of long-service active army troops, who were superbly trained and equipped".[6]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Zuber 2011, p. 257.
  2. ^ Edmonds 1926, pp. 141–160.
  3. ^ Bailey 2004, pp. 212–213.
  4. ^ Zuber 2011, p. 235.
  5. ^ Zuber 2011, p. 215.
  6. ^ a b c d e f Zuber 2011.
  7. ^ Edmonds 1926, pp. 161–174.
  8. ^ Humphries & Maker 2013, pp. 259–265.
  9. ^ Edmonds 1926, p. 182.
  10. ^ Edmonds 1926, pp. 176–187.
  11. ^ Humphries & Maker 2013, pp. 260–261.


  • Bailey, J. B. A. (2004). Field Artillery and Firepower. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-59114-029-0. 
  • Edmonds, J. E. (1926). Military Operations France and Belgium, 1914: Mons, the Retreat to the Seine, the Marne and the Aisne August–October 1914. History of the Great War Based on Official Documents by Direction of the Historical Section of the Committee of Imperial Defence II (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan. OCLC 58962523. 
  • Humphries, M. O.; Maker, J. (2013). Der Weltkrieg: 1914, The Battle of the Frontiers and Pursuit to the Marne. Germany's Western Front: Translations From the German Official History of the Great War I. Part 1. Waterloo, Canada: Wilfrid Laurier University Press. ISBN 978-1-55458-373-7. 
  • Zuber, Terence (2011). The Mons Myth. Stroud, Gloucestershire: The History Press. ISBN 978-0-7524-7628-5. 

Further reading[edit]

  • Battle of Le Cateau 26th August, 1914. Tour of the Battlefield. By Command of the Army Council (Naval & Military Press repr. ed.). London: HMSO. 2005 [1934]. ISBN 978-1-84574-033-7. 
  • Becke, Major A. F. (2006) [1919]. The Royal Regiment of Artillery at Le Cateau, Wednesday, 26th August 1914 (Naval & Military Press reprint ed.). Woolwich: Royal Artillery Inst. Print. House. ISBN 1-84342-545-9. 
  • Bird, Antony (2008). Gentlemen, We Will Stand and Fight: Le Cateau 1914. Ramsbury: The Crowood Press. ISBN 978-1-84797-062-6. 
  • Brown, Malcolm (1993). The Imperial War Museum book of the Western Front. London: Sidgwick and Jackson. ISBN 0-28306-140-5. 
  • Cave, Nigel; Sheldon, Jack (2008). Le Cateau. Battlefield Europe. Barnsley: Pen & Sword Books. ISBN 978-0-85052-842-8. 
  • Evans, M. M. (2004). Battles of World War I. Devizes: Select Editions. ISBN 1-84193-226-4. 
  • Gavaghan, Michael (1999). Illustrated Pocket Guide to Mons, 1914. Forgotten Battles. Leyland: M & L. ISBN 0-9524464-5-6. 
  • Gavaghan, Michael (2000). Illustrated Pocket Guide to Le Cateau, 1914. Forgotten Battles. Preston: M & L. ISBN 0-95244-646-4. 
  • Jones, Nigel H. (1983). The War Walk: A Journey Along the Western Front. London: Robert Hale. ISBN 0-70901-174-1. 
  • Lomas, David (1997). Mons – 1914. Oxford: Osprey. ISBN 1-84176-142-7. 

External links[edit]