Battle of Malplaquet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Battle of Malplaquet
Part of the War of the Spanish Succession
The Battle of Malplaquet, 1709.png
The Duke of Marlborough and Prince Eugene Entering the French Entrenchments, Louis Laguerre
Date11 September 1709
Location50°20′10″N 3°52′35″E / 50.33611°N 3.87639°E / 50.33611; 3.87639Coordinates: 50°20′10″N 3°52′35″E / 50.33611°N 3.87639°E / 50.33611; 3.87639
Result Grand Alliance pyrrhic victory;[1][2]
French strategic victory[3][4]
 Great Britain
Habsburg Monarchy
 Dutch Republic
Commanders and leaders
Duke of Marlborough
Eugene of Savoy
Duke of Villars
Duke of Boufflers
86,000 men[1]
100 guns
75,000 men[1]
80 guns
Casualties and losses
10,500 killed
14,000 wounded
Total: 24,500
4,500 killed
8,000 wounded
Total: 12,500

The Battle of Malplaquet was fought near the border of France on 11 September 1709 and was a major engagement of the War of the Spanish Succession. It pitted a French army, commanded by Marshal Duke of Villars and Marshal Duke of Boufflers, against an allied army, led by the Duke of Marlborough and Prince Eugene of Savoy. After a string of defeats, failure of the harvest and the prospect of invasion, Louis XIV of France had appealed to French patriotism, recruited fresh soldiers and instructed Villars to use the country's last army to give battle against Marlborough's formidable force. After a series of manoeuvres, Villars settled on a position in which both of his flanks were anchored in woods. Even though the French were outnumbered, Marlborough's familiar tactics of flank attacks to draw off troops from the centre incurred serious attrition by massed French musketry and skillful use of artillery.

When Marlborough's assault on the denuded enemy centre came, his Allied army had been so badly weakened that the Allies made no attempt at pursuit when the French retreated in good order. The Allies lost 20,000 men, twice as many as the French, which was regarded by contemporaries as a shocking number of casualties. That caused Britain to question the sacrifices that might be required for Marlborough's campaign to continue. The Battle of Malplaquet is often regarded as a Grand Alliance pyrrhic victory due to the casualties suffered by the allies, which delayed them considerably and ensured that the British and Dutch governments would never again allow their armies to engage in field battles on such a scale for the remainder of the war. At Malplaquet, the Allies were left in control of the battlefield and went on to capture Mons but Villars and Boufflers' ferocious efforts in the battle turned out to have effectively prevented an invasion of France by the Grand Alliance and the French position stabilised.


After a late start to the campaigning season because it was preceded by an unusually-harsh winter, the Allied campaign of 1709 began in mid-June. Unable to bring the French army, under Marshal Villars, battle because of the strong French defensive lines and his orders from Versailles not to risk battle, the Duke of Marlborough concentrated instead on taking the fortresses of Tournai and Ypres. Tournai fell after an unusually-long siege of almost 70 days. Since it was by now early September, rather than run the risk of disease spreading in his army in the poorly-draining land around Ypres, Marlborough moved eastwards towards the lesser fortress of Mons. He hoped to take it and to outflank the French defensive lines in the west.

Villars moved after him, under new orders from Louis XIV to prevent the fall of Mons at all costs, which was effectively an order for the aggressive Marshal to give battle. After several complicated manoeuvres, the two armies faced each other across the gap of Malplaquet, southwest of Mons.


Battle of Maplaquet by Louis Laguerre

The Allied army, with mainly Dutch and Austrian troops but also considerable British and Prussian contingents, was led by the Duke of Marlborough and Prince Eugene of Savoy. The French were commanded by Villars and Marshal Boufflers. Boufflers was officially Villars' superior but voluntarily served under him. The allies had about 86,000 troops and 100 guns,[5] and the French had about 75,000 and 80 guns.[6] They were encamped within cannon range of each other near what is now the French-Belgian border, but the area was then still part of the Spanish Netherlands. At 9:00 a.m., on 11 September, the Austrians attacked with the support of Prussian and Danish troops, under the command of Count Albrecht Konrad Finck von Finckenstein, pushing the French left wing back into the forest behind them. Prince Eugene was wounded twice in the fighting.[7] The Dutch, under the command of John William Friso, Prince of Orange, on the Allied left wing, attacked the French right flank half an hour later and succeeded with heavy casualties in distracting Boufflers enough that he could not come to Villars' aid.

Villars was able to regroup his forces, but Marlborough and Savoy attacked again, assisted by the advance of a detachment under General Henry Withers. They advanced on the French left flank, which forced Villars to divert forces from his centre to confront them. At around 1:00 p.m., Villars was badly wounded by a musket ball that smashed his knee, and command passed to Boufflers. The decisive final attack was made on the now-weakened French centre by British infantry, under the command of the Earl of Orkney, which managed to occupy the French line of redans. That enabled the Allied cavalry to advance through the line and confront the French cavalry behind it. In the fierce cavalry battle, Boufflers personally led the elite troops of the Maison du Roi. He managed six times to drive the Allied cavalry back upon the redans, but every time, the French cavalry was driven back by British infantry fire. Finally, by 3:00 p.m., Boufflers, realising that the battle could not be won, ordered a retreat, which was made in good order. The Allies had suffered so many casualties in their attack that they could not pursue him. By now, they had lost over 24,000 men, including 6,500 killed, almost twice as many as the French.[7][8] Villars himself remarked on the enemy's Pyrrhic victory and adapted a famous quote of King Pyrrhus.[9][10]

A firsthand account of the Battle of Malplaquet is given in the book Amiable Renegade: The Memoirs of Peter Drake (1671–1753) on pages 163 to 170. Captain Drake, an Irishman who served as a mercenary in various European armies, served the French cause in the battle and was wounded several times. Drake wrote his memoirs at an advanced age (another Irish émigré, Féilim Ó Néill, died in the battle).


By the norms of warfare of the era, the battle was an Allied victory since the French withdrew at the end of the day's fighting and left Marlborough's army in possession of the battlefield. Unlike in his previous victories, however, the French army was able to withdraw in good order and relatively intact, and remained a potent threat to further allied operations. As Winston Churchill noted in Marlborough: His Life and Times, "The enemy had been beaten.... But they had not been routed; they had not been destroyed. They retreated, but they cheered. They were beaten, but they boasted".[citation needed] Indeed, Villars wrote to Louis XIV that another such French defeat would destroy the allied armies,[11] and historian John A. Lynn in The Wars of Louis XIV 1667–1714 terms the battle a Pyrrhic victory.[12][13] However, the attempt to save Mons failed and the fortress fell on 20 October.[citation needed]

News of Malplaquet, the bloodiest battle of the 18th century, stunned Europe. The rumour that even Marlborough had died possibly inspired the popular French folk song, "Marlbrough s'en va-t-en guerre".[citation needed]

For the last of his four great battlefield victories, Marlborough received no personal letter of thanks from Queen Anne.[citation needed] Richard Blackmore's Instructions to Vander Beck was virtually alone among English poems in attempting to celebrate the "victory" of Marlborough at Malplaquet, and it moved the English Tories to begin agitating for a withdrawal from the alliance once they formed a government the next year.[citation needed]

The battle is notable for the peculiarity that Swiss mercenaries were fighting on both sides. On the French side, there were two battalions of Swiss Guards and four other mercenary regiments. On the Allied side, there were six mercenary regiments in Dutch service. Two regiments were even commanded by members of the same patrician family of Bern: Gabriel von May on the Dutch side, and Hans Rudolf von May on the French side. With more than 8,000 Swiss casualties, the battle caused heavy controversy in the Swiss Diet. Malplaquet was the last battle where Swiss mercenaries directly engaged one another for a full century, until the Battle of Bailén of 1808. [14]




  1. ^ a b c Lynn 1999, p. 334.
  2. ^ Delbrück, History of the Art of War (1985), p. 370.
  3. ^ Tucker, Spencer C. (23 December 2009). A Global Chronology of Conflict: From the Ancient World to the Modern Middle East [6 volumes]: From the Ancient World to the Modern Middle East. ABC-CLIO. p. 872. ISBN 978-1-85109-672-5. ... it was in effect a strategic victory for France.
  4. ^ Bergin, Joseph (2001). The Seventeenth Century: Europe 1598-1715. Oxford University Press. pp. 125–126. ISBN 978-0-19-873168-9.
  5. ^ Lynn: The Wars of Louis XIV 1667–1714, p. 332
  6. ^ Lynn: The Wars of Louis XIV 1667–1714, p. 331
  7. ^ a b Clodfelter 2017, p. 72.
  8. ^ Lynn: The Wars of Louis XIV 1667–1714, p. 334
  9. ^  Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Villars, Claude Louis Hector de". Encyclopædia Britannica. 28 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 76–77.
  10. ^ Weir, p. 95
  11. ^ In a letter to Louis XIV, Villars wrote: "Si Dieu nous fait la grâce de perdre encore une pareille bataille, Votre Majesté peut compter que tous ses ennemis seront détruits". ["If God lets us have the grace of losing such a battle again, Your Majesty can count on all of his enemies being destroyed".]; Anquetil, Louis-Pierre, Histoire de France depuis les Gaulois jusqu'à la mort de Louis XVI (1819), Paris: Chez Janet et Cotelle, p. 241.
  12. ^ Lynn, 1999, p. 334: "Marlborough's triumph proved to be a Pyrrhic victory".
  13. ^ Delbrück, History of the Art of War, p. 370: "Malplaquet was what has been termed with the age-old expression a "Pyrrhic victory...."
  14. ^ "Die von May in der Schlacht von Malplaquet", in: Andreas Z'Graggen, Adel in der Schweiz. Wie Herrschaftsfamilien unser Land über Jahrhunderte prägten, NZZ Libro (2018), p. 51. Hans Braun: Hans Rudolf von May in German, French and Italian in the online Historical Dictionary of Switzerland, 2009.