Battle of Orgreave
|Battle of Orgreave|
|Part of the UK miners' strike|
|Date||18 June 1984|
|Location||Orgreave, South Yorkshire|
|Causes||Miners' picket at coking plant|
|Result||Police held the bridge|
|Parties to the civil conflict|
The Battle of Orgreave is the name given to a confrontation between police and picketing miners at a British Steel coking plant in Orgreave, South Yorkshire, in 1984, during the UK miners' strike. In 1991, South Yorkshire Police were forced to pay out £500,000 to 39 miners who were arrested in the events at the Battle of Orgreave.
The National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) organised a mass picket of Orgreave for 18 June 1984, with the intention of blockading the plant, and ideally forcing its temporary closure. Aware of the plans by means of MI5 infiltration, the police organised counter-measures.
The NUM was represented by 5,000 to 6,000 pickets from across the UK. The police deployed between 4,000 and 8,000 officers, and were deployed from 10 counties. Of these, a small number had been trained in new riot tactics following the Toxteth and Brixton riots, while most had little or no experience in dealing with such events. There were between 40 and 50 mounted police and 58 police dogs. There were no women officers and only a handful of female pickets.
Unlike most of the strikes of the time, where pickets were kept well away from their intended positions, the strikers were escorted to a field to the north of the Orgreave plant. The field was flanked by police on all sides except the south, where the Sheffield to Worksop railway line runs. Opinion is divided as to whether this was a deliberate arrangement.
Background to the picket
The Orgreave coking works, where coal was turned into coke for use in steel production, was regarded by Scargill as crucial. Early in the strike, British Steel plants had been receiving "dispensations", picket-permitted movements of coal to prevent damage to their furnaces. However, it was found that more than the permitted amount of coal had been delivered, so action was taken.
Two months went by before it dawned on Yorkshire, South Wales and Scotland that they had been outmanoeuvred by British Steel, and the leadership of the steelworkers' union, and that British Steel was moving far more coal than the dispensations agreed with NUM areas. Yet there was still time to stop all those giant steelworks, and if the steelworkers' union would not cooperate with the NUM to stop all deliveries of coal to the steelworks then the National Union of Seamen and rail unions ASLEF and NUR had already demonstrated that they would stop all deliveries.
If coal could be prevented from reaching there, the low stocks at British Steel plants such as Ravenscraig steelworks would be exhausted and the furnaces prevented from "ticking over", causing significant economic damage to the industry.
Events of the battle
Initially the strike played out like most others, and the strikers played football for a while. However, as more numbers arrived on both sides, tensions began to rise. The commander of the police presence, Assistant Chief Constable Anthony Clement, deployed a protective cordon of long-shielded police in front of his standard officers, a fairly standard practice in such encounters.
At much the same time, the lorries arrived to fetch the coal. This was the cue for the "push", in which the miners charged towards the police in an attempt to break the lines. Shortly afterwards, Clements ordered the mounted police forwards. This tactic successfully delivered a retreat by the striking miners, and the horses stopped about 30 yards (30 m) ahead of the police line before withdrawing. This allowed a space for the lorries to pass on their business and escalated the tension on the field.
A second push was followed by a second mounted response, but this time, the whole police line advanced 30 yards (30 m). Increased stone throwing heightened the tension, and the miners were warned that if they did not retreat 100 yards (90 m), short shield squads would be deployed.
Short shield squads (police in riot gear, with batons and short shields) were a new development and would represent an offensive rather than defensive approach to riot control, which was new to the country.
When the miners did not move back, a third mounted advance was initiated, with the short shield squads in pursuit. The result of this third advance was general panic amongst the strikers, and an increasing amount of hand-to-hand fighting between the two sides.
Having repelled the picket line, the police withdrew again to their original positions. The miners moved forwards again, this time with more stone-throwing.
At 09:25, the fully laden lorries began to leave the plant. This was the cue for another push by the strikers. This push was less friendly than the previous one, and again, the miners were pushed back.
Following a show of defiance by NUM leader Arthur Scargill, who walked in front of the police lines for a few moments, there was a lull in the proceedings, and most of the pickets headed to Orgreave village for refreshments. Those that were left sunbathed. The police, on the other hand, were hot in their uniforms, and a breakdown in logistics had left many without a drink for several hours. However, many police (including the long shields) were stood down during the lull.
What happened next is the subject of some debate. The police claim that a lorry tyre was rolled to within 20 yards (20 m) of their line and that stones started to be thrown again. Another account blamed an argument between miners and police. Given that the confrontation was not dying down, the police chose to make further charges.
This advance was more substantial than before and left the now outnumbered pickets with no option but to cross the railway line. While most made it to the bridge, others had to scramble down the embankment and across the rails.
Some miners tried to fight police officers but were arrested, and fighting escalated to the point where miners were being beaten with batons. The police soon reached the bridge, taking and holding the field side. Here they were bombarded by missiles, with the miners utilising a nearby scrapyard. A car was dragged from the yard, put across the road and set alight.
The option now for the police was to withdraw into the field, risking another push by the miners, or advance into the village and chase off the hostile strikers. After three short-range charges (during which Scargill was one of the injured), an advance was ordered. The miners were forced into the village with a new police line forming.
However, stonethrowing continued, so about 20 mounted police were ordered to advance. That finally resulted in the dispersal of the crowds, but several police officers ran in pursuit and reportedly[who?] attacked some of the fleeing miners.
More stoning resulted in a further charge down Rotherham Lane, during which Lesley Boulton, a photographer and a member of Women Against Pit Closures, narrowly missed a baton strike while helping an injured miner. The incident was caught in a photograph by John Harris, which showed her before a mounted police officer in the act of attempting to strike her with his baton, her arm raised, and a surprised expression on her face. A subsequent photograph, taken as Boulton was pulled out of range shows how close the baton came to her. Only one newspaper of 17 published the photograph in its coverage of the day's events, leading to allegations of media bias against the miners.
Boulton claimed that striking miners were "sitting or standing around in small groups" and that "there was really not a lot going on. A lot of the men had taken their t-shirts off and stuffed them in their back pockets. It certainly wasn't the sort of thing you'd do if you were planning to attack a seriously armed police force – they had their long shields, all their protective gear on, batons, helmets on. You don't confront police like that in nothing but a pair of jeans and trainers. So I say quite categorically that there was no intention of the miners to attack the police. I myself, with a lot of other miners, was forced to run away and take refuge."
Finally, the police withdrew back to the bridge, and, despite continued stoning, they held their line. The remaining miners built barricades from scrap, but by mid-afternoon, the stone-throwing had stopped.
Official reports state that during the confrontation 93 arrests were made, with 51 pickets and 72 policemen injured.
95 pickets were charged with riot, unlawful assembly and similar offences after the battle. A number of these were put on trial in 1987, but the trials collapsed, all charges were dropped and a number of lawsuits were brought against the police for assault, unlawful arrest and malicious prosecution. South Yorkshire Police later agreed to pay £425,000 compensation and £100,000 in legal costs to 39 pickets in an out of court settlement. However, no officer was disciplined for misconduct.
Michael Mansfield QC described the evidence given by South Yorkshire Police as "the biggest frame-up ever". He said that the force had a culture of fabricating evidence, which was not corrected by the time of the Hillsborough disaster. After the 2012 report of the Hillsborough Independent Panel, NUM leader Chris Kitchen called for the investigation into the force's practices to be widened to cover the Orgreave clashes. Also in 2012, the Orgreave Truth and Justice Campaign (OTJC) was formed to campaign for a public enquiry into the policing of the events of 18 June 1984, following the success of the Hillsborough Justice Campaign In October 2012 the BBC broadcast a documentary about what happened at Orgreave. The programme revealed evidence that there was evidence that South Yorkshire Police had deliberately attempted to co-ordinate arrest statements in order to charge the miners with riot. Following the programme, South Yorkshire Police referred itself to the Independent Police Complaints Commission.
In June 2015 the IPCC announced that it would not launch a formal investigation into the events at Ogreave because too much time had passed. A Labour MP, Helen Jones, responded in the House of Commons by expressing her "deep concern", saying that the decision "calls into question whether the IPCC is fit for purpose".
The Battle of Orgreave in culture
In 2001, conceptual artist Jeremy Deller originated and set in motion the idea of a re-enactment of the event as an arts project, commissioned by British arts organisation Artangel, with the recreations scripted and staged by historical re-enactment events company EventPlan Limited. The event took place on 17 June 2001 and was filmed by film director Mike Figgis for a Channel 4 documentary. The re-enactment featured 800 people including 280 local residents, a number of people (police and pickets) from the original encounter and 520 re-enactors from various groups such as Legio II Augusta (Romans), The Vikings, War of the Roses English Civil War Society and The Sealed Knot, but with authentic 1980s clothing and techniques. Only the railway crossing was omitted from the re-enactment, on safety grounds.
Irvine Welsh's Skagboys opens with a journal entry detailing the lead character Mark Renton's experience at The Battle of Orgreave.
The confrontations at Orgreave form a substantial part of David Peace's 2004 novel GB84.
The Orgreave Truth and Justice Campaign has been involved in a number of fundraising and commemorative activities in 2014 and 2015, including live concerts and a fundraising double-CD compilation album, containing (in part) musical and spoken-word tracks relating to the events.
- Scargill, Arthur (7 March 2009). "'We could surrender – or stand and fight'". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 10 March 2009. Retrieved 9 March 2009.
- Shaw, Grace (2 March 2009). "What happened next...". South Yorkshire. BBC. Archived from the original on 16 March 2009. Retrieved 9 March 2009.
- Conn, David (21 October 2012). "Hillsborough investigation should be extended to Orgreave, says NUM leader". The Guardian. Retrieved 22 October 2012.
- Orgreave Truth and Justice Campaign
- Flannery, Kate; Etherington, David (20 March 2015). "Orgreave: no justice, no peace". Red Pepper.
- "Orgreave Truth And Justice Campaign". Morning Star.
- "Orgreave - BBC - Battle for Orgreave". Dailymotion.
- "IPCC apologise for Orgreave probe delay". South Yorkshire (BBC). 14 November 2013.
- Conn, David (12 June 2015). "IPCC will not investigate Orgreave police action during miners' strike". The Guardian.
- "Police Watchdog 'Not Fit For Purpose', Argues MP". Morning Star. 19 June 2015. Retrieved 26 August 2015.
- Lazenby, Peter (16 June 2014). "Battle of Orgreave 30th Anniversary: We Demand Justice For Victims of Police Brutality, Says 1,500-Strong Crowd". Morning Star.
- "The Battle of Orgreave". Artangel.
- "The Battle of Orgreave, June 18 1984". EventPlan. — use "Site Search" to find page.
- Hunt, Tristram (4 September 2006). "Charge of the heavy brigade". The Guardian.
- Scargill, Arthur (7 March 2009). "'We could surrender – or stand and fight'". The Guardian. Retrieved 9 March 2009.
- "Strike84". Martin Shakeshaft.