Bayesian information criterion
||This article needs attention from an expert in Statistics. (March 2011)|
In statistics, the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) or Schwarz criterion (also SBC, SBIC) is a criterion for model selection among a finite set of models; the model with the lowest BIC is preferred. It is based, in part, on the likelihood function and it is closely related to the Akaike information criterion (AIC).
When fitting models, it is possible to increase the likelihood by adding parameters, but doing so may result in overfitting. Both BIC and AIC resolve this problem by introducing a penalty term for the number of parameters in the model; the penalty term is larger in BIC than in AIC.
The BIC is formally defined as
- = the maximized value of the likelihood function of the model , i.e. , where are the parameter values that maximize the likelihood function;
- = the observed data;
- = the parameters of the model;
- = the number of data points in , the number of observations, or equivalently, the sample size;
- = the number of free parameters to be estimated. If the model under consideration is a linear regression, is the number of regressors, including the intercept;
The BIC is an asymptotic result derived under the assumptions that the data distribution is in an exponential family. That is, the integral of the likelihood function times the prior probability distribution over the parameters of the model for fixed observed data is approximated as
For large , this can be approximated by the formula given above. The BIC is used in model selection problems where adding a constant to the BIC does not change the result.
|This section needs additional citations for verification. (November 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
- It is independent of the prior or the prior is "vague" (a constant).
- It can measure the efficiency of the parameterized model in terms of predicting the data.
- It penalizes the complexity of the model where complexity refers to the number of parameters in the model.
- It is approximately equal to the minimum description length criterion but with negative sign.
- It can be used to choose the number of clusters according to the intrinsic complexity present in a particular dataset.
- It is closely related to other penalized likelihood criteria such as clarification needed] and the Akaike information criterion. [
The BIC criterion suffers from two main limitations
- the above approximation is only valid for sample size much larger than the number of parameters in the model.
- the BIC cannot handle complex collections of models as in the variable selection (or feature selection) problem in high-dimension.
Gaussian special case
Under the assumption that the model errors or disturbances are independent and identically distributed according to a normal distribution and that the boundary condition that the derivative of the log likelihood with respect to the true variance is zero, this becomes (up to an additive constant, which depends only on n and not on the model):
where is the error variance. The error variance in this case is defined as
where is the number of model parameters in the test.
When picking from several models, the one with the lowest BIC is preferred. The BIC is an increasing function of the error variance and an increasing function of k. That is, unexplained variation in the dependent variable and the number of explanatory variables increase the value of BIC. Hence, lower BIC implies either fewer explanatory variables, better fit, or both. The strength of the evidence against the model with the higher BIC value can be summarized as follows:
|ΔBIC||Evidence against higher BIC|
|0 to 2||Not worth more than a bare mention|
|2 to 6||Positive|
|6 to 10||Strong|
The BIC generally penalizes free parameters more strongly than the Akaike information criterion, though it depends on the size of n and relative magnitude of n and k.
It is important to keep in mind that the BIC can be used to compare estimated models only when the numerical values of the dependent variable are identical for all estimates being compared. The models being compared need not be nested, unlike the case when models are being compared using an F-test or a likelihood ratio test.
- Akaike information criterion
- Bayesian model comparison
- Deviance information criterion
- Hannan–Quinn information criterion
- Jensen–Shannon divergence
- Kullback–Leibler divergence
- Model selection
- Schwarz, Gideon E. (1978), "Estimating the dimension of a model", Annals of Statistics, 6 (2): 461–464, doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136, MR 468014.
- Wit, Ernst; Edwin van den Heuvel; Jan-Willem Romeyn (2012). "'All models are wrong...': an introduction to model uncertainty". Statistica Neerlandica. 66 (3): 217–236. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9574.2012.00530.x.
- Giraud, C. (2015), Introduction to high-dimensional statistics, Chapman & Hall/CRC, ISBN 9781482237948
- Priestley, M.B. (1981), Spectral Analysis and Time Series, Academic Press. ISBN 0-12-564922-3 (p. 375).
- Kass, Robert E.; Raftery, Adrian E. (1995), "Bayes Factors", Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90 (430): 773–795, doi:10.2307/2291091, ISSN 0162-1459.
- Bhat, H. S., and Kumar, N. (2010), "On the derivation of the Bayesian Information Criterion", http://nscs00.ucmerced.edu/~nkumar4/BhatKumarBIC.pdf
- Findley, D. F. (1991), "Counterexamples to parsimony and BIC", Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 43: 505–514. doi:10.1007/BF00053369
- Kass, R. E., and Wasserman, L. (1995), "A reference Bayesian test for nested hypotheses and its relationship to the Schwarz criterion", Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90: 928–934.
- Liddle, A. R. (2007), "Information criteria for astrophysical model selection", Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 377: L74–L78.
- McQuarrie, A. D. R., and Tsai, C.-L. (1998) Regression and Time Series Model Selection, World Scientific.