Big Three (colleges)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The Big Three
Edward Penfield, College crews, 1908.jpg
Members rowing teams from ten colleges, including the Big Three in the top row

The Big Three is a historical term used in the United States to refer to Harvard University, Yale University, and Princeton University. The phrase Big Three originated in the 1880s, when these three colleges dominated college football, particularly Princeton and Yale, which together won or shared the national championship in every year between 1869 and 1903, except 1890 when Harvard was the sole champion.[1] [2] [3] In 1906, these schools formed a sports compact that formalized a three-way football competition which had begun in 1878. This early agreement predated the formation of the Ivy League by exactly half a century. The rivalry remains intense today and though the three schools are no longer national football powerhouses, they continue to refer to their intercollegiate competitions across many sports as "Big Three" or "Harvard-Princeton-Yale" meets.

Historic status[edit]

Harvard-Princeton Football Game, 1915

In 1908, Scotsman Robert Knox Risk wrote the following about the state of American universities during the early 20th century.

Princeton, like [Harvard and Yale], confers some social distinction upon its graduates. In this respect Harvard, Yale, and Princeton are the Western Counterparts of Oxford and Cambridge, and are maintained largely for the sons of rich men. Members of the American aristocracy would send their boys to one or other of these three universities if there were any aristocracy in the United States.[4]

Edward Digby Baltzell wrote: "The three major upper-class institutions in America have been Harvard, Yale, and Princeton." These colleges have, in the past, been set apart from others by a special historic connection with the White-Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) establishment. Of the three, Princeton University was traditionally the preferred choice of the Southern upper class.[5] While describing the recruiting process for The Rough Riders, Theodore Roosevelt, mentioned the Ivy League schools including Harvard, Yale and Princeton as target schools.

We drew recruits from Harvard, Yale, Princeton, and many another college; from clubs like the Somerset, of Boston, and Knickerbocker, of New York; and from among the men who belonged neither to club nor to college, but in whose veins the blood stirred with the same impulse which once sent the Vikings over sea.[6]

The Saturday Review found in 1963 that Harvard, Yale, and Princeton enrolled 45% of boys on the New York Social Register. [7] That year Nathaniel Burt described the social prestige of the Big Three:

It is, above all, the national social prestige of the Big Three which is competition with the purely local social prestige of the University [of Pennsylvania]. Upper-class boys from all over the country, including Philadelphia, go to Harvard, Yale, and Princeton. Only from Philadelphia do upper-class boys go in any significant numbers to Penn. This is of course a universal national phenomenon. The pattern of upper-class male college preference, as deduced from a counting of noses in the various Social Registers, can be summed up as "The Big Three and a Local Favorite."[8]

Burt continued, "Every city sends or has sent its Socially Registered sons to Harvard, Yale, and Princeton, in some preferred order, and to one local institution. This order varies. New York sets the pattern with Yale first, Harvard second, Princeton third, then Columbia. St. Louis and Baltimore are Princeton towns. Most other cities (Chicago, Cleveland, Cincinnati) are Yale towns. Only Boston, and occasionally Washington, are Harvard towns."

The connection between certain colleges and social ranking is old; Jerome Karabel, in a note citing Kenneth Davis, says that "in the mid-eighteenth century, the [president of Harvard] personally listed students when they enrolled, according to ... 'to the Dignity of the Familie whereto the student severally belong'—a list that was printed in the college catalogue and that determined precedence in such matters as table seating, position in academic processionals, even recitations in class."[9] Ronald Story, however, says that it was during “the four decades from 1815 to 1855” that “parents, in Henry Adams′ words, began sending their children to Harvard College for the sake of its social advantages.”[10]

A further intensification of the importance of the Big Three occurred during the 1920s; According to E. Digby Baltzell,[11] “in a … managerial society, the proper college degree became the main criterion for potential elite status… it was during the [1920s] that certain institutions of high prestige, such as Harvard, Yale and Princeton (and Stanford on the West Coast) became all-important as upper-class-ascribing institutions.” Not coincidentally, this was also the era when the Big Three became concerned by “the Jewish problem” and began instituting interviews, essays, and judgements of “character” into the admissions process.[12] From the 1930s on, Big Three admissions became progressively more meritocratic, but still included non-academic factors such as “lineage.”

Ivy League schools including Harvard, Yale and Princeton have in the past been regarded as the goals for many children in WASP circles. Some educators have attempted to discourage this fixation. Jay Mathews, author of Harvard Schmarvard, addresses seniors obsessed with Ivy League schools with the analysis: “It does not matter where you go to school, it matters what you do when you get there and what you do after you graduate.”

Rankings[edit]

U.S. News & World Report[edit]

Princeton, Harvard and Yale are regularly rated among the top three institutions in the National Universities category.[13] Over the past nineteen years ending with the 2019 rankings, U.S. News has named as the best national university Princeton twelve times, Harvard twice and the two schools tied for first five times.[14] Over that same 2001-2019 period, Yale has been third in every ranking, either alone or tied with other universities. For the first sixteen years in that span, Yale was ranked third by itself. In 2017 and 2018, Yale was ranked third, tied with the University of Chicago.

In the current 2019 U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges Ranking, Princeton is ranked first for the tenth consecutive year; Harvard is second; and Yale is third, tied with Chicago, Columbia and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. In the 2019 list, as the top ranked national university, Princeton has a raw score of 100.[15] Harvard has a raw score of 96,[16] while Yale, Chicago, Columbia and MIT share a raw score of 94.[17] The four-point gap between the raw scores of Princeton and Harvard is the largest ever between the top two national universities, and the six-point drop down to third place is the greatest difference ever between the universities ranked first and third.

University Endowments[edit]

The Big Three universities have financial endowments which rank among the largest American educational endowments. Harvard has the largest by a comfortable margin at $36 billion. When viewed on a per capita basis (or largest endowments per student), Princeton has the highest by a considerable margin at $2.8 million per student.[18]

Use in Evaluating Secondary Schools[edit]

Certain organizations which seek to evaluate or rank the quality of various American secondary schools often use as an input variable how well those high schools perform in terms of getting their graduates admitted to the Big Three universities as well as other highly selective colleges such as other Ivy League members, Stanford and MIT. The Wall Street Journal publishes a regular ranking of American high schools which uses as an input variable how many graduates enroll at Princeton and Harvard, among other elite colleges.[19][20]

Order of the names[edit]

The three colleges, when named together, are generally named in the order Harvard, Yale, and Princeton or Harvard, Princeton and Yale .[21] The Harvard, Yale, and Princeton order is the one in which they were founded — 1636, 1701, and 1746, respectively.[22]

Economic diversity[edit]

Over the past half-century, the 'Big Three', and the rest of the Ivy League, have increasingly stressed both diversity and academic merit in their admissions process, and have dissociated themselves from some of their WASP roots. Notwithstanding, a certain lack in economic diversity persists at the three colleges. As Jerome Karabel, a Harvard graduate and the author of The Chosen detailing the history of the admissions process at HPY, noted:

The Big Three are notoriously lacking one of [diversity's] most critical dimensions: class diversity. In a study of the percentage of low-income students in 2000 (as measured by the proportion of federal Pell Grants - need-based awards that do not have to be repaid and make up the bulk of many poorer students' aid) at the nation's leading universities, the Big Three were found to be among the nation's least economically diverse schools. Of the 40 universities studied, Harvard and Princeton ranked 39th and 38th respectively, with Yale at 25th. While the three top universities in economic diversity were all public institutions (the University of California at Los Angeles, UC-Berkeley, and UC-San Diego), the next two—the University of Southern California and New York University—were private. And one university in the top 10, California Institute of Technology, is among the most selective private institutions in the nation.[23]

More recently, Yale,[24] Princeton[25] and Harvard[26][27] instituted no-loan financial aid policies which provide students with need-based aid from private funds held by the universities. This enables greater attendance from the poorer classes than Pell Grant statistics would indicate, since many recipients of university grants do not receive Pell Grants.

As an athletic association[edit]

The athletic agreements among the three universities were first formalized in 1906, although their football teams had been engaging in three-way competitions, which newspapers had been referring to as "HPY," since 1878. (Princeton and Yale first played in 1873, Harvard and Yale in 1875, with Harvard and Princeton first meeting in 1877.) The Big Three teams had an outsized hold on popular culture as they dominated college football during its early formative years, when there were few competing spectator sports besides fledgling professional baseball teams. In 25 seasons spanning 1869 through the 1894 title for the University of Pennsylvania, the consensus national champion was either Princeton (16 titles), Yale (13) or Harvard (2).[28] Football between Harvard and Yale was suspended for two years after the 1894 game in Springfield, Massachusetts was so violent that it was referred to as "The Springfield Massacre." Other sports including baseball and crew were suspended as well. The Big Three made further formal agreements in 1916 and 1923, and although in part they have now been superseded by the Ivy League, formalized in 1956, the three universities still sponsor events that involve only themselves.

The first Big Three agreement in 1906 was the result of a conference on football called by President of the United States and Harvard alumnus Theodore Roosevelt in October 1905 as a result of deteriorating relations, caused once again by increasing violence of play, more recently between Harvard and Princeton. The agreement of June 1916, the Triple Agreement, was originally proposed by President and Princeton alumnus Woodrow Wilson in December 1909 out of a desire to reduce injuries, and took several years to come to fruition, resulting in common eligibility requirements. The Three Presidents' Agreement addendum of January 1923 covered financial arrangements, scouting and scholarships, among other things. In 1926, tensions arose once more after Princeton had shut out Harvard for three consecutive games by a cumulative score of 82-0. This led to a hiatus in games between Harvard and Princeton which caused Big Three competition to be suspended for eight years, although Yale continued to play both opponents during that period.

Big Four[edit]

More than 150 years ago, Union College was one of the Big Four along with Harvard, Yale and Princeton. Student attrition due to the Civil War and a scandal over college finances led to a decline at Union that caused it to lose ground and drop from the Big Four.[29]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Synnott, Marsha G. The "Big Three" and the Harvard-Yale Football Break, 1926-1934.
  2. ^ Wallace, William N. (16 November 1997). "A Woeful Yale Loses To Princeton". The New York Times. Retrieved 25 April 2013.
  3. ^ Hyland, Tim. "College Football National Champions: The Complete List". About.com. Retrieved 25 April 2013.
  4. ^ Risk, Robert K. (1908). America at College. Glasgow: John Smith & Son. p. 154.
  5. ^ Lieber, Francis; Wigglesworth, Edward; Bradford, Thomas Gamaliel (1833). Encyclopædia Americana: A Popular Dictionary of Arts, Sciences, Literature, History, Politics. Carey, Lea and Carey. p. 247. The College of New Jersey at Princeton has long and justly maintained a high reputation, and numbers among its alumni many of the most eminent men of the Union, especially in the Southern States.
  6. ^ Roosevelt, Theodore (1899) The Rough Riders,
  7. ^ "Big Three Now Enroll 45% Of Social Register Students". Harvard Crimson. 1963-11-15. Retrieved March 1, 2013.
  8. ^ Burt, Nathaniel (1999) [1963]. The Perennial Philadelphians: The Anatomy of an American Aristocracy. University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 86. ISBN 0-8122-1693-8. …the Big Three and a Local Favorite…
  9. ^ Karabel, Jerome (2005). The Chosen: The Hidden History of Admission and Exclusion at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton. Houghton Mifflin. p. 562. ISBN 0-618-57458-1. note 19, citing Kenneth Davis, FDR, p. 135, re the Harvard president's list
  10. ^ Story, Ronald (1980). The Forging of an Aristocracy: Harvard and the Boston Upper Class, 1800-1870. Irvington, NY: Wesleyan University Press. p. 97. ISBN 0-8195-5044-2. 1815-1855 as the era when Harvard began to be perceived as socially advantageous
  11. ^ Baltzell, E. Digby (1964). The Protestant Establishment: Aristocracy and Caste in America. Yale University Press. p. 209. ISBN 0-300-03818-6. …proper college degree became the main criterion…
  12. ^ Karabel, op. cit, Part I, The Origins of Selective Admissions, 1900-1933
  13. ^ https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities
  14. ^ ""Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2011-05-21. Retrieved 2014-12-07."
  15. ^ https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/princeton-university-2627
  16. ^ https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/harvard-university-2155
  17. ^ https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/columbia-university-2707
  18. ^ "List of colleges and universities in the United States by endowment". Wikipedia.
  19. ^ "Phillips Exeter Academy" (PDF). IvyLabs.
  20. ^ "Boston Trinity Academy". PrepReview.
  21. ^ Google Book and Google search engine searches find that 75% of mentions are in the order "Harvard, Yale and Princeton", and 25% are in the order "Harvard, Princeton and Yale", with no other order having any significant number of matches. Quotations naming them in this order abound: "The quadrangles and lawns of Harvard, Yale, and Princeton;" Archer, William, America Today, Observations and Reflections
  22. ^ All facts in this section from the Wikipedia articles Harvard, Yale, and Princeton unless otherwise noted
  23. ^ Karabel, Jerome (2005-09-04). "The Chosen Few". Boston Globe.
  24. ^ Arenson, Karen W. (2008-01-15). "Yale Plans Sharp Increase in Student Aid". New York Times.
  25. ^ "University approves "no-loan" financial aid program". The Daily Princetonian. 2001-02-05. Archived from the original on 2007-12-10. Retrieved 2011-12-19.
  26. ^ Rimer, Sara; Finder, Alan (2007-12-10). "Harvard Steps Up Financial Aid". New York Times.
  27. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2008-05-15. Retrieved 2008-06-13.
  28. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2016-10-15. Retrieved 2016-11-19.
  29. ^ Archibold, Randal C. (2006-07-30). "Off the Beaten Path". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2017-05-02.

External links[edit]