Biofuelwatch is a non-governmental environmental organization based in the United Kingdom and the United States, which works to raise awareness of the negative impacts of industrial biofuels and bioenergy, on biodiversity, human rights, food sovereignty and climate change, human rights abuses, the impoverishment and dispossession of local populations, water and soil degradation, loss of food sovereignty and loss of food security. It opposes the expansion of industrial monocultures driven by demand for bioenergy, and instead advocates for food sovereignty, agroecological farming practices, ecosystem and biodiversity protection and human rights.
In the UK,it has active campaigns against bioliquid and biomass power stations and the subsidies (Renewable Obligation Certificates) available for those. In the US, Biofuelwatch works closely with network of groups and campaigners against industrial biomass developments and policies. Internationally, the organisation works with a variety of groups and networks and is European Focal Point of the Global Forest Coalition. A lot of Biofuelwatch's recent work has focused on providing a critical perspective on biochar as well. It also campaigns against market based solutions to climate change, especially the inclusion of soil and forest carbon offsets.
Founders of Biofuelwatch
Almuth Ernsting helped to found the organisation, Biofuelwatch in 2006. She has researched and published various reports on the central issues to the organization, such as bioenergy, climate, social and biodiversity impacts of biofuels and wood-based biomass. Rachel Smolker is a co-director of Biofuelwatch and an organizer at Engine Justice Network. She is the daughter of one of the founders of Environmental Defense Fund and holds a Ph.D in ecology/biology from the University of Michigan.
Aims of Biofuelwatch
- Biofuelwatch acts as an advocate towards educating the public of the environmental, climate, social and public health implications of bio energy and bio-based products. They also allow the public to voice their concerns over these same topics.
- Promote energy policies and investments of renewable energy, that result to greenhouse gas reduction, protect the environment and basic human rights
- Promote environment decision making related to bio-energy and bio-based products such as land use, social justice, active citizenship and public health
Bio fuels are commonly viewed as a suitable alternative to non-renewable energy and Biofuelwatch works towards bringing light to risks associated with this belief, at least until they are much efficient. Another benefit is that when biofuels are burned they release (carbon dioxide) which had been used in their production. This is a food source for plants, which they use during the process of photosynthesis. This in turn increases the biomass' (the plants needed to make biofuel) growth. Conversely, biofuels can also harm the planet, that Biofuelwatch educates the public about. That is biofuels are made out of food crops; these food crops are traded on international markets. When there is an increase in production of biofuels globally, the price of these crops will increase. Food is less accessible because of the increase in price (e.g., Tortilla Crisis) and the crops that are bought are being used to make fuel and not used for human consumption. The second more argument against biofuels is that the sheer amount of crops needed to produce the amount of biofuel demanded by the world is staggering. This leads to heavy dependence on pesticides, fertilizers, and energy to produce the crops. These three factors contribute heavily to pollution.
Biofuel is a biomass that is converted into a liquid that can be used to power motorized vehicles. The main source of biomass that can be used for vehicle fuels is food crops. These crops are cultivated using modern, mechanized agriculture. Crop-based biofuels (e.g., ethanol: produced from sugar cane or corn) have globally increased in production by 75% during the 2000-2006 period. In particular, the United States produces 50 billion liters of corn based ethanol per year. This production of corn based ethanol consumes a third of all planted corn.
Biofuelwatch has argued that the term "Biofuel" is misleading. The prefix "Bio" comes from "life". This implies that the fuel comes from life or is pro-life. Biofuelwatch argues that we need to find a term that translates in every language to a more true definition of what biofuel really is. They came up with the term "Agro-fuel", the prefix "agro" comes from agriculture. They believe this is fitting because the production of biofuels taint land and water, which are directly related to agriculture. This term "agro-fuel" is pejoratively based.
Biofuelwatch and Protests
Biofuelwatch has been known to join forces with various other organizations with similar views towards the biomass and biofuel industry in attempts to sway public opinion on public policies. Through actions such as public protests, demonstrations and press statements regarding their views on governments positions towards biofuels and the biofuel industry.
- 20 April 2016, London, England; Protest during the Drax Annual General Meeting
- 25 June 2012; African Land Summit protest. Joined with ActionAid and Friends of the Earth
- 19 April 2012; Edinburgh, Scotland, outside the Scottish Parliament building. Joined with Friends of the World (Scotland), No Leith Biomass Campaign and the Grangemouth Community Council
- 22–23 October 2011; London, England. Action Against Agrofuel Campaign
- 14 September 2011; Edinburgh, Scotland. Joined in the Moving Planet protest against fossil fuels and large-scale biomass plans.
- 16 May 2011; Grangemouth, Scotland. Action Against Agrofuel protest
- 24 February 2011; Holyrood, Edinburgh, Scotland. No Leith Biomass protest
- 23 August 2010; Grangemouth, Scotland. Action Against Agrofuel protest
- 25 September 2010; Portland, Oregon, USA. Demonstration against W4B's palm oil plans
- 10 August 2010; Bristol, England. Demonstration during the W4B public inquiry
- 11 May 2010; Portland, Oregon, USA. Demonstration during the No Oil Palm Energy (NOPE) rally
The #AxeDrax Campaign is a UK based campaign based around the UK company Drax Group and the Drax power station. The aim of the #AxeDrax Campaign aims to bring public awareness towards Drax and their CO2 emissions in the UK. It is also aimed to bring awareness to now Drax and its electricity production and how it relates to large scare deforestation.
The UK Government announced in 2015 that they will begin to phase-out coal burning power stations leading to a complete banning of coal burning power stations by 2025. To accompany this phase out, the UK government issued 470 million pounds to Drax to begin its conversion from coal to wood pellets, and protestors of Drax also claim that Drax receives more than 1 million pounds in subsidies per day to add to the wood pellets conversion efforts.
The #AxeDrax Campaign and its efforts have provoked a response from the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change
This in turn sparked the social media campaign that became the #AxeDrax campaign on social media outlets such as Twitter, where Biofuelwatch and news outlets such as the Ecologist have been promoting the demonstrations and encouraging people to join in the demonstrations.
Campaign to end UK subsidies for biomass electricity
As of 21 December 2017, the government of UK declared its increase in bioenergy production by almost 23 percent compared the year 2016, due to increased availability at Drax. Biofuelwatch campaigns to enlighten the public on the biodiversity losses and climatic implications of such an increase in bioenergy productions and propose a subsidy reformation to allow proper allocation of resources to other renewable sources of energy: wind, solar and tidal.
UK Local Campaigns against Biofuel and Biomass Power stations
This campaign aims at offering advice and support to the local community concerned about "proposed and existing biomass power stations in the UK". Some local groups they supported include campaigners in West Thurrock, Androver, Milford Haven, and Norwich.
Biofuelwatch has released a number of Reports and Briefings providing great detail on the effects of using geoengineering technologies to cope with climate change. Rachel Smolker, suggests " geoengineering research is being actively promoted by vested interests."
Biotechnology for Biofuels
Biotechnology for Biofuels refers to research on biofuels derived from lignocellulose and algae. In partnership with Friends of the Earth U.S., the organization released the report: "Microalgae Biofuels: Myths and Risks". Various reports have been released, that encompass the use of genetically engineered organisms in different contexts and the effects of the endeavor to the general public. 
Genetically Engineered Trees Campaign (GE Trees)
The Genetically Engineered Trees Campaign (GE Trees Campaign) pertains to companies that genetically engineer trees in attempts to increase the profits f their tree plantations. The GE trees campaign seeks to examine the affects that these trees will or do have as they relate to climate change. The campaign also examines and evaluates the risks involved with the commercialization of genetically engineered trees.
- Boswell, Andrew (6 May 2008). "The whole biofuels enterprise is in doubt" (audio; 3:06; embedded player or MP3 download). The Guardian. Retrieved 8 May 2009.
- Doussou-Bodjrenou; et al. (July 2007). "Agrofuels in Africa – the impacts on land, food and forests" (PDF). African Biodiversity Network. p. 4. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 August 2008. Retrieved 8 May 2009.
[Biofuelwatch's paper highlights] agrofuel impacts in nine key areas, including discussions on climate change, GMOs, biodiversity, food security and rural development. Credibly backed up by scientific evidence.
- "Rachel Smolker". HuffPost.
- "Anger over power station's biomass bid". Thurrock Gazette. Thurrock News.
- Biofuel. (2013). In National Geographic (Ed.), National geographic science of everything. Washington, DC: National Geographic Society.
- The Biofuels Debate: Searching for the role of environmental justice in environmental discourse Fast, StewartAuthor InformationView Profile. Environments; Waterloo Vol. 37, Iss. 1, (2009): 83-100.[Scholarly Journal]
- "biofuelwatch | Past Protests". www.biofuelwatch.org.uk. Retrieved 23 February 2018.
- "biofuelwatch | #AxeDrax AGM Protest 2016". www.biofuelwatch.org.uk. Retrieved 23 February 2018.
- "UK now burning 33% of world's wood pellet imports | Carbon Brief". Carbon Brief. 21 December 2015. Retrieved 23 February 2018.
- "biofuelwatch | #AxeDrax Campaign". www.biofuelwatch.org.uk. Retrieved 23 February 2018.
- GB, Forestry Commission. "Forestry Commission - Statistics - Forestry Statistics". forestry.gov.uk. Retrieved 23 February 2018.
- "Department of Energy and Climate Change" (PDF).
- "#AxeDrax: campaigners unite for climate justice against coal and biofueled deforestation". theecologist.org. The Ecologist.
- "Department of Energy and Climate Change" (PDF).
- "Biofuels: Making the climate crisis worse, not better". 26 November 2008.
- Mathiesen, Karl (11 February 2015). "Is geoengineering a bad idea? | Karl Mathiesen". The Guardian.
- "Biofuelwatch | Biotechnology for Biofuels".
- "Genetically Engineered Trees Condemned in Myrtle Beach". 21 October 2016.
- "Protests to UK Prime Minister - Scrap Biofuel Targets / Scrap RTFO - UK Indymedia".
- "GE Trees".
- "Home - STOPGETREES.ORG". STOPGETREES.ORG. Retrieved 23 February 2018.
- "Media Coordinator Hired for Campaign to STOP GE Trees and Biofuelwatch". ProQuest 1532439256. Cite journal requires