Biological dispersal refers to both the movement of individuals (animals, plants, fungi, bacteria, etc.) from their birth site to their breeding site ('natal dispersal'), as well as the movement from one breeding site to another ('breeding dispersal'). Dispersal is also used to describe the movement of propagules such as seeds and spores. Technically, dispersal is defined as any movement that has the potential to lead to gene flow. The act of dispersal involves three phases: departure, transfer, settlement and there are different fitness costs and benefits associated with each of these phases. Through simply moving from one habitat patch to another, the dispersal of an individual has consequences not only for individual fitness, but also for population dynamics, population genetics, and species distribution. Understanding dispersal and the consequences both for evolutionary strategies at a species level, and for processes at an ecosystem level, requires understanding on the type of dispersal, the dispersal range of a given species, and the dispersal mechanisms involved.
Biological dispersal may be contrasted with geodispersal, which is the mixing of previously isolated populations (or whole biotas) following the erosion of geographic barriers to dispersal or gene flow (Lieberman, 2005; Albert and Reis, 2011).
Dispersal can be distinguished from animal migration (typically round-trip seasonal movement), although within the population genetics literature, the terms 'migration' and 'dispersal' are often used interchangeably.
- 1 Types of dispersal
- 2 Costs and benefits
- 3 Dispersal range
- 4 Dispersal mechanisms
- 5 Quantifying dispersal
- 6 Consequences of dispersal
- 7 See also
- 8 References
- 9 Further reading
- 10 External links
Types of dispersal
Some organisms are motile throughout their lives, but others are adapted to move or be moved at precise, limited phases of their life cycles. This is commonly called the dispersive phase of the life cycle. The strategies of organisms' entire life cycles often are predicated on the nature and circumstances of their dispersive phases.
In general there are two basic types of dispersal:
- Density-independent dispersal
- Organisms have evolved adaptations for dispersal that take advantage of various forms of kinetic energy occurring naturally in the environment. This is referred to as density independent or passive dispersal and operates on many groups of organisms (some invertebrates, fish, insects and sessile organisms such as plants) that depend on animal vectors, wind, gravity or current for dispersal.
- Density-dependent dispersal
- Density dependent or active dispersal for many animals largely depends on factors such as local population size, resource competition, habitat quality, and habitat size.
Due to population density, dispersal may relieve pressure for resources in an ecosystem, and competition for these resources may be a selection factor for dispersal mechanisms.
A distinction is often made between natal dispersal where an individual (often a juvenile) moves away from the place it was born, and breeding dispersal where an individual (often an adult) moves away from one breeding location to breed elsewhere.
Costs and benefits
In the broadest sense, dispersal occurs when the fitness benefits of moving outweigh the costs.
There are a number of benefits to dispersal such as locating new resources, escaping unfavorable conditions, avoiding competing with siblings, and avoiding breeding with closely related individuals which could lead to inbreeding depression.
There are also a number of costs associated with dispersal, which can be thought of in terms of four main currencies: energy, risk, time and opportunity. Energetic costs include the extra energy required to move as well as energetic investment in movement machinery (e.g. wings). Risks include increased injury and mortality during dispersal and the possibility of settling in an unfavorable environment. Time spent dispersing is time that often cannot be spent on other activities such as growth and reproduction. Finally dispersal can also lead to outbreeding depression if an individual is better adapted to its natal environment than the one it ends up in. In social animals (such as many birds and mammals) a dispersing individual must find and join a new group, which can lead to loss of social rank.
"Dispersal range" refers to the distance a species can move from an existing population or the parent organism. An ecosystem depends critically on the ability of individuals and populations to disperse from one habitat patch to another. Therefore, biological dispersal is critical to the stability of ecosystems.
Few species are ever evenly or randomly distributed within or across landscapes. In general, species significantly vary across the landscape in association with environmental features that influence their reproductive success and population persistence. Spatial patterns in environmental features (e.g. resources) permit individuals to escape unfavorable conditions and seek out new locations. This allows the organism to "test" new environments for their suitability, provided they are within animal's geographic range. In addition, the ability of a species to disperse over a gradually changing environment could enable a population to survive extreme conditions. (i.e. climate change).
As the climate changes, prey and predators have to adapt to survive. This poses a problem for many animals, for example the Southern Rockhopper Penguins. These penguins are able to live and thrive in a variety of climates due to the penguins' phenotypic plasticity. However, they are predicted to respond by dispersal, not adaptation this time. This is explained due to their long life spans and slow microevolution. Penguins in the subantarctic have very different foraging behavior than the subtropical waters, it would be very hard to survive and keep up with the fast changing climate because these behaviors took years to shape.
A dispersal barrier may mean that the dispersal range of a species is much smaller than the species distribution. An artificial example is habitat fragmentation due to human land use. Natural barriers to dispersal that limit species distribution include mountain ranges and rivers. An example is the separation of the ranges of the two species of chimpanzee by the Congo River.
On the other hand, human activities may also expand the dispersal range of a species by providing new dispersal methods (e.g., ships). Many of them become invasive, like rats and stinkbugs, but some species also have a slightly positive effect to human settlers like honeybees and earthworms.
Most animals are capable of locomotion and the basic mechanism of dispersal is movement from one place to another. Locomotion allows the organism to "test" new environments for their suitability, provided they are within the animal's range. Movements are usually guided by inherited behaviors.
The formation of barriers to dispersal or gene flow between adjacent areas can isolate populations on either side of the emerging divide. The geographic separation and subsequent genetic isolation of portions of an ancestral population can result in speciation.
Plant dispersal mechanisms
Seed dispersal is the movement or transport of seeds away from the parent plant. Plants have limited mobility and consequently rely upon a variety of dispersal vectors to transport their propagules, including both abiotic and biotic vectors. Seeds can be dispersed away from the parent plant individually or collectively, as well as dispersed in both space and time. The patterns of seed dispersal are determined in large part by the dispersal mechanism and this has important implications for the demographic and genetic structure of plant populations, as well as migration patterns and species interactions. There are five main modes of seed dispersal: gravity, wind, ballistic, water and by animals.
Animal dispersal mechanisms
There are numerous animal forms that are non—motile, such as sponges, bryozoans, tunicates, sea anemones, corals, and oysters. In common, they are all either marine or aquatic. It may seem curious that plants have been so successful at stationary life on land, while animals have not, but the answer lies in the food supply. Plants produce their own food from sunlight and carbon dioxide—both generally more abundant on land than in water. Animals fixed in place must rely on the surrounding medium to bring food at least close enough to grab, and this occurs in the three-dimensional water environment, but with much less abundance in the atmosphere.
All of the marine and aquatic invertebrates whose lives are spent fixed to the bottom (more or less; anemones are capable of getting up and moving to a new location if conditions warrant) produce dispersal units. These may be specialized "buds", or motile sexual reproduction products, or even a sort of alteration of generations as in certain cnidaria.
Corals provide a good example of how sedentary species achieve dispersion. Corals reproduce by releasing sperm and eggs directly into the water. These release events are coordinated by lunar phase in certain warm months, such that all corals of one or many species on a given reef will release on the same single or several consecutive nights. The released eggs are fertilized, and the resulting zygote develops quickly into a multicellular planula. This motile stage then attempts to find a suitable substratum for settlement. Most are unsuccessful and die or are fed upon by zooplankton and bottom dwelling predators such as anemones and other corals. However, untold millions are produced, and a few do succeed in locating spots of bare limestone, where they settle and transform by growth into a polyp. All things being favorable, the single polyp grows into a coral head by budding off new polyps to form a colony.
The majority of all animals are motile. Although motile animals can, in theory, disperse themselves by their spontaneous and independent locomotive powers, a great many species utilize the existing kinetic energies in the environment, resulting in passive movement. Dispersal by water currents is especially associated with the physically small inhabitants of marine waters known as zooplankton. The term plankton comes from the Greek, πλαγκτον, meaning "wanderer" or "drifter".
Dispersal by dormant stages
Many animal species, especially freshwater invertebrates, are able to disperse by wind or by transfer with an aid of larger animals (birds, mammals or fishes) as dormant eggs, dormant embryos or, in some cases, dormant adult stages. Tardigrades, some rotifers and some copepods are able to withstand desiccation as adult dormant stages. Many other taxa (Cladocera, Bryozoa, Hydra, Copepoda and so on) can disperse as dormant eggs or embryos. Freshwater sponges usually have special dormant propagules called gemmulae for such a dispersal. Many kinds of dispersal dormant stages are able to withstand not only desiccation and low and high temperature, but also action of digestive enzymes during their transfer through digestive tracts of birds and other animals, high concentration of salts and many kinds of toxicants. Such dormant-resistant stages made possible the long-distance dispersal from one water body to another and broad distribution ranges of many freshwater animals.
Dispersal is most commonly quantified either in terms of rate or distance.
Dispersal rate (also called migration rate in the population genetics literature) or probability describes the probability that any individual leaves an area or, equivalently, the expected proportion of individual to leave an area.
The dispersal distance is usually described by a dispersal kernel which gives the probability distribution of the distance traveled by any individual. A number of different functions are used for dispersal kernels in theoretical models of dispersal including the negative exponential distribution, extended negative exponential distribution, normal distribution, exponential power distribution, inverse power distribution, and the two-sided power distribution. The inverse power distribution and distributions with 'fat tails' representing long-distance dispersal events (called leptokurtic distributions) are thought to best match empirical dispersal data.
Consequences of dispersal
Dispersal not only has costs and benefits to the dispersing individual (as mentioned above), it also has consequences at the level of the population and species on both ecological and evolutionary timescales.
Many populations have patchy spatial distributions where separate yet interacting sub-populations occupy discrete habitat patches (see metapopulations). Dispersing individuals move between different sub-populations which increases the overall connectivity of the metapopulation and can lower the risk of stochastic extinction. If a sub-population goes extinct by chance, it is more likely to be recolonized if the dispersal rate is high. Increased connectivity can also decrease the degree of local adaptation.
- Ronce O (2007). "How does it feel to be like a rolling stone? Ten questions about dispersal evolution". Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 38: 231–253. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095611.
- Bonte D, Van Dyck H, Bullock JM, Coulon A, Delgado M, Gibbs M, Lehouck V, Matthysen E, Mustin K, Saastamoinen M, Schtickzelle N, Stevens VM, Vandewoestijne S, Baguette M, Barton K, Benton TG, Chaput-Bardy A, Clobert J, Dytham C, Hovestadt T, Meier CM, Palmer SC, Turlure C, Travis JM (May 2012). "Costs of dispersal". Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 87 (2): 290–312. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00201.x. PMID 21929715.
- Dunning JB, Stewart DJ, Danielson BJ, Noon BR, Root TL, Lamberson RH, Stevens EE (1995). "Spatially explicit population models: current forms and future uses" (PDF). Ecological Applications. 5 (1): 3–11. doi:10.2307/1942045. JSTOR 1942045.
- Hanski I, Gilpin ME, eds. (1997). Metapopulation biology : ecology, genetics and evolution. San Diego: Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-323446-9.
- Hanski I (1999). Metapopulation Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-854065-6.
- Lieberman BS (2005). "Geobiology and paleobiogeography: tracking the coevolution of the Earth and its biota". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 219 (1–2): 23–33. Bibcode:2005PPP...219...23L. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2004.10.012.
- Lieberman BS (2005). "Geobiology and paleobiogeography: Tracking the coevolution of the Earth and its biota". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 219 (1–2): 23–33. Bibcode:2005PPP...219...23L. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2004.10.012.
- Albert JS, Reis RE (2011). Historical Biogeography of Neotropical Freshwater Fishes. University of California Press. p. 308. ISBN 978-0-520-26868-5.
- Maguire B (1963). "The passive dispersal of small aquatic organisms and their colonization of isolated bodies of water". Ecological Monographs. 33 (2): 161–185. doi:10.2307/1948560. JSTOR 1948560.
- Nathan R (2001). "The challenges of studying dispersal" (PDF). Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 16 (9): 481–483. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02272-8. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-09-28.
- Johst K, Brandl R (1997). "The effect of dispersal on local population dynamics". Ecological Modelling. 104: 87–101. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(97)00112-9.
- Bowler DE & Benton TG (May 2005). "Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics". Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 80 (2): 205–25. doi:10.1017/S1464793104006645. PMID 15921049.
- Fernández L (2015). "Source-sink dynamics shapes the spatial distribution of soil protists in an arid shrubland of northern Chile". Journal of Arid Environments. 113: 121–125. Bibcode:2015JArEn.113..121F. doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2014.10.007.
- Irwin AJ, Taylor PD (December 2000). "Evolution of dispersal in a stepping-stone population with overlapping generations". Theoretical Population Biology. 58 (4): 321–8. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.37.2823. doi:10.1006/tpbi.2000.1490. PMID 11162790.
- Groom MJ, Meffe GK, Carroll CR (2005). Principles of Conservation Biology. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates, Inc. ISBN 978-0-87893-597-0.
- Martin TE (1998). "Are microhabitat preferences of coexisting species under selection and adaptive?" (PDF). Ecology. 79 (2): 656–670. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[0656:AMPOCS]2.0.CO;2. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2013-12-31. Retrieved 2013-08-29.
- Turner MG, Gardner RH, O'Neill, Robert V (2001). Landscape Ecology: In theory and practice, pattern and process. New York: Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-95123-2.
- Tremblay Y (April 11, 2003). "Geographic variation in the foraging behaviour, diet and chick growth of rockhopper penguins" (PDF). Marine Ecology Progress Series. 251: 279–297. Bibcode:2003MEPS..251..279T. doi:10.3354/meps251279. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-08-09.
- Forcada J, Trathan PN (2009-07-01). "Penguin responses to climate change in the Southern Ocean". Global Change Biology. 15 (7): 1618–1630. Bibcode:2009GCBio..15.1618F. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01909.x. ISSN 1365-2486.
- "Jamestown". History Magazine. Archived from the original on 2014-04-19. Retrieved 2014-04-17.
- Chapman DS, Dytham C, Oxford GS (January 2007). "Modelling population redistribution in a leaf beetle: an evaluation of alternative dispersal functions". The Journal of Animal Ecology. 76 (1): 36–44. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01172.x. PMID 17184351.
- Zhou, Y. & Kot, M. (2011). "Discrete-time growth-dispersal models with shifting species ranges". Theoretical Ecology. 4 (1): 13–25. doi:10.1007/s12080-010-0071-3.
- Miller TE, Shaw AK, Inouye BD, Neubert MG (May 2011). "Sex-biased dispersal and the speed of two-sex invasions" (PDF). The American Naturalist. 177 (5): 549–61. doi:10.1086/659628. hdl:1912/4617. PMID 21508603.
- Radinger, J. & Wolter, C. (2014). "Patterns and predictors of fish dispersal in rivers". Fish and Fisheries. 15 (3): 456–473. doi:10.1111/faf.12028.
- Dieckmann U, O'Hara B, Weisser W (March 1999). "The evolutionary ecology of dispersal" (PDF). Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 14 (3): 88–90. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01571-7.
- Fahrig L, Merriam G (March 1994). "Conservation of Fragmented Populations". Conservation Biology. 8 (1): 50–59. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08010050.x.
- Travis JM, Dytham C (April 1999). "Habitat persistence, habitat availability and the evolution of dispersal". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 266 (1420): 723–8. doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0696. PMC 1689820.
- Lenormand T (2002). "Gene flow and the limits to natural selection". Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 17 (4): 183–189. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02497-7.
- Ingold CT (1971). Fungal spores: their liberation and dispersal. Oxford: Clarendon Press. pp. 302. ISBN 978-0-19-854115-8.
- Lidicker WZ, Caldwell RL (1982). Dispersal and migration. Stroudsburg, Pa.: Hutchinson Ross Pub. Co. p. 311. ISBN 978-0-87933-435-2. (Dispersal of animals)
- Bullock JM, Kenward RE, Hails RS, eds. (2002). Dispersal ecology : the 42nd symposium of the British Ecological Society. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science. p. 458. ISBN 978-0-632-05876-1. (Animals and plants)
- Lieberman BS (2008). "Emerging syntheses between palaeobiogeography and macroevolutionary theory". Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria. 120: 51–57.
- Turner MG, Gardner RH, O'Neill RV (2001). Landscape Ecology: In theory and practice, pattern and process. New York (NY): Springer Science.
- Levin SA (1974). "Dispersion and Population Interactions". The American Naturalist. 108 (960): 207. doi:10.1086/282900.
- Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD, eds. (2001). Dispersal. Oxford.: Oxford University Press.
- Cousens R, Dytham C, Law R (2008). Dispersal in plants: a population perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.