|Part of a series on|
Biomass is organic matter derived from living, or recently living organisms. In the context of biomass as a resource for making energy, it most often refers to plants or plant-based materials which are not used for food or feed, and are specifically called lignocellulosic biomass . As an energy source, biomass can either be used directly via combustion to produce heat, or indirectly after converting it to various forms of biofuel. Conversion of biomass to biofuel can be achieved by different methods which are broadly classified into: thermal, chemical, and biochemical methods.
- 1 Biomass sources
- 2 Comparison of total plant biomass yields (dry basis)
- 3 Biomass conversion process to useful energy
- 4 Environmental impact
- 5 Supply chain issues
- 6 See also
- 7 References
- 8 External links
Historically, humans have harnessed biomass-derived energy since the time when people began burning wood to make fire. Even today, biomass is the only source of fuel for domestic use in many developing countries. Biomass is all biologically-produced matter based in carbon, hydrogen and oxygen. The estimated biomass production in the world is 104.9 petagrams (104.9 * 1015 g) of carbon per year, about half in the ocean and half on land.
Wood remains the largest biomass energy source today; examples include forest residues (such as dead trees, branches and tree stumps), yard clippings, wood chips and even municipal solid waste. Wood energy is derived by using lignocellulosic biomass (second-generation biofuels) as fuel. Harvested wood may be used directly as a fuel or collected from wood waste streams. The largest source of energy from wood is pulping liquor or "black liquor," a waste product from processes of the pulp, paper and paperboard industry. In the second sense, biomass includes plant or animal matter that can be converted into fibers or other industrial chemicals, including biofuels. Industrial biomass can be grown from numerous types of plants, including miscanthus, switchgrass, hemp, corn, poplar, willow, sorghum, sugarcane, bamboo, and a variety of tree species, ranging from eucalyptus to oil palm (palm oil).
Based on the source of biomass, biofuels are classified broadly into two major categories. First-generation biofuels are derived from sources such as sugarcane and corn starch. Sugars present in this biomass are fermented to produce bioethanol, an alcohol fuel which can be used directly in a fuel cell to produce electricity or serve as an additive to gasoline. However, utilizing food-based resources for fuel production only aggravates the food shortage problem. Second-generation biofuels, on the other hand, utilize non-food-based biomass sources such as agriculture and municipal waste. These biofuels mostly consist of lignocellulosic biomass, which is not edible and is a low-value waste for many industries. Despite being the favored alternative, economical production of second-generation biofuel is not yet achieved due to technological issues. These issues arise mainly due to chemical inertness and structural rigidity of lignocellulosic biomass.
Plant energy is produced by crops specifically grown for use as fuel that offer high biomass output per hectare with low input energy. Some examples of these plants are wheat, which typically yields 7.5–8 tonnes of grain per hectare, and straw, which typically yields 3.5–5 tonnes per hectare in the UK. The grain can be used for liquid transportation fuels while the straw can be burned to produce heat or electricity. Plant biomass can also be degraded from cellulose to glucose through a series of chemical treatments, and the resulting sugar can then be used as a first-generation biofuel.
The main contributors of waste energy are municipal solid waste, manufacturing waste, and landfill gas. Energy derived from biomass is projected to be the largest non-hydroelectric renewable resource of electricity in the US between 2000 and 2020.
Biomass can be converted to other usable forms of energy like methane gas or transportation fuels like ethanol and biodiesel. Rotting garbage, and agricultural and human waste, all release methane gas, also called landfill gas or biogas. Crops such as corn and sugar cane can be fermented to produce the transportation fuel ethanol. Biodiesel, another transportation fuel, can be produced from leftover food products like vegetable oils and animal fats. Also, biomass-to-liquids (called "BTLs") and cellulosic ethanol are still under research.
There is research involving algae, or algae-derived, biomass, as this non-food resource can be produced at rates five to ten times those of other types of land-based agriculture, such as corn and soy. Once harvested, it can be fermented to produce biofuels such as ethanol, butanol, and methane, as well as biodiesel and hydrogen. Efforts are being made to identify which species of algae are most suitable for energy production. Genetic engineering approaches could also be utilized to improve microalgae as a source of biofuel.
The biomass used for electricity generation varies by region. Forest by-products, such as wood residues, are common in the US. Agricultural waste is common in Mauritius (sugar cane residue) and Southeast Asia (rice husks). Animal husbandry residues, such as poultry litter, are common in the UK.
As of 2015, a new bioenergy sewage treatment process aimed at developing countries is under trial; the Omni Processor is a self-sustaining process which uses sewerage solids as fuel in a process to convert waste water into drinking water, with surplus electrical energy being generated for export.
Comparison of total plant biomass yields (dry basis)
|This section needs additional citations for verification. (June 2013)|
If the total annual primary production of biomass is just over 100 billion (1.0E+11) tonnes /yr. and the energy reserve per metric tonne of biomass is between about 1.5E3 – 3E3 Kilowatt hours (5E6 – 10E6 BTU), or 24.8 TW average, then biomass could in principle provide 1.4 times the approximate annual 150E3 Terrawatt.hours required for the current world energy consumption For reference, the total solar power on Earth is 174 kTW. The biomass equivalent to solar energy ratio is 143 ppm (parts per million), given current living system coverage on Earth. Best in class solar cell efficiency is (20-40)%. Additionally, Earth's internal radioactive energy production, largely the driver for vulcanic activity, continental drift, etc, is in the same range of power, 20 TW. At some 50% carbon mass content in biomass, annual production, this corresponds to about 6% of atmospheric carbon content in CO2 (for the current 400 ppm).
- (1.0E+11 tonnes biomass annually produced approximately 25 TW)
- Annual world biomass energy equivalent =16.7 - 33.4 TW.
- Annual world energy consumption =17.7. On average, biomass production is 1.4 times larger than world energy consumption.
Common commodity food crops
- Agave: 1-21 tons/acre
- Alfalfa: 4–6 tons/acre
- Barley: grains – 1.6–2.8 tons/acre, straw – 0.9–2.5 tons/acre, total – 2.5–5.3 tons/acre
- Corn: grains – 3.2–4.9 tons/acre, stalks and stovers – 2.3–3.4 tons/acre, total – 5.5–8.3 tons/acre
- Jerusalem artichokes: tubers 1–8 tons/acre, tops 2–13 tons/acre, total 9–13 tons/acre
- Oats: grains – 1.4–5.4 tons/acre, straw – 1.9–3.2 tons/acre, total – 3.3–8.6 tons/acre
- Rye: grains – 2.1–2.4 tons/acre, straw – 2.4–3.4 tons/acre, total – 4.5–5.8 tons/acre
- Wheat: grains – 1.2–4.1 tons/acre, straw – 1.6–3.8 tons/acre, total – 2.8–7.9 tons/acre
- Oil palm: fronds 11 ton/acre, whole fruit bunches 1 ton/acre, trunks 30 ton/acre
Not yet in commercial planting
Genetically modified varieties
- Energy Sorghum
Biomass conversion process to useful energy
|This section needs additional citations for verification. (November 2010)|
Thermal conversion processes use heat as the dominant mechanism to convert biomass into another chemical form. The basic alternatives of combustion (torrefaction, pyrolysis, and gasification) are separated principally by the extent to which the chemical reactions involved are allowed to proceed (mainly controlled by the availability of oxygen and conversion temperature).
Energy created by burning biomass (fuel wood) is particularly suited for countries where the fuel wood grows more rapidly, e.g. tropical countries. There are a number of other less common, more experimental or proprietary thermal processes that may offer benefits such as hydrothermal upgrading (HTU) and hydroprocessing. Some have been developed for use on high moisture content biomass, including aqueous slurries, and allow them to be converted into more convenient forms. Some of the applications of thermal conversion are combined heat and power (CHP) and co-firing. In a typical dedicated biomass power plant, efficiencies range from 20–27% (higher heating value basis). Biomass cofiring with coal, by contrast, typically occurs at efficiencies near those of the coal combustor (30–40%, higher heating value basis).
A range of chemical processes may be used to convert biomass into other forms, such as to produce a fuel that is more conveniently used, transported or stored, or to exploit some property of the process itself. Many of these processes are based in large part on similar coal-based processes, such as Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, methanol production, olefins (ethylene and propylene), and similar chemical or fuel feedstocks. In most cases, the first step involves gasification, which step generally is the most expensive and involves the greatest technical risk. Biomass is more difficult to feed into a pressure vessel than coal or any liquid. Therefore, biomass gasification is frequently done at atmospheric pressure and causes combustion of biomass to produce a combustible gas consisting of carbon monoxide, hydrogen, and traces of methane. This gas mixture, called a producer gas, can provide fuel for various vital processes, such as internal combustion engines, as well as substitute for furnace oil in direct heat applications. Because any biomass material can undergo gasification, this process is far more attractive than ethanol or biomass production, where only particular biomass materials can be used to produce a fuel. In addition, biomass gasification is a desirable process due to the ease at which it can convert solid waste (such as wastes available on a farm) into producer gas, which is a very usable fuel.
Conversion of biomass to biofuel can also be achieved via selective conversion of individual components of biomass. For example, cellulose can be converted to intermediate platform chemical such a sorbitol, glucose, hydroxymethylfurfural etc. These chemical are then further reacted to produce hydrogen or hydrocarbon fuels.
Biomass also has the potential to be converted to multiple commodity chemicals. Halomethanes have successfully been by produced using a combination of A. fermentans and engineered S. cerevisiae. This method converts NaX salts and unprocessed biomass such as switchgrass, sugar cane, corn stover, or poplar into halomethanes. S-adenosylmethionine which is naturally occurring in S. cerevisiae allows a methyl group to be transferred. Production levels of 150 mg L-1H-1 iodomethane were achieved. At these levels roughly 173000L of capacity would need to be operated just to replace the United States’ need for iodomethane. However, an advantage of this method is that it uses NaI rather than I2; NaI is significantly less hazardous than I2. This method may be applied to produce ethylene in the future.
As biomass is a natural material, many highly efficient biochemical processes have developed in nature to break down the molecules of which biomass is composed, and many of these biochemical conversion processes can be harnessed.
Biochemical conversion makes use of the enzymes of bacteria and other microorganisms to break down biomass. In most cases, microorganisms are used to perform the conversion process: anaerobic digestion, fermentation, and composting.
In addition to combustion, bio-mass or bio-fuels can be directly converted to electrical energy via electrochemical oxidation of the material. This can be performed directly in a direct carbon fuel cell, direct ethanol fuel cell or a microbial fuel cell. The fuel can also be consumed indirectly via a fuel cell system containing a reformer which converts the bio-mass into a mixture of CO and H2 before it is consumed in the fuel cell.
In the United States
The biomass power generating industry in the United States, which consists of approximately 11,000 MW of summer operating capacity actively supplying power to the grid, produces about 1.4 percent of the U.S. electricity supply.
Currently, the New Hope Power Partnership is the largest biomass power plant in the U.S. The 140 MW facility uses sugar cane fiber (bagasse) and recycled urban wood as fuel to generate enough power for its large milling and refining operations as well as to supply electricity for nearly 60,000 homes.
Second-generation biofuels were not (in 2010) produced commercially, but a considerable number of research activities were taking place mainly in North America, Europe and also in some emerging countries. These tend to use feedstock produced by rapidly reproducing enzymes or bacteria from various sources including excrement grown in Cell cultures or hydroponics There is huge potential for second generation biofuels but non-edible feedstock resources are highly under-utilized.
Using biomass as a fuel produces air pollution in the form of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, NOx (nitrogen oxides), VOCs (volatile organic compounds), particulates and other pollutants at levels above those from traditional fuel sources such as coal or natural gas in some cases (such as with indoor heating and cooking). Utilization of wood biomass as a fuel can also produce fewer particulate and other pollutants than open burning as seen in wildfires or direct heat applications. Black carbon – a pollutant created by combustion of fossil fuels, biofuels, and biomass – is possibly the second largest contributor to global warming. In 2009 a Swedish study of the giant brown haze that periodically covers large areas in South Asia determined that it had been principally produced by biomass burning, and to a lesser extent by fossil-fuel burning. Researchers measured a significant concentration of 14C, which is associated with recent plant life rather than with fossil fuels.
Biomass power plant size is often driven by biomass availability in close proximity as transport costs of the (bulky) fuel play a key factor in the plant's economics. It has to be noted, however, that rail and especially shipping on waterways can reduce transport costs significantly, which has led to a global biomass market. To make small plants of 1 MWel economically profitable those power plants have need to be equipped with technology that is able to convert biomass to useful electricity with high efficiency such as ORC technology, a cycle similar to the water steam power process just with an organic working medium. Such small power plants can be found in Europe.
On combustion, the carbon from biomass is released into the atmosphere as carbon dioxide (CO2). The amount of carbon stored in dry wood is approximately 50% by weight. However, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, plant matter used as a fuel can be replaced by planting for new growth. When the biomass is from forests, the time to recapture the carbon stored is generally longer, and the carbon storage capacity of the forest may be reduced overall if destructive forestry techniques are employed.
Industry professionals claim that a range of issues can affect a plant's ability to comply with emissions standards. Some of these challenges, unique to biomass plants, include inconsistent fuel supplies and age. The type and amount of the fuel supply is completely reliant factors; the fuel can be in the form of building debris or agricultural waste (such as deforestation of invasive species or orchard trimmings). Furthermore, many of the biomass plants are old, use outdated technology and were not built to comply with today’s stringent standards. In fact, many are based on technologies developed during the term of U.S. President Jimmy Carter, who created the United States Department of Energy in 1977.
The U.S. Energy Information Administration projected that by 2017, biomass is expected to be about twice as expensive as natural gas, slightly more expensive than nuclear power, and much less expensive than solar panels. In another EIA study released, concerning the government’s plan to implement a 25% renewable energy standard by 2025, the agency assumed that 598 million tons of biomass would be available, accounting for 12% of the renewable energy in the plan.
The adoption of biomass-based energy plants has been a slow but steady process. Between the years of 2002 and 2012 the production of these plants has increased 14%. In the United States, alternative electricity-production sources on the whole generate about 13% of power; of this fraction, biomass contributes approximately 11% of the alternative production. According to a study conducted in early 2012, of the 107 operating biomass plants in the United States, 85 have been cited by federal or state regulators for the violation of clean air or water standards laws over the past 5 years. This data also includes minor infractions.
Despite harvesting, biomass crops may sequester carbon. For example, soil organic carbon has been observed to be greater in switchgrass stands than in cultivated cropland soil, especially at depths below 12 inches. The grass sequesters the carbon in its increased root biomass. Typically, perennial crops sequester much more carbon than annual crops due to much greater non-harvested living biomass, both living and dead, built up over years, and much less soil disruption in cultivation.
The proposal that biomass is carbon-neutral put forward in the early 1990s has been superseded by more recent science that recognizes that mature, intact forests sequester carbon more effectively than cut-over areas. When a tree's carbon is released into the atmosphere in a single pulse, it contributes to climate change much more than woodland timber rotting slowly over decades. Current studies indicate that "even after 50 years the forest has not recovered to its initial carbon storage" and "the optimal strategy is likely to be protection of the standing forest".[not in citation given]
Forest-based biomass has recently come under fire from a number of environmental organizations, including Greenpeace and the Natural Resources Defense Council, for the harmful impacts it can have on forests and the climate. Greenpeace recently released a report entitled "Fuelling a BioMess" which outlines their concerns around forest-based biomass. Because any part of the tree can be burned, the harvesting of trees for energy production encourages Whole-Tree Harvesting, which removes more nutrients and soil cover than regular harvesting, and can be harmful to the long-term health of the forest. In some jurisdictions, forest biomass removal is increasingly involving elements essential to functioning forest ecosystems, including standing trees, naturally disturbed forests and remains of traditional logging operations that were previously left in the forest. Environmental groups also cite recent scientific research which has found that it can take many decades for the carbon released by burning biomass to be recaptured by regrowing trees, and even longer in low productivity areas; furthermore, logging operations may disturb forest soils and cause them to release stored carbon. In light of the pressing need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the short term in order to mitigate the effects of climate change, a number of environmental groups are opposing the large-scale use of forest biomass in energy production.
Supply chain issues
With the seasonality of biomass supply and a great variability in sources, supply chains play a key role in cost-effective delivery of bioenergy. There are several potential challenges peculiar to bioenergy supply chains:
- Inefficiencies of conversion
- Storage methods for seasonal availability
- Complex multi-component constituents incompatible with maximizing efficiency of single purpose use
- High water content
- Conflicting decisions (technologies, locations, and routes)
- Complex location analysis (source points, inventory facilities, and production plants)
- Seasonal availability leading to storage challenges and/or seasonally idle facilities
- Low bulk-density and/or high water content
- Finite productivity per area and/or time incompatible with conventional approach to economy of scale focusing on maximizing facility size
- The limits for the traditional approach to economy of scale which focuses on maximizing single facility size
- Unavailability and complexity of life cycle costing data
- Lack of required transport infrastructure
- Limited flexibility or inflexibility to energy demand
- Risks associated with new technologies (insurability, performance, rate of return)
- Extended market volatilities (conflicts with alternative markets for biomass)
- Difficult or impossible to use financial hedging methods to control cost
- Lack of participatory decision making
- Lack of public/community awareness
- Local supply chain impacts vs. global benefits
- Health and safety risks
- Extra pressure on transport sector
- Decreasing the esthetics of rural areas
Policy and regulatory issues
- Impact of fossil fuel tax on biomass transport
- Lack of incentives to create competition among bioenergy producers
- Focus on technology options and less attention to selection of biomass materials
- Lack of support for sustainable supply chain solutions
Institutional and organizational issues
- Varied ownership arrangements and priorities among supply chain parties
- Lack of supply chain standards
- Impact of organizational norms and rules on decision making and supply chain coordination
- Immaturity of change management practices in biomass supply chains
- Biofact (biology)
- Biomass (ecology)
- Biomass gasification
- Biomass heating systems
- Biomass to liquid
- Carbon footprint
- Energy crop
- Energy forestry
- Microbial electrolysis cell generates hydrogen or methane
- Pellet fuel
- Thermal mass
- Wood fuel (a traditional biomass fuel)
- Biomass Energy Center. Biomassenergycentre.org.uk. Retrieved on 2012-02-28.
-  Retrieved on 2012-04-12.
- Field, C. B.; Behrenfeld, M. J.; Randerson, J. T.; Falkowski, P. (1998). "Primary Production of the Biosphere: Integrating Terrestrial and Oceanic Components". Science 281 (5374): 237–240. doi:10.1126/science.281.5374.237. PMID 9657713.
- Darby, Thomas. "What Is Biomass Renewable Energy". Real World Energy. Retrieved 12 June 2014.
- T.A. Volk, L.P. Abrahamson, E.H. White, E. Neuhauser, E. Gray, C. Demeter, C. Lindsey, J. Jarnefeld, D.J. Aneshansley, R. Pellerin and S. Edick (October 15–19, 2000). "Developing a Willow Biomass Crop Enterprise for Bioenergy and Bioproducts in the United States". Proceedings of Bioenergy 2000. Adam's Mark Hotel, Buffalo, New York, USA: North East Regional Biomass Program. OCLC 45275154. Retrieved 2006-12-16.
- Martin, Marshall A. (1 November 2010). "First generation biofuels compete". New Biotechnology 27 (5): 596–608. doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2010.06.010. PMID 20601265.
- Naik, S.N.; Goud, Vaibhav V.; Rout, Prasant K.; Dalai, Ajay K. (2010). "Production of first and second generation biofuels: A comprehensive review". Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14 (2): 578–597. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.003.
- Renewable Energy World Retrieved on 2012-03-31.
- biofuelstp.eu European Biofuels Retrieved on 2012-03-31.
- "Energy crops". crops are grown specifically for use as fuel. BIOMASS Energy Centre. Retrieved 6 April 2013.
- "Biomass for Electricity Generation". capacity of about 6.7 gigawatts in 2000 to about 10.4 gigawatts by 2020. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Retrieved 6 April 2013.
- Energy Kids. Eia.doe.gov. Retrieved on 2012-02-28.
- "Fuel Ethanol Production: GSP Systems Biology Research". U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science. April 19, 2010. Archived from the original on 2010-10-28. Retrieved 2010-08-02.
- "Breaking the Biological Barriers to Cellulosic Ethanol: A Joint Research Agenda" (PDF). June 2006. Retrieved 2010-08-02.
- Randor Radakovits; Robert E. Jinkerson; Al Darzins; Matthew C. Posewitz1 (2010). "Genetic Engineering of Algae for Enhanced Biofuel Production". Eukaryotic Cell 9 (4): 486–501. doi:10.1128/EC.00364-09. PMC 2863401. PMID 20139239.
- Frauke Urban and Tom Mitchell 2011. Climate change, disasters and electricity generation. London: Overseas Development Institute and Institute of Development Studies
- "Janicki Bioenergy website". Retrieved 11 January 2015.
- "BBC news article "Bill Gates drinks water distilled from human faeces"". Retrieved 11 January 2015.
- "Watch Bill Gates Sip Water Made From Sewer Sludge". Forbes.
- Field, C.B.; Behrenfeld, M.J.; Randerson, J.T.; Falkowski, P. (1998). "Primary production of the Biosphere: Integrating Terrestrial and Oceanic Components". Science 281 (5374): 237–240. doi:10.1126/science.281.5374.237. PMID 9657713.
- USA DoE - Bioenergy Feedstock Information Network
- Enerdata Independent Research
- , Potential of Plants from the Genus Agave as Bioenergy Crops
- Adding an alfalfa rotation with corn grown for ethanol improves energy efficiency, reduces environmental impact, USDA Agriculture Research Services, Madison, Wisconsin
- Barley, Chemistry and Technology, MacGregor & Bhatty editors
- Biology and Chemistry of Jerusalem Artichoke, Table 10-10, Stanley Kays & Stephen Nottingham
- Iowa State University, Department of Agronomy Factsheet, Biomass: Miscanthus
- Perry, A. Sunn Hemp Shows Promise as Biofuel Source. USDA ARS News. January 3, 2012.
- Owning and Operating Costs of Waste and Biomass Power Plants. Claverton-energy.com (2010-09-17). Retrieved on 2012-02-28.
- Baxter, L. (2005). "Biomass-coal co-combustion: Opportunity for affordable renewable energy." Fuel 84(10): 1295–1302.
- Liu, G., E. D. Larson, R. H. Williams, T. G. Kreutz and X. Guo (2011). "Making fischer-tropsch fuels and electricity from coal and biomass: Performance and cost analysis." Energy & Fuels 25: 415–437.
- Rajvanshi, A. K. "Biomass Gasification." Alternative Energy in Agriculture, Vol. II, Ed. D. Yogi Goswami, CRC Press, 1986, pp. 83–102.
- Kunkes, E. L.; Simonetti, D. A.; West, R. M.; Serrano-Ruiz, J. C.; Gartner, C. A.; Dumesic, J. A. (2008). "Catalytic Conversion of Biomass to Monofunctional Hydrocarbons and Targeted Liquid-Fuel Classes". Science 322 (5900): 417–421. doi:10.1126/science.1159210. PMID 18801970.
- Shrotri, Abhijit; Tanksale, Akshat; Beltramini, Jorge Norberto; Gurav, Hanmant; Chilukuri, Satyanarayana V. (2012). "Conversion of cellulose to polyols over promoted nickel catalysts". Catalysis Science & Technology 2 (9): 1852. doi:10.1039/C2CY20119D.
- Kobayashi, Hirokazu; Yabushita, Mizuho; Komanoya, Tasuku; Hara, Kenji; Fujita, Ichiro; Fukuoka, Atsushi (2013). "High-Yielding One-Pot Synthesis of Glucose from Cellulose Using Simple Activated Carbons and Trace Hydrochloric Acid". ACS Catalysis 3 (4): 581–587. doi:10.1021/cs300845f.
- Chheda, Juben N.; Román-Leshkov, Yuriy; Dumesic, James A. (2007). "Production of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and furfural by dehydration of biomass-derived mono- and poly-saccharides". Green Chemistry 9 (4): 342. doi:10.1039/B611568C.
- Huber, George W.; Iborra, Sara; Corma, Avelino (2006). "Synthesis of Transportation Fuels from Biomass: Chemistry, Catalysts, and Engineering". Chemical Reviews 106 (9): 4044–4098. doi:10.1021/cr068360d. PMID 16967928.
- Alaimo, Peter & Amanda-Lynn Marshall (2010) "Useful Products from Complex Starting Materials: Common Chemicals from Biomass Feedstocks" Chemistry – A European Journal 15 4970–4980.
- Conversion technologies. Biomassenergycentre.org.uk. Retrieved on 2012-02-28.
- Munnings, C.; Kulkarni, A.; Giddey, S.; Badwal, S.P.S. (August 2014). "Biomass to power conversion in a direct carbon fuel cell". International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 39 (23): 12377–12385. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.03.255.
- Knight, Chris (2013). "Wireless Sensor Networks and Ecological Monitoring". Smart Sensors, Measurement and Instrumentation 3. pp. 151–178. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36365-8_6. ISBN 978-3-642-36364-1.
- Badwal, Sukhvinder P. S.; Giddey, Sarbjit S.; Munnings, Christopher; Bhatt, Anand I.; Hollenkamp, Anthony F. (24 September 2014). "Emerging electrochemical energy conversion and storage technologies (open access)". Frontiers in Chemistry 2. doi:10.3389/fchem.2014.00079.
- "U.S. Electric Net Summer Capacity". U.S. Energy Information Administration. July 2001. Retrieved 2010-01-25.
- Agreement for Generating Balancing Service. (PDF). Retrieved on 2012-02-28.
- Biomass: Can Renewable Power Grow on Trees?. Scientificamerican.com. Retrieved on 2012-02-28.
- free fatty acid pools in Escherichia coli
- Biomass-to-Fuel Conversion (Princeton University USA)
- The Nocera lab
- Kosinkova, Jana; Doshi, Amar; Maire, Juliette; Ristovski, Zoran; Brown, Richard; Rainey, Thomas (September 2015). "Measuring the regional availability of biomass for biofuels and the potential for microalgae". Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 49: 1271–1285. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.084.
- Eartha Jane Melzer (January 26, 2010). "Proposed biomass plant: Better than coal?". The Michigan Messenger. Archived from the original on 2010-02-05.
- Zhang, J.; Smith, K. R. (2007). "Household Air Pollution from Coal and Biomass Fuels in China: Measurements, Health Impacts, and Interventions". Environmental Health Perspectives 115 (6): 848–855. doi:10.1289/ehp.9479. PMC 1892127. PMID 17589590.
- "Announcement". Archives of Virology 130: 225. 1993. doi:10.1007/BF01319012.
- Springsteen, Bruce; Christofk, Tom; Eubanks, Steve; Mason, Tad; Clavin, Chris; Storey, Brett (2011). "Emission Reductions from Woody Biomass Waste for Energy as an Alternative to Open Burning". Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 61 (1): 6. doi:10.3155/1047-3218.104.22.168.
- 2009 State Of The World, Into a Warming World, Worldwatch Institute, 56–57, ISBN 978-0-393-33418-0
- Gustafsson, O.; Krusa, M.; Zencak, Z.; Sheesley, R. J.; Granat, L.; Engstrom, E.; Praveen, P. S.; Rao, P. S. P.; et al. (2009). "Brown Clouds over South Asia: Biomass or Fossil Fuel Combustion?". Science 323 (5913): 495–8. doi:10.1126/science.1164857. PMID 19164746.
- Biomass burning leads to Asian brown cloud, Chemical & Engineering News, 87, 4, 31
- Heinimö, J.; Junginger, M. (2009). "Production and trading of biomass for energy – an overview of the global status" (PDF). Biomass and Bioenergy 33 (9): 1310. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.05.017.
- Use of biomass by help of the ORC process. Gmk.info. Retrieved on 2012-02-28.
- How False Solutions to Climate Change Will Worsen Global Warming. globaljusticeecology.org
- Biofuel crops may worsen global warming: study. Ctv.ca (2008-02-09). Retrieved on 2012-02-28.
- Biodiesel Will Not Drive Down Global Warming. Energy-daily.com (2007-04-24). Retrieved on 2012-02-28.
- Forest volume-to-biomass models and estimates of mass for live and standing dead trees of U.S. forests. (PDF) . Retrieved on 2012-02-28.
- Prasad, Ram. "SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT FOR DRY FORESTS OF SOUTH ASIA". Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 August 2010.
- "Treetrouble: Testimonies on the Negative Impact of Large-scale Tree Plantations prepared for the sixth Conference of the Parties of the Framework Convention on Climate Change". Friends of the Earth International. Retrieved 11 August 2010.
- Laiho, Raija; Sanchez, Felipe; Tiarks, Allan; Dougherty, Phillip M.; Trettin, Carl C. "Impacts of intensive forestry on early rotation trends in site carbon pools in the southeastern US". United States Department of Agriculture. Retrieved 11 August 2010.
- "THE FINANCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FEASIBILITY OF SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT". Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 August 2010.
- U.S. Energy Information Administration (April 2010). Annual Energy Outlook 2010 (PDF) (report no. DOE/EIA-0383(2010)). Washington, DC. National Energy Information Center. Retrieved September 27, 2012.
- "How Biomass Energy Works". Union of Concerned Scientists. Retrieved 4 April 2013.
- Scheck, Justin; et al. (July 23, 2012). "Wood-Fired Plants Generate Violations". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved September 27, 2012.
- "Learning About Renewable Energy". NREL's vision is to develop technology. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Retrieved 4 April 2013.
- Soil Carbon under Switchgrass Stands and Cultivated Cropland (Interpretive Summary and Technical Abstract). USDA Agricultural Research Service, April 1, 2005
- Jobs and Energy. Jobs and Energy. Retrieved on 2012-02-28.
- Edmunds, Joe; Richard Richets; Marshall Wise, "Future Fossil Fuel Carbon Emissions without Policy Intervention: A Review". In T. M. L. Wigley, David Steven Schimel, The Carbon Cycle. Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp.171–189
- Luyssaert, Sebastiaan; -Detlef Schulze, E.; Börner, Annett; Knohl, Alexander; Hessenmöller, Dominik; Law, Beverly E.; Ciais, Philippe; Grace, John (11 September 2008). "Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks". Nature 455 (7210): 213–215. doi:10.1038/nature07276. PMID 18784722.
- "Biofuel Companies Question ARB's Inclusion of Indirect Effects in Low Carbon Fuel Standard". Green Car Congress. 2008-10-24. Retrieved 2009-04-28.
- "Fuelling a BioMess" (PDF). Greenpeace. October 2011. Retrieved 2015-06-14.
- NRDC fact sheet lays out biomass basics, campaign calls for action to tell EPA our forests aren't fuel | Sasha Lyutse's Blog | Switchboard, from NRDC. Switchboard.nrdc.org (2011-05-02). Retrieved on 2012-02-28.
- Mafakheri, F.; Nasiri, F. (2014). "Modeling of biomass-to-energy supply chain operations: Applications, challenges and research directions". Energy Policy 67: 116. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.071.
|Look up biomass in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.|
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Biomass.|
- Solid biomass EurObserv'ER barometer – 2012 PDF
- Biomass as an Energy Source – Växjö University
- Biomass interactive by PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency