Neuroplasticity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Brain plasticity)
Jump to: navigation, search
"Neural plasticity" redirects here. For the journal, see Neural Plasticity (journal). For the 2014 album by the band Cold Specks, see Neuroplasticity (Cold Specks album).
Contrary to conventional thought as expressed in this diagram, brain functions are not confined to certain fixed locations.

Neuroplasticity, also known as brain plasticity or neural plasticity, is an umbrella term that describes lasting change to the brain throughout an individual's life course. The term gained prominence in the latter half of the 20th century, when new research[1] showed that many aspects of the brain can be altered (or are "plastic") even into adulthood.[2] This notion is in contrast with the previous scientific consensus that the brain develops during a critical period in early childhood and then remains relatively unchanged (or "static").[3]

Neuroplasticity can be observed at multiple scales, from microscopic changes in individual neurons to larger-scale changes such as cortical remapping in response to injury. However, cortical remapping is more extensive early in development.[4] Behavior, environmental stimuli, thought, and emotions may also cause neuroplastic change through activity-dependent plasticity, which has significant implications for healthy development, learning, memory, and recovery from brain damage.[4][5][6]

At the single cell level, synaptic plasticity refers to changes in the connections between neurons, whereas non-synaptic plasticity refers to changes in their intrinsic excitability.

Localizationism[edit]

Dating all the way back to the late 1500s, neurology was largely based on the theory of localizationism, which states that the brain is composed of functionally specialized areas. The famed astronomer Galileo Galilei is credited with the creation of localizationism. According to Norman Doidge, Galileo's studies of space and its celestial bodies led him to believe that "all nature functioned as a large cosmic clock" and that these bodies "began to explain individual living things, including our bodily organs, mechanistically".[7] He saw the universe as a giant machine rather than a living organism. When applied to the brain, this means that its parts have hardwired functions as a machine has parts designated to a certain area.[7] According to this theory, the functional specialization of each brain area could mean that localized damage to one area would lead to a loss of the function that it served. This led physicians to consider certain diseases or conditions arising from brain damage as untreatable.

Neurobiology[edit]

One of the fundamental principles underlying neuroplasticity is based on the idea that individual synaptic connections are constantly being removed or recreated, largely dependent upon the activity of the neurons that bear them. The activity-dependence of synaptic plasticity is captured in the aphorism which is often used to summarize Hebbian theory: "neurons that fire together, wire together"/"neurons that fire out of sync, fail to link". If two nearby neurons often produce an impulse in close temporal proximity, their functional properties may converge. Conversely, neurons that are not regularly activated simultaneously may be more likely to functionally diverge.

Cortical maps[edit]

Cortical organization, especially in sensory systems, is often described in terms of maps.[8] For example, sensory information from the foot projects to one cortical site and the projections from the hand target another site. As a result, the cortical representation of sensory inputs from the body resembles a somatotopic map, often described as the sensory homunculus.

In the late 1970s and early 1980s, several groups began exploring the impact of interfering with sensory inputs on cortical map reorganization. Michael Merzenich, Jon Kaas and Doug Rasmusson were some of those researchers. They found that if the cortical map is deprived of its input, it activates at a later time in response to other, usually adjacent inputs. Their findings have been since corroborated and extended by many research groups. Merzenich's (1984) study involved the mapping of owl monkey hands before and after amputation of the third digit. Before amputation, there were five distinct areas, one corresponding to each digit of the experimental hand. Sixty-two days following amputation of the third digit, the area in the cortical map formerly occupied by that digit had been invaded by the previously adjacent second and fourth digit zones. The areas representing digit one and five are not located directly beside the area representing digit three, so these regions remained, for the most part, unchanged following amputation.[9] This study demonstrates that only those regions that border a certain area invade it to alter the cortical map. In the somatic sensory system, in which this phenomenon has been most thoroughly investigated, JT Wall and J Xu have traced the mechanisms underlying this plasticity. Re-organization is not cortically emergent, but occurs at every level in the processing hierarchy; this produces the map changes observed in the cerebral cortex.[10]

Merzenich and William Jenkins (1990) initiated studies relating sensory experience, without pathological perturbation, to cortically observed plasticity in the primate somatosensory system, with the finding that sensory sites activated in an attended operant behavior increase in their cortical representation. Shortly thereafter, Ford Ebner and colleagues (1994) made similar efforts in the rodent whisker barrel cortex (also part of the somatosensory system). These two groups largely diverged over the years. The rodent whisker barrel efforts became a focus for Ebner, Matthew Diamond, Michael Armstrong-James, Robert Sachdev, and Kevin Fox. Great inroads were made in identifying the locus of change as being at cortical synapses expressing NMDA receptors, and in implicating cholinergic inputs as necessary for normal expression. The work of Ron Frostig and Daniel Polley (1999, 2004) identified behavioral manipulations causing a substantial impact on the cortical plasticity in that system.

Merzenich and DT Blake (2002, 2005, 2006) went on to use cortical implants to study the evolution of plasticity in both the somatosensory and auditory systems. Both systems show similar changes with respect to behavior. When a stimulus is cognitively associated with reinforcement, its cortical representation is strengthened and enlarged. In some cases, cortical representations can increase two to threefold in 1–2 days when a new sensory motor behavior is first acquired, and changes are largely finalised within at most a few weeks. Control studies show that these changes are not caused by sensory experience alone: they require learning about the sensory experience, they are strongest for the stimuli that are associated with reward, and they occur with equal ease in operant and classical conditioning behaviors.

An interesting phenomenon involving plasticity of cortical maps is the phenomenon of phantom limb sensation. Phantom limb sensation is experienced by people who have undergone amputations in hands, arms, and legs, but it is not limited to extremities. Although the neurological basis of phantom limb sensation is still not entirely understood it is believed that cortical reorganization plays an important role.[11]

Norman Doidge, following the lead of Michael Merzenich, separates manifestations of neuroplasticity into adaptations that have positive or negative behavioral consequences. For example, if an organism can recover after a stroke to normal levels of performance, that adaptiveness could be considered an example of "positive plasticity". Changes such as an excessive level of neuronal growth leading to spasticity or tonic paralysis, or excessive neurotransmitter release in response to injury that could result in nerve cell death, are considered as an example of "negative" plasticity. In addition, drug addiction and obsessive-compulsive disorder are both deemed examples of "negative plasticity" by Dr. Doidge, as the synaptic rewiring resulting in these behaviors is also highly maladaptive.[11][12]

A 2005 study found that the effects of neuroplasticity occur even more rapidly than previously expected. Medical students' brains were imaged during the period of studying for their exams. In a matter of months, the students' gray matter increased significantly in the posterior and lateral parietal cortex.[13]

Applications and example[edit]

The adult brain is not entirely "hard-wired" with fixed neuronal circuits. There are many instances of cortical and subcortical rewiring of neuronal circuits in response to training as well as in response to injury. There is solid evidence that neurogenesis (birth of brain cells) occurs in the adult, mammalian brain—and such changes can persist well into old age.[2] The evidence for neurogenesis is mainly restricted to the hippocampus and olfactory bulb, but current research has revealed that other parts of the brain, including the cerebellum, may be involved as well.[14]

There is now ample evidence[citation needed] for the active, experience-dependent re-organization of the synaptic networks of the brain involving multiple inter-related structures including the cerebral cortex. The specific details of how this process occurs at the molecular and ultrastructural levels are topics of active neuroscience research. The way experience can influence the synaptic organization of the brain is also the basis for a number of theories of brain function including the general theory of mind and Neural Darwinism. The concept of neuroplasticity is also central to theories of memory and learning that are associated with experience-driven alteration of synaptic structure and function in studies of classical conditioning in invertebrate animal models such as Aplysia.

Treatment of brain damage[edit]

A surprising consequence of neuroplasticity is that the brain activity associated with a given function can be transferred to a different location; this can result from normal experience and also occurs in the process of recovery from brain injury. Neuroplasticity is the fundamental issue that supports the scientific basis for treatment of acquired brain injury with goal-directed experiential therapeutic programs in the context of rehabilitation approaches to the functional consequences of the injury.

Neuroplasticity is gaining popularity as a theory that, at least in part, explains improvements in functional outcomes with physical therapy post-stroke. Rehabilitation techniques that are supported by evidence which suggest cortical reorganization as the mechanism of change include constraint-induced movement therapy, functional electrical stimulation, treadmill training with body-weight support, and virtual reality therapy. Robot assisted therapy is an emerging technique, which is also hypothesized to work by way of neuroplasticity, though there is currently insufficient evidence to determine the exact mechanisms of change when using this method.[15]

One group has developed a treatment that includes increased levels of progesterone injections in brain-injured patients. "Administration of progesterone after traumatic brain injury[16] (TBI) and stroke reduces edema, inflammation, and neuronal cell death, and enhances spatial reference memory and sensory motor recovery."[17] In a clinical trial, a group of severely injured patients had a 60% reduction in mortality after three days of progesterone injections.[18] However, a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2014 detailing the results of a multi-center NIH-funded phase III clinical trial of 882 patients found that treatment of acute traumatic brain injury with the hormone progesterone provides no significant benefit to patients when compared with placebo.[19]

Vision[edit]

For decades, researchers assumed that humans had to acquire binocular vision, in particular stereopsis, in early childhood or they would never gain it. In recent years, however, successful improvements in persons with amblyopia, convergence insufficiency or other stereo vision anomalies have become prime examples of neuroplasticity; binocular vision improvements and stereopsis recovery are now active areas of scientific and clinical research.[20][21][22]

Brain training[edit]

Several companies have offered so-called cognitive training software programs for various purposes that claim to work via neuroplasticity; one example is Fast ForWord which is marketed to help children with learning disabilities.[23] A systematic meta-analytic review found that "There is no evidence from the analysis carried out that Fast ForWord is effective as a treatment for children's oral language or reading difficulties".[23] A 2016 review found very little evidence supporting any of the claims of Fast ForWord and other commercial products, as their task-specific effects fail to generalise to other tasks.[24]

Sensory prostheses[edit]

Neuroplasticity is involved in the development of sensory function. The brain is born immature and it adapts to sensory inputs after birth. In the auditory system, congenital hearing impairment, a rather frequent inborn condition affecting 1 of 1000 newborns, has been shown to affect auditory development, and implantation of a sensory prostheses activating the auditory system has prevented the deficits and induced functional maturation of the auditory system.[25] Due to a sensitive period for plasticity, there is also a sensitive period for such intervention within the first 2–4 years of life. Consequently, in prelingually deaf children, early cochlear implantation, as a rule, allows to learn the mother language and acquire acoustic communication.[26]

Phantom limbs[edit]

A diagrammatic explanation of the mirror box. The patient places the intact limb into one side of the box (in this case the right hand) and the amputated limb into the other side. Due to the mirror, the patient sees a reflection of the intact hand where the missing limb would be (indicated in lower contrast). The patient thus receives artificial visual feedback that the "resurrected" limb is now moving when they move the good hand.
Main articles: Phantom limb and Mirror box

In the phenomenon of phantom limb sensation, a person continues to feel pain or sensation within a part of their body that has been amputated. This is strangely common, occurring in 60–80% of amputees.[27] An explanation for this is based on the concept of neuroplasticity, as the cortical maps of the removed limbs are believed to have become engaged with the area around them in the postcentral gyrus. This results in activity within the surrounding area of the cortex being misinterpreted by the area of the cortex formerly responsible for the amputated limb.

The relationship between phantom limb sensation and neuroplasticity is a complex one. In the early 1990s V.S. Ramachandran theorized that phantom limbs were the result of cortical remapping. However, in 1995 Herta Flor and her colleagues demonstrated that cortical remapping occurs only in patients who have phantom pain.[28] Her research showed that phantom limb pain (rather than referred sensations) was the perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization.[29] This phenomenon is sometimes referred to as maladaptive plasticity.

In 2009 Lorimer Moseley and Peter Brugger carried out a remarkable experiment in which they encouraged arm amputee subjects to use visual imagery to contort their phantom limbs into impossible configurations. Four of the seven subjects succeeded in performing impossible movements of the phantom limb. This experiment suggests that the subjects had modified the neural representation of their phantom limbs and generated the motor commands needed to execute impossible movements in the absence of feedback from the body.[30] The authors stated that: "In fact, this finding extends our understanding of the brain's plasticity because it is evidence that profound changes in the mental representation of the body can be induced purely by internal brain mechanisms—the brain truly does change itself."

Chronic pain[edit]

Main article: Chronic pain

Individuals who suffer from chronic pain experience prolonged pain at sites that may have been previously injured, yet are otherwise currently healthy. This phenomenon is related to neuroplasticity due to a maladaptive reorganization of the nervous system, both peripherally and centrally. During the period of tissue damage, noxious stimuli and inflammation cause an elevation of nociceptive input from the periphery to the central nervous system. Prolonged nociception from the periphery then elicits a neuroplastic response at the cortical level to change its somatotopic organization for the painful site, inducing central sensitization.[31] For instance, individuals experiencing complex regional pain syndrome demonstrate a diminished cortical somatotopic representation of the hand contralaterally as well as a decreased spacing between the hand and the mouth.[32] Additionally, chronic pain has been reported to significantly reduce the volume of grey matter in the brain globally, and more specifically at the prefrontal cortex and right thalamus.[33] However, following treatment, these abnormalities in cortical reorganization and grey matter volume are resolved, as well as their symptoms. Similar results have been reported for phantom limb pain,[34] chronic low back pain[35] and carpal tunnel syndrome.[36]

Meditation[edit]

A number of studies have linked meditation practice to differences in cortical thickness or density of gray matter.[37][38][39] One of the most well-known studies to demonstrate this was led by Sara Lazar, from Harvard University, in 2000.[40] Richard Davidson, a neuroscientist at the University of Wisconsin, has led experiments in cooperation with the Dalai Lama on effects of meditation on the brain. His results suggest that long-term or short-term practice of meditation results in different levels of activity in brain regions associated with such qualities as attention, anxiety, depression, fear, anger, the ability of the body to heal itself. These functional changes may be caused by changes in the physical structure of the brain.[41][42][43][44]

Fitness and exercise[edit]

Aerobic exercise promotes adult neurogenesis by increasing the production of neurotrophic factors (compounds that promote growth or survival of neurons), such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).[45][46][47] Exercise-induced neurogenesis in the hippocampus is associated with measurable improvements in spatial memory.[48][49][50][51] Consistent aerobic exercise over a period of several months induces marked clinically significant improvements in executive function (i.e., the "cognitive control" of behavior) and increased gray matter volume in multiple brain regions, particularly those that give rise to cognitive control.[47][48][52][53] The brain structures that show the greatest improvements in gray matter volume in response to aerobic exercise are the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus;[47][48][49] moderate improvements are seen in the anterior cingulate cortex, parietal cortex, cerebellum, caudate nucleus, and nucleus accumbens.[47][48][49] Higher physical fitness scores (measured by VO2 max) are associated with better executive function, faster processing speed, and greater volume of the hippocampus, caudate nucleus, and nucleus accumbens.[48]

Human echolocation[edit]

Human echolocation is a learned ability for humans to sense their environment from echoes. This ability is used by some blind people to navigate their environment and sense their surroundings in detail. Studies in 2010[54] and 2011[55] using functional magnetic resonance imaging techniques have shown that parts of the brain associated with visual processing are adapted for the new skill of echolocation. Studies with blind patients, for example, suggest that the click-echoes heard by these patients were processed by brain regions devoted to vision rather than audition.[56]

ADHD stimulants[edit]

Reviews of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies on individuals with ADHD suggest that the long-term treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with stimulants, such as amphetamine or methylphenidate, decreases abnormalities in brain structure and function found in subjects with ADHD, and improves function in several parts of the brain, such as the right caudate nucleus of the basal ganglia.[57][58][59] Based on studies of rodent models, the authors of one review proposed that "juvenile exposure to methylphenidate may cause abnormal prefrontal function and impaired plasticity in the healthy brain".[60] The same authors noted in another review that in juvenile rats, methylphenidate reduced levels of NR2B subunit of the NMDA receptor without altering NR2A levels in the prefrontal cortex, thereby affecting long-term plasticity in the prefrontal cortex.[61]

In animals[edit]

In a single lifespan, individuals of an animal species may encounter various changes in brain morphology. Many of these differences are caused by the release of hormones in the brain; others are the product of evolutionary factors or developmental stages.[62][63][64][65] Some changes occur seasonally in species to enhance or generate response behaviors.

Seasonal brain changes[edit]

Changing brain behavior and morphology to suit other seasonal behaviors is relatively common in animals.[66] These changes can improve the chances of mating during breeding season.[62][63][64][66][67][68] Examples of seasonal brain morphology change can be found within many classes and species.

Within the class Aves, black-capped chickadees experience an increase in the volume of their hippocampus and strength of neural connections to the hippocampus during fall months.[69][70] These morphological changes within the hippocampus which are related to spatial memory are not limited to birds, as they can also be observed in rodents and amphibians.[66] In songbirds, many song control nuclei in the brain increase in size during mating season.[66] Among birds, changes in brain morphology to influence song patterns, frequency, and volume are common.[71] Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) immunoreactivity, or the reception of the hormone, is lowered in European starlings exposed to longer periods of light during the day.[62][63]

The California sea hare, a gastropod, has more successful inhibition of egg-laying hormones outside of mating season due to increased effectiveness of inhibitors in the brain.[64] Changes to the inhibitory nature of regions of the brain can also be found in humans and other mammals.[65] In the amphibian Bufo japonicus, part of the amygdala is larger before breeding and during hibernation than it is after breeding.[67]

Seasonal brain variation occurs within many mammals. Part of the hypothalamus of the common ewe is more receptive to GnRH during breeding season than at other times of the year.[68] Humans experience a change in the "size of the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus and vasopressin-immunoreactive neurons within it"[65] during the fall, when these parts are larger. In the spring, both reduce in size.[72]

Operation of brain-machine interfaces[edit]

Brain-machine interface (BMI) is a rapidly developing field of neuroscience that is relevant to neuroplasticity. According to the results obtained by Mikhail Lebedev, Miguel Nicolelis and their colleagues,[73] operation of BMIs results in incorporation of artificial actuators into brain representations. Studies of BMIs showed that modifications in the neuronal representation of the monkey's hand and the actuator that was controlled by the monkey brain occurred in multiple cortical areas while the monkey operated a BMI. In these single day experiments, monkeys initially moved the actuator by pushing a joystick. After mapping out the motor neuron ensembles, control of the actuator was switched to the model of the ensembles so that the brain activity, and not the hand, directly controlled the actuator. The activity of individual neurons and neuronal populations became less representative of the animal's hand movements while representing the movements of the actuator. Presumably as a result of this adaptation, the animals could eventually stop moving their hands yet continue to operate the actuator. Thus, during BMI control, cortical ensembles plastically adapt within tens of minutes, in order to represent behaviorally significant motor parameters, even if these are not associated with movements of the animal's own limb.

Active laboratory groups include those of John Donoghue at Brown, Richard Andersen at Caltech, Krishna Shenoy at Stanford, Nicholas Hatsopoulos of University of Chicago, Andy Schwartz at University of Pittsburgh, Sandro Mussa-Ivaldi at Northwestern and Miguel Nicolelis at Duke. Donoghue and Nicolelis' groups have independently shown that animals can control external interfaces in tasks requiring feedback, with models based on activity of cortical neurons, and that animals can adaptively change their brain's activity to make the models work better. Donoghue's group took the implants from Richard Normann's lab at Utah (the "Utah" array), and improved it by changing the insulation from polyimide to parylene-c, and commercialized it through the company Cyberkinetics. These efforts are the leading candidate for the first human trials on a broad scale for motor cortical implants to help quadriplegic or locked-in patients communicate with the outside world.

Traumatic brain injury research[edit]

Randy Nudo's group found that if a small stroke (an infarction) is induced by obstruction of blood flow to a portion of a monkey's motor cortex, the part of the body that responds by movement moves when areas adjacent to the damaged brain area are stimulated. In one study, intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) mapping techniques were used in nine normal monkeys. Some underwent ischemic-infarction procedures and the others, ICMS procedures. The monkeys with ischemic infarctions retained more finger flexion during food retrieval and after several months this deficit returned to preoperative levels.[74] With respect to the distal forelimb representation, "postinfarction mapping procedures revealed that movement representations underwent reorganization throughout the adjacent, undamaged cortex."[74] Understanding of interaction between the damaged and undamaged areas provides a basis for better treatment plans in stroke patients. Current research includes the tracking of changes that occur in the motor areas of the cerebral cortex as a result of a stroke. Thus, events that occur in the reorganization process of the brain can be ascertained. Nudo is also involved in studying the treatment plans that may enhance recovery from strokes, such as physiotherapy, pharmacotherapy, and electrical-stimulation therapy.

Jon Kaas, a professor at Vanderbilt University, has been able to show "how somatosensory area 3b and ventroposterior (VP) nucleus of the thalamus are affected by longstanding unilateral dorsal-column lesions at cervical levels in macaque monkeys."[75] Adult brains have the ability to change as a result of injury but the extent of the reorganization depends on the extent of the injury. His recent research focuses on the somatosensory system, which involves a sense of the body and its movements using many senses. Usually, damage of the somatosensory cortex results in impairment of the body perception. Kaas' research project is focused on how these systems (somatosensory, cognitive, motor systems) respond with plastic changes resulting from injury.[75]

One of the most recent applications of neuroplasticity involves work done by a team of doctors and researchers at Emory University, specifically Dr. Donald Stein[76] and Dr. David Wright. This is the first treatment in 40 years that has significant results in treating traumatic brain injuries while also incurring no known side effects and being cheap to administer.[18] Dr. Stein noticed that female mice seemed to recover from brain injuries better than male mice. Also in females, he noticed that at certain points in the estrus cycle females recovered even more. This difference can be attributed to different levels of progesterone. The higher the level of progesterone leads to the faster recovery from brain injury in mice.

History[edit]

Origin[edit]

The term "plasticity" was first applied to behavior in 1890 by William James in The Principles of Psychology.[77] The first person to use the term neural plasticity appears to have been the Polish neuroscientist Jerzy Konorski.[1][78]

In 1793, Italian anatomist Michele Vicenzo Malacarne described experiments in which he paired animals, trained one of the pair extensively for years, and then dissected both. He discovered that the cerebellums of the trained animals were substantially larger. But these findings were eventually forgotten.[79] The idea that the brain and its function are not fixed throughout adulthood was proposed in 1890 by William James in The Principles of Psychology, though the idea was largely neglected.[77] Until around the 1970s, neuroscientists believed that brain's structure and function was essentially fixed throughout adulthood.[80]

The term has since seen broadly applied:

Given the central importance of neuroplasticity, an outsider would be forgiven for assuming that it was well defined and that a basic and universal framework served to direct current and future hypotheses and experimentation. Sadly, however, this is not the case. While many neuroscientists use the word neuroplasticity as an umbrella term it means different things to different researchers in different subfields ... In brief, a mutually agreed upon framework does not appear to exist.[81]

Research and discovery[edit]

In 1923, Karl Lashley conducted experiments on rhesus monkeys that demonstrated changes in neuronal pathways, which he concluded were evidence of plasticity. Despite this, and other research that suggested plasticity took place, neuroscientists did not widely accept the idea of neuroplasticity.

In 1945, Justo Gonzalo concluded from his research of brain dynamics, that, contrary to the activity of the projection areas, the "central" cortical mass (more or less equidistant from the visual, tactile and auditive projection areas), would be a "maneuvering mass", rather unspecific or multisensory, with capacity to increase neural excitability and re-organize the activity by means of plasticity properties.[82] He gives as a first example of adaptation, to see upright with reversing glasses in the Stratton experiment,[83] and specially, several first-hand brain injuries cases in which he observed dynamic and adaptive properties in their disorders, in particular in the inverted perception disorder [e.g., see pp 260–62 Vol. I (1945), p 696 Vol. II (1950)].[82] He stated that a sensory signal in a projection area would be only an inverted and constricted outline that would be magnified due to the increase in recruited cerebral mass, and re-inverted due to some effect of brain plasticity, in more central areas, following a spiral growth.[84]

Significant evidence was produced in the 1960s and after, notably from scientists including Paul Bach-y-Rita, Michael Merzenich along with Jon Kaas, as well as several others.[80][85]

In the 1960s, Paul Bach-y-Rita invented a device that allowed blind people to read, perceive shadows, and distinguish between close and distant objects. This "machine was one of the first and boldest applications of neuroplasticity."[11] The patient sat in an electrically stimulated chair. Behind the chair, a large camera scanned the area, sending electrical signals of the image to four hundred vibrating stimulators on the chair against the patient's skin. The six experimental subjects eventually could recognize a picture of the fashion model Twiggy.[11]

It must be emphasized that these people were congenitally blind. Bach-y-Rita believed in sensory substitution; if one sense is damaged, your other senses can sometimes take over. He thought the skin and its touch receptors could act as a retina (using one sense for another[86]). For the brain to interpret tactile information and convert it into visual information, it must learn something new and adapt to the new signals. The brain's capacity to adapt implied that it possessed the capacity for plasticity. He thought, "We see with our brains, not with our eyes."[11]

A tragic stroke that left his father paralyzed inspired Bach-y-Rita to study brain rehabilitation. His brother, a physician, worked tirelessly to develop therapeutic measures that were so successful that the father recovered complete functionality by age 68, and was able to live a normal, active life that even included mountain climbing. "His father's story was firsthand evidence that a 'late recovery' could occur even with a massive lesion in an elderly person."[11] He found more evidence of this possible brain reorganization with Shepherd Ivory Franz's work.[87] One study involved stroke patients who were able to recover through the use of brain stimulating exercises after having been paralyzed for years. "Franz understood the importance of interesting, motivating rehabilitation: 'Under conditions of interest, such as that of competition, the resulting movement may be much more efficiently carried out than in the dull, routine training in the laboratory'(Franz, 1921, pg.93)."[88] This notion has led to motivational rehabilitation programs that are used today.

Eleanor Maguire documented changes in hippocampal structure associated with acquiring the knowledge of London's layout in local taxi drivers.[89][90][91] A redistribution of grey matter was indicated in London Taxi Drivers compared to controls. This work on hippocampal plasticity not only interested scientists, but also engaged the public and media world-wide.

Michael Merzenich is a neuroscientist who has been one of the pioneers of neuroplasticity for over three decades. He has made some of "the most ambitious claims for the field – that brain exercises may be as useful as drugs to treat diseases as severe as schizophrenia – that plasticity exists from cradle to the grave, and that radical improvements in cognitive functioning – how we learn, think, perceive, and remember are possible even in the elderly."[11] Merzenich's work was affected by a crucial discovery made by David Hubel and Torsten Wiesel in their work with kittens. The experiment involved sewing one eye shut and recording the cortical brain maps. Hubel and Wiesel saw that the portion of the kitten's brain associated with the shut eye was not idle, as expected. Instead, it processed visual information from the open eye. It was "…as though the brain didn't want to waste any 'cortical real estate' and had found a way to rewire itself."[11]

This implied neuroplasticity during the critical period. However, Merzenich argued that neuroplasticity could occur beyond the critical period. His first encounter with adult plasticity came when he was engaged in a postdoctoral study with Clinton Woosley. The experiment was based on observation of what occurred in the brain when one peripheral nerve was cut and subsequently regenerated. The two scientists micromapped the hand maps of monkey brains before and after cutting a peripheral nerve and sewing the ends together. Afterwards, the hand map in the brain that they expected to be jumbled was nearly normal. This was a substantial breakthrough. Merzenich asserted that, "If the brain map could normalize its structure in response to abnormal input, the prevailing view that we are born with a hardwired system had to be wrong. The brain had to be plastic."[11] Merzenich received the 2016 Kavli Prize in Neuroscience "for the discovery of mechanisms that allow experience and neural activity to remodel brain function."[92]

Notable studies[edit]

Hubel and Wiesel had demonstrated that ocular dominance columns in the lowest neocortical visual area, V1, remained largely immutable after the critical period in development.[93] Researchers also studied critical periods with respect to language; the resulting data suggested that sensory pathways were fixed after the critical period. However, studies determined that environmental changes could alter behavior and cognition by modifying connections between existing neurons and via neurogenesis in the hippocampus and in other parts of the brain, including in the cerebellum.[14]

Decades of research have shown that substantial changes occur in the lowest neocortical processing areas, and that these changes can profoundly alter the pattern of neuronal activation in response to experience. Neuroscientific research indicates that experience can actually change both the brain's physical structure (anatomy) and functional organization (physiology). As of 2014[citation needed], neuroscientists are engaged in a reconciliation of critical-period studies (demonstrating the immutability of the brain after development) with the more recent research showing how the brain can, and does, change in response to hitherto unsuspected stimuli.[94]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Livingston R.B. (1966). "Brain mechanisms in conditioning and learning". Neurosciences Research Program Bulletin. 4 (3): 349–354. 
  2. ^ a b Rakic, P. (January 2002). "Neurogenesis in adult primate neocortex: an evaluation of the evidence". Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 3 (1): 65–71. doi:10.1038/nrn700. PMID 11823806. 
  3. ^ Pascual-Leone A.; Amedi A.; Fregni F.; Merabet L. B. (2005). "The plastic human brain cortex". Annual Review of Neuroscience. 28: 377–401. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144216. 
  4. ^ a b Pascual-Leone A.; Freitas C.; Oberman L.; Horvath J. C.; Halko M.; Eldaief M.; et al. (2011). "Characterizing brain cortical plasticity and network dynamics across the age-span in health and disease with TMS-EEG and TMS-fMRI". Brain Topography. 24: 302–315. doi:10.1007/s10548-011-0196-8. 
  5. ^ Ganguly K, Poo MM (October 2013). "Activity-dependent neural plasticity from bench to bedside". Neuron. 80 (3): 729–741. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.028. PMID 24183023. 
  6. ^ Keller TA, Just MA (January 2016). "Structural and functional neuroplasticity in human learning of spatial routes". Neuroimage. 125: 256–266. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.015. PMID 26477660. Recent findings with both animals and humans suggest that decreases in microscopic movements of water in the hippocampus reflect short-term neuroplasticity resulting from learning. Here we examine whether such neuroplastic structural changes concurrently alter the functional connectivity between hippocampus and other regions involved in learning. ... These concurrent changes characterize the multidimensionality of neuroplasticity as it enables human spatial learning. 
  7. ^ a b Doidge, Norman (2007). The Brain that Changes Itself. Penguin Books. p. 22. 
  8. ^ Buonomano, Dean V.; Merzenich, Michael M. (March 1998). "CORTICAL PLASTICITY: From Synapses to Maps". Annual Review of Neuroscience. 21: 149–186. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.21.1.149. PMID 9530495. 
  9. ^ Merzenich, M.M.; Nelson, R.J.; Stryker, M.P.; Cynader, M.S.; Schoppmann, A.; Zook, J.M. (1984). "Somatosensory Cortical Map Changes Following Digit Amputation in Adult Monkeys". Journal of Comparative Neurology. 224 (4): 591–605. doi:10.1002/cne.902240408. PMID 6725633. 
  10. ^ Wall, J.T.; Xu, J.; Wang, X. (September 2002). "Human brain plasticity: an emerging view of the multiple substrates and mechanisms that cause cortical changes and related sensory dysfunctions after injuries of sensory inputs from the body". Brain Research Reviews. Elsevier Science B.V. 39 (2–3): 181–215. doi:10.1016/S0165-0173(02)00192-3. PMID 12423766. 
  11. ^ a b c d e f g h i Doidge, Norman (2007). The Brain That Changes Itself: Stories of Personal Triumph from the frontiers of brain science. New York: Viking. ISBN 978-0-670-03830-5. 
  12. ^ Interview with Merzenich, 2004
  13. ^ Draganski et al. "Temporal and Spatial Dynamics of Brain Structure Changes during Extensive Learning" The Journal of Neuroscience, 7 June 2006, 26(23):6314–6317
  14. ^ a b Ponti, Giovanna; Peretto, Paolo; Bonfanti, Luca; Reh, Thomas A. (2008). Reh, Thomas A., ed. "Genesis of Neuronal and Glial Progenitors in the Cerebellar Cortex of Peripuberal and Adult Rabbits". PLoS ONE. 3 (6): e2366. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002366. PMC 2396292Freely accessible. PMID 18523645. 
  15. ^ Young J. A., Tolentino M.; Tolentino (2011). "Neuroplasticity and its Applications for Rehabilitation". American Journal of Therapeutics. 18 (1): 70–80. doi:10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181e0f1a4. PMID 21192249. 
  16. ^ Traumatic Brain Injury (a story of TBI and the results of ProTECT using progesterone treatments) Emory University News Archives
  17. ^ Cutler, Sarah M.; Hoffman, Stuart W.; Pettus, Edward H.; Stein, Donald G. (October 2005). "Tapered progesterone withdrawal enhances behavioral and molecular recovery after traumatic brain injury". Experimental Neurology. Elsevier. 195 (2): 423–429. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.06.003. PMID 16039652. 
  18. ^ a b Stein, Donald. "Plasticity." Personal interview. Alyssa Walz. 19 November 2008.
  19. ^ Progesterone offers no significant benefit in traumatic brain injury clinical trial, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
  20. ^ Dominick M. Maino: Neuroplasticity: Teaching an Old Brain New Tricks, Review of Optometry, January 2009
  21. ^ Indu Vedamurthy; Samuel J. Huang; Dennis M. Levi; Daphne Bavelier; David C. Knill (27 December 2012). "Recovery of stereopsis in adults through training in a virtual reality task". Journal of Vision. 12 (14). doi:10.1167/12.14.53.  Article 53
  22. ^ Robert F. Hess; Benjamin Thompson (February 2013). "New insights into amblyopia: binocular therapy and noninvasive brain stimulation". Journal of AAPOS. 17 (1). pp. 89–93. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.10.018. 
  23. ^ a b Strong GK, Torgerson CJ, Torgerson D, Hulme C (Mar 2011). "A systematic meta-analytic review of evidence for the effectiveness of the 'Fast ForWord' language intervention program". J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 52 (3): 224–35. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02329.x. PMC 3061204Freely accessible. PMID 20950285. 
  24. ^ Simons DJ, Boot WR, Charness N, Gathercole SE, Chabris CF, Hambrick DZ, Stine-Morrow EA (2016). "Do "Brain-Training" Programs Work?" (PDF). Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 17 (3): 103–186. doi:10.1177/1529100616661983. 
  25. ^ Kral A, Sharma A; Sharma (2012). "Developmental Neuroplasticity after Cochlear Implantation". Trends Neurosci. 35 (2): 111–122. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2011.09.004. PMC 3561718Freely accessible. PMID 22104561. 
  26. ^ Kral A, O'Donoghue GM (2010). "Profound Deafness in Childhood". New England J Medicine. 363: 1438–50. doi:10.1056/nejmra0911225. 
  27. ^ Beaumont, Geneviève; Mercier, Pierre-Emmanuel; Malouin, Jackson (2011). "Decreasing phantom limb pain through observation of action and imagery: A case series". Pain Medicine. 12 (2): 289–299. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.01048.x. PMID 21276185. 
  28. ^ Flor H, Elbert T, Knecht S, Wienbruch C, Pantev C, Birbaumer N; Elbert; Knecht; Wienbruch; Pantev; Birbaumer; Larbig; Taub; et al. (1995). "Phantom-limb pain as a perceptual correlate of cortical reorganization following arm amputation". Nature. 375 (6531): 482–484. doi:10.1038/375482a0. PMID 7777055. 
  29. ^ Flor H, Cortical Reorganization And Chronic Pain: Implications For Rehabilitation, J Rehabil Med, 2003, Suppl.41:66–72
  30. ^ Moseley, Brugger, Interdependence of movement and anatomy persists when amputees learn a physiologically impossible movement of their phantom limb, PNAS, 16 September 2009,[1]
  31. ^ Seifert F.; Maihöfner C. (2011). "Functional and structural imaging of pain-induced neuroplasticity". Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 24: 515–523. doi:10.1097/aco.0b013e32834a1079. 
  32. ^ Maihöfner C.; Handwerker H.O.; Neundorfer B.; Birklein F. (2003). "Patterns of cortical reorganization in complex regional pain syndrome". Neurology. 61: 1707–1715. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000098939.02752.8e. 
  33. ^ Apkarian A.V., Sosa Y., Sonty S; Sosa; Sonty; Levy; Harden; Parrish; Gitelman; et al. (2004). "Chronic back pain is associated with decreased prefrontal and thalamic gray matter density". J Neurosci. 24 (46): 10410–10415. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2541-04.2004. PMID 15548656. 
  34. ^ Karl A., Birbaumer N., Lutzenberger W.; Birbaumer; Lutzenberger; Cohen; Flor; et al. (2001). "Reorganization of motor and somatosensory cortex in upper extremity amputees with phantom limb pain". J Neurosci. 21 (10): 3609–18. PMID 11331390. 
  35. ^ Flor H.; Braun C.; Elbert T.; et al. (1997). "Extensive reorganization of primary somatosensory cortex in chronic back pain patients". Neurosci Lett. 224: 5–8. doi:10.1016/s0304-3940(97)13441-3. 
  36. ^ Napadow V., Kettner N., Ryan A.; Kettner; Ryan; Kwong; Audette; Hui; et al. (2006). "Somatosensory cortical plasticity in carpal tunnel syndrome: a cross-sectional fMRI evaluation". NeuroImage. 31 (2): 520–530. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.017. PMID 16460960. 
  37. ^ Pagnoni, Giuseppe; Cekic, Milos (28 July 2007). "Age effects on gray matter volume and attentional performance in Zen meditation.". Neurobiology of Aging. 28 (10): 1623–1627. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.06.008. PMID 17655980. 
  38. ^ Vestergaard-Poulsen, Peter; van Beek, Martijn; Skewes, Joshua; Bjarkam, Carsten R; Stubberup, Michael; Bertelsen, Jes; Roepstorff, Andreas (28 January 2009). "Long-term meditation is associated with increased gray matter density in the brain stem.". NeuroReport. 20 (2): 170–174. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e328320012a. 
  39. ^ Luders, Eileen; Toga, Arthur W.; Lepore, Natasha; Gaser, Christian (14 January 2009). "The underlying anatomical correlates of long-term meditation: larger hippocampal and frontal volumes of gray matter.". NeuroImage. 45 (3): 672–678. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.061. 
  40. ^ Lazar, S.; Kerr, C.; Wasserman, R.; Gray, J.; Greve, D.; Treadway, Michael T.; McGarvey, Metta; Quinn, Brian T.; et al. (28 November 2005). "Meditation experience is associated with increased cortical thickness". NeuroReport. 16 (17): 1893–97. doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000186598.66243.19. PMC 1361002Freely accessible. PMID 16272874. 
  41. ^ Lutz, A.; Greischar, L.L.; Rawlings, N.B.; Ricard, M.; Davidson, R. J. (16 November 2004). "Long-term meditators self-induce high-amplitude gamma synchrony during mental practice". PNAS. 101 (46): 16369–73. doi:10.1073/pnas.0407401101. PMC 526201Freely accessible. PMID 15534199. Retrieved 8 July 2007. 
  42. ^ Sharon Begley (20 January 2007). "How Thinking Can Change the Brain". http://www.dalailama.com.  External link in |publisher= (help)
  43. ^ Davidson, Richard; Lutz, Antoine (January 2008). "Buddha's Brain: Neuroplasticity and Meditation" (PDF). IEEE Signal Processing Magazine. Archived from the original on 12 January 2012. 
  44. ^ Chris Frith (17 February 2007). "Stop meditating, start interacting". New Scientist. 
  45. ^ Tarumi T, Zhang R (January 2014). "Cerebral hemodynamics of the aging brain: risk of Alzheimer disease and benefit of aerobic exercise". Front Physiol. 5: 6. doi:10.3389/fphys.2014.00006. PMC 3896879Freely accessible. PMID 24478719. Exercise-related improvements in brain function and structure may be conferred by the concurrent adaptations in vascular function and structure. Aerobic exercise increases the peripheral levels of growth factors (e.g., BDNF, IFG-1, and VEGF) that cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and stimulate neurogenesis and angiogenesis (Trejo et al., 2001; Lee et al., 2002; Fabel et al., 2003; Lopez-Lopez et al., 2004). 
  46. ^ Szuhany KL, Bugatti M, Otto MW (October 2014). "A meta-analytic review of the effects of exercise on brain-derived neurotrophic factor". J Psychiatr Res. 60C: 56–64. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.10.003. PMC 4314337Freely accessible. PMID 25455510. Consistent evidence indicates that exercise improves cognition and mood, with preliminary evidence suggesting that brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) may mediate these effects. The aim of the current meta-analysis was to provide an estimate of the strength of the association between exercise and increased BDNF levels in humans across multiple exercise paradigms. We conducted a meta-analysis of 29 studies (N = 1111 participants) examining the effect of exercise on BDNF levels in three exercise paradigms: (1) a single session of exercise, (2) a session of exercise following a program of regular exercise, and (3) resting BDNF levels following a program of regular exercise. Moderators of this effect were also examined. Results demonstrated a moderate effect size for increases in BDNF following a single session of exercise (Hedges' g = 0.46, p < 0.001). Further, regular exercise intensified the effect of a session of exercise on BDNF levels (Hedges' g = 0.59, p = 0.02). Finally, results indicated a small effect of regular exercise on resting BDNF levels (Hedges' g = 0.27, p = 0.005). ... Effect size analysis supports the role of exercise as a strategy for enhancing BDNF activity in humans 
  47. ^ a b c d Gomez-Pinilla F, Hillman C (January 2013). "The influence of exercise on cognitive abilities". Compr Physiol. 3 (1): 403–428. doi:10.1002/cphy.c110063. PMC 3951958Freely accessible. PMID 23720292. 
  48. ^ a b c d e Erickson KI, Leckie RL, Weinstein AM (September 2014). "Physical activity, fitness, and gray matter volume". Neurobiol. Aging. 35 Suppl 2: S20–528. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.03.034. PMC 4094356Freely accessible. PMID 24952993. Retrieved 9 December 2014. 
  49. ^ a b c Erickson KI, Miller DL, Roecklein KA (2012). "The aging hippocampus: interactions between exercise, depression, and BDNF". Neuroscientist. 18 (1): 82–97. doi:10.1177/1073858410397054. PMC 3575139Freely accessible. PMID 21531985. 
  50. ^ Lees C, Hopkins J (2013). "Effect of aerobic exercise on cognition, academic achievement, and psychosocial function in children: a systematic review of randomized control trials". Prev Chronic Dis. 10: E174. doi:10.5888/pcd10.130010. PMC 3809922Freely accessible. PMID 24157077. 
  51. ^ Carvalho A, Rea IM, Parimon T, Cusack BJ (2014). "Physical activity and cognitive function in individuals over 60 years of age: a systematic review". Clin Interv Aging. 9: 661–682. doi:10.2147/CIA.S55520. PMC 3990369Freely accessible. PMID 24748784. 
  52. ^ Guiney H, Machado L (February 2013). "Benefits of regular aerobic exercise for executive functioning in healthy populations". Psychon Bull Rev. 20 (1): 73–86. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0345-4. PMID 23229442. 
  53. ^ Buckley J, Cohen JD, Kramer AF, McAuley E, Mullen SP (2014). "Cognitive control in the self-regulation of physical activity and sedentary behavior". Front Hum Neurosci. 8: 747. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00747. PMC 4179677Freely accessible. PMID 25324754. 
  54. ^ "Human Echolocation". Journal of Vision. 10 (7): 1050. 2010. doi:10.1167/10.7.1050. 
  55. ^ "Neural Correlates of Natural Human Echolocation in Early and Late Blind Echolocation Experts". PLOS ONE. 6: e20162. 2011. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020162. PMC 3102086Freely accessible. PMID 21633496. 
  56. ^ Thaler, L; Arnot, S.R.; Goodale, M.A (2011). "Neural correlates of natural human echolocation in early and late blind echolocation experts". Public Library of Science. 6 (5). 
  57. ^ Hart H, Radua J, Nakao T, Mataix-Cols D, Rubia K (February 2013). "Meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of inhibition and attention in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: exploring task-specific, stimulant medication, and age effects". JAMA Psychiatry. 70 (2): 185–198. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.277. PMID 23247506. 
  58. ^ Spencer TJ, Brown A, Seidman LJ, Valera EM, Makris N, Lomedico A, Faraone SV, Biederman J (September 2013). "Effect of psychostimulants on brain structure and function in ADHD: a qualitative literature review of magnetic resonance imaging-based neuroimaging studies". J. Clin. Psychiatry. 74 (9): 902–917. doi:10.4088/JCP.12r08287. PMC 3801446Freely accessible. PMID 24107764. 
  59. ^ Frodl T, Skokauskas N (February 2012). "Meta-analysis of structural MRI studies in children and adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder indicates treatment effects.". Acta psychiatrica Scand. 125 (2): 114–126. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2011.01786.x. PMID 22118249. Basal ganglia regions like the right globus pallidus, the right putamen, and the nucleus caudatus are structurally affected in children with ADHD. These changes and alterations in limbic regions like ACC and amygdala are more pronounced in non-treated populations and seem to diminish over time from child to adulthood. Treatment seems to have positive effects on brain structure. 
  60. ^ Urban KR, Gao WJ (December 2013). "Methylphenidate and the juvenile brain: enhancement of attention at the expense of cortical plasticity?". Med. Hypotheses. 81 (6): 988–994. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2013.09.009. PMC 3851931Freely accessible. PMID 24095262. 
  61. ^ Urban KR, Gao WJ (2014). "Performance enhancement at the cost of potential brain plasticity: neural ramifications of nootropic drugs in the healthy developing brain". Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8: 38. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00038. PMC 4026746Freely accessible. PMID 24860437. 
  62. ^ a b c Parry D.M.; et al. (1997). "Immunocytochemical localization of GnRH precursor in the hypothalamus of European starlings during sexual maturation and photorefractoriness". J. Neuroendocrinol. 9: 235–243. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2826.1997.00575.x. 
  63. ^ a b c D.M. Parry, A.R. Goldsmith Ultrastructural evidence for changes in synaptic input to the hypothalamic luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone neurons in photosensitive and photorefractory starlings J. Neuroendocrinol., 5 (1993), pp. 387–395
  64. ^ a b c Wayne N.L.; et al. (1998). "Seasonal fluctuations in the secretory response of neuroendocrine cells of Aplysia californica to inhibitors of protein kinase A and protein kinase C". Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 109: 356–365. doi:10.1006/gcen.1997.7040. 
  65. ^ a b c M.A. Hofman, D.F. Swaab "Seasonal changes in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of man Neurosci. Lett. 1992; 139 , pp. 257–260
  66. ^ a b c d F. Nottebohm A brain for all seasons: cyclical anatomical changes in song control nuclei of the canary brain Science, 214 (1981), pp. 1368–1370
  67. ^ a b Takami S.; Urano A. (1984). "The volume of the toad medial amygdala-anterior preoptic complex is sexually dimorphic and seasonally variable". Neurosci. Lett. 44: 253–258. doi:10.1016/0304-3940(84)90031-4. 
  68. ^ a b J.J. Xiong et al. Evidence for seasonal plasticity in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) system of the ewe: Changes in synaptic inputs onto GnRH neurons Endocrinology, 138 (1997), pp. 1240–1250
  69. ^ Barnea A.; Nottebohm F. (1994). "Seasonal recruitment of hippocampal neurons in adult free-ranging black-capped chickadees". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91: 11217–11221. doi:10.1073/pnas.91.23.11217. 
  70. ^ Smulders T.V.; et al. (1995). "Seasonal variation in hippocampal volume in a food-storing bird, the black-capped chickadee". J. Neurobiol. 27: 15–25. doi:10.1002/neu.480270103. 
  71. ^ Smith G.T. (1996). "Seasonal plasticity in the song nuclei of wild rufous-sided towhees". Brain Res. 734: 79–85. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(96)00613-0. 
  72. ^ Anthony D. Tramontin, Eliot A. Brenowitz "Seasonal plasticity in the adult brain. Trends in Neurosciences, Volume 23, Issue 6, 1 June 2000, Pages 251–258
  73. ^ Lebedev, Mikhail A.; Carmena, Jose M.; O'Doherty, Joseph E.; Zacksenhouse, Miriam; Henriquez, Craig S.; Principe, Jose C.; Nicolelis, Miguel A. L. (11 May 2005). "Cortical Ensemble Adaptation to Represent Velocity of an Artificial Actuator Controlled by a Brain-Machine Interface". The Journal of Neuroscience. 25 (19): 4681–4693. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4088-04.2005. PMID 15888644. Retrieved 31 January 2010. 
  74. ^ a b Frost, S.B.; Barbay, S.; Friel, K.M.; Plautz, E.J.; Nudo, R.J. (2003). "Reorganization of Remote Cortical Regions After Ischemic Brain Injury: A Potential Substrate for Stroke Recovery" (PDF). Journal of Neurophysiology. 89 (6): 3205–3214. doi:10.1152/jn.01143.2002. PMID 12783955. 
  75. ^ a b Jain, Neeraj; Qi, HX; Collins, CE; Kaas, JH (22 October 2008). "Large-Scale Reorganization in the Somatosensory Cortex and Thalamus after Sensory Loss in Macaque Monkeys". The Journal of Neuroscience. 28 (43): 11042–11060. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2334-08.2008. PMC 2613515Freely accessible. PMID 18945912. 
  76. ^ "Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering: BME Faculty". Bme.gatech.edu. Archived from the original on 2008-06-24. Retrieved 12 June 2010. 
  77. ^ a b "The Principles of Psychology", William James 1890, Chapter IV, Habits
  78. ^ LeDoux, Joseph E. (2002). Synaptic self: how our brains become who we are. New York, United States: Viking. p. 137. ISBN 0-670-03028-7. 
  79. ^ Rosenzweig, Mark R. (1996). "Aspects of the search for neural mechanisms of memory". Annual Review of Psychology. 47: 1–32. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.1. PMID 8624134. 
  80. ^ a b Meghan O'Rourke Train Your Brain 25 April 2007
  81. ^ Shaw, Christopher; McEachern, Jill, eds. (2001). Toward a theory of neuroplasticity. London, England: Psychology Press. ISBN 978-1-84169-021-6. 
  82. ^ a b Gonzalo, J. (1945, 1950, 1952, 2010). Dinámica Cerebral. Facsimil edition of Volumen I 1945 and Volumen II 1950 (Madrid: Inst. S. Ramón y Cajal, CSIC), Suplemento I 1952 (Trab. Inst. Cajal Invest. Biol.), first ed. Suplemento II 2010. Santiago de Compostela, Spain: Red Temática en Tecnologías de Computación Artificial/Natural (RTNAC) and Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (USC). ISBN 978-84-9887-458-7. Open Access. For a recent review in English see this article (Open Access).English translation of: Article of 1952 and Indexes of Vol. I (1945) and Vol. II (1950), Open Access.
  83. ^ Stratton G.M. (1896). "Some preliminary experiments on vision without inversion of the retinal image". Psychological Review. 3 (6): 611–7. doi:10.1037/h0072918. 
  84. ^ Gonzalo, J. (1952). "Las funciones cerebrales humanas según nuevos datos y bases fisiológicas. Una introducción a los estudios de Dinámica Cerebral". Trabajos del Inst. Cajal de Investigaciones Biológicas XLIV: pp. 95–157. [Facsimil edition as `Splemento I´ in Dinámica Cerebral (2010), Open Access. Complete English translation, Open Access.
  85. ^ Brain Science Podcast Episode #10, "Neuroplasticity"
  86. ^ "Wired Science . Video: Mixed Feelings". PBS. Retrieved 12 June 2010. 
  87. ^ "Shepherd Ivory Franz". Rkthomas.myweb.uga.edu. Archived from the original on 2012-02-03. Retrieved 12 June 2010. 
  88. ^ Colotla, Victor A.; Bach-y-Rita, Paul (2002). "Shepherd Ivory Franz: His contributions to neuropsychology and rehabilitation" (PDF). Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience. 2 (2): 141–148. doi:10.3758/CABN.2.2.141. Archived from the original on 1 March 2012. 
  89. ^ Maguire, E. A.; Frackowiak, R. S.; Frith, C. D. (1997). "Recalling routes around london: Activation of the right hippocampus in taxi drivers". The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 17 (18): 7103–7110. PMID 9278544. 
  90. ^ Woollett, K.; Maguire, E. A. (2011). "Acquiring "the Knowledge" of London's Layout Drives Structural Brain Changes". Current Biology. 21 (24): 2109–2114. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.11.018. PMC 3268356Freely accessible. PMID 22169537. 
  91. ^ Maguire, E. A.; Gadian, D. G.; Johnsrude, I. S.; Good, C. D.; Ashburner, J.; Frackowiak, R. S. J.; Frith, C. D. (2000). "Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 97 (8): 4398–4403. Bibcode:2000PNAS...97.4398M. doi:10.1073/pnas.070039597. PMC 18253Freely accessible. PMID 10716738. 
  92. ^ http://www.kavliprize.org/prizes-and-laureates/prizes/2016-kavli-prize-neuroscience
  93. ^ Hubel, D.H.; Wiesel, T.N. (1 February 1970). "The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens". The Journal of Physiology. 206 (2): 419–436. PMC 1348655Freely accessible. PMID 5498493. 
  94. ^ Bos, I; De Boever, P; Int Panis, L; Meeusen, R (August 2014). "Physical Activity, Air Pollution and the Brain". Sports Medicine. 44: 1505–18. doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0222-6. PMID 25119155. 

Further reading[edit]

Videos
Other readings
  • Chorost, Michael (2005). Rebuilt: how becoming part computer made me more human. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. ISBN 0-618-37829-4. 

External links[edit]