This article needs additional citations for verification. (December 2007) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
In mathematics and computer science, a canonical, normal, or standard form of a mathematical object is a standard way of presenting that object as a mathematical expression. The distinction between "canonical" and "normal" forms varies by subfield. In most fields, a canonical form specifies a unique representation for every object, while a normal form simply specifies its form, without the requirement of uniqueness.
More generally, for a class of objects on which an equivalence relation is defined, a canonical form consists in the choice of a specific object in each class. For example, Jordan normal form is a canonical form for matrix similarity, and the row echelon form is a canonical form, when one considers as equivalent a matrix and its left product by an invertible matrix.
In computer science, and more specifically in computer algebra, when representing mathematical objects in a computer, there are usually many different ways to represent the same object. In this context, a canonical form is a representation such that every object has a unique representation. Thus, the equality of two objects can easily be tested by testing the equality of their canonical forms. However canonical forms frequently depend on arbitrary choices (like ordering the variables), and this introduces difficulties for testing the equality of two objects resulting on independent computations. Therefore, in computer algebra, normal form is a weaker notion: A normal form is a representation such that zero is uniquely represented. This allows testing for equality by putting the difference of two objects in normal form.
Canonical form can also mean a differential form that is defined in a natural (canonical) way.
In computer science, data that has more than one possible representation can often be canonicalized into a completely unique representation called its canonical form. Putting something into canonical form is canonicalization.
- 1 Definition
- 2 Examples
- 2.1 Linear algebra
- 2.2 Classical logic
- 2.3 Functional analysis
- 2.4 Number theory
- 2.5 Algebra
- 2.6 Geometry
- 2.7 Mathematical notation
- 2.8 Set theory
- 2.9 Game theory
- 2.10 Proof theory
- 2.11 Rewriting systems
- 2.12 Lambda calculus
- 2.13 Dynamical systems
- 2.14 Graph theory
- 2.15 Differential forms
- 2.16 Computing
- 3 See also
- 4 Notes
- 5 References
Suppose we have some set S of objects, with an equivalence relation R. A canonical form is given by designating some objects of S to be "in canonical form", such that every object under consideration is equivalent to exactly one object in canonical form. In other words, the canonical forms in S represent the equivalence classes, once and only once. To test whether two objects are equivalent, it then suffices to test their canonical forms for equality. A canonical form thus provides a classification theorem and more, in that it not just classifies every class, but gives a distinguished (canonical) representative.
Formally, a canonicalization with respect to an equivalence relation R on a set S is a mapping c:S→S such that for all s, s1, s2 ∈ S:
- c(s) = c(c(s)) (idempotence),
- s1 R s2 if and only if c(s1) = c(s2) (decisiveness), and
- s R c(s) (representativeness).
Property 3 is redundant, it follows by applying 2 to 1.
In practical terms, one wants to be able to recognize the canonical forms. There is also a practical, algorithmic question to consider: how to pass from a given object s in S to its canonical form s*? Canonical forms are generally used to make operating with equivalence classes more effective. For example, in modular arithmetic, the canonical form for a residue class is usually taken as the least non-negative integer in it. Operations on classes are carried out by combining these representatives and then reducing the result to its least non-negative residue. The uniqueness requirement is sometimes relaxed, allowing the forms to be unique up to some finer equivalence relation, like allowing reordering of terms (if there is no natural ordering on terms).
A canonical form may simply be a convention, or a deep theorem.
For example, polynomials are conventionally written with the terms in descending powers: it is more usual to write x2 + x + 30 than x + 30 + x2, although the two forms define the same polynomial. By contrast, the existence of Jordan canonical form for a matrix is a deep theorem.
Note: in this section, "up to" some equivalence relation E means that the canonical form is not unique in general, but that if one object has two different canonical forms, they are E-equivalent.
|Objects||A is equivalent to B if:||Normal form||Notes|
|Normal matrices over the complex numbers||for some unitary matrix U||Diagonal matrices (up to reordering)||This is the Spectral theorem|
|Matrices over the complex numbers||for some unitary matrices U and V||Diagonal matrices with real positive entries (in descending order)||Singular value decomposition|
|Matrices over an algebraically closed field||for some invertible matrix P||Jordan normal form (up to reordering of blocks)|
|Matrices over an algebraically closed field||for some invertible matrix P||Weyr canonical form (up to reordering of blocks)|
|Matrices over a field||for some invertible matrix P||Frobenius normal form|
|Matrices over a principal ideal domain||for some invertible Matrices P and Q||Smith normal form||The equivalence is the same as allowing invertible elementary row and column transformations|
|Finite-dimensional vector spaces over a field K||A and B are isomorphic as vector spaces||, n a non-negative integer|
- Negation normal form
- Conjunctive normal form
- Disjunctive normal form
- Algebraic normal form
- Prenex normal form
- Skolem normal form
- Blake canonical form, also known as the complete sum of prime implicants, the complete sum, or the disjunctive prime form
|Objects||A is equivalent to B if:||Normal form|
|Hilbert spaces||If A and B are both separable Hilbert spaces of infinite dimension, then A and B are isometrically isomorphic.||sequence spaces (up to exchanging the index set I with another index set of the same cardinality)|
|Commutative -algebras with unit||A and B are isomorphic as -algebras||The algebra of continuous functions on a compact Hausdorff space, up to homeomorphism of the base space.|
|Objects||A is equivalent to B if:||Normal form|
|Finitely generated R-modules with R a principal ideal domain||A and B are isomorphic as R-modules||Primary decomposition (up to reordering) or invariant factor decomposition|
- The equation of a line: Ax + By = C, with A2 + B2 = 1 and C ≥ 0
- The equation of a circle:
By contrast, there are alternative forms for writing equations. For example, the equation of a line may be written as a linear equation in point-slope and slope-intercept form.
- All faces are flat,
- All edges are tangent to the unit sphere, and
- The centroid of the polyhedron is at the origin.
Standard form is used by many mathematicians and scientists to write extremely large numbers in a more concise and understandable way.
- In an abstract rewriting system a normal form is an irreducible object.
- A lambda term is in beta normal form if no beta reduction is possible; lambda calculus is a particular case of an abstract rewriting system. In the untyped lambda calculus, e.g., the term doesn't have a normal form. In the typed lambda calculus, every well-formed term can be rewritten to its normal form.
In graph theory, a branch of mathematics, graph canonization is the problem finding a canonical form of a given graph G. A canonical form is a labeled graph Canon(G) that is isomorphic to G, such that every graph that is isomorphic to G has the same canonical form as G. Thus, from a solution to the graph canonization problem, one could also solve the problem of graph isomorphism: to test whether two graphs G and H are isomorphic, compute their canonical forms Canon(G) and Canon(H), and test whether these two canonical forms are identical.
In computing, the reduction of data to any kind of canonical form is commonly called data normalization.
In the field of software security, a common vulnerability is unchecked malicious input. The mitigation for this problem is proper input validation. Before input validation may be performed, the input must be normalized, i.e., eliminating encoding (for instance HTML encoding) and reducing the input data to a single common character set.