From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In algebraic topology the cap product is a method of adjoining a chain of degree p with a cochain of degree q , such that q ≤ p , to form a composite chain of degree p − q . It was introduced by Eduard Čech in 1936, and independently by Hassler Whitney in 1938.
Definition [ edit ]
Let X be a topological space and R a coefficient ring. The cap product is a bilinear map on singular homology and cohomology
⌢
:
H
p
(
X
;
R
)
×
H
q
(
X
;
R
)
→
H
p
−
q
(
X
;
R
)
.
{\displaystyle \frown \;:H_{p}(X;R)\times H^{q}(X;R)\rightarrow H_{p-q}(X;R).}
defined by contracting a singular chain
σ
:
Δ
p
→
X
{\displaystyle \sigma :\Delta \ ^{p}\rightarrow \ X}
with a singular cochain
ψ
∈
C
q
(
X
;
R
)
,
{\displaystyle \psi \in C^{q}(X;R),}
by the formula:
σ
⌢
ψ
=
ψ
(
σ
|
[
v
0
,
…
,
v
q
]
)
σ
|
[
v
q
,
…
,
v
p
]
.
{\displaystyle \sigma \frown \psi =\psi (\sigma |_{[v_{0},\ldots ,v_{q}]})\sigma |_{[v_{q},\ldots ,v_{p}]}.}
Here, the notation
σ
|
[
v
0
,
…
,
v
q
]
{\displaystyle \sigma |_{[v_{0},\ldots ,v_{q}]}}
indicates the restriction of the simplicial map
σ
{\displaystyle \sigma }
to its face spanned by the vectors of the base, see Simplex .
Interpretation [ edit ]
In analogy with the interpretation of the cup product in terms of the Künneth formula , we can explain the existence of the cap product in the following way. Using CW approximation we may assume that
X
{\displaystyle X}
is a CW-complex and
C
∙
(
X
)
{\displaystyle C_{\bullet }(X)}
(and
C
∙
(
X
)
{\displaystyle C^{\bullet }(X)}
) is the complex of its cellular chains (or cochains, respectively). Consider then the composition
C
∙
(
X
)
⊗
C
∙
(
X
)
⟶
Δ
∗
⊗
I
d
C
∙
(
X
)
⊗
C
∙
(
X
)
⊗
C
∙
(
X
)
⟶
I
d
⊗
ε
C
∙
(
X
)
{\displaystyle C_{\bullet }(X)\otimes C^{\bullet }(X){\overset {\Delta _{*}\otimes \mathrm {Id} }{\longrightarrow }}C_{\bullet }(X)\otimes C_{\bullet }(X)\otimes C^{\bullet }(X){\overset {\mathrm {Id} \otimes \varepsilon }{\longrightarrow }}C_{\bullet }(X)}
where we are taking
tensor products of chain complexes ,
Δ
:
X
→
X
×
X
{\displaystyle \Delta \colon X\to X\times X}
is the
diagonal map which induces the map
Δ
∗
:
C
∙
(
X
)
→
C
∙
(
X
×
X
)
≅
C
∙
(
X
)
⊗
C
∙
(
X
)
{\displaystyle \Delta _{*}\colon C_{\bullet }(X)\to C_{\bullet }(X\times X)\cong C_{\bullet }(X)\otimes C_{\bullet }(X)}
on the chain complex, and
ε
:
C
p
(
X
)
⊗
C
q
(
X
)
→
Z
{\displaystyle \varepsilon \colon C_{p}(X)\otimes C^{q}(X)\to \mathbb {Z} }
is the
evaluation map (always 0 except for
p
=
q
{\displaystyle p=q}
).
This composition then passes to the quotient to define the cap product
⌢
:
H
∙
(
X
)
×
H
∙
(
X
)
→
H
∙
(
X
)
{\displaystyle \frown \colon H_{\bullet }(X)\times H^{\bullet }(X)\to H_{\bullet }(X)}
, and looking carefully at the above composition shows that it indeed takes the form of maps
⌢
:
H
p
(
X
)
×
H
q
(
X
)
→
H
p
−
q
(
X
)
{\displaystyle \frown \colon H_{p}(X)\times H^{q}(X)\to H_{p-q}(X)}
, which is always zero for
p
<
q
{\displaystyle p<q}
.
Relation with Poincaré duality [ edit ]
For a closed orientable n-manifold M, we can define its fundamental class
[
M
]
{\displaystyle [M]}
as a generator of
H
n
(
M
)
{\displaystyle H_{n}(M)}
, and then the cap product map
H
k
(
M
)
→
H
n
−
k
(
M
)
,
α
→
[
M
]
∩
α
{\displaystyle H^{k}(M)\to H_{n-k}(M),\alpha \to [M]\cap \alpha }
gives Poincaré duality. This also holds for (co)homology with coefficient in some other ring
R
{\displaystyle R}
.
The slant product [ edit ]
If in the above discussion one replaces
X
×
X
{\displaystyle X\times X}
by
X
×
Y
{\displaystyle X\times Y}
, the construction can be (partially) replicated starting from the mappings
C
∙
(
X
×
Y
)
⊗
C
∙
(
Y
)
≅
C
∙
(
X
)
⊗
C
∙
(
Y
)
⊗
C
∙
(
Y
)
⟶
I
d
⊗
ε
C
∙
(
X
)
{\displaystyle C_{\bullet }(X\times Y)\otimes C^{\bullet }(Y)\cong C_{\bullet }(X)\otimes C_{\bullet }(Y)\otimes C^{\bullet }(Y){\overset {\mathrm {Id} \otimes \varepsilon }{\longrightarrow }}C_{\bullet }(X)}
and
C
∙
(
X
×
Y
)
⊗
C
∙
(
Y
)
≅
C
∙
(
X
)
⊗
C
∙
(
Y
)
⊗
C
∙
(
Y
)
⟶
I
d
⊗
ε
C
∙
(
X
)
{\displaystyle C^{\bullet }(X\times Y)\otimes C_{\bullet }(Y)\cong C^{\bullet }(X)\otimes C^{\bullet }(Y)\otimes C_{\bullet }(Y){\overset {\mathrm {Id} \otimes \varepsilon }{\longrightarrow }}C^{\bullet }(X)}
to get, respectively, slant products
/
{\displaystyle /}
:
H
p
(
X
×
Y
;
R
)
⊗
H
q
(
Y
;
R
)
→
H
p
−
q
(
X
;
R
)
{\displaystyle H_{p}(X\times Y;R)\otimes H^{q}(Y;R)\rightarrow H_{p-q}(X;R)}
and
H
p
(
X
×
Y
;
R
)
⊗
H
q
(
Y
;
R
)
→
H
p
−
q
(
X
;
R
)
.
{\displaystyle H^{p}(X\times Y;R)\otimes H_{q}(Y;R)\rightarrow H^{p-q}(X;R).}
In case X = Y , the first one is related to the cap product by the diagonal map:
Δ
∗
(
a
)
/
ϕ
=
a
⌢
ϕ
{\displaystyle \Delta _{*}(a)/\phi =a\frown \phi }
.
These ‘products’ are in some ways more like division than multiplication, which is reflected in their notation.
Equations [ edit ]
The boundary of a cap product is given by :
∂
(
σ
⌢
ψ
)
=
(
−
1
)
q
(
∂
σ
⌢
ψ
−
σ
⌢
δ
ψ
)
.
{\displaystyle \partial (\sigma \frown \psi )=(-1)^{q}(\partial \sigma \frown \psi -\sigma \frown \delta \psi ).}
Given a map f the induced maps satisfy :
f
∗
(
σ
)
⌢
ψ
=
f
∗
(
σ
⌢
f
∗
(
ψ
)
)
.
{\displaystyle f_{*}(\sigma )\frown \psi =f_{*}(\sigma \frown f^{*}(\psi )).}
The cap and cup product are related by :
ψ
(
σ
⌢
φ
)
=
(
φ
⌣
ψ
)
(
σ
)
{\displaystyle \psi (\sigma \frown \varphi )=(\varphi \smile \psi )(\sigma )}
where
σ
:
Δ
p
+
q
→
X
{\displaystyle \sigma :\Delta ^{p+q}\rightarrow X}
,
ψ
∈
C
q
(
X
;
R
)
{\displaystyle \psi \in C^{q}(X;R)}
and
φ
∈
C
p
(
X
;
R
)
.
{\displaystyle \varphi \in C^{p}(X;R).}
An interesting consequence of the last equation is that it makes
H
∗
(
X
;
R
)
{\displaystyle H_{\ast }(X;R)}
into a right
H
∗
(
X
;
R
)
−
{\displaystyle H^{\ast }(X;R)-}
module .
See also [ edit ]
References [ edit ]