Carmichele v Minister of Safety & Security
The Constitutional Court, in Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security and Another (Centre for Applied Legal Studies Intervening), an important case in South African criminal, delict and constitutional law, found that the State could be held delictually liable for damages arising out of the unlawful omissions of its servants. In casu, the conduct of the police and a prosecutor had resulted in the release of a person, charged with rape, on his own recognisance. This person had subsequently assaulted the complainant.
CR Snyman, for one, has noted the court's emphasis on section 39(2) of the Constitution, which provides that "every court [...] must promote the spirit, purport and objects of the Bill of Rights." This, he argues, "may perhaps one day open the way for holding an individual police officer liable for a crime such as culpable homicide flowing from her negligent omission to protect a person from the real possibility of harm."
- Burchell, J. Principles of Criminal Law. 3 ed. Juta and Company Ltd, 2004.
- Snyman, CR. Criminal Law. 5 ed. LexisNexis, 2008.
- Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security and Another (Center for Applied Legal Studies Intervening) 2001 (4) SA 938 (CC).
- Snyman 61n, recommending a consultation of Burchell 196-205.
|This article relating to case law in South Africa is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|