Carolinas–Virginia Tube Reactor
|Carolinas-Virginia Tube Reactor|
The Parr Nuclear Plant as it appeared when it was operational during the 1960s.(This is a mirror image of the plant's layout)
|Location||Fairfield County, near Jenkinsville, South Carolina|
|Construction began||January 1, 1960|
|Commission date||December 18, 1963|
|Decommission date||January 10, 1967|
|Operator(s)||Carolinas Virginia Nuclear Power Associates|
|Nuclear power station|
|Units decommissioned||1 x 17 MWe|
Carolinas–Virginia Tube Reactor (CVTR), also known as Parr Nuclear Station, was an experimental pressurized tube heavy water nuclear power reactor at Parr, South Carolina in Fairfield County. It was built and operated by the Carolinas Virginia Nuclear Power Associates.
Construction started on January 1, 1960. The CVTR was built to test the concept of a heavy water moderated and cooled pressurized tube reactor for civilian power. It was the first US heavy water power reactor. It was operated by the Carolinas Virginia Nuclear Power Associates, which was a consortium of the following utilities: Carolina Power & Light Company, Duke Power Company, South Carolina Electric & Gas Company (SCE&G), and Virginia Electric and Power Company
Design of the CVTR began around 1955. CVTR had a thermal output of about 65 MWth and a gross electrical output of 19 MW. Westinghouse Atomic Power Division was responsible for the design of the nuclear systems while Stone and Webster Engineering designed the remainder of the plant.
The reactor consisted of 36 vertical U-tube fuel channels in a moderator tank which was 10 feet in diameter and 16 feet tall. Each leg of the U-tube contained one fuel assembly made up of 19 fuel rods. The reactor used enriched uranium; 12 of the tubes contained fuel enriched to 1.5% U-235 and 24 tubes contained fuel enriched to 2% U-235.
During power operation, heavy water was circulated by primary pumps through the U-tubes containing the fuel assemblies which heated the water. The heated water then flowed through an inverted U-tube steam generator where the heat was transferred to the secondary side light water which turned to steam. The steam flowed to an oil-fired superheater which increased the steam quality before the steam entered the turbine which spun the electrical generator. After passing through the steam generator, the primary loop water was pumped back to the reactor by the primary pumps to repeat the cycle. The primary loop heavy water was pressurized to ensure that the heavy water remained liquid and did not flash to steam at any point in the loop.
The U-shaped pressure tubes containing the fuel were thermally isolated from the hot fuel assembly by two circular thermal baffle tubes around the fuel assembly. This allowed the pressure tubes to operate at low temperatures, essentially that of the moderator tank which was maintained about 155 degrees F and close to atmospheric pressure. The moderator tank contained heavy water which moderated the fission process during operation of the reactor.
The CVTR containment design was a new concept at the time; the general design later became the prevalent design for pressurized water reactor containments in the United States. Designed by Stone and Webster Engineering, the design was focused on not allowing any leakage of radioactive gases or material following an accident. The containment design featured a flat concrete foundation, cylindrical walls, and a hemispherical dome, all with an airtight 1/2" or 1/4" (depending on location) steel plate welded liner. The containment was constructed of reinforced concrete. From the basement floor to the interior surface of the top of the dome measured 114’-2”. The vertical walls were 2’-0” thick, the cylindrical structure had an interior diameter of 58’-0”, and the dome had a slightly larger interior radius of 29’-4”.
Harry Ferguson, General Manager (initial); Mayhue Bell (later) Walt Selkinghouse, Plant Superintendent Paul Barton, Operations Supervisor Shift Supervisors: James Wright; Pete Beament; Stan Nabow; J. Ed Smith Shift Nuclear Engineers: Sam McManus; Doug Simpson; Larry Smith; J.M.McGough Health Physicist: Lionel Lewis Construction Supervisor: Bill Thomas Engineering Supervisor: Shep Waggoner
Test facility use
Following decommissioning of the CVTR, the facility was used for conducting large scale tests to provide experimental information on the response of containment structures to severe events. In the late 1960s, three tests were conducted in which large volumes of steam from the nearby coal-fired power plant was suddenly released into the CVTR Containment and the response of the plant measured. The results of these experiments were later used for the development and validation of computer model codes.
The much larger and currently operational Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Generating Station was constructed in the 1970s, and began operating in 1984, approximately three miles north of the CVTR.
- . IAEA. 2013-04-13 http://www.iaea.org/PRIS/CountryStatistics/ReactorDetails.aspx?current=600. Retrieved 2013-04-14. Missing or empty
- "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-04-13. Retrieved 2007-03-25.CS1 maint: Archived copy as title (link) Heavy Water Reactors: Status and Projected Development; Technical Reports Series No. 407. International Atomic Energy Agency; Vienna, 2002.
-  Crandall, J. L. et al. Lattice studies and critical experiments in D2O moderated systems. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy. Geneva. 1964. NRC ADAMS ascension number ML051680328
-  Okrent, David. On the History of the Evolution of Light Water Reactor Safety in the United States. NRC ADAMS ascension number ML090630275
-  Tills, Jack, et al. SAND2008-1224 An Assessment of MELCOR 1.8.6: Design Basis Accident Tests of the Carolinas Virginia Tube Reactor (CVTR) Containment (Including Selected Separate Effects Tests); Sandia National Laboratories, February 2008. NRC ADAMS ascension number ML080840322
- Heavy Water Reactors: Status and Projected Development, IAEA Technical Report No. 407 CVTR is described on pp. 52 – 55.
- Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants