Catchiness is how easy it is for one to remember a song, tune or phrase. It is often taken into account when writing songs, catchphrases, advertising slogans, jingles etc. Alternatively, it can be defined as how difficult it is for one to forget it. Songs that embody high levels of remembrance or catchiness are literally known as "catchy songs" or "earworms". While it is hard to scientifically explain what makes a song catchy, there are many documented techniques that recur throughout catchy music, such as repetition, hooks and alliteration. Selling Sounds: The Commercial Revolution in American Music says that "although there was no definition for what made a song catchy, all the songwriting guides agreed that simplicity and familiarity were vital".
The physical symptoms of listening to a catchy song include "running [it] over in our heads or tapping a foot". According to Todd Tremlin, catchy music "spread[s] because [it] resonates similarly from one mind to the next".
In an article written by psychologist Tom Stafford for BBC, the psychology of "earworms" (catchy songs) is discussed. These songs are referred to as earworms due to their parasitic characteristics; their entrance and exit from our mind cannot be controlled and despite our best efforts they may refuse to leave. In that aspect, catchiness, depending on how digestible the music is to the listener, has a level of annoyance unlike anything else. In this article Stafford reviews the work of neurologist Oliver Sacks and the conclusion by Sacks that this catchiness is due to the inherent repetitiveness of popular music, which can affect our ability to remember a song. It is concluded that since memory is powerfully affected by repetition that this could be a significant contributing factor to catchiness, though certainly not the only aspect. A song's catchiness may also be due to the auditory "slave system" of our inner ear, much like the visual slave system of our "mind's eye." 
Often, a song with few qualities can still become immensely popular due to its catchiness. According to T.C.W. Blanning: "I would sacrifice everything – rhyme, reason, sense, and sentiment to catchiness. There is... a very great art in making rubbish acceptable". A Billboard review explains that "any lack of originality (in the album The Remote Part) is more than made up for by the... catchiness of the musical arrangement"
In response to the 2011 song "Call Me Maybe", which has been identified as a very catchy song, an article by ABC News listed some of its "catchiness factors." The article explains that it has a chorus which is "melodically easy on the ear, simple enough to stay in your head all day, and is topically appealing to Jepsen’s target pop demographic." It also briefly describes the concept of musical incongruity and its use within the song. In music, incongruity refers to the inclusion of varied or irregular musical and lyrical features, such as mispronounced words or unexpected syllable accentuation. These incongruities are intended to capture the listener's attention and to preserve their level of interest throughout the song, regardless of the simple and otherwise repetitive lyrical content. Songwriter/producer Eve Nelson was quoted saying, "a five-year-old could probably sing this, because it’s just so easy." As well as having lyrical hooks, the music itself can also be considered a hook.
Musicologist Dr. Alison Pawley and psychologist Dr. Daniel Mullensiefen identified the following as factors of a song being catchy:
- Longer and detailed musical phrases.
- Higher number of pitches in the chorus hook.
- Male vocalists
- Higher male voices with noticeable vocal effort
A 2014 study by the University of Amsterdam and the Museum of Science and Industry in Manchester found "Wannabe" by the Spice Girls to be the catchiest pop song of the last 60 years in the UK. The study found that having a simple and relentless melody was the key to a song being "catchy". "We found, much to our surprise, that writing a very surprising and unusual hook is not the recipe for long term memorability,” musicologist Dr John Ashley Burgoyne explained. “Actually, the more conventional your melody in terms of the interval patterns that you use; in terms of the rhythms that you use, the easier the song is to remember over the long term. What makes Wannabe work so well is that it isn’t a difficult song to sing, it has a conventional melody that repeats itself a lot, and it’s just relentless.”
- "Earworm". Dictionary (definition) (online ed.). Merriam-Webster. Retrieved 6 May 2013.
- Suisman, David, Selling Sounds: The Commercial Revolution in American Music, Google Books, p. 49.
- Bogost, Ian. How to Do Things with Videogames. p. 133. Retrieved September 23, 2012.
- Tremlin, Todd. Minds and Gods:The Cognitive Foundations of Religion. p. 195. Retrieved September 23, 2012.
- Stafford, Tom (April 11, 2012). "Earworms: Why catchy tunes get trapped in our heads". BBC News. Retrieved May 10, 2013.
- Blanning, TCW. The Triumph of Music: The Rise of Composers, Musicians and Their Art. p. 164. Retrieved September 23, 2012.
- Billboard. April 5, 2003. p. 37. Retrieved September 23, 2012.
- Sher, Lauren (June 22, 2012). "Why ‘Call Me Maybe’ Is So Catchy". ABC News. Retrieved September 23, 2012.
- Puiu, Tibi (3 October 2011). "What makes a song ‘catchy’ – science explains". ZME Science. Retrieved 13 February 2015.
- "'Wannabe' by the Spice Girls Is the Catchiest Song, Study Says". Time. 3 November 2014. Retrieved 1 April 2017.
- "Why Spice Girls' Wannabe is the catchiest song of all time". BBC. 8 July 2016. Retrieved 22 February 2017.
- Probing Question: What makes a song catchy?, PSU, 2006-06-05.
- "Science Determines the 10 Catchiest Songs of All Time — also, science is sexist", Seriously random lists, Pajiba.
- How tunes get stuck in your head, UK: The BBC.
- "Catchiest, Most Annoying Songs that burrow into your brains & make you want to die", Top Ten, May 2009.
- How To Write a Catchy Song Title (PDF), Vince core zine.