Category talk:Logic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Philosophy (Rated Category-class)
WikiProject icon This category is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
Category page Category  This category does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 

Mathematics[edit]

See Talk:Logic#Mathematics.

Should we have Category:Formal logic?[edit]

Note the prior discussion on Category talk:Formal logic

User:Isaac_Rabinovitch and myself are involved in a dispute over whether we should have a Category:Formal logic, following my failed attempt to put it up for Categories for Deletion. I'll put my argument here; Isaac will, I assume, follow shortly.

The problems with the category are:

  1. Logic is an integral whole, where topics in formal and informal logic closely mirror each other, and it helps navigation to see similar topics side by side;
  2. Many topics in logic do not neatly divide into formal and informal, but instead treat the two side-by-side. If we have a subcategory formal logic, should these mixed topics go in or not? Since it is not a clean criterion for division we are best not using it for breaking up the logic category;
  3. As far as possible subcategories should be orthogonal to each other. Formal logic cuts across many subcategories (eg. Category:Modal logic, Category:Paradoxes, and Category:Philosophical logic) raising more issues of classification that will not be obvious to the user;
  4. Since the category does not help classification, it's main effect would be to add degrees of remoteness between related subjects.

Hence I think we would be better off without such a category. --- Charles Stewart 18:42, 20 May 2005 (UTC)

  • Suprise suprise, I've come around to Charles's POV. I don't agree with all his arguments (in particular, I don't accept any of the argument in his CfD nomination). I even disagree with a lot of what he says on this page. But he raises one big point here I can't rebut: it's too hard to come up with a useful category subtree that cleanly separates formalistic topics from the rest of them. So for that reason alone, I'm accepting the demise of Category:Formal logic. Resubmit the CfD (be sure to reference this page), and I'll support it this time. ----Isaac R 19:08, 20 May 2005 (UTC)

Oh my, we have consensus. I've resubmitted the page on Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 May 20#Category:Formal logic --- Charles Stewart 19:40, 20 May 2005 (UTC)

Category:Mathematical logic[edit]

I think a bunch of articles in Category:Logic (but not all of them) belong rather in Category:Mathematical logic. I tried to move some of them, but ran out of breadth. Any help would be appreciated. Oleg Alexandrov 02:03, 3 August 2005 (UTC)