Celtic warfare

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Replicas of Celtic warrior's garments. In the museum Kelten-Keller Rodheim-Bieber, Germany.

Celtic Warfare was the type of warfare practiced by the various Celtic peoples and tribes, from Classical antiquity through the Migration period. No Celtic group employed a regular military as we would understand it today. Organization was varied from group to group and was usually structured according to clan groupings and social class. Historical Celtic groups included the Belgae, Boii, Britons, Caledonians, Celtiberians, Gaels, Gauls, Gallaeci, Galatians, Helvetii, Lepontii, Noricum, the Picts and all their offshoots through descent, diffusion, migration and Celticisation.

Endemic warfare appears to have been a regular feature and an important aspect of life in the various Celtic societies. Celtic tribes and peoples often fought amongst each other; sometimes they allied themselves with the Romans, Greeks, Etruscans, Macedonians, Germanic peoples and various other peoples against each other and against other Celtic groups. The organizational structure of Celtic tribes and societies varied greatly from group to group. With some having a strict hierarchical structure and others exhibiting representational organizational structures similar to that of a Republic.

Archaeology provides much information regarding the material culture of the Celts, but the significance of these finds in determining how the ancient Celts actually fought is the subject of much speculation.

Mythological[edit]

"Cuchulain in Battle", illustration by J. C. Leyendecker in T. W. Rolleston's Myths & Legends of the Celtic Race, 1911

The Celtic and Irish mythological heroic cycles were committed to writing in the medieval period, some time after the pre-Christian era they are supposed to depict. The Welsh Mabinogion dates from roughly the same era. Champion warfare was an important aspect of Celtic mythology and culture. The Táin Bó Cúailnge, chiefly the story of the Ulster hero Cú Chulainn, who defeats an entire army from Connacht one by one in single combat. This story describes combat centered on the use of the spear (gae) and javelin (gá-ín) with no mention of helmets or metal armor, which is consistent and in keeping with archaeological evidence. Chariots also played an important role in the warfare and culture of various Celtic groups, with Chariot burials being an important and unifying aspect of Celtic cultures such as the Hallstatt culture, La Tène culture, Gallic and Brittonic cultures; no remains of these vehicles from the period have yet been discovered in Ireland.[1]

Tribal warfare[edit]

La Tène era Celtic sword and scabbard circa 60 BC.

Celtic tribes and peoples fought amongst each other; sometimes they allied themselves with the Romans, Greeks, Etruscans, Macedonians, Germanic peoples and various other peoples against each other and against other Celtic groups. The organizational structure of Celtic tribes and societies varied greatly with some groups having a strict tribal hierarchical structure and others exhibiting the organizational structures of a Republic, especially by the time of the Gallic Wars. [2]

Endemic warfare appears to have been a regular feature of Celtic societies. While epic literature depicts this as more of a sport focused on raids and hunting rather than an organized territorial conquest, the historical record is more of different groups using warfare to exert political control and harass rivals, for economic advantage, and in some instances to conquer territory.

Archaeology provides much information regarding the material culture of the Celts, especially that of the La Tène culture and Hallstatt culture but the significance of these finds in determining how the ancient Celts actually fought is the subject of much speculation and debate. It was long thought, for instance, that the Celts were headhunters, but recent research from France has indicated that it may have been the heads of slain allies that were collected to be placed in porticos, while the defeated were dumped in mass graves, their weapons ritually broken.[3]

Hallstatt Cultures 1200 BC to 450 BC[edit]

The Hallstatt Culture is the earliest to be identified as associated with Celtic culture, spreading from north of the Alps west into France, Southern Britain and the Iberian Peninsula. The earlier phases of the Hallstatt era fall into the Bronze Age. Swords seem to have been the primary weapon from this period, perhaps indicating that warfare was a relatively small scale affair, possibly between groups of elite warriors.

Antenna swords of the Hallstatt B period (c. 10th century BC), found near Lake Neuchâtel (in Auvernier and Cortaillod; Laténium inv. nr. AUV-40315 and CORT-216, respectively)

In the latter phases of the Hallstatt era, iron began to replace bronze in the manufacture of weapons, and the classic "Celtic sword" with its leaf-bladed design made its appearance. Chariot burials are also characteristic of the period; it is possible that they also served a function in the warfare of this age, but the chariots are four-wheeled vehicles and they do not occur at all in Britain until the La Tène period.[4]

At the very end of the Hallstatt era, the longsword seemed to fall out of favor, ousted by shorter, thrusting daggers which are found in greater numbers among grave goods in high status burials.[5]

La Tène Culture 450 BC to 50 BC[edit]

The La Tène Period saw changing patterns of warfare. At the beginning of the La Tène period warfare was likely conducted on a small scale between elite warriors, perhaps in chariots, wielding a new type of Celtic longsword.

During the succeeding centuries the design of the sword changed, characteristically becoming shorter, single-edged and lacking a thrusting point, designed purely to make a cut (although the Hallstatt era sword had also been primarily a slashing weapon).[6] and greater regional variation in swords appeared: in Britain and Ireland even the longer sword designs were shorter and thinner than their Continental counterparts.[7] It is possible that in the later La Tène era, an increasing population would have led to larger armies organized in ranks of spearmen, leading to a decline in the importance of the champion with his sword and hence a decline in sword functionality.

Sculpture of a chainmail-armoured, torc-wearing Gallic warrior wielding a Celtic shield, although depicted in the Greco-Roman style, from Vacheres, France, 1st century BC[8]

The La Tène era also saw the development of armor in the form of chainmail, the familiar form in which a garment is constructed of linked metal rings. Finds of mail are rare, suggesting that it was a luxury restricted to high status warriors. Crested helmets of this period occur in greater numbers than of mail, but overall the picture is of Celtic armies being made up largely of lightly armored or unarmored fighters.

Chariot burials continued well into the La Tène period, suggesting their continued importance in warfare. The La Tène chariot was a light, two-wheeled vehicle, unlike the heavier chariot of earlier times. The arrangement of the chariot poles in a reconstruction of the Wetwang Chariot suggests they were drawn by small ponies only 11 or 12 hands high[9] and thus seem unlikely to be used in a frontal charge. Because chariot burials were never practiced in Ireland, the nature or existence of chariot warfare in that specific country remains unclear.

In the Later La Tène period, Roman expansion into Celtic areas began with the conquest of Gallia Cisalpina in 275 BC. The conquest of Gallia Celtica followed in 121 BC and was completed with the Gallic Wars of 58-50 BC. After this period, Gallic culture quickly assimilated to Roman culture, giving rise to the hybrid Gallo-Roman culture of Late Antiquity.

Continuation in Ireland[edit]

Roman conquest eventually extinguished the cultural and political independence of all the Celtic peoples starting on the Italian peninsula, then the Iberian Peninsula, Anatolia, Gaul and finally Britain. Celtic cultural independence survived only in Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Cumbria.

Three Gaelic Ceithearn. Drawing by Albrecht Dürer, 1521.

After the Roman era, only in the British Isles, therefore, could there be said to still exist a distinctly Celtic style of warfare. Ireland was the last region to adopt the La Tène style of Celtic culture and technology with a smaller and less dense population than that of the British or Continental Celts, the Gaelic Irish sustained an era of small scale elite clan warfare for much longer.[10]

Traditional patterns of warfare seem to have continued all the way to the Viking and Norman invasions. For centuries the backbone of any Gaelic Irish army were lightly armed foot soldiers called Ceithearn or Kern. Kern usually fought lacking metal armor including helmets, fighting with spears (gae) and a set of javelins or darts (gá-ín), a long dagger (scian), occasionally wielding axes (tua) and bow (bogha) and in the case of higher status and class warriors, swords (claideamh), protected by a round shield (sciath).[11] The Viking invasions saw greater adoption of the shortbow and heavier armor in addition, but never in great numbers.[11]

The Norman invasion in the 12th century and the ineffectiveness of traditional tactics in resisting it led to the Irish moving towards a more typically medieval style of warfare exemplified by the Gallóglaigh or Gallowglass heavy infantry soldier. Unlike Kern, Gallowglass usually wore chainmail and iron helmets and wielded heavy weaponry such as the Dane axe, Sparth axe, Claymores and sometimes spears or lances. They were a kind of heavy infantry, shock troop and elite bodyguard for the Gaelic nobility. They were the Celtic response to the heavily favored and armored Heavy Cavalry, Knights and Men-at-arms of the era and were very effective.

Gallic Wars[edit]

Vercingetorix Throws Down His Arms at the Feet of Julius Caesar by Lionel Noel Royer, 1899. A famous painting depicting surrender of Gallic Chieftain Vercingetorix to Julius Caesar following the Siege of Alesia during the Gallic Wars

The best known Roman source for descriptions of Celtic warfare was from Julius Caesar in his Commentaries on the Gallic Wars in which he describes the methods of warfare of both the Gauls and the Britons.

The Gallic Wars were a series of military campaigns waged by the Roman proconsul against Gallic tribes, lasting from 58 BC to 51 BC. The Romans would also raid Britannia and Germania, but these expeditions never developed into full-scale invasions. The Gallic Wars culminated in the decisive Battle of Alesia in 52 BC, in which a complete Roman victory resulted in the expansion of the Roman Republic over the whole of Gaul. These wars paved the way for Caesar to become the sole ruler of the Roman Republic.

Descriptions of battles against various Gallic tribes, heavily contrasts the popular picture of the wild and naked Celtic warrior. Caesar even speaks of the Helvetii fighting in close order in an organized fashion, forming a phalanx as a defense against cavalry and advancing in a close formation.[12] He also speaks of arrows being used against his troops crossing rivers and against the besiegers of Gergovia, capital of the Arverni[13] - one of the few engagements in which Vercingetorix outmanoeuvred Caesar. He mentions the use of javelins by the Belgic tribe, the Nervii,[14] but despite Roman writers frequently referring to the use of swords by the Celts in battle, Caesar never mentions Gallic troops fighting en masse with swords. By the mid-1st century BC, Celtic tribes in Gaul may have had a core of properly trained and equipped Gallic leaders, in addition to the tribal levy of lightly armed and armored Gauls.

It is perhaps the descriptions of the Britons which have most influenced the popular image of the wild Celtic berserker. Caesar purposefully emphasized the "barbarian" aspect of the Britons for political reasons since his expedition was brief out of necessity, describing how they wore animal skins, had wives in common, did not grow crops and they dyed and tattoo their skin blue: although his description does not mention which plant was used, subsequent commentators have supposed that woad was the source of this blue dye and though later experimentation suggests that woad is not very well suited as a skin dye nor as tattoo ink,[15] this image, when conflated with the descriptions of the Gaesatae, has nevertheless helped paint the picture of the woad-daubed ancient Briton or Pict charging into battle naked and blue.

The other popular image of pre-Roman Britain, the scythed chariot, is not mentioned by Caesar either but alluded to by later commentators, such as Pomponius Mela, during and after the Roman conquest.

Celtic troop types and organization[edit]

No Celtic group employed a regular military as we would understand it. Organization was according to clan grouping and social class. A war leader's immediate companions were known in Gaulish as *ambaxtoi ("those who accompany") a term which passed into Latin and from which the English ambassador ultimately derives.

Celtic warriors

The earliest Celtic encounter with Romans in 387 BC, was an outright disaster for the Roman Republic. The resulting Battle of the Allia, was a defeat and rout for the Romans, after which all of the city of Rome apart from the Capitoline Hill fell. A confederacy of Gaulish and Celtic tribes led by Brennus of the Senones occupied the city for a time before being driven out. Little or no detail is given of the methods of warfare of these Gauls, except that according to Plutarch some were armed with swords and some were mounted.[16]

In 280 BC, a great army comprising about 85,000 warriors[17] left Pannonia, split into three divisions, and marched south in a great expedition[18][19] to Macedon and Central Greece. Under the leadership of Cerethrius, 20,000 men moved against the Thracians and Triballi. Another division, led by another Brennus[20] and Acichorius[21] moved against the Paionians, while the third division, headed by Bolgios, aimed for the Macedonians and Illyrians. Leonnorius split off from the group with a sizable force into Thrace, heading further into Asia Minor where they ravaged the country to the shores of the Hellespont, compelled the city of Byzantium to pay them tribute, and then moved into central Anatolia. The area they eventually settled became known as Galatia after the people who settled there. The Gallic campaign of Brennus, eventually met the fierce resistance of a combined allied Greek Army at the second Battle of Thermopylae. The Celts were able to defeat the Greeks but at great cost. Despite the hollow Celtic victory at Thermopylae, Brennus pushed onwards toward Delphi, this ultimately led to a Celtic defeat and his death following the attack on Delphi. Most scholars deem the Greek campaign a disaster for the Celts.

According to Pausanias this force included large numbers of cavalry, organized in a system called Trimarcisia (from the words *tri- *marko- "three horse") dividing them into teams of three, only two of whom would be mounted at one time. The second Brennus' expedition would have originated in Pannonia and Noricum, the same region which would later became famous for producing Noric steel, the highest quality available for armor and weaponry in the Roman Empire. Celts were renowned for their ability to make swords of both bronze and iron. Swords were too expensive for many common soldiers so they fought with spears or slings instead.[22]

Infantry and cavalry[edit]

The famous Celtic shield found at Battersea likely used for ceremonial purposes.[23]

Tacitus wrote that the strength of the Celts lies in their infantry[24] but some had a strong cavalry arm and others continued to use chariots.

In earlier times[when?], the Celts would employ the chariot.[25] Although chariots had fallen out of use in continental Europe from the end of the 3rd century BC, Caesar found that they remained significant in British warfare. If his descriptions are to be believed, he encountered in Britain an army in transition, possessing cavalry but still with an elite fighting from chariots. He describes how these warriors would throw javelins from their vehicles before abandoning them to fight on foot and returning to them in order to retreat or redeploy.[26] Cavalry proper is described as used for skirmishing. Gauls are said to have commented that they themselves had formerly used chariots but had abandoned them by this time.

Their mode of fighting with their chariots is this: firstly, they drive about in all directions and throw their weapons and generally break the ranks of the enemy with the very dread of their horses and the noise of their wheels; and when they have worked themselves in between the troops of horse, leap from their chariots and engage on foot. The charioteers in the meantime withdraw a little distance from the battle, and so place themselves with the chariots that, if their masters are overpowered by the number of the enemy, they may have a ready retreat to their own troops. Thus they display in battle the speed of horse, [together with] the firmness of infantry.[27]

The carnyx was a wind instrument of the Iron Age Celts, attested for ca. 300 BC to 200 AD. It is a kind of bronze trumpet, held vertically, the mouth styled in the shape of a boar's head. It was used in warfare, probably to incite troops to battle and intimidate opponents.[28] The instrument's upright carriage allowed its notes to carry over the heads of the participants in battles and ceremonies.

Mercenaries[edit]

Celtic warriors served as mercenaries in many great armies of Classical antiquity. The best known[29] were those who joined Carthage and Hannibal in his invasion of the Italian peninsula during the Second Punic war and who contributed to his victories in Lake Trasimene and at Cannae. Celtic mercenaries notably fought for the Romans at their defeat at the Battle of Carrhae. The Celtic cavalry, composed of Gallic horsemen, fought bravely and held their own against the Parthians and the renowned Cataphracts before being defeated. Celtic warriors would often fight on the sides of Ancient Greeks and Romans throughout antiquity as mercenaries. When a branch of Brennus' Balkan expedition turned East and crossed the Hellespont, they founded a Celtic-ruled state in Asia Minor known as Galatia. Galatia became well known as a source of mercenaries throughout the Eastern Mediterranean region. Illustrations showing troops armed with long, straight swords and oval shields have generally been taken to depict Galatians.

The Greek historian Polybius gives an account of the Battle of Telamon 225 BC in which the Romans defeated an invasion by the Boii, Insubres, Taurisci and Gaesatae. The Gaesatae were said to be a group of warriors who fought for hire and it is they who are described in the most detail. Whereas the Boii and Insubres wore trousers and cloaks which were thick enough to afford limited protection from the Roman javelins, the Gaesatae removed their clothes to fight naked, standing in front of their allies and seeking to intimidate the Romans with shouting and gesturing. However, this lack of protection caused their defeat since they carried relatively small shields which did not adequately protect them against the missile fire of the Roman skirmishers. Suffering heavy casualties, the Gaesatae either fled the battlefield or desperately charged headlong into the Roman lines where, outmatched for both numbers and equipment, they were defeated. What position the Gaesatae occupied in Celtic society has been much debated. Early writers assumed that they were a tribe, but later authors have inclined to the view that they may have been groups of unattached young warriors who lived by raiding and mercenary activities like the early Roman iuventes or the semi-legendary Irish fiana.[30]

There are accounts of Celtic soldiers working as bodyguards of Cleopatra VII of Egypt and Herod the Great of Judea. Josephus in his Antiquities of the Jews mentions Gallic or Galatian soldiers present at the funeral of the King of Judea, Herod.[31]

Navy[edit]

While relatively little has been written about Celtic warfare at sea, one group the Gallic Veneti, a tribe dwelling on the southern coast of Armorica (Brittany), along the Gulf of Morbihan. The Veneti were well known and renowned as a strong seafaring people among the Gauls.

The Veneti had trading stations in Britain and regularly sailed to the island, and they charged customs and port dues on trade ships as they passed through the region. They constructed ships of oak with tough leather sails, well adapted for traversing and plying the rough Atlantic sea. The Veneti designed and maneuvered their vessels so skillfully that boarding was near impossible on open water.

Following the beginning of the Gallic Wars, the Veneti fiercely resisted the Romans both on land and by sea during the period following Caesar's conquest of Gaul but before his invasion of Britain.[32] They targeted the Romans for raiding and maintained positive trade relations with the Britons across the channel. Given the highly defensible nature of the Veneti sea strongholds, land attacks were frustrated by the incoming tide, and naval forces were left trapped on the rocks vulnerable when the tide ebbed. Their capital, Darioritum, in modern-day Vannes, was extremely difficult to attack from land.

At first the Roman galleys, fighting in unfamiliar conditions, were at a great disadvantage and suffered defeats and setbacks. Julius Caesar gave Decimus Junius Brutus Albinus command of the Roman fleet and the Roman navy adopted new tactics in order to quell the activities of the Veneti once and for all. Instead of boarding or capturing ships, the Romans would simply set them on fire. The Roman fleet under Albinus subjected the Veneti to savage reprisals for their earlier defiance. This culminated in the Battle of Morbihan when the Romans succeeded in setting aflame and destroying the entire Gallic fleet in Quiberon Bay, with Caesar watching from the shore. Following this defeat, their maritime commerce and trade activities declined under the Roman Empire.[33]

Fortifications[edit]

Modern-day rendering of a Celtic Oppidum, Central Europe 1st century BC

Large stores of slingstones aerodynamically shaped by adding clay have been found in the Southern British hillfort of Maiden Castle[34] which indicates that slings must also have played a role in the conflicts between Celtic tribes there, probably in sieges. The La Tène period also saw the development of multivallate fortresses, protected by formidable earthworks as well as the Murus Gallicus and Pfostenschlitzmauer constructions. The larger settlements in Gaul were described by Julius Caesar as oppida and the term is now used to designate the large pre-Roman towns that existed all across Western and Central Europe, many of which grew from hill forts. There are over 2000 of these forts known in Britain alone.[35]

The Celtic circular wall of Otzenhausen is one of the biggest fortifications the Celts ever constructed. It was built by Celts of the Treveri tribe, who lived in the region north of the fort. The fort is located on top of the Dollberg, a hill near Otzenhausen in Germany, about 695 m above sea level. The only visible remains are two circular earth ramparts, covered with stones.

External influence[edit]

Diachronic distribution of Celtic peoples:
  core Hallstatt territory, by the 6th century BC
  maximal Celtic expansion, by 275 BC
  Lusitanian area of Iberia where Celtic presence is uncertain
  the six Celtic nations which retained significant numbers of Celtic speakers into the Early Modern period
  areas where Celtic languages remain widely spoken today

Celts were influenced by other peoples but they heavily influenced the warfare of their enemies.

Germans[edit]

Celtic influence on Germanic culture is a long debated topic; it is generally accepted that Celtic languages had an impact on Germanic languages;[36] however their impact on Germanic religion, myths[37] and material culture[38] is more difficult to assess. The Germanic languages borrowed much of their vocabulary related to politics, leadership, iron smithing and medicine from the Celtic languages, such as *rik- ‘king’, *isarna ‘iron’,*ambahtaz ‘servant’, *brunjon- ‘mailshirt’, *lekijaz ‘physician’,*gislaz ‘hostage’, *Rinaz ‘Rhine’, and *walhaz ‘foreigner’.[36] In Denmark, the Wagons from Dejbjerg and the bronze kettle of Sophienborg Mose show huge similarities with the La Tène artistic culture, notably the bull figures on the kettle[39] and the figure of a man on a wagon. As for the weaponry, double-edged La Tène swords found at Værebro and Tissø (Zealand, Denmark), Vogn (Hjørring, Denmark) and Lindholmgård (Scania, Sweden) suggest a likely cultural transfer through local elite.[40][41] The famous Hjortspring Bog, where a boat and multiple weapons have been found, displays Celtic influence, specifically in the spearheads and the chainmails.[42] In the regions associated with Elbe Germanic groups, double-edged La Tène swords similar to those from Denmark have been found at Großromstedt (Thuringia, Germany).[43] There is a correspondence in the weaponry found in graves at Schkopau and Großromstedt with the description of the Gallic society by Poseidonios, where there is a hierarchy for the warrior's companions, from the shield-bearers to the spear-bearers and finally the chief at the top.[44] The presence of La Tène items in Thuringia could also be due to a growing influence of Przeworsk culture from the east at the end of the 1st century BC.[45]

Close to the Rhine, in the region of Westphalia and Lower Saxony, multiple La Tène spearheads have been identified in local context at Borchen-Gellinghausen,[46] Olfen-Kökelsum[47] and Schnippenburg, and two La Tène swords at Wilzenberger.[48] Schnippenburg's site is an interesting case of Middle La Tène influence on several aspect of the local lifestyle (fortification, adornment, weaponry, cult). Quoting Sebastian Möllers: "Until 10 to 15 years ago, there was still the assumption that the La Tène culture was largely confined to the described core space. However, the results of recent research paint a whole new picture. And especially in this context, the findings of the Schnippenburg is a very special place."[49]

The Przeworsk culture is a culture beginning at the 2nd century BC; it is characterized by a cultural facies strongly influenced by the La Tène culture.[50][51][52] Compared to Elbe cultural groups, the Przeworsk culture is best documented regarding weaponry prior to the period of the Roman Empire, as cremation graves are frequently accompanied by weapons. It is generally interpreted as warlike society.[53] On the matter, Celtic iron chain belts, iron scabbards, spurs, knives and fibula are found in the graves.[50][54][55][56] In contrast to the scabbards found in other Germanic regions, Przeworsk culture seems to have adopted the characteristic suspension of Middle La Tène swords during the first half of the 2nd century BC.[57] Although single edged swords commonly related to Germanic cultures are also common in warrior graves. A sword with a bronze pseudo-anthropomorphic hilt elements typical of the Middle La Tène has been discovered in the Vistula River close to the village of Siarzewo (Poland).[58]

Thracians[edit]

The Celts influenced Thracian warfare in the adoption of certain long swords by the Triballi, for example, although this was not universal among the Thracians. Another weapon, the sica, was called the Thracian sword[59] (Ancient Greek: Θρᾳκικὸν ξίφος) though it did not originate there, despite its popular usage.[60] Considered Thrace's national weapon, the sword's ultimate origin was the Hallstatt culture[61] and the Thracians may have or adopted or inherited it.

Dacians[edit]

Several archaeological discoveries suggest an important influence on the Dacian warfare. Celtic chariots have been found in Geto-Dacian territories at the actual locations of Curtuiuşeni, Apahida, Fântânele, Gălăoaia, Cristuru Secuiesc, Vurpăr and Toarcla.[62] Celts introduced their typical horned saddle as it is observed in Dacian necropoleis along items belonging to the La Tène culture.[62][63] Dacians incorporated Celtic long swords, round shield bosses and helmets in their panoply, a good example is the tumulus N°2 of Cugir necropolis.[64][65][66] Iron chain belts and chainmails are also interpreted as the result of Celtic influence.[67][68] The Celtic-Germanic Bastarnae were an important part of the Dacian army when they inflicted a harsh defeat to Gaius Antonius Hybrida.[69][70] The Celts played a very active role in Dacia[71] and the Celtic Scordisci were among the tribes allied to the Dacians.[72]

Illyrians[edit]

Celts affected Illyrian warfare and the Illyrians in cultural and material aspects and some Illyrians were even Celticized, especially the tribes in Dalmatia[73] and the Pannonians.[74] A type of wooden oblong shield with an iron boss was introduced to Illyria from the Celts. Hallstatt culture influences abounded as the Illyrians were also its descendants.[75]

Greeks[edit]

The Greeks adopted the long oval Celtic shields they called Thureos in the 3rd Century BC. This ultimately led to the development of two new troop types: the Thureophoroi and the Thorakitai.

Romans[edit]

The Romans were heavily influenced and affected by their interactions with the Celts. Much of the standardized equipment of the military of the later Roman Republic and early Roman Empire were based upon equipment with Celtic origins. Some major examples being the Galea helmet based upon Gallic helmets, Lorica Hamata armor was based upon Chainmail of the Noric peoples and both of the primary swords used by the Romans, the Gladius and Spatha were based upon earlier swords of Celtiberian design. The Celtic swords and scabbards of the La Tène B have been found in early Rome. Notably, the oldest record for the word ROMA comes from a La Tène sword found in San Vittore del Lazio (Frosinone, Latium)[76][77][78][79][80] see also. Another sword of the same type have been found in the sanctuary of Juno of Gabii with its typical Celtic scabbard.[81] The Iberian peninsula, comprising modern Spain and Portugal, was a place of diverse cultures in classical times with various tribes who cannot always be placed firmly as Celtic. Iberian Celts mainly Celtiberians, but also Lusitanians and Cantabrians fought for Hannibal as mercenaries against the Romans in the Second Punic War. The Iberian Celts' best known weapon was the gladius Hispaniensis, which was eventually adopted by the Romans as their own standardized gladius. The very name, too, may derive from the Celtic root *kledo-, meaning "sword". The Romans described the spear of the Gauls with the word gaesum, a Latinisation of the Gaulish *gaisos. It is likely that two Latin words for chariot, carrus and covinnus, were adopted from Celtic languages, although the Romans at no point seem to have employed chariots in warfare. The Latin word lancea, used for the javelins of auxiliary troops, as well as the two words for chariot, carrus and covinnus, are also supposedly derived from Iberian, Celtiberian, or Celtic words.

Celts depicted as barbarians[edit]

Reconstruction of a Celtic skull trophy

From their earliest interactions, the major civilizations of Classical antiquity such as Greek, Roman, Etruscan and Macedonian civilizations faced major threats from the Celtic world. Early in the period, the Etruscans had to deal with the Celtic Biturges' mass migration crossing the Alps under the lead of Bellovesus in the 5th century BC. The Romans' first major encounter with the Celts, at the Battle of the Allia, was an outright disaster for the fledgling Roman Republic. The inexperienced Roman army was routed; this defeat culminated with the Senones, led by their war leader, Brennus, sacking the city except for the Capitoline Hill. Even though the Romans were able to save their city and wrest control back, these events left a lasting impression on the Roman people.

The Greeks and Macedonians had their own issues with the Gallic tribes. Celts originating from various La Tène chiefdoms and Noricum began a mass migration and settlement of the Balkans from the 4th century BC. These expeditions were led by multiple leaders, including another Brennus, Acichorious, Bolgios, Cerethrius and Leonnorius. These migrations had a massive impact on the region and culminated with a series of events: the defeat and decapitation of the Macedonian king, Ptolemy Ceraunus, the defeat of a Greek Army at the Battle of Thermopolaye, the subsequent attack on Delphi and finally the foundations of the settlement in Asia Minor that became home to the Galatians. This series of events left a lasting impression on the Greeks.

Later, the military position was reversed as the Roman Empire expanded its sphere of influence and gradually conquered most of the Celtic peoples. During this period, both Greek and Roman writers and scholars were heavily biased against the Celts and tended to focus much on the savage ferocity of the fearless, naked, headhunting Celtic warrior, creating an image which has persisted ever since. To the Ancient Greeks and Romans the Celtic warrior was the archetypal barbarian,[82] stereotypically presented as massive, powerful, and malicious.

The Trvve Picture of One Picte Theodor de Bry’s 1588 engraving of a Pict a member of an ancient Celtic people from Scotland. An example of how negative Greco-Roman depictions of the Celts persisted

One of the practices of the Celts that the Greco-Roman civilizations found especially barbaric was headhunting. Celts were described by Greco-Roman writers as having a "cult of the severed head" and human sacrifice as major components of their religious life. Celts followed an ancient Celtic religion overseen by the Druids. According to Paul Jacobsthal, "Amongst the Celts the human head was venerated above all else, since the head was to the Celt the soul, centre of the emotions as well as of life itself, a symbol of divinity and of the powers of the other-world." [83]

Ancient Romans and Greeks recorded the Celts' habits of embalming in cedar oil the heads of the most distinguished enemies, allies and relatives; and the mounting of the heads on walls for decoration and in porticos or pillars in their entry for display. The Greco-Roman writers also describe the Celts hanging severed heads from the necks of their horses while riding in order to intimidate onlookers and enemies alike. If Irish mythology is to be believed, headhunting may have been practiced in Ireland for a great deal longer by the Celtic Gaels, perhaps all the way to the introduction of Christianity to Ireland in the 5th century AD. In the Ulster Cycle of Irish mythology, two of the major heroic figures, Cúchulainn and Conall Cernach, are both described as beheading their enemies and publicly displaying the heads.

Both the Greeks and Romans found the Celtic decapitation practices shocking, and the Romans made sure to put an end to them when Celtic regions came under their control. However, Greeks and Romans both employed decapitation and other horrific tortures, highlighting a tendency to view practices as more shocking when carried out by an outside group, even if the practices were essentially similar.[84]

In the 5th century BC, Greek writer Ephoros described the Celts as "one of the four great barbarian peoples, along with the Persians, the Scythians and the Libyans". They were called Keltoi or Galatae by the Greeks and Celtae or Galli by the Romans. Aristotle comments that their courage had an element of passion to it,[85] like that of all barbarians. Diodorus Siculus writes that they were extremely addicted to wine[86] and that one could exchange a mere jar of wine for a slave.

The Celts were described by classical writers such as Strabo, Livy, Pausanias, and Florus as fighting like "wild beasts", and as hordes. Dionysius said that their "manner of fighting, being in large measure that of wild beasts and frenzied, was an erratic procedure, quite lacking in military science. Thus, at one moment they would raise their swords aloft and smite after the manner of wild boars, throwing the whole weight of their bodies into the blow like hewers of wood or men digging with mattocks, and again they would deliver crosswise blows aimed at no target, as if they intended to cut to pieces the entire bodies of their adversaries, protective armor and all".[87] Such descriptions have been challenged by contemporary historians[who?].[88]

Celtic war leaders[edit]

Brennus and the Senones during the sack of Rome in 390 BC which followed the Battle of the Allia
Vercingetorix surrenders to Julius Caesar following the Battle of Alesia
Boudica and her allied army of Celtic Britons
Calgacus delivering an impassioned speech to the Caledonians before the Battle of Mons Graupius.

List of Celtic conflicts and battles[edit]

This is a list of battles or conflicts in which Celts had a leading or crucial role, including as mercenaries.

BC[edit]

[edit]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ E. Estyn Evans, The Personality of Ireland, Cambridge University Press (1973), ISBN 0-521-02014-X
  2. ^ Malleson, G.B. (1889). "Vercingetorix". Transactions of the Royal Historical Society. 4: 1–40. doi:10.2307/3678158. JSTOR 3678158.
  3. ^ "Grands Sites Archéologiques".
  4. ^ British Archaeology 76 "Ridding (sic) Into History"
  5. ^ Barry W. Cunliffe, Iron Age Communities in Britain Ch. 19 Warfare, ISBN 0-415-34779-3,
  6. ^ Cowen, J. D., The Hallstatt Sword of Bronze: on the Continent and in. Britain, in: Proc. Prehist. Soc. 33
  7. ^ Piggott, S. (1950) 'Swords and scabbards of the British Early Iron Age', Proc. Prehist. Soc. 16
  8. ^ Ashton, Kasey. "The Celts Themselves." University of North Carolina. Accessed 5 November 2017.
  9. ^ Building an Iron Age Chariot, Mike Loades http://www.mikeloades.co.uk/cms/images/British_Chariot.pdf
  10. ^ Ó Cléirigh, Cormac (1997). Irish frontier warfare: a fifteenth-century case study (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 December 2010.
  11. ^ a b The Archaeology of Late Celtic Britain and Ireland c.400-1200AD, Lloyd Laing, 1975
  12. ^ Caesar De Bello Gallica, Book 1, XXIV
  13. ^ Caesar De Bello Gallica, Book 7, XLI
  14. ^ Caesar De Bello Gallica, Book 5, XLIV
  15. ^ "The Problem of the Woad".
  16. ^ Plutarch, Camillus 15-30
  17. ^ Kruta, Venceslas (2012-08-01). Les Celtes. Que sais-je?. Presses Universitaires de France. ISBN 978-2-13-060668-0.
  18. ^ Cunliffe, Barry W. (1997). The ancient Celts. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-815010-5. OCLC 36085150.
  19. ^ Ross, Steven T. (1967). "The Military Strategy of the Directory: The Campaigns of 1799". French Historical Studies. 5 (2): 170. doi:10.2307/286174. ISSN 0016-1071.
  20. ^ Lundell, Richard; Pitts, Vincent J. (1995). "The Man Who Sacked Rome: Charles de Bourbon, Constable of France (1490- 1527)". Sixteenth Century Journal. 26 (3): 711. doi:10.2307/2543177. ISSN 0361-0160.
  21. ^ dx.doi.org http://dx.doi.org/10.17658/issn.2058-5462/issue-20/wschupbach/figure11. Retrieved 2022-08-05. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  22. ^ Grant, R. (2008). Warfare in the Ancient World. In Battle (pp. 32-33). DK Publishing.
  23. ^ Grant, R. (2008). Warfare in the Ancient World. In Battle (pp. 32–33). DK Publishing
  24. ^ Celtic Warrior, 300 BC–AD 100 by Stephen Allen, 2001, ISBN 1841761435, page 45
  25. ^ Celtic Warrior, 300 BC–AD 100 by Stephen Allen, 2001, ISBN 1841761435, page 47
  26. ^ Caesar, De Bello Gallica Book 4, XXXIII
  27. ^ The Gallic Wars, Chapter 33
  28. ^ Polybius Histories Book 2, 29–31
  29. ^ Celtic warrior, 300 BC-AD 100 by Stephen Allen,2001,ISBN 1841761435,page 14
  30. ^ Mountain, H. The Celtic Encyclopedia (1998)
  31. ^ Rocca, Samuel (2009). The Army of Herod the Great. Osprey Publishing. pp. 15–16. ISBN 978-1-8460-3206-6. Retrieved 2 November 2013.
  32. ^ Levick, Barbara (2009). "The Veneti Revisited: C.E. Stevens and the tradition on Caesar the propagandist". In Welch, Kathryn; Powell, Anton (eds.). Julius Caesar as Artful Reporter: The War Commentaries as Political Instruments. Classical Press of Wales. ISBN 978-1-910589-36-6.
  33. ^ Drinkwater, John F. (2016). "Veneti (1), Gallic tribe". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Classics.
  34. ^ Barry W. Cunliffe, Iron Age Communities in Britain, 2005, ISBN 0-415-34779-3, ISBN 978-0-415-34779-2
  35. ^ The Iron Age, smr.herefordshire.gov.uk
  36. ^ a b Ringe, Donald A., 1954- (2017). From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic (Second ed.). Oxford. ISBN 978-0-19-183457-8. OCLC 979813633.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  37. ^ Egeler, Matthias. (2013). Celtic influences in Germanic religion : a survey. München: Utz. ISBN 978-3-8316-4226-7. OCLC 840391241.
  38. ^ Keltische Einflüsse im nördlichen Mitteleuropa während der mittleren und jüngeren vorrömischen Eisenzeit : Akten des internationalen Kolloquiums in Osnabrück vom 29. März bis 1. April 2006. Möllers, Sebastian., Schlüter, Wolfgang, 1937-, Sievers, Susanne. Bonn: R. Habelt. 2007. ISBN 978-3-7749-3501-3. OCLC 144615408.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  39. ^ Ginoux, Nathalie (2006). "Éléments d'iconographie celtique : le thème du taureau à cornes bouletées dans le répertoire du Nord de la Gaule". Revue du Nord. 368 (5): 128–150. doi:10.3917/rdn.368.0128. ISSN 0035-2624.
  40. ^ Martens, Jes (January 2011). "Weapons, Armament and Society. The Pre-Roman Iron Age on Zealand and in Scania". The Iron Age on Zealand. Status and Perspectives.
  41. ^ Luczkiewcz, Piotr; Łuczkiewicz, Piotr. "Kriegergemeinschaften im Ostseebereich während der jüngeren vorrömischen Eisenzeit". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  42. ^ Randsborg, Klavs. (1995). Hjortspring : warfare and sacrifice in early Europe. Aarhus [Denmark]: Aarhus University Press. ISBN 87-7288-545-9. OCLC 35141354.
  43. ^ "Gräberfeld von Großromstedt", Wikipedia (in German), 2020-10-27, retrieved 2020-11-28
  44. ^ Teegen, Wolf-Rüdiger; Cordie, Rosemarie; Dörrer, Olaf; Rieckhoff, Sabine; Steuer, Heiko, eds. (2008-08-22). "Frühe germanische Kriegerordnung und keltische militärische Gemeinschaftsformen". Studien zur Lebenswelt der Eisenzeit: Festschrift für Rosemarie Müller (in German). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. pp. 149–192. doi:10.1515/9783110202809.149. ISBN 978-3-11-020280-9.
  45. ^ Meyer, Michael (January 2005). "Migration und Adaption. Ein differenziertes Modell zur Erklärung der latènezeitlichen Przeworsk Funde in Deutschland". Alt-Thüringen. 38.
  46. ^ Stiehl, Alexandra (2011). "Die eisenzeitlichen Speerspitzen der "Hünenburg" bei Borchen-Gellinghausen". Archäologie in Westfalen-Lippe (in German): 69–72. doi:10.11588/aiw.0.0.25923. ISSN 2191-1207.
  47. ^ Stiehl, Alexandra (2012). "Die späteisenzeitliche Lanzenspitze aus Olfen-Kökelsum – ein Bauopfer?". Archäologie in Westfalen-Lippe (in German): 74–76. doi:10.11588/aiw.0.0.25115. ISSN 2191-1207.
  48. ^ Lehmann, Ulrich (2013). "Neues zu den ältesten Eisenschwertern aus Westfalen". Archäologie in Westfalen-Lippe.
  49. ^ "Die Schnippenburg im Fokus der Archäologie". Archäologie Online (in German). Retrieved 2020-11-28.
  50. ^ a b Bochnak, Tomasz (2007). "Les Celtes en Pologne : aperçu général". Mélanges de l'école française de Rome. 119 (1): 25–40. doi:10.3406/mefr.2007.10323.
  51. ^ Bochnak, Tomasz. "Un nouveau regard sur la laténisation du bassin de la Vistule". Il Mondo Celtico Prima e Dopo la Conquista Romana.
  52. ^ Andrzejowski, Jacek (2010). U. Lund Hansen; A. Bitner-Wróblewska (eds.). The Przeworsk Culture. A Brief Story (for the Foreigners) Worlds Apart? Contacts across the Baltic Sea in the Iron Age. København-Warszawa: Nordiske Fortidsminder.
  53. ^ Kontny, Bartosz (2019-12-24). "Not only the Tisa River basin. The martial activities of the Przeworsk culture peoples and their allies in the Roman Period". Acta Archaeologica Carpathica (in Polish). 54 (Tom LIV): 159–190. doi:10.4467/00015229AAC.19.009.11886. ISSN 2719-4841. S2CID 216735181.
  54. ^ Bochnak, Tomasz (2007). "Les couteaux "celtiques" avec manche muni d'un anneau de suspension dans la culture de Przeworsk". ISTROS. 14 (1): 297–320. ISSN 1453-6943.
  55. ^ Maciałowicz, Andrzej. "With gold and sword. Contacts of Celts and early Germanics in central Europe. The historical background: 3rd - 1st c. BC". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  56. ^ Bochnak, Tomasz; Harasim, Przemysław. "Reparierte Waffen der vorrömischen Eisenzeit in der Przeworsk- und Oksywie-Kultur, Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt Jahrgang 45 · 2015 · Heft 4". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  57. ^ Bochnak, Tomasz (2006). "Un aperçu général de l'armement de la culture de Przeworsk aux derniers siècles avant J.-C". ISTROS (in French). 13 (1): 95–118. ISSN 1453-6943.
  58. ^ Kieca, Piotr; Sobczyk, Paweł (2019). "The Celtic sword with bronze hilt elements from Siarzewo, Nieszawa Commune, Kuyavian-Pomeranian voivodeship". Światowit. 57: 71–81. doi:10.5604/01.3001.0013.6795. S2CID 213474005. Retrieved 2020-11-26.
  59. ^ The Odrysian Kingdom of Thrace: Orpheus Unmasked (Oxford Monographs on Classical Archaeology) by Z. H. Archibald, ISBN 0-19-815047-4,1998,page 203,""
  60. ^ Complete Encyclopedia Of Arms & Weapons (Hardcover)by Rh Value Publishing, ISBN 0-517-48776-4, 1986
  61. ^ HaA(1200-1000), HaB(1000-800)
  62. ^ a b Iron age connectivity in the Carpathian basin : proceedings of the International Colloquium from Târgu Mureş, 13-15 October 2017. Berecki, Sándor., Rustoiu, Aurel., Egri, Mariana. Cluj-Napoca: Mega. 2018. ISBN 978-606-020-028-4. OCLC 1117739328.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  63. ^ Crişan, Ion Horațiu; Medeleţ, Florin (1979). "Raport preliminar asupra săpăturilor din 1978 la cetatea dacică de la Cugir (județul Alba)". Materiale şi cercetări arheologice. 13 (1): 105–107. doi:10.3406/mcarh.1979.1443. ISSN 0076-5147.
  64. ^ Teleaga, Emilian; Bălăşescu, Adrian; Soficaru, Andrei; Schoch, Werner (2014-06-30). "Die Scheiterhaufen aus Cugir und Tarinci. Ein Beitrag zu den Bestattungssitten der Balkanhalbinsel und des vorrömischen Dakiens in der Spätlatènezeit". Praehistorische Zeitschrift (in German). 89 (2): 305–336. doi:10.1515/pz-2014-0021. ISSN 1613-0804. S2CID 166075687.
  65. ^ "Category:Dacian tomb of Cugir - Wikimedia Commons". commons.wikimedia.org. Retrieved 2020-11-26.
  66. ^ "Dacian settlements and necropolises in Southwestern Romania (2nd c. B.C.-1st c. A.D.)". arheologie.ulbsibiu.ro. Retrieved 2020-11-26.
  67. ^ Popa, Cătălin Nicolae (26 May 2018). Modelling Identities : a Case Study from the Iron Age of South-East Europe. Cham. ISBN 978-3-319-63267-4. OCLC 1042957385.
  68. ^ Rustoiu, Aurel. "Aurel Rustoiu, Masters of metals in the Carpathian Basin (workshops, production centres and funerary manifestations in the early and middle La Tene)". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  69. ^ Rome's enemies: Germanics and Dacians by Peter Wilcox,Gerry Embleton,ISBN 0850454735,1982,page 35
  70. ^ "Kingdoms of the Germanic Tribes - Bastarnae / Peucini". www.historyfiles.co.uk. Retrieved 2020-11-26.
  71. ^ Dacia: Land of Transylvania, Cornerstone of Ancient Eastern Europe by Ion Grumeza, 2009, page 88
  72. ^ Strab. 7.5,"they often used the Scordisci as allies"
  73. ^ A dictionary of the Roman Empire Oxford paperback reference,ISBN 0-19-510233-9,1995,page 202,"contact with the peoples of the Illyrian kingdom and at the Celticized tribes of the Delmatae"
  74. ^ The Oxford Classical Dictionary, Simon Hornblower and Antony Spawforth, 2003, p. 1106
  75. ^ Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology by Barbara Ann Kipfer,2000,page 251,"... Sea and from there eastward to the Sar Mountains. The Illyrians, descendants of the hallstatt culture, were divided into tribes, each a self-governing community with ...
  76. ^ Tagliamonte, Gianluca (2010). "Armamento e guerra nell'Italia medio-adriatica preromana". Armamento e Guerra Nell'Italia Medio-adriatica Preromana (2): 381–392. doi:10.1400/210935.
  77. ^ Lejars, Thierry (2008), Verger, Daniele Vitali e Stéphane (ed.), "Les guerriers et l'armement celto-italique de la nécropole de Monte Bibele", Tra mondo celtico e mondo italico : la necropoli di Monte Bibele : atti della tavola rotonda, Bologna : Università di Bologna, Dipartimento di archeologia, pp. 127–222, retrieved 2020-11-26
  78. ^ Ricerche di archeologia medio-adriatica. Tagliamonte, Gianluca. Galatina (Lecce): Congedo. 2008. ISBN 978-88-8086-817-0. OCLC 436912717.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  79. ^ Tondo, Manuela (January 2012). "Nicosia-Tondo-Sacco 2012_Ricerche archeologiche e topografiche nel Comune di San Vittore del Lazio (Frosinone) in Lazio e Sabina 8". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  80. ^ Waffen für die Götter : Krieger, Trophäen, Heiligtümer. Meighörner, Wolfgang. Innsbruck: Tiroler Landesmuseen, Ferdinandeum Volkskunstmuseum. 2012. ISBN 978-3-900083-40-3. OCLC 829679857.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  81. ^ Lejars, Thierry; Bernadet, Renaud (2015). "L'Épée Laténienne du Sanctuaire de Junon À Gabies les Témoignages Archéologiques d'une Présence Celtique dans le Latium". Archeologia Classica. 66: 121–188. ISSN 0391-8165. JSTOR 26364279.
  82. ^ Celtic warrior, 300 BC-AD 100 by Stephen Allen,2001,ISBN 1841761435,page 3
  83. ^ Jacobsthal, Paul (2003). Early Celtic art. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-817170-6. OCLC 51779742.
  84. ^ Cunliffe, Barry (2010-05-01). Druids. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/actrade/9780199539406.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-953940-6.
  85. ^ Aristot. Eud. Eth. 3.1229b
  86. ^ Celtic warrior, 300 BC-AD 100 by Stephen Allen,2001,ISBN 1841761435,page 15
  87. ^ Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities p259 Excerpts from Book XIV
  88. ^ Ellis, Peter Berresford (1998). The Celts: A History. Caroll & Graf. pp. 60–3. ISBN 0-7867-1211-2.

External links[edit]