Women's medicine in antiquity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
An ancient oil painting of a birthing scene.

Childbirth and obstetrics in Classical Antiquity (here meaning the ancient Greco-Roman world) were studied by the physicians of ancient Greece and Rome. Their ideas and practices during this time endured in Western medicine for centuries and many themes are seen in modern women's health. Gynecology and obstetrics were originally studied and taught mainly by midwives in the ancient world, but eventually scholarly physicians of both sexes became involved as well. Obstetrics is traditionally defined as the surgical specialty dealing with the care of a woman and her offspring during pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium (recovery). Gynecology involves the medical practices dealing with the health of women's reproductive organs (vagina, uterus, ovaries) and their breasts.

Midwifery and obstetrics are distinctly different but overlap in medical practice that focuses on pregnancy and labor. Midwifery emphasizes the normality of pregnancy along with the reproductive process. Classical Antiquity saw the beginning of attempts to classify various areas of medical research, and the terms gynecology and obstetrics came into use. The Hippocratic Corpus, a large collection of treatises attributed to Hippocrates, features a number of gynecological treatises, which date to the classical period.

Women as Doctors[edit]

A modern engraving of Agnodice, a midwife and obstetrician, who according to legend disguised herself as a man in order to practice as a doctor.

During the era of Classical Antiquity, women practiced as doctors, but they were by far in the minority and typically confined to only gynecology and obstetrics. Aristotle was an important influence on later medical writers in Greece and eventually Europe. Aristotle concluded, similar to the writers of the Hippocratic Corpus, that women's physiology was fundamentally different from that of men primarily because women were physically weaker, and therefore more prone to symptoms caused in some way by weakness, such as the theory of humourism. humourism claims that both men and women had several "humours" regulating their physical health, and that women had a "cooler" humour.[1]

The Hippocratic Corpus writers indicated that men were more rational than women, and that women's physiology made them susceptible to problems that would cause symptoms of irrationality.[1] Continuing with this assumption that men were more rational, men dominated the profession of physicians, an occupation requiring rational research, and for which they believed women were not suited.

This did not stop women from becoming physicians, however; Agnodice was a popular gynecologist who disguised herself as a man in order to practice as a physician. Agnodice became so popular among her female patients that her male colleagues charged her with seducing her patients. In court, she revealed her sex and was exonerated.[2] Philista was a popular professor of medicine who delivered lectures from behind a curtain, to prevent her beauty from distracting her students.[3] In ancient Greece, there was also an intermediate occupation for midwives with some further medical training, known in Latin as the iatromea.[4] Merit-Ptah is the first woman named in the history of medicine and perhaps that of medicine; she is immortalized as the "chief physician".[5]

Women doctors may have offered specializations beyond gynecology and obstetrics, but there is not enough information to know how frequently. As obstetricians and gynecologists, they appear to have been numerous. The Law Code of Justinian presumed women doctors to be primarily obstetricians. The first medical text known to be written by a woman is by Metrodora, Concerning the Feminine Diseases of the Womb, a work in 63 chapters that was part of a series of at least two works that she authored. The earliest copy dates from between the 2nd century and the 4th century CE.[6]

It is important to remember that during Classical Antiquity, anyone could practice as a doctor; one's reputation served as their accreditation. Training involved mainly practical applications as well as forming an apprenticeship to other doctors. In many cases, medical profession seems to have come from family tradition. For example, Pantheia, who was the wife of a physician, became one herself, a pattern also seen in the careers of Aurelia Alexandria Zosime and Auguste. Auguste received recognition as a chief doctor of her city, a title her husband also received. Metilia Donata was prominent enough to commission a large public building in Lyon. Anthiochis of Tlos, a doctor who was the daughter of a prominent physician, Diodotus, was recognized by the council of Tlos for her work as a doctor and had a statue of herself erected. She was also a widely discussed expert cited by Galen and others. Aspasia is quoted extensively by Aetius on gynecology.[7]


During antiquity, there was no profession equal to that of our modern day nurse. No ancient medical sources discuss any sort of trained nursing personnel assisting doctors. However, many texts mention the use of slaves or members of a doctor's family as assistants.[8] The closest similarity to that of a nurse during antiquity was a midwife. Midwifery flourished in ancient civilizations, including Egypt, Byzantium, Mesopotamia, and the Mediterranean empires of Greece and Rome. Herophilus wrote a manual for midwives, an advance for midwifery's status. This was followed by the work of the Greek Soranus of Ephesus, who was widely translated into Latin,[9] and Galen. This Greco-Roman approach differs greatly from other ancient civilizations, where women's role as medical specialists concerning gynecology and obstetrics was apparently unquestioned. Medical schools attached to temples in ancient Egypt were numerous, including well-known medical schools for women at Heliopolis and Sais, where women are also believed to have been the professors.[3]

Soranus of Ephesus states that for a woman to be an eligible midwife she must be

A suitable person…must be literate to be able to comprehend the art through theory too. She must have her wits about her so that she may easily follow what is said and what is happening. She must have a good memory to retain the imparted instructions (for knowledge arises from memory of what has been grasped). She must love work, to preserve through all vicissitudes (for a woman who wishes to acquire such vast knowledge needs manly patience).

The most qualified midwife would be trained in all branches of therapy. She should be able to prescribe hygienic regulations for her patients, observe the general and individual features of the case, give advice by recalling from previous knowledge what medical decisions would work in every case and to be reassuring to her patients. It is not necessary for her to have had a child to deliver another woman’s child, but it is good if she has been in labor to enhance sympathy with the mother.

To obtain good midwifery habits, she will be well disciplined and always sober, have a quiet disposition sharing many life secrets, must not be greedy for money, be free of superstition to not overlook salutary measures, keeping her hands soft by staying away from wool-working as this may harden her hands and use ointments to acquire softness. She too needs to be respectable, the people of the household will have to trust her within their household, may not be handicapped in the performance of her work. Long and slim fingers with short nails are necessary to touch deep-lying inflammation without causing too much pain. Midwives that acquire of all these will be the best midwives.[10]

Soranus of Ephesus (98-138 BC) was an important gynecologist during antiqiuty and is credited with four books describing the female anatomy. This detailed instruction on midwives served as a sort of textbook and makes evident the well-respected role that midwives filled in society.

Birth Control[edit]

Women practiced birth control in antiquity mainly through their knowledge of plants and herbs. heir knowledge was transmitted by herders who observed sterility of their livestock when exposed to certain plants. Knowledge of birth control was also transmitted by word of mouth, mainly originating from knowledgeable midwives. Midwives knew how to identify necessary plants, how to administer them, and most importantly, when to administer them in relation to the last menstruation or coitus.[11]

Ancient coin depicting the silphium seed

A very popular plant used for birth control by the Greeks was Silphium. It is a giant fennel-like herb which was filled with a pungeant sap and offered a rich flavor. The plant was so widely used that it appeared on a Cyrenian coin as a woman touched the plant with one hand and pointed to her genitals with the other.[11] The demand for the plant was so great that by the fourth century, it had gone extinct. It is believed that the heart shape originated from the seed of this plant as they are the same shape and the plant was associated with love, romance, and sexuality.[12]

Although Silphium was most popular, there were many other plants and herbs used. The seeds of Queen Anne's Lace (a wild carrot) were cut up or chewed to release ingredients that inhibited fetal and ovarian growth. These seeds are still commonly used in India.[11] Another plant used as a contraceptive was pennyroyal, a plant that stimulated the production of female sex chromosomes thus reducing fertility. A medical document dating back to 1500 BC in Egypt includes a list of substances used as birth control. One substance involved making a paste from acacia gum, dates, fiber, honey, and other unidentified plants to create a sort of spermicide.[11]


There were many theories used to determine whether a woman was pregnant during antiquity. A popular method involved examining the vessels of her breasts. A second method involved sitting a woman on a beer and date mash covered floor and using a proportionality equation according to the number of times she vomits. Another method included inserting an onion into a woman's vagina and determining whether or not it could be smelled from her breath.[11] Although there is little evidence as to whether or not any of these methods were confirmed medical procedures or if they were just folklore.

Abortions were uncommon, but in their few occurrences, were performed by the mother herself. The results for both mother and child were often fatal as most abortions were performed by plunging a dagger into the woman's vagina.[11] Because of this procedure, it was most common to carry a baby full term before performing the abortion. According to the Hippocratic Corpus, there were oral alternatives used to induce abortion such as chaste, tree, copper, and Ferula species.[12] Plato explores the control that midwives perhaps had during this process:

And furthermore, the midwives, by means of drugs [149d] and incantations, are able to arouse the pangs of labor and, if they wish, to make them milder, and to cause those to bear who have difficulty in bearing; and they cause miscarriages if they think them desirable.

Labor and Delivery[edit]

Greek Attic funerary stele, showing a seated woman who died in childbirth bidding farewell to her husband, mother and newborn's nurse. Around 350 to 330 BCE.

Hospitals did not exist during antiquity so delivery took place in the home of the expectant mother with a midwife and other assistants to the midwife. Religion played a major role during labor and delivery. Women called upon Artemis, a goddess with the ability to bring new life into the world as well as the ability to take it away. Though she remained a virgin herself, it was said that she witnessed the pain of her mother during the birth of her brother, Apollo, and immediately assumed the position of midwife. If a woman died during childbirth, her clothes were taken to the temple of Artemis due to the fact the woman's death was attributed to her.[13] If the birth was successful, the mother would make an offering of thanks by sacrificing some of her clothes to the goddess as well.[14]

Herbs and other plants were used heavily in the delivery process, a practice also linked to religious belief. For example, a drink sprinkled with powdered sow’s dung was given to relieve labor pain, and fumigation with the fat from a hyena was thought to produce immediate delivery.[15] Most of these practices had little to no medical efficacy, but they did probably provide some placebo effect. Despite the attempt to use science in advancing medical knowledge, the experimentation and teachings of the Hippocratic Corpus were not necessarily more effective than the traditional customs of midwifery. For example, the Hippocratic writers believed that the womb could move out of place and cause health problems, and the prescribed treatment was to coax the displaced womb back into place using sweet-smelling herbs.[16]

Soranus described three main stages of pregnancy: conception, which regarded keeping the male seed within the womb; pica, which occurred 40 days into pregnancy and included symptoms of nausea and cravings for extraordinary foods. During this phase women were also instructed to exercise and sleep more to build up strength as preparation for the labor process. The final stage of pregnancy was described as the labor and the process of delivery. In preparation for labor, the woman was advised to bathe in wine and sweet-water baths to calm her mind before delivery. Her belly was then rubbed with oils to decrease the appearance of stretch marks and her genitals were anointed with herbs and injected with softeners such as goose fat.[15]

The role of the midwife was very important during the process of childbirth and Soranus described her role in great detail. For example, the midwife was to have certain tools to ensure a safe delivery, including: clean olive oil, sea sponges, pieces of wool bandages to cradle the infant, a pillow, strong smelling herbs in case of fainting, and a birthing stool.[15] A birthing stool is a chair from which the seat has been removed.

The midwife would ready her supplies as labor began. During the labor process, the mother would lie on her back on a hard, low bed with support under her hips. Her thighs were parted with her feet drawn up. Gentle massage was implemented to ease labor pains as cloths soaked in warm olive oil were laid over her stomach and genital area. Against the woman's sides were placed hot compresses in the form of warm oil-filled bladders.[15]

During the actual birth, the mother would be moved to the birthing stool where she was seated or would squat on two llarge bricks with a midwife in front of her and female aids standing at her sides. In a normal headfirst delivery, the cervical opening was stretched slightly, and the rest of the body was pulled out. Soranus instructed the midwife to wrap her hands in pieces of cloth or thin papyrus so that the slippery newborn did not slide out of her grasp.[15]

Caesarian Sections[edit]

The word “caesarian” possibly derives from the ancient Roman ruler Julius Caesar, because it was believed that Caesar was delivered through this procedure.[17] However, this is probably based more on tradition and myth than historical accuracies. Another possibility for the etymology of the word “caesarian” is the Latin word caedere, meaning “to cut”.[17] This practice is probably much older than Julius Caesar, but "C-sections", as performed by the Romans, were done to rescue the baby from a dying or already dead mother, and were performed post-mortem.[18]

Evidence suggests that Jews in ancient Rome successfully practiced C-sections on living mothers who were not in danger of dying.[19] Evidence of these procedures is found in several collections of ancient Roman Rabbis, the most famous of which is called the Mishnah.[19] Greeks and Egyptians did not perform C-sections, either post-mortem or on living mothers. However, Greeks would have had at least some knowledge of the caesarian operation and the procedure involved. The Greek god Aesclepius was fabled to have been extracted from his mother’s womb through this procedure.[17]

Other than the evidence of Jews practicing C-sections in antiquity (very little in ancient Rome, even less in ancient Greece), not much more evidence exists regarding caesarian-operation birth. One reason could have been that C-sections were not performed very often because of medical complications or superstitions surrounding C-sections. In early Christian Rome, C-sections were almost non-existent.[19] Loss of skill is a possibility for the lack of C-sections. Infant mortality rates were high in antiquity, so C-sections certainly could have been useful. However, early Christian doctors could have disregarded C-sections as a socially acceptable surgery because of religious beliefs.Disease, a perceived need for secrecy, and social discouragement could also have been factors that lead to the decline in C-sections among early Christians in Rome. Almost no evidence exists for C-sections in the Christian world until the 10th century.[18]

The lack of education for women and the social norm that women remained in the private sphere of life (as opposed to public) is theorized to also have contributed to a shortage of C-sections.[18] Midwives were the primary persons involved in the childbirth process. They did not record their medical practices in writing like Soranus or Galen. Thus, C-sections could have potentially occurred on a fairly regular basis, and accounts were simply not recorded.

Death and Childbirth[edit]

Mortality is considered to have been quite high in antiquity due to a few factors: a lack of sanitation and hygienic awareness, no understanding of micro-organisms, and a dearth of effective drugs. In the context of childbirth, however, maternal and infant mortality were exponentially raised by modern standards. This inflation resulted from the toll childbirth took on women, and the increased risk of infection following labor.


Maternal mortality figures are available only through comparison. Maternal mortality is thought to be comparable with figures for similar, but much later, societies with more surviving records, such as eighteenth-century rural England, where maternal mortality averaged 25 per 1000 births.[20]


The question of infant mortality in antiquity is complicated by infanticide and exposure, neither of which reflect on medical ability during the period. The former does this through intentional death of the child, and the latter through abandonment, and possible death. These reflect instead on social conditions and norms. While valuable, this is not the information sought, and scholars having painstakingly attempted to eliminate the noise from their inquiries.[21]

Much like maternal mortality, it is difficult to construct actual figures of the infant mortality rate in antiquity, but comparisons have been made between ancient societies and modern non-industrialized societies. The figures suggest that they are comparable with those of modern industrialized societies to put them in perspective. While infant mortality is less than 10 per 1000 in modern industrialized societies, non-industrialized societies display rates from 50 to 200+ per 1000. Scholarship using model life tables and assuming life expectancy at birth of 25 years produces the figure of 300 per 1000 for Roman society.[20]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ a b Salisbury, Joyce E. (2001). Women in the Ancient World. ABC-CLIO. pp. 142–3. ISBN 9781576070925. 
  2. ^ Retief, Fracois P. (2005). The Healing Hand: The Role of Women in Ancient Medicine: The Graeco-Roman World. Acta Theologica Supplementum. p. 178. 
  3. ^ a b Grant, Ted and Sandy Carter (2004). Women In Medicine: A Celebration Of Their Work. Firefly Books. p. 24. ISBN 9781552979068. 
  4. ^ Furst, Lilian R. (1999). Women Healers and Physicians: Climbing a Long Hill. University Press of Kentucky. p. 136. ISBN 9780813109541. 
  5. ^ "13.7: Women's History Month | Merit Ptah". www.13point7billion.org. Retrieved 2015-10-25. 
  6. ^ Furst, Lilian R. (1999). Women Healers and Physicians: Climbing a Long Hill. University Press of Kentucky. p. 138. ISBN 9780813109541. 
  7. ^ Furst, Lilian R. (1999). Women Healers and Physicians: Climbing a Long Hill. University Press of Kentucky. pp. 136–7. ISBN 9780813109541. 
  8. ^ Retief, Francois P (2005). The Healing Hand: The Role of Women in Ancient Medicine: The Graeco-Roman World. Acta Theologica Supplemetum. p. 167. 
  9. ^ Gagarin, Michael and Elaine Fantham (2009). The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Greece and Rome, Volume 1. Oxford University Press. p. 372. ISBN 9780195170726. 
  10. ^ Mary R. Lefkowitz and Maureen B. Fant, Women's Life in Greece and Rome, (Baltimore, Maryland, 2005), 265
  11. ^ a b c d e f "Birth Control in Antiquity". University of Illinois at Chicago. 
  12. ^ a b Baumann-Birbeck, Lyndsee. "Women's Reproductive Medicines in Classical Antiquity" (PDF). International Society for the History of Pharmacy. Griffith University. 
  13. ^ Ginette Paris, Pagan Meditations, (Dallas: Spring Publications, Inc., 1986) 109.
  14. ^ Robert Garland, “Mother and Child in the Greek World,” History Today, March 1986, 43
  15. ^ a b c d e Donald Todman, “Childbirth in ancient Rome: from tradition folklore to obstetrics,” Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2007, 83
  16. ^ Gagarin, Michael and Elaine Fantham (2009). The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Greece and Rome, Volume 1. Oxford University Press. p. 371. ISBN 9780195170726. 
  17. ^ a b c Anon. “Caesarian Section.” U.S. National Library of Medicine. Maryland: Bethesda. Jan., 1993, updated May 2008
  18. ^ a b c Depierri, Kate P. “One Way of Unearthing the Past.” American Journal of Nursing, vol. 68, 1968: 521 524
  19. ^ a b c Boss, Jeffrey. “Caesarian Section with Maternal Survival Among Jews in the Roman Period.” Man, Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland,1961, 18-19
  20. ^ a b Brisbane, Todd (8 Mar 2007). "Childbirth in ancient Rome: from traditional folklore to obstetrics". Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 47 (2): 82–85. doi:10.1111/j.1479-828X.2007.00691.x. 
  21. ^ Riddle, John M. (1992). Contraception and Abortion: From the Ancient World to the Renaissance. Harvard UP. pp. 7–15. ISBN 0-674-16875-5.