Jump to content

Circular RNA

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
CircRNAs Biogenesis
This is a representative figure showing mature mRNA splicing and corresponding canonical biogenesis of circRNAs which might include:
B.1) direct back splicing;
B.2) Intron pairing driven circularization;
B.3) debranching resistant intron lariat;
B.4) lariat-driven circularization (exon skipping).

In molecular biology, circular RNA (or circRNA) is a type of single-stranded RNA which, unlike linear RNA, forms a covalently closed continuous loop. In circular RNA, the 3' and 5' ends normally present in an RNA molecule have been joined together. This feature confers numerous properties to circular RNA, many of which have only recently been identified.

Many types of circular RNA arise from otherwise protein-coding genes. Some circular RNA have been shown to code for proteins.[1][2] Some types of circular RNA have also recently shown potential as gene regulators. The biological function of most circular RNA is unclear.

Because circular RNA do not have 5' or 3' ends, they are resistant to exonuclease-mediated degradation and are presumably more stable than most linear RNA in cells.[3] Circular RNA has been linked to some diseases such as cancer.[4]

RNA splicing


In contrast to genes in bacteria, eukaryotic genes are split by non-coding sequences called introns. In eukaryotes, as a gene is transcribed from DNA into a messenger RNA (mRNA) transcript, intervening introns are removed, leaving only exons in the mature mRNA, which can subsequently be translated to produce the protein product.[5] The spliceosome,[5] a protein-RNA complex located in the nucleus, catalyzes splicing in the following manner:

  1. The spliceosome recognizes an intron, which is flanked by specific sequences at its 5' and 3' ends, known as a donor splice site (or 5' splice site) and an acceptor splice site (or 3' splice site), respectively.
  2. The 5' splice site sequence is then subjected to a nucleophilic attack by a downstream sequence called the branch point, resulting in a circular structure called a lariat.
  3. The free 5' exon then attacks the 3' splice site, joining the two exons and releasing a structure known as an intron lariat. The intron lariat is subsequently de-branched and quickly degraded.[5]
Pre-mRNA to mRNA splicing

Alternative splicing


Alternative splicing is a phenomenon through which one RNA transcript can yield different protein products based on which segments are considered "introns" and "exons" during a splicing event.[5] Although not specific to humans, it is a partial explanation for the fact that humans and other much simpler species (such as nematodes) have similar numbers of genes (in the range of 20 - 25 thousand).[6] One of the most striking examples of alternative splicing is in the Drosophila DSCAM gene, which can give rise to approximately 30 thousand distinct alternatively spliced isoforms.[7]

Non-canonical splicing


Exon scrambling


Exon scrambling, also called exon shuffling, describes an event in which exons are spliced in a "non-canonical" (atypical) order. There are three ways in which exon scrambling can occur:

  1. Tandem exon duplication in the genome, which often occurs in cancers.
  2. Trans-splicing, in which two RNA transcripts fuse, resulting in a linear transcript containing exons that, for example, may be derived from genes encoded on two different chromosomes. Trans-splicing is very common in C. elegans
  3. A splice donor site being joined to a splice acceptor site further upstream in the primary transcript, yielding a circular transcript.[8]

The notion that circularized transcripts are byproducts from imperfect splicing is supported by the low abundance and the lack of sequence conservation of most circRNAs,[9] but has been challenged.[8][10][3]

Alu elements impact circRNA splicing


Repetitive Alu sequences represent approximately 10% of the human genome.[11] The presence of Alu elements in flanking introns of protein-coding genes adjacent to the first and last exons that form circRNAs, influence the formation of circRNAs.[12][13][3][14] It is important that the flanking intronic Alu elements are complementary, as this enables RNA pairing, which in turn facilitates circRNA synthesis.[15]

Impact of RNA editing on circRNA formation


RNAs can undergo base modification by RNA editing after transcription. RNA editing occurs mainly in Alu elements of protein-coding genes.[16] A-to-I RNA editing in up- and downstream intronic Alu elements flanking the back-splice site (BSS) can reduces the formation of circRNAs in the human heart.[16] In the failing human heart, a predominant reduction in A-to-I RNA editing leads to an increased formation of circRNAs, which is presumably mediated by better complementary pairing of RNA of the Alu elements flanking the back-splice site.[16]

Characteristics of circular RNA


Early discoveries of circRNAs


Early discoveries of circular RNAs led to the belief that they lacked significance due to their rarity. These early discoveries included the analysis of genes like the DCC and Sry genes, and the recent discovery of the human non-coding RNA ANRIL, all of which expressed circular isoforms. CircRNA producing genes like the human ETS-1 gene, the human and rat cytochrome P450 genes, the rat androgen binding protein gene (Shbg), and the human dystrophin gene were also discovered.[17]

Genome-wide identification of circRNAs


Scrambled isoforms and circRNAs


In 2012, in an effort to initially identify cancer-specific exon scrambling events, scrambled exons were discovered in large numbers in both normal and cancer cells. It was found that scrambled exon isoforms comprised about 10% of the total transcript isoforms in leukocytes, with 2,748 scrambled isoforms in HeLa and H9 embryonic stem cells being identified. Additionally, about 1 in 50 expressed genes produced scrambled transcript isoforms at least 10% of the time. Tests used to recognize circularity included treating samples with RNase R, an enzyme that degrades linear but not circular RNAs, and testing for the presence of poly-A tails, which are not present in circular molecules. Overall, 98% of scrambled isoforms were found to represent circRNAs, circRNAs were found to be located in the cytoplasm, and circRNAs were found to be abundant.[17][8]

Discovery of a higher abundance of circRNAs


In 2013, a higher abundance of circRNAs was discovered. Human fibroblast RNA was treated with RNase R to enrich for circular RNAs, followed by the categorization of circular transcripts based on their abundance (low, medium, high).[3] Approximately 1 in 8 expressed genes were found to produce detectable levels of circRNAs, including those of low abundance, which was significantly higher than previously suspected, and was attributed to greater sequencing depth.[3][8]

CircRNAs tissue specificity and antagonist activity


At the same time, a computational method to detect circRNAs was developed, leading to de novo detection of circRNAs in humans, mice, and C. elegans, and extensively validating them. The expression of circRNAs was often found to be tissue/developmental stage specific. Additionally, circRNAs were found to have the ability to act as antagonists of miRNAs, microRNAs which interfere with translation of mRNAs, as exemplified by the circRNA CDR1as, which has miRNA binding sites (as seen below).[18]

CircRNAs and ENCODE Ribozero RNA-seq data


In 2014, human circRNAs were identified and quantified from ENCODE Ribozero RNA-seq data. Most circRNAs were found to be minor splice isoforms and to be expressed in only a few cell types, with 7,112 human circRNAs having circular fractions (the fraction of similarity an isoform has to transcripts the same locus) of at least 10%. CircRNAs were also found to be no more conserved than their linear controls and, according to ribosome profiling, are not translated.<[9] As previously noted, circRNAs have the ability to act as antagonists of miRNA, which is also known as the potential to act as microRNA sponges. Aside from CDR1as, very few circRNAs have the potential to act as microRNA sponges. As a whole, the majority of circular RNAs were found to be inconsequential side-products of imperfect splicing.[18][9]

CircRNAs and CIRCexplorer


In the same year, CIRCexplorer, a tool used to identify thousands of circRNAs in humans without RNase R RNA-seq data, was developed. The vast majority of identified highly expressed exonic circular RNAs were found to be processed from exons located in the middle of RefSeq genes, suggesting that the circular RNA formation is generally coupled to RNA splicing. It was determined that most circular RNAs contain multiple, most commonly, two to three, exons. Exons from circRNAs with only one circularized exon were found to be much longer than those from circRNAs with multiple circularized exons, indicating that processing may prefer a certain length to maximize exon(s) circularization. The introns of circularized exons generally contain high Alu densities that can form inverted repeated Alu pairs (IRAlus). IRAlus, either convergent or divergent, are juxtaposed across flanking introns of circRNAs in a parallel way with similar distances to adjacent exons. IRAlus, and other non-repetitive, but complementary, sequences were also found to promote circular RNA formation. On the other hand, exon circularization efficiency was determined to be affected by the competition of RNA pairing, such that alternative RNA pairing, and its competition, leads to alternative circularization. Finally, both exon circularization and its regulation were found to be evolutionarily dynamic.[15]

Genome-wide calling of circRNA in Alzheimer disease cases


The Cruchaga lab performed the first large scale analyses of circRNA in Alzheimer disease (AD) and demonstrated the role of circRNAs in health and disease. A total of 148 circRNAs were found to be significantly associated in multiple datasets with Alzheimer's disease status and clinical dementia rating (CDR) at death after false discovery rate (FDR) correction. The expression of circRNAs was independent of the lineal form and that circRNA expression was also corrected by cell proportion. CircRNAs were also found to be co-expressed with known causal Alzheimer genes, such as APP and PSEN1, indicating that some circRNAs are also part of the causal pathway. Altogether, circRNA brain expression was found to explain more about Alzheimer's clinical manifestations than the number of APOε4 alleles, suggesting that circRNAs could be used as a potential biomarker for Alzheimer's.[19]

Classes of CircRNA

Hepatitis delta virus containing a circular single-stranded RNA genome.

Circular RNAs can be separated into five classes:[20][21]

Classes of Circular RNAs Description
Viroids and the hepatitis delta virus (HDV) In viroids and HDV, single-stranded circRNAs are vital in RNA replication. Circularity allows for one initiation event to lead to multiple genomic copies in a process otherwise known as rolling circle RNA replication.[22][23][24]
CircRNAs from introns Circular molecules are produced by introns produced from spliceosomal splicing, tRNA splicing, and group I and group II (self-splicing ribozymes) introns. Group I introns form circRNAs through autocatalytic ribozymal action, and while they can be detected in vivo, their function is yet to be determined.[22][23][24] Group II introns also generate circRNAs in vivo. Circular introns produced by eukaryotic spliceosomal splicing are circularized intron lariats known as circular intronic RNAs (ciRNAs). Due to circularization, ciRNAs can avoid degradation and are believed to be highly overrepresented. CiRNA function is currently unknown; however, it is speculated they may play a role in enhancing the transcription of genes they are produced from, as they interact with RNA polymerase II.[21]
CircRNAs from intermediates in RNA processing reactions These are first spliced from precursors as linear molecules and then circularized with a ligase. They are essential in allowing for the rearrangement in RNA sequence order and vital in the biogenesis of permuted tRNA genes in certain algae and archaea.[21]
Noncoding circRNAs in archaea Certain archaeal species have circRNAs that are produced from excised circularized tRNA introns. Circularization of functional noncoding RNAs is thought to work as a protective mechanism against exonucleases and to promote proper folding.[21][3]
CircRNAs in eukaryotes produced by back-splicing Circular RNAs produced by back-splicing (a form of exon scrambling) occur when a 5′ splice site is joined to an upstream 3′ splice site. Currently, more than 25,000 different circRNAs have been identified in humans.[21][3]

Length of circRNAs


A recent study of human circRNAs revealed that these molecules are usually composed of 1–5 exons.[18] Each of these exons can be up to three times longer than the average expressed exon,[3] suggesting that exon length may play a role in deciding which exons to circularize. 85% of circularized exons overlap with exons that code for protein,[18] although the circular RNAs themselves do not appear to be translated. During circRNA formation, exon 2 is often the upstream "acceptor" exon.[8]

Introns surrounding exons that are selected to be circularized are, on average, up to three times longer than those not flanking pre-circle exons,[8][3] although it is not yet clear why this is the case. Compared to regions not resulting in circles, these introns are much more likely to contain complementary inverted Alu repeats, Alu being the most common transposon in the genome.[3] By the Alu repeats base pairing to one another, it has been proposed that this may enable the splice sites to find each other, thus facilitating circularization.[10][3]

Introns within the circRNAs are retained at a relatively high frequency (~25%),[9] thus adding extra sequence to the mature circRNAs.

Location of circRNAs in the cell


In the cell, circRNAs are predominantly found in the cytoplasm, where the number of circular RNA transcripts derived from a gene can be up to ten times greater than the number of associated linear RNAs generated from that locus. It is unclear how circular RNAs exit the nucleus through a relatively small nuclear pore. Because the nuclear envelope breaks down during mitosis, one hypothesis is that the molecules exit the nucleus during this phase of the cell cycle.[3] However, certain circRNAs, such as CiRS-7/CDR1as, are expressed in neuronal tissues,[18][25] where mitotic division is not prevalent.

Human cell nucleus diagram

CircRNAs are more stable than linear RNAs


CircRNAs lack a polyadenylated tail and, therefore, are predicted to be less prone to degradation by exonucleases. In 2015, Enuka et al. measured the half-lives of 60 circRNAs and their linear counterparts expressed from the same host gene and revealed that the median half-life of circRNAs of mammary cells (18.8 to 23.7 hours) is at least 2.5 times longer than the median half-life of their linear counterparts (4.0 to 7.4 hours).[26] Generally, the lifetime of RNA molecules defines their response time.[27] Accordingly, it was reported that mammary circRNAs respond slowly to stimulation by growth factors.[26]

Plausible functions of circular RNA


Evolutionary conservation of circularization mechanisms and signals


CircRNAs have been identified in various species across the domains of life. In 2011, Danan et al. sequenced RNA from Archaea. After digesting total RNA with RNase R, they were able to identify circular species, indicating that circRNAs are not specific to eukaryotes.[28] However, these archaeal circular species are probably not made via splicing, suggesting that other mechanisms to generate circular RNA likely exist.

CircRNAs were found to be largely conserved between human and sheep. By analyzing total RNA sequencing data from sheep's parietal lobe cortex and peripheral blood mononuclear cells it was shown that 63% of the detected circRNAs are homologous to known human circRNAs.[29]

Three domains of life

In a closer evolutionary connection, a comparison of RNA from mouse testes vs. RNA from a human cell found 69 orthologous circRNAs. For example, both humans and mice encode the HIPK2 and HIPK3 genes, two paralogous kinases which produce a large amount of circRNA from one particular exon in both species.[3] Evolutionary conservation reinforces the likelihood of a relevant and significant role for RNA circularization.

CDR1as/CiRS-7 as a miR-7 sponge


microRNAs (miRNAs) are small (~21nt) non-coding RNAs that repress translation of messenger RNAs involved in a large, diverse set of biological processes.[30] They directly base-pair to target messenger RNAs (mRNAs), and can trigger cleavage of the mRNA depending on the degree of complementarity.

MicroRNAs are grouped in "seed families". Family members share nucleotides 2–7, known as the seed region.[31] Argonaute proteins are the "effector proteins" which help miRNAs carry out their job, while microRNA sponges are RNAs that "sponge up" miRNAs of a particular family, thereby serving as competitive inhibitors that suppress the ability of the miRNA to bind its mRNA targets, thanks to the presence of multiple binding sites that recognize a specific seed region.[31] Certain circular RNAs have many miRNA binding sites, which yielded a clue that they may function in sponging. Two recent papers confirmed this hypothesis by investigating a circular sponge called CDR1as/CiRS-7 in Detail, while other groups found no direct evidence for circular RNAs acting as miRNA sponges by analyzing the potential interaction of circular RNAs with the Argonaut (AGO) Protein using high-throughput sequencing of RNA isolated by cross-linking and immunoprecipitation (HITS-CLIP) data .[32]

CDR1as/CiRS-7 is encoded in the genome antisense to the human CDR1 (gene) locus (hence the name CDR1as),[18] and targets miR-7 (hence the name CiRS-7 – Circular RNA Sponge for miR-7).[25] It has over 60 miR-7 binding sites, far more than any known linear miRNA sponge.[18][25]

AGO2 is miR-7's associated Argonaute protein (see above). Though CDR1as/CiRS-7 can be cleaved by miR-671 and its associated Argonaute protein,[25] it cannot be cleaved by miR-7 and AGO2. MicroRNA cleavage activity depends on complementarity beyond the 12th nucleotide position; none of CiRS-7's binding sites meet this requirement.

An experiment with zebrafish, which do not have the CDR1 locus in their genome, provides evidence for CiRS-7's sponge activity. During development, miR-7 is strongly expressed in the zebrafish brain. To silence miR-7 expression in zebrafish, Memczak and colleagues took advantage of a tool called morpholino, which can base pair and sequester target molecules.[33] Morpholino treatment had the same severe effect on midbrain development as ectopically expressing CiRS-7 in zebrafish brains using injected plasmids. This indicates a significant interaction between CiRS-7 and miR-7 in vivo.[18]

Another notable circular miRNA sponge is SRY. SRY, which is highly expressed in murine testes, functions as a miR-138 sponge.[25][34] In the genome, SRY is flanked by long inverted repeats (IRs) over 15.5 kilobases (kb) in length. When one or both of the IRs are deleted, circularization does not occur. It was this finding that introduced the idea of inverted repeats enabling circularization.[35]

Because circular RNA sponges are characterized by high expression levels, stability, and a large number of miRNA binding sites, they are likely to be more effective sponges than those that are linear.[10]

Other possible functions for circRNAs


Though recent attention has been focused on circRNA's "sponge" functions, scientists are considering several other functional possibilities as well. For example, some areas of the mouse adult hippocampus show expression of CiRS-7 but not miR-7, suggesting that CiRS-7 may have roles that are independent of interacting with the miRNA.[18]

Potential roles include the following:

  • Binding to RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) and RNAs besides miRNAs to form RNA-protein complexes.[10] These complexes could regulate RBP & RNA interactions with, for example, the canonical linear transcript of the gene or viral infection.[8][36]
  • Protein production
    • Chen and Sarnow 1995 showed that a synthetic circRNA that contained an IRES (internal ribosome entry site) produced a protein product in vitro, whereas that without an IRES did not. Although the tested circRNA was a purely artificial construct, Chen and Sarnow stated in their paper that they would be interested to see whether circles naturally contain IRES elements.[37]
    • Jeck et al. 2013: Tested natural circRNAs that contained a translation "start codon". However, none of these molecules bound to ribosomes, suggesting that many circRNAs may not be translated in vivo.[3]
  • Transporting miRNAs inside the cell. The fact that CiRS-7 can be sliced by miR-671 might indicate the existence of a system to release a "load" of miRNAs at the appropriate time.[38]
  • Regulating mRNA in the cell through limited base pairing. It is formally possible that miR-7 moderates CiRS-7's regulatory activity instead of the other way around![18][38]

Circular intronic long non-coding RNAs (ciRNAs)


Usually, intronic lariats (see above) are debranched and rapidly degraded. However, a debranching failure can lead to the formation of circular intronic long non-coding RNAs, also known as ciRNAs.[39] CiRNA formation, rather than being a random process, seems to depend on the presence of specific elements near the 5' splice site and the branchpoint site (see above).

CiRNAs are distinct from circRNAs in that they are prominently found in the nucleus rather than the cytoplasm. In addition, these molecules contain few (if any) miRNA binding sites. Instead of acting as sponges, ciRNAs seem to function in regulating the expression of their parent genes. For example, a relatively abundant ciRNA called ci-ankrd52 positively regulates Pol II transcription. Many ciRNAs remain at their "sites of synthesis" in the nucleus. However, ciRNA may have roles other than simply regulating their parent genes, as ciRNAs do localize to additional sites in the nucleus other than their "sites of synthesis".[39]

Circular RNA and disease


As with most topics in molecular biology, it is important to consider how circular RNA can be used as a tool to help mankind. Given its abundance, evolutionary conservation, and potential regulatory role, it is worthwhile to look into how circular RNA can be used to study pathogenesis and devise therapeutic interventions. For example:

  • Circular ANRIL (cANRIL) is the circular form of ANRIL, a long non-coding RNA (ncRNA). Expression of cANRIL is correlated with risk for atherosclerosis, a disease in which the arteries become hard. It has been proposed that cANRIL can modify INK4/ARF expression, which, in turn, increases risk for atherosclerosis.[40] Further study of cANRIL expression could potentially be used to prevent or treat atherosclerosis.
  • miR-7 plays an important regulatory role in several cancers and in Parkinson's disease, which is a brain illness of unknown origin.[25] Perhaps CiRS-7's sponge activity could help in countering miR-7 activity. If circular sponge activity can indeed help in countering harmful miRNA activity, scientists will need to figure out the best way to introduce sponge expression, perhaps via a transgene, which is a synthetic gene that is transferred between organisms. It is also important to consider how transgenes can be expressed only in specific tissues, or expressed only when induced.[31]
  • Circular RNAs were found to be regulated by hypoxia, especially the circRNA cZNF292 was found to have proangiogenic activities in endothelial cells.[32]
  • Circular RNA was discovered to play a role in assisting HIV-1 in evading the body's immune defenses. HIV protein known as Vpr induced the production of a circular RNA molecule referred to as ciTRAN. Subsequently, ciTRAN was observed binding to a specific protein called SRSF1, thereby effectively disrupting SRSF1's ability to inhibit HIV-1 transcription.[41]

Circular RNAs play a role in Alzheimer disease pathogenesis


Dube et al.,[19] demonstrated for the first time that brain circular RNAs (circRNA) are part of the pathogenic events that lead to Alzheimer's disease, hypothesizing that specific circRNA would be differentially expressed in AD cases compared to controls and that those effects could be detected early in the disease. They optimized and validated a novel analyses pipeline for circular RNAs (circRNA). They performed a three-stage study design, using the Knight ADRC brain RNA-seq data as discovery (stage 1), using the data from Mount Sinai as replication (stage 2) and a meta-analysis (stage 3) to identify the most significant circRNA differentially expressed in Alzheimer disease. Using his pipeline, they found 3,547 circRNA that passed stringent QC in the Knight ADRC cohort that includes RNA-seq from 13 controls and 83 Alzheimer cases, and 3,924 circRNA passed stringent QC in the MSBB dataset. A meta-analysis of the discovery and replication results revealed a total of 148 circRNAs that were significantly correlated with CDR after FDR correction. In addition, 33 circRNA passed the stringent gene-based, Bonferroni multiple test correction of 5×10-6, including circHOMER1 (P =2.21×10−18) and circCDR1-AS (P = 2.83 × 10−8), among others. They also performed additional analyses to demonstrate that the expression of circRNA were independent of the lineal form as well as the cell proportion that can confound the brain RNA-seq analyses in Alzheimer disease studies. They performed co-expression analyses of all the circRNA together with the lineal forms and found that circRNA, including those that were differentially expressed in Alzheimer disease compared to controls co-expressed with known causal Alzheimer genes, such as APP and PSEN1, indicating that some circRNA are also part of the causal pathway. They also demonstrated that circRNA brain expression explained more about Alzheimer clinical manifestations that the number of APOε4 alleles, suggesting that could be used as a potential biomarker for Alzheimer disease. This is an important study for the field, as it is the first time that circRNA are quantified and validated (by real-time PCR) in human brain samples at genome-wide scale and in large and well-characterized cohorts. It also demonstrates that these RNA forms are likely to be implicated on complex traits including Alzheimer disease will help to understand the biological events that leads to disease.

Circular RNA pathogenesis in Heart disease, Renal disease, Liver disease, autoimmune disease, and Cancer development


Heart disease


Recent studies have shown that circRNA is associated with heart failure and heart disease. circFOXO3, Titin genes, circSLC8A1-1 and circAmotl1 play an important role in cardiac function through upregulation or inhibition relevant to heart disease. Overexpression of circFOXO3 and its downregulation binds to the transcription factors E2F1, HIF1α and protein ID1, FAK, causing cardiomyopathy induced by DOX. Titin gene derived circRNA induces cardiotoxicity in cardiomyocytes. circSLC8A1-1 overexpression causes sponging of the cardiac hypertrophy regulator miR-133 and leads to heart failure. Apart from circRNA-mediated cardiac disease, some circRNAs have played a role in cardiac damage repair. For example, circAmotl1 overexpression increases cardiomyocyte longevity through binding and translocation of AKT that regulates cardiac repair. Circular RNA CDR1 has an important role during infection in the myocardium. Cardiac dysfunction occurs post myocardial infection due to CircNfix downregulation. Since various types of circular RNA are related to heart disease, it can be used as a potential biomarker and therapeutic target. For example, postoperative atrial fibrillation has been observed in some patients after cardiac surgery where circRNA_025016 is used as a biomarker. Although the relevance of circular RNA overexpression and downregulation to heart disease has been found from various research studies, it is still unclear. Therefore, further research is needed to trace disease progression in different stages of cardiac dysfunction using circular RNA as a biomarker and can be used for gene delivery purposes in cells.[42]

Renal disease


Various studies have demonstrated that circular RNA acts as a prognostic agent and biomarker in kidney diseases including renal cell carcinoma, acute kidney injury, diabetic nephropathy, and lupus nephritis. Renal chronicity is associated with miR-150, which is negatively regulated by circHLA-C, in patients with lupus nephritis. There is also evidence that circular RNA is involved in acute kidney injury. In these circumstances circular RNA proves to be a novel biomarker and is also used for targeted therapy of kidney disease because its pseudogene can alter DNA composition.[43]

Liver disease


Evidence found that circular RNA plays a role in chronic liver disease and homeostasis regulation leading to liver fibrosis and autoimmune disease by an epigenetic mechanism.[44]



Circular RNA has both positive and negative functions in cancer. For example, ciRS-7 was found to be an oncogene in colorectal cancer tissue that regulates the disease. Overexpression of this ciRS-7 leads to deregulated gene expression leading to malignant phenotypic features. On the other hand, some CircRNAs show positive effects such as circ-ITCH which regulates lung cancer associated with oncogenic sponges miR7 and miR214 and overexpression of circ-ITCH inhibits cell proliferation in lung cancer. From different research studies it has been found that F-circM-9, F-circPR and F-circEA, FcircEA-2 are involved in the development of leukemia and cancer. In osteosarcoma cell circ-0016347 induces tumor and downregulation of caspase-1 target. Another circular RNA hsa_circRNA_002178 leads to breast cancer when it overexpresses and down-regulates COL1A1 protein function. In contrast, silencing of hsa_circRNA_002178 reduced IL-6 and TNF-α production, which inhibited tumor growth and inflammation. Some viruses such as Epstein Barr virus and human papillomavirus can encode circular RNAs such as circEBNA_W1_C1 (EBV) and circE7 (HPV) that play a role in oncogenesis in infected individuals. As circRNAs involved in cancer development or regulation process so that it has the potential to use as a biomarker in cancer surveillance and identification process.[45] Circular RNA has the advantage of stability, tissue specificity and it can be found in the blood, saliva, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, and human body fluid secretion that has abundance in exosomes are good to use as cancer biomarker agent.[44][45]

Autoimmune disease


Circular RNA has a function in autoimmune disease progression acting as a miRNA sponge which regulates DNA methylation, adaptive immune activation, and costimulatory molecule secretion.[44]

Circular RNA in immune response


Circular RNA plays a significant role in immune regulation and induction of T cell responses. circRNA100783 is involved in immunity and senescence of CD8+ T cells. circRNA-003780 and circRNA-010056 also have major roles for macrophage differentiation and polarization.[45]

Circular RNA acts as a very active immune agent when it combines with soluble protein antigens and induces adaptive immunity that does not require a specific route of administration.  Plasma circular RNA and combined circRNa have higher efficiency in diagnosis than tissue specific treatment and single circular RNA. Treatment with circular RNA activates the differentiation and maturation of dendritic cells which then secrete a large number of different cytokines and chemokines by expressing the genes for IL-1β, IL-6 and TNFa. After immunization with circular RNA that encodes the antigen sequence, CD8+ mediator T cell responses to the target antigen are enhanced. Circular RNA has the very advantageous properties of stability and long shelf life, so it is useful for use as biomarkers and plasmids to express genes of interest.[46]

Circular RNA in Myogenesis regulation


Circular RNA plays an important role in myogenesis mechanisms such as circRBFOX2, circLMO7 acts as a negative regulator and CircSVIL acts as a positive regulator.[47] circRBFOX2 regulates miR-206 expression and induces myoblast proliferation in a negative effect on the myogenesis process. circLMO7 is involved in overexpression of HDAC4 and downregulates MEF2A expression by upregulating miR-378a-3p leading to myoblast differentiation.[47] CircSVIL a positive regulator induces miR-203 activity that is the inhibitor of myoblast production and differentiation. circFUT10 is involved in inhibition of myoblast proliferation but enhances differentiation through enhancement of SRF expression.[47] circSNX29 sponges miR-744 and circFGFR2 sponges miR-133a-5p and miR-29b-1-5p that promote myoblast differentiation. circSNX29 activates Wnt pathways by enhancing Wnt5a and CaMKIId expression which are involved in myogenesis regulation.[47]

Viroids as circular RNAs


Viroids are mostly plant pathogens, which consist of short stretches (a few hundred nucleobases) of highly complementary, circular, single-stranded, and non-coding RNAs without a protein coat. Compared with other infectious plant pathogens, viroids are extremely small in size, ranging from 246 to 467 nucleobases; they thus consist of fewer than 10,000 atoms. In comparison, the genome of the smallest known viruses capable of causing an infection by themselves are around 2,000 nucleobases long.[48]

See also



  1. ^ Dawoud A, Ihab Zakaria Z, Hisham Rashwan H, Braoudaki M, Youness RA (March 2023). "Circular RNAs: New layer of complexity evading breast cancer heterogeneity". Non-Coding RNA Research. 8 (1): 60–74. doi:10.1016/j.ncrna.2022.09.011. PMC 9637558. PMID 36380816. S2CID 252890235.
  2. ^ Pamudurti NR, Bartok O, Jens M, Ashwal-Fluss R, Stottmeister C, Ruhe L, et al. (April 2017). "Translation of CircRNAs". Molecular Cell. 66 (1): 9–21.e7. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.02.021. PMC 5387669. PMID 28344080.Open access icon
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Jeck WR, Sorrentino JA, Wang K, Slevin MK, Burd CE, Liu J, et al. (February 2013). "Circular RNAs are abundant, conserved, and associated with ALU repeats". RNA. 19 (2): 141–157. doi:10.1261/rna.035667.112. PMC 3543092. PMID 23249747.
  4. ^ Vromman M, Vandesompele J, Volders PJ (January 2021). "Closing the circle: current state and perspectives of circular RNA databases". Briefings in Bioinformatics. 22 (1): 288–297. doi:10.1093/bib/bbz175. PMC 7820840. PMID 31998941.
  5. ^ a b c d Reece JB (2010). Campbell Biology (9th ed.). San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings.
  6. ^ Yu J, Hu S, Wang J, Wong GK, Li S, Liu B, et al. (April 2002). "A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica)". Science. 296 (5565): 79–92. Bibcode:2002Sci...296...79Y. doi:10.1126/science.1068037. PMID 11935017. S2CID 208529258.
  7. ^ Celotto AM, Graveley BR (October 2001). "Alternative splicing of the Drosophila Dscam pre-mRNA is both temporally and spatially regulated". Genetics. 159 (2): 599–608. doi:10.1093/genetics/159.2.599. PMC 1461822. PMID 11606537.
  8. ^ a b c d e f g Salzman J, Gawad C, Wang PL, Lacayo N, Brown PO (2012). "Circular RNAs are the predominant transcript isoform from hundreds of human genes in diverse cell types". PLOS ONE. 7 (2): e30733. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...730733S. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030733. PMC 3270023. PMID 22319583.
  9. ^ a b c d Guo JU, Agarwal V, Guo H, Bartel DP (July 2014). "Expanded identification and characterization of mammalian circular RNAs". Genome Biology. 15 (7): 409. doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0409-z. PMC 4165365. PMID 25070500.
  10. ^ a b c d Wilusz JE, Sharp PA (April 2013). "Molecular biology. A circuitous route to noncoding RNA". Science. 340 (6131): 440–441. Bibcode:2013Sci...340..440W. doi:10.1126/science.1238522. PMC 4063205. PMID 23620042.
  11. ^ Daniel C, Silberberg G, Behm M, Öhman M (February 2014). "Alu elements shape the primate transcriptome by cis-regulation of RNA editing". Genome Biology. 15 (2): R28. doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r28. PMC 4053975. PMID 24485196.
  12. ^ Ivanov A, Memczak S, Wyler E, Torti F, Porath HT, Orejuela MR, et al. (January 2015). "Analysis of intron sequences reveals hallmarks of circular RNA biogenesis in animals". Cell Reports. 10 (2): 170–177. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.12.019. PMID 25558066.
  13. ^ Wilusz JE (2015-05-04). "Repetitive elements regulate circular RNA biogenesis". Mobile Genetic Elements. 5 (3): 39–45. doi:10.1080/2159256X.2015.1045682. PMC 4588227. PMID 26442181.
  14. ^ Liang D, Wilusz JE (October 2014). "Short intronic repeat sequences facilitate circular RNA production". Genes & Development. 28 (20): 2233–2247. doi:10.1101/gad.251926.114. PMC 4201285. PMID 25281217.
  15. ^ a b Zhang XO, Wang HB, Zhang Y, Lu X, Chen LL, Yang L (September 2014). "Complementary sequence-mediated exon circularization". Cell. 159 (1): 134–147. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.001. PMID 25242744. S2CID 18390400.
  16. ^ a b c Kokot KE, Kneuer JM, John D, Rebs S, Möbius-Winkler MN, Erbe S, et al. (June 2022). "Reduction of A-to-I RNA editing in the failing human heart regulates formation of circular RNAs". Basic Research in Cardiology. 117 (1): 32. doi:10.1007/s00395-022-00940-9. PMC 9226085. PMID 35737129.
  17. ^ a b Barrett SP, Salzman J (June 2016). "Circular RNAs: analysis, expression and potential functions". Development. 143 (11): 1838–1847. doi:10.1242/dev.128074. PMC 4920157. PMID 27246710.
  18. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Memczak S, Jens M, Elefsinioti A, Torti F, Krueger J, Rybak A, et al. (March 2013). "Circular RNAs are a large class of animal RNAs with regulatory potency". Nature. 495 (7441): 333–338. Bibcode:2013Natur.495..333M. doi:10.1038/nature11928. PMID 23446348. S2CID 4416605.
  19. ^ a b Dube U, Del-Aguila JL, Li Z, Budde JP, Jiang S, Hsu S, et al. (November 2019). "An atlas of cortical circular RNA expression in Alzheimer disease brains demonstrates clinical and pathological associations". Nature Neuroscience. 22 (11): 1903–1912. doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0501-5. PMC 6858549. PMID 31591557.
  20. ^ Eger N, Schoppe L, Schuster S, Laufs U, Boeckel JN (2018). "Circular RNA Splicing". In Xiao J (ed.). Circular RNAs. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. Vol. 1087. Singapore: Springer Singapore. pp. 41–52. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-1426-1_4. ISBN 978-981-13-1425-4. PMID 30259356.
  21. ^ a b c d e Nisar S, Bhat AA, Singh M, Karedath T, Rizwan A, Hashem S, et al. (2021-02-05). "Insights Into the Role of CircRNAs: Biogenesis, Characterization, Functional, and Clinical Impact in Human Malignancies". Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 9: 617281. doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.617281. PMC 7894079. PMID 33614648.
  22. ^ a b Grabowski PJ, Zaug AJ, Cech TR (February 1981). "The intervening sequence of the ribosomal RNA precursor is converted to a circular RNA in isolated nuclei of Tetrahymena". Cell. 23 (2): 467–476. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(81)90142-2. PMID 6162571. S2CID 41905828.
  23. ^ a b Kruger K, Grabowski PJ, Zaug AJ, Sands J, Gottschling DE, Cech TR (November 1982). "Self-splicing RNA: autoexcision and autocyclization of the ribosomal RNA intervening sequence of Tetrahymena". Cell. 31 (1): 147–157. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(82)90414-7. PMID 6297745. S2CID 14787080.
  24. ^ a b Zaug AJ, Grabowski PJ, Cech TR (17–23 February 1983). "Autocatalytic cyclization of an excised intervening sequence RNA is a cleavage-ligation reaction". Nature. 301 (5901): 578–583. Bibcode:1983Natur.301..578Z. doi:10.1038/301578a0. PMID 6186917. S2CID 4348876.
  25. ^ a b c d e f Hansen TB, Jensen TI, Clausen BH, Bramsen JB, Finsen B, Damgaard CK, Kjems J (March 2013). "Natural RNA circles function as efficient microRNA sponges". Nature. 495 (7441): 384–388. Bibcode:2013Natur.495..384H. doi:10.1038/nature11993. PMID 23446346. S2CID 205233122.
  26. ^ a b Enuka Y, Lauriola M, Feldman ME, Sas-Chen A, Ulitsky I, Yarden Y (February 2016). "Circular RNAs are long-lived and display only minimal early alterations in response to a growth factor". Nucleic Acids Research. 44 (3): 1370–1383. doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1367. PMC 4756822. PMID 26657629.
  27. ^ Sneppen K (2014). Models of Life - Dynamics and Regulation in Biological Systems. San Francisco: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-06190-3.
  28. ^ Danan M, Schwartz S, Edelheit S, Sorek R (April 2012). "Transcriptome-wide discovery of circular RNAs in Archaea". Nucleic Acids Research. 40 (7): 3131–3142. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1009. PMC 3326292. PMID 22140119.
  29. ^ Varela-Martínez E, Corsi GI, Anthon C, Gorodkin J, Jugo BM (January 2021). "Novel circRNA discovery in sheep shows evidence of high backsplice junction conservation". Scientific Reports. 11 (1): 427. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-79781-2. PMC 7801505. PMID 33432020.
  30. ^ Ding XC, Weiler J, Grosshans H (January 2009). "Regulating the regulators: mechanisms controlling the maturation of microRNAs". Trends in Biotechnology. 27 (1): 27–36. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.09.006. PMID 19012978.
  31. ^ a b c Ebert MS, Sharp PA (November 2010). "MicroRNA sponges: progress and possibilities". RNA. 16 (11): 2043–2050. doi:10.1261/rna.2414110. PMC 2957044. PMID 20855538.
  32. ^ a b Boeckel JN, Jaé N, Heumüller AW, Chen W, Boon RA, Stellos K, et al. (October 2015). "Identification and Characterization of Hypoxia-Regulated Endothelial Circular RNA". Circulation Research. 117 (10): 884–890. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306319. PMID 26377962.
  33. ^ Summerton J (December 1999). "Morpholino antisense oligomers: the case for an RNase H-independent structural type". Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Structure and Expression. 1489 (1): 141–158. doi:10.1016/S0167-4781(99)00150-5. PMID 10807004.
  34. ^ Capel B, Swain A, Nicolis S, Hacker A, Walter M, Koopman P, et al. (June 1993). "Circular transcripts of the testis-determining gene Sry in adult mouse testis". Cell. 73 (5): 1019–1030. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90279-y. PMID 7684656.
  35. ^ Dubin RA, Kazmi MA, Ostrer H (December 1995). "Inverted repeats are necessary for circularization of the mouse testis Sry transcript". Gene. 167 (1–2): 245–248. doi:10.1016/0378-1119(95)00639-7. PMID 8566785.
  36. ^ Bhardwaj V, Singh A, Dalavi R, Ralte L, Chawngthu RL, Senthil Kumar N, et al. (2022-11-04). "HIV-1 Vpr induces ciTRAN to prevent transcriptional silencing of the provirus". bioRxiv: 2022.11.04.515166. doi:10.1101/2022.11.04.515166. S2CID 253371318.
  37. ^ Chen CY, Sarnow P (April 1995). "Initiation of protein synthesis by the eukaryotic translational apparatus on circular RNAs". Science. 268 (5209): 415–417. Bibcode:1995Sci...268..415C. doi:10.1126/science.7536344. PMID 7536344.
  38. ^ a b Hentze MW, Preiss T (April 2013). "Circular RNAs: splicing's enigma variations". The EMBO Journal. 32 (7): 923–925. doi:10.1038/emboj.2013.53. PMC 3616293. PMID 23463100.
  39. ^ a b Zhang Y, Zhang XO, Chen T, Xiang JF, Yin QF, Xing YH, et al. (September 2013). "Circular intronic long noncoding RNAs". Molecular Cell. 51 (6): 792–806. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2013.08.017. PMID 24035497.
  40. ^ Burd CE, Jeck WR, Liu Y, Sanoff HK, Wang Z, Sharpless NE (December 2010). "Expression of linear and novel circular forms of an INK4/ARF-associated non-coding RNA correlates with atherosclerosis risk". PLOS Genetics. 6 (12): e1001233. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001233. PMC 2996334. PMID 21151960.
  41. ^ Bhardwaj V, Singh A, Choudhary A, Dalavi R, Ralte L, Chawngthu RL, et al. (September 2023). "HIV-1 Vpr induces ciTRAN to prevent transcriptional repression of the provirus". Science Advances. 9 (36): eadh9170. Bibcode:2023SciA....9H9170B. doi:10.1126/sciadv.adh9170. PMC 10482341. PMID 37672576.
  42. ^ Wang, Ying; Liu, Bin (2020-05-17). "Circular RNA in Diseased Heart". Cells. 9 (5): 1240. doi:10.3390/cells9051240. ISSN 2073-4409. PMC 7290921. PMID 32429565.
  43. ^ Jin, Juan; Sun, Haolu; Shi, Chao; Yang, Hui; Wu, Yiwan; Li, Wanhai; Dong, Yu-hang; Cai, Liang; Meng, Xiao-ming (June 2020). "Circular RNA in renal diseases". Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 24 (12): 6523–6533. doi:10.1111/jcmm.15295. ISSN 1582-1838. PMC 7299708. PMID 32333642.
  44. ^ a b c Zeng, Xianhui; Yuan, Xianglei; Cai, Qiuyu; Tang, Chengwei; Gao, Jinhang (August 2021). "Circular RNA as An Epigenetic Regulator in Chronic Liver Diseases". Cells. 10 (8): 1945. doi:10.3390/cells10081945. ISSN 2073-4409. PMC 8392363. PMID 34440714.
  45. ^ a b c Li, Weizhen; Liu, Jia-Qiang; Chen, Ming; Xu, Jiang; Zhu, Di (March 2022). "Circular RNA in cancer development and immune regulation". Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. 26 (6): 1785–1798. doi:10.1111/jcmm.16102. ISSN 1582-1838. PMC 8918416. PMID 33277969.
  46. ^ Amaya, Laura; Grigoryan, Lilit; Li, Zhijian; Lee, Audrey; Wender, Paul A.; Pulendran, Bali; Chang, Howard Y. (2023-05-16). "Circular RNA vaccine induces potent T cell responses". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 120 (20): e2302191120. Bibcode:2023PNAS..12002191A. doi:10.1073/pnas.2302191120. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 10193964. PMID 37155869.
  47. ^ a b c d Zhang, Pengpeng; Chao, Zhe; Zhang, Rui; Ding, Ruoqi; Wang, Yaling; Wu, Wei; Han, Qiu; Li, Cencen; Xu, Haixia; Wang, Lei; Xu, Yongjie (2019-08-13). "Circular RNA Regulation of Myogenesis". Cells. 8 (8): 885. doi:10.3390/cells8080885. ISSN 2073-4409. PMC 6721685. PMID 31412632.
  48. ^ Sanger HL, Klotz G, Riesner D, Gross HJ, Kleinschmidt AK (November 1976). "Viroids are single-stranded covalently closed circular RNA molecules existing as highly base-paired rod-like structures". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 73 (11): 3852–3856. Bibcode:1976PNAS...73.3852S. doi:10.1073/pnas.73.11.3852. PMC 431239. PMID 1069269.