|Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age|
First edition hardcover
|Media type||Print (Hardback)|
Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age is a 2010 non-fiction book by Clay Shirky. The book is an indirect sequel to Shirky's Here Comes Everybody, which covered the impact of social media.
Shirky argues that since the 1940s, people are learning how to use free time more constructively for creative acts rather than consumptive ones, particularly with the advent of online tools that allow new forms of collaboration. The author catalogs the means and motives behind these new forms of cultural production and provides key examples.
While Shirky acknowledges that the activities that we use our cognitive surplus for may be frivolous (such as creating LOLcats), the trend as a whole is leading to valuable and influential new forms of human expression. He also asserts that even the most inane forms of creation and sharing are preferable to the hundreds of billions of hours spent consuming television shows in countries such as the United States. He sees compulsive television viewing as the modern equivalent of the Gin Craze, presenting both as maladaptive and self-anesthetizing responses to epochal social disruptions. The mass bingeing, stoked by nightmarish urbanization during the Industrial Revolution, ended when, according to Shirky, English society evolved "new urban realities created by London's incredible social density" changing London into one of the first modern cities.
Shirky notes that Wikipedia represents the investment of 100 million hours (up to 2009), compared to 200 billion hours we spend watching TV every year.
- Gin, Television, and Cognitive Surplus - comparison of the Gin Craze to contemporary television viewing habits, and speculation on what people would do if not watching television
- Means - discussion of protests on United States beef imports in South Korea as organized by fans of boyband DBSK, and more generally the ability of anyone to publish online
- Motive - gives case of Josh Groban's fans spontaneously organizing an online charity project in his name; discussion of fan fiction
- Opportunity - gives case of the Z-boys skateboarding in abandoned California swimming pools; discusses ultimatum game in context of internet resources; describes history of Apache HTTP Server and Napster software
- Culture - discusses the difference between a fee and a fine in marketing; gives a history of the Invisible College; talks about online coursework collaboration at universities; reviews the PatientsLikeMe website
- Personal, Communal, Public, Civic - discussion of why CouchSurfing and eBay websites work
- Looking for the Mouse - a history of publishing and some advice for modern business practices
Upon its release, Cognitive Surplus was praised by some writers who discuss the Internet and its effect on society. However, his approach has been criticized by Farhad Manjoo in The New York Times for being too academic and for cheerleading positive examples of the online use of cognitive surplus. Author Jonah Lehrer criticized what he saw as Shirky's premise that forms of consumption, cultural consumption in particular, are inherently less worthy than producing and sharing.
- Manjoo, Farhad (August 8, 2010). "When the Screen Goes Blank". The New York Times Book Review.
- Walker, Tim (July 16, 2010). "Cognitive Surplus, By Clay Shirky". The Independent.
- Shirky, Clay (2010). Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age. Penguin. pp. 1–3. ISBN 978-1-59420-253-7.
- Cognitive Surplus, p. 49
- Chatfield, Tom (June 27, 2010). "Cognitive Surplus by Clay Shirky". The Guardian.
- Harkin, James (July 5, 2010). "Cognitive Surplus". The Financial Times.
- Lehrer, Jonah (June 9, 2010). "Cognitive Surplus". bnreview.barnsandnoble.com.
- Tenner, E. (2010). No Brainer? The Wilson Quarterly, 34(4): 92-95. (subscription required)
- Tomlinson, B., Silberman, M. Six (2012). The cognitive surplus is made of fossil fuels. First Monday, 17(11): November 5. ISSN 13960466