Co-living is a residential community living model that accommodates three or more biologically unrelated people. Generally coliving is a type of intentional community that provides shared housing for people with similar values or intentions. The coliving experience may simply include group discussions in common areas or weekly meals, although will oftentimes extend to shared workspace and collective endeavors such as living more sustainably. An increasing number of people across the world are turning to coliving in order to unlock the same benefits as other communal living models (such as communes or cohousing), including “comfort, affordability, and a greater sense of social belonging.”
Coliving as a modern concept traces its origins to shared living models of the 19th and 20th centuries such as tenements in the UK, boarding houses in the US, and chawls in western India, yet ancient forms of communal living such as the longhouse date back thousands of years. Its contemporary form has gained prominence in recent years due to a combination of factors including increased urbanization rates, a lack of affordable housing options, and a growing interest in lifestyles not dependent upon long-term contracts.
For the individual, living in a coliving community provides many advantages as compared to traditional living options. While the benefits are many, the most common benefits include community, convenience, cost savings, and comfort.
The vast majority of coliving companies around the world claim that community is the number one benefit they provide their residents. Coliving companies promise their residents a thoughtful, community driven living experience that will lead to meaningful relationships. One of the trends that has increased the demand for community is the loneliness epidemic that has been identified by researchers in countries around the world. Studies have shown that “loneliness is just as lethal as smoking 15 cigarettes per day” and “lonely people are 50% more likely to die prematurely than those with healthy social relationships.”
Studies show that daily social interactions, such as those common in coliving communities, can actually “improve health and increase longevity.” Early evidence from coliving operators highlights the benefit of community. Venn, an Israeli coliving operator with locations in Israel, Germany, and the US, found that “loneliness levels drop by 50% just 6 months after joining Venn” and “100% of members feel they are socially supported.”
The convenience benefit of coliving comes namely from flexible lease terms and a customer-centric business model. Instead of only offering twelve month leases, many coliving operators offer shorter lease terms of three or six months that better suit the dynamic lifestyles of their tenants. In fact, an increasing number of coliving locations are starting to offer month by month rental agreements as well as the option to not pay a traditional deposit. As a differentiation strategy, coliving operators also aim to remove the many frictions of the traditional living experience such as buying and moving furniture, finding roommates, or paying separate utility bills. By providing fully furnished rooms, offering roommate matching, and including utilities in a single rent price, coliving operators create a convenient living experience “so all you need to do upon arrival is unpack your suitcase.”
Another potential benefit of coliving is relatively affordable rent when compared to traditional living environments in the same area. Coliving operators decrease costs for their residents in two main ways. First, many coliving operators bundle their product offering to include a variety of services for one, all-inclusive price. Instead of paying separate bills for utilities, furniture, wifi, gym access, cleaning services, and amenities (such as paper towels, linens, or coffee), coliving residents pay one bill each month that comes at a discount compared to paying for all the services individually. Second, many coliving operators utilize higher density spatial design models to decrease the amount of rent paid by each resident. By operating four or six bedroom units instead of studios or two bedroom units, “the rent per square foot of a co-living unit will be much higher than that of a traditional multifamily unit.”
Coliving residents also benefit from a more comfortable living experience when compared to alternative living solutions. Coliving has been referred to as “housing as a service” and oftentimes includes many of the comfortable perks that are traditional in the hospitality industry. Many digital nomad coliving companies will offer their residents sim cards, help setting up a local bank account, and even taxi rides from the airport. Longer term coliving operators are known to offer basic amenities, fresh linens, and even a weekly cleaning service.
All modern coliving concepts are in one way or another a form of communal living, yet people from across the world have developed different types of coliving. Coliving communities can vary on a wide variety of characteristics including length of stay, building type, community size, and resident demographics. For example many urban coliving spaces have upwards of 100 residents, cater their offering to young professionals, and only offer leases longer than six months. Rural coliving spaces may exist in a five-bedroom house, are popular amongst digital nomads, and allow residents to rent on a month-to-month basis.
The urban apartment category of coliving is oriented towards city dwellers that value a convenient, community centric, and relatively affordable lifestyle. Some of the biggest, most well-funded coliving operators in the world fall in the urban apartment model including Common, Quarters, Ollie, Starcity, Ziroom, Zolo Stays, Hmlet, and The Collective. These companies typically operate buildings with 50+ residents and generally attract a younger demographic. This type of coliving is similar to single room occupancy and typically exchanges private space (bedrooms) in favor of common areas such as living rooms, shared kitchens, or rooftop patios (source). Units generally come fully furnished, contain three to six private bedrooms, and may have ensuite bathrooms, although shared bathrooms are not uncommon.
Some urban apartment coliving companies utilize a decentralized model. Instead of operating buildings with 50+ residents, these companies will manage apartments or houses dispersed across an urban area. Operators include companies such as Bungalow, Cove, and LifeX. Both centralized and decentralized urban apartment coliving serve as the primary residence for their tenants and as such, typically require a minimum lease of three, six, or sometimes even twelve months.
The digital nomad category of coliving is oriented towards international travelers that value flexibility and mobility. Due to its focus on shorter-term stays and creating a social environment this brand of coliving is sometimes compared to a hostel style of living, although it is different in many ways. Digital nomad coliving spaces will normally also operate a coworking space and perhaps a cafe or restaurant in the same building. This type of coliving typically has stays that range from one to three months. Additionally, many digital nomad coliving companies such as Selina, Outsite, Roam, and Outpost operate a network of locations in popular travel destinations across the world so customers can stay with the same operator as they travel.
The business traveler category of coliving is oriented towards traveling workers that desire a more intentional and better designed living experience while on business trips away from home. While hotels have long served as a temporary residence for business travelers, coliving operators such as Zoku in the Netherlands and Lyf in Singapore are customizing their living experience to fit the needs of the modern business traveler. Typically located in close proximity to a city’s central business district, these coliving locations offer networking events and fully serviced coworking spaces.
The cost conscious category of coliving is oriented towards cost conscious residents that are oftentimes priced out of large cities. With home prices outpacing wage growth in 80% of U.S. markets, an increasing number of people are looking for affordable living options within large urban areas. Many coliving operators have seized the opportunity to provide a relatively more affordable living experience centered around community. Operators such as Haven Coliving in Los Angeles, Outpost-Club in New York, or The Student Hotel in Europe have a shared room offering (along with single rooms) where two to four residents will stay in the same room. Due to the increase in density, potential residents can expect to pay far less than renting a studio in the same city.
The community seeking category of coliving is oriented towards residents that truly value an intimate communal living environment. While all coliving operators offer some form of community programming, the community seeking brands go above and beyond to ensure that community is the number one focus of the living experience. Many of these coliving operators maintain a thorough application process to ensure all the residents are ones that will help foster an intentional community. Many times the communities are relatively small and driven by a shared interest such as entrepreneurs living together at Kindred Quarters in San Diego or StartupHome in London.
Coliving can be considered to be the conjunction of two aspects of people living together: the physical space, and the shared values or philosophy. Both vary tremendously resulting in many such spaces being unique. Operational aspects influence the scale of the properties used, but it is more the culture and philosophy of both the operator and the residents using the space that define it.
Coliving is similar to single room occupancy as it offers residents an individual space in a shared property. Most typically a private room with an ensuite bathroom; however, shared bathrooms are not uncommon and at lower prices spaces have dormitories in the same manner as a hostel. Spaces may simultaneously offer many of these types of individual space thus providing for multiple budgets and types of resident.
The defining characteristic is that all coliving spaces offer at least a shared kitchen and living room in the same manner as in a flatshare, yet usually larger and better furnished as coliving spaces focus more on the shared facilities than the individual space.
Some may have a separate workspace whether simply offering desks for online work, or tailored more to their specific residents, such as studios for painting or woodworking. More elaborate and larger spaces may also have cafes, gyms, cinemas, and other amenities.
An aspect of intentional communities that is found, especially in smaller independent coliving spaces, is that of shared values, interests, or purpose in life amongst its residents. Such houses often curate their residents to match these values, so that strong bonds and affinities are built which works to resolve the social isolation often found in entirely independent housing units.
This is rarer in the larger commercial spaces due to the intrinsic difficulties of connecting people together at larger sizes and therefore use of the coliving term with such properties tends to result in only physical characteristics defining them.
Operators almost exclusively focus on a single model, and there are two aspects that distinguishes their operations, that of rental period, being either short and mid term, or long term; and that of scale.
Short and mid term rentals range from nightly to monthly thus giving residents great flexibility, but due to occupancy churn and vacancies this model results in higher pricing, in the same manner as for hotels. More traditional long-term contracts provide a more reliable approach to revenue and this is often reflected in their more affordable pricing.
Sometime between 1933 and 1934, a shared living space was designed in north London called 'Isokon', which was established by Wells Coats. It offered similar amenities, such as a shared communal space, work space, and things such as a laundry area. It was seen as a part of a greater effort by a greater effort during the intra-war period between World War I and World War II by the Modern Architectural Research Group (MARS) to advance modernist discourse in Britain. Another effort to do this idea was in 1937 by Maxwell Fry (a founding member of MARS) and Elizabeth Denby and was called Kensal House.
Coliving spaces began to emerge in part due to rising property prices. Attempts to establish coliving businesses were made in 2014 and 2015 by companies including 13 and Techsquat, but the attempts failed. Later more successful efforts were made to establish coliving businesses. Relaxations on the minimal rental period for private homes were made in June 2018 from six months to three resulted in a boost for the industry. Cities such as New York City have created incentives for coliving companies to build affordable housing in the city.
Coliving appeals particularly to millennials due to rising property prices. Residents of coliving spaces typically range between the ages of 19 and 40 years. They are typically employees of startups, entrepreneurs, or students. A survey conducted in various cities in India found that approximately 72% of millennials were willing to consider a coliving space. It also found that 55% of 18–23 year olds were willing to spend R10,000–15,000 per month. Part of the appeal to millennials is due also to a relative reluctance to marry and/or start a family due to cost. High student loan costs are also a factor. From 2005 to 2015, there was a 39% increase for millennials living with housemates. The rise in coliving and similar housing was also impacted by the financial crisis of 2007–2008. Coliving is particularly popular in cities and urban spaces where housing is costly and limited, providing a more affordable and amenity-based alternative to individual apartments. Guests from the same or similar industry tend to be matched together.
Coliving has grown in popularity in cities such as New York City and London. A Bloomberg article cited "adult dorms" such as coliving facilities as one of the "eight social trends told us about America's economy in 2018."
Author Alexandria Lafci speculated in 2018 that coliving could become ubiquitous in the same way coworking is. She cited both the expectation of 2.5 billion people living in cities by 2050 and 90% of people living on 10% of our land's surface. Hotelier Ian Schrager claimed that coliving spaces were "blurring the distinction between residential and hotels" due in part to differing sensibilities between millennials and previous generations. Author Polly Chu proposed coliving as a potential solution for Hong Kong's housing issues. She said that it could both be done with cross-generational housing – ie, retrofitting a retirement home to accommodate younger people living with elderly family members – or standard housemates.
Author Matthew Stewart was critical of a specific coliving corporation for "the price, exclusivity, substandard size of bedrooms and cynical view of community." He was also critical of the idea of coliving as a new idea, when he claims that it is a modern, commodified take on a form of living that had a "radical social intent."
Coliving can be considered related to cohousing as the concepts have overlap. Cohousing provides self-contained private units (most often houses), and ownership by the individual unit's resident. In common with coliving, cohousing projects may have shared areas that benefit all such as to be for events or communal meals. Coliving on the other hand is distinguished by having independent units within the same building, and by most often being rented. However, none of these are exclusive, thus the potential overlaps.
- Tummers, Lidewij (August 2016). "The re-emergence of self-managed co-housing in Europe: A critical review of co-housing research". Urban Studies. 53 (10): 2023–2040. doi:10.1177/0042098015586696. ISSN 0042-0980.
- Alfirević Đorđe, Simonović Alfirević Sanјa. Significance of Territoriality in Spatial Organization of Co-living Communities, Arhitektura i urbanizam 50, pp. 7-19. https://scindeks.ceon.rs/article.aspx?artid=0354-60552050007A
- Co-Liv (2020-04-07). "What Is Co-Living?". Medium. Retrieved 2020-10-30.
- Howe, Neil. "Millennials And The Loneliness Epidemic". Forbes. Retrieved 2020-11-03.
- Morin, Amy (2018-06-18). "Loneliness Is as Lethal As Smoking 15 Cigarettes Per Day. Here's What You Can Do About It". Inc.com. Retrieved 2020-11-03.
- Holt-Lunstad, Julianne; Smith, Timothy B.; Layton, J. Bradley (2010-07-27). "Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review". PLOS Medicine. 7 (7): e1000316. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316. ISSN 1549-1676.
- Publishing, Harvard Health. "The health benefits of strong relationships". Harvard Health. Retrieved 2020-11-03.
- "Venn Impact Report 2019". Venn City. Retrieved 2020-11-03.
- "All Inclusive Coliving - NY, CA, PA, MA". Ollie. Retrieved 2020-11-03.
- Manji, Aaron, and Sam Pepper. "Co-Living as an Emerging Market: An Assessment of Co-Living's Long-Term Resiliency." Massachusetts Institute of Technology, September 2019, https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/123605/1135867129-MIT.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
- Dishotsky, Jon (2016-08-20). "The Housing as a Service (HaaS) Revolution Has Begun…". Medium. Retrieved 2020-11-03.
- Scapinelli, Virginia (2018-10-24). "Stonup - Stonup au Coliving Summit". Stonup (in French). Retrieved 2020-11-03.
- "Home prices are rising faster than wages in 80% of U.S. markets". HousingWire. 2019-01-10. Retrieved 2020-11-02.
- Stewart, Matthew (December 2, 2016). "The Collective is Not a New Way of Living – It's an Old One, Commodified". Failed Architecture. Retrieved December 30, 2018. CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
- "Tiny Rooms, Shared Kitchens: Co-Living on the Rise in Big Cities". Wsj.com. Retrieved 27 December 2018.
- "So what exactly is coliving? – Open Door". Retrieved 2018-12-27.
- "What Is Co-Living?". Medium.com. 2018-04-05. Retrieved 2018-12-27.
- Hemnani, Rohit (December 15, 2018). "New real estate sectors reflect changing lifestyles in Asia". Business Times. Retrieved December 30, 2018. CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
- Ramchadani, Nisha (December 15, 2018). "All together now: The growing co-living scene in Singapore". Business Times. Retrieved December 30, 2018. CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
- Chen, Stefanos (November 1, 2018). "Co-Living Goes Affordable". The New York Times. Retrieved January 2, 2019. CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
- Sharma, Ankit (December 27, 2018). "Over 70% millennial willing to consider co-living spaces in top cities: Survey". The Economic Times. Retrieved December 30, 2018. CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
- Volpe, Allie (August 13, 2018). "The Strange, Unique Intimacy of the Roommate Relationship". The Atlantic. Retrieved January 2, 2019. CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
- McDannell, Christine (January 2, 2019). "The Generation Y and Millennial Response to Coliving". KNDRD. Retrieved January 2, 2019. CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
- "To Keep Rents Down, Some In Big Cities Turn To 'Co-Living'". Npr.org. Retrieved 2018-12-27.
- "Technologies predicted to be huge in 2019". nine.com.au. Retrieved January 2, 2019. CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
- "What eight social trends told us about America's economy in 2018". Bloomberg. December 30, 2018. Retrieved January 2, 2019. CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
- Lafci, Alexandria (October 17, 2018). "We'll soon co-live in apartments in much the same way we co-work". Quartz. Retrieved December 30, 2018. CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
- "Hotel Icon Ian Schrager Thinks Communal Living Is the Future". National Real Estate Investor. December 3, 2018. Retrieved January 2, 2019. CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
- Chu, Polly (November 9, 2018). "How co-living for old and young could ease Hong Kong's housing crisis and create a more caring community". South China Morning Post. Retrieved January 2, 2019. CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)