Collaborative innovation network
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)(Learn how and when to remove this template message)
A collaborative innovation network (CoIN) is a social construct used to describe innovative teams.[clarification needed] It has been defined by the originator of the term, Peter Gloor from MIT Sloan's Center for Collective Intelligence, as "a cyberteam of self-motivated people with a collective vision, enabled by the Web to collaborate in achieving a common goal by sharing ideas, information, and work."
COINs feature internal transparency and direct communication. Members of a COIN collaborate and share knowledge directly with each other, rather than through hierarchies. They come together with a shared vision because they are intrinsically motivated to do so and seek to collaborate in some way to advance an idea.
The five essential elements of collaborative innovation networks (what Gloor calls their "genetic code") are as follows:
- Evolve from learning networks[clarification needed]
- Feature sound ethical principles
- Based on trust and self-organization
- Make knowledge accessible to everyone
- Operate in internal honesty and transparency
COINs existed well before modern communication technology enabled their creation and development. Peter Gloor and Scott Cooper, in their book, describe Benjamin Franklin's "Junto" organization in Philadelphia as a COIN paradigm. Franklin brought together people with diverse backgrounds, from varying occupations, but of like mind to share knowledge and promulgate innovation.
As COINs become increasingly popular among governments and corporations, the ethical, financial, economic, and cognitive issues which drive incentives will inevitably face challenges. Over time potential innovators may be unwilling to participate in projects merely on the basis of implied financial gain. As globalization begins to impact traditional models of planned social progress, the broader political context in which participants cooperate has become more relevant lately. This suggests an increased need for independent parties to collaborate on the basis of agreed upon principles and objectives, ultimately this could encompass the interests of humanity and the emergence of a global culture.
- General theory of collaboration • Collective intelligence • Polytely • Swarm intelligence
- Open politics • Symbolic interactionism
- Commons-based peer production
- Community of practice
- Peter Gloor (2005) Swarm Creativity: Competitive Advantage Through Collaborative Innovation Networks. ISBN 0-19-530412-8
- Peter Gloor and Scott Cooper (2007) Coolhunting: Chasing Down the Next Big Thing. ISBN 0-8144-7386-5
- Silvestre, B. S., Dalcol, P. R. T. (2009) Geographical proximity and innovation: Evidences from the Campos Basin oil & gas industrial agglomeration — Brazil. Technovation, Vol. 29 (8), pp. 546–561.
- Gillett, A.G. and Smith, G., 2015. Creativities, innovation, and networks in garage punk rock: A case study of the Eruptörs. Artivate: A Journal of Entrepreneurship in the Arts, pp.9-24.
- fido ('fearless innovation designed online') - collaborative innovation system
- Ethical Issues in Collaborative Innovation Networks by Peter A. Gloor, Carey Heckman, & Fillia Makedon.
- "Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams"
- "Transforming Government Through Collaborative Innovation"
- "The Future of Work"
- "Global University System with Globally Collaborative Innovation Network"
- "Network Plasticity and Collaborative Innovation"
- "Performance Based Integrated Innovation Management System" proposal