Colony-forming unit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In microbiology, colony-forming unit (CFU, cfu or Cfu) is a unit which estimates the number of microbial cells (bacteria, fungi, viruses etc.) in a sample that are viable, able to multiply via binary fission under the controlled conditions. Counting with colony-forming units requires culturing the microbes and counts only viable cells, in contrast with microscopic examination which counts all cells, living or dead. The visual appearance of a colony in a cell culture requires significant growth, and when counting colonies, it is uncertain if the colony arose from one cell or a group of cells. Expressing results as colony-forming units reflects this uncertainty.


A dilution made with bacteria and peptoned water is placed in an Agar plate (Agar plate count for food samples or Trypticase soy agar for clinic samples) and spread over the plate by tipping in the pattern shown.

The purpose of plate counting is to estimate the number of cells present based on their ability to give rise to colonies under specific conditions of nutrient medium, temperature and time. Theoretically, one viable cell can give rise to a colony through replication. However, solitary cells are the exception in nature, and most likely the progenitor of the colony was a mass of cells deposited together.[1][2] In addition, many bacteria grow in chains (e.g. Streptococcus) or clumps (e.g., Staphylococcus). Estimation of microbial numbers by CFU will, in most cases, undercount the number of living cells present in a sample for these reasons. This is because the counting of CFU assumes that every colony is separate and founded by a single viable microbial cell.[3]

The plate count is linear for E. coli over the range of 30 to 300 CFU on a standard sized Petri dish.[4] Therefore, to ensure that a sample will yield CFU in this range requires dilution of the sample and plating of several dilutions. Typically, ten-fold dilutions are used, and the dilution series is plated in replicates of 2 or 3 over the chosen range of dilutions. Often 100 µl are plated but also larger amounts up to 1 ml are used. Higher plating volumes increase drying times but often do not result in higher accuracy, since additional dilution steps may be needed.[5] The CFU/plate is read from a plate in the linear range, and then the CFU/g (or CFU/mL) of the original is deduced mathematically, factoring in the amount plated and its dilution factor.

A solution of bacteria at an unknown concentration is often serially diluted in order to obtain at least one plate with a countable number of bacteria. In this figure, the "x10" plate is suitable for counting.

An advantage to this method is that different microbial species may give rise to colonies that are clearly different from each other, both microscopically and macroscopically. The colony morphology can be of great use in the identification of the microorganism present.[6]

A prior understanding of the microscopic anatomy of the organism can give a better understanding of how the observed CFU/mL relates to the number of viable cells per milliliter. Alternatively it is possible to decrease the average number of cells per CFU in some cases by vortexing the sample before conducting the dilution. However, many microorganisms are delicate and would suffer a decrease in the proportion of cells that are viable when placed in a vortex.[7]

Log notation[edit]

Concentrations of colony-forming units can be expressed using logarithmic notation, where the value shown is the base 10 logarithm of the concentration.[8][9][10] This allows the log reduction of a decontamination process to be computed as a simple subtraction.


Colony-forming units are used to quantify results in many microbiological plating and counting methods, including:

  • The pour plate method wherein the sample is suspended in a Petri dish using molten agar cooled to approximately 40–45 °C (just above the point of solidification to minimize heat-induced cell death). After the nutrient agar solidifies the plate is incubated.[11]
  • The spread plate method wherein the sample (in a small volume) is spread across the surface of a nutrient agar plate and allowed to dry before incubation for counting.[11]
  • The membrane filter method wherein the sample is filtered through a membrane filter, then the filter placed on the surface of a nutrient agar plate (bacteria side up). During incubation nutrients leach up through the filter to support the growing cells. As the surface area of most filters is less than that of a standard Petri dish, the linear range of the plate count will be less.[11]
  • The Miles and Misra methods or drop-plate method wherein a very small aliquot (usually about 10 microliters) of sample from each dilution in series is dropped onto a Petri dish. The drop dish must be read while the colonies are very small to prevent the loss of CFU as they grow together.[12]

However, with the techniques that require the use of an agar plate, no fluid solution can be used because the purity of the specimen cannot be unidentified and it is not possible to count the cells one by one in the liquid.[13]

Tools for counting colonies[edit]

The traditional way of enumerating CFUs with a "click-counter" and a pen. When the colonies are too numerous, it is common practice to count CFUs only on a fraction of the dish.

Counting colonies is traditionally performed manually using a pen and a click-counter. This is generally a straightforward task, but can become very laborious and time-consuming when many plates have to be enumerated. Alternatively semi-automatic (software) and automatic (hardware + software) solutions can be used.[14][15][16]

Software for counting CFUs[edit]

Colonies can be enumerated from pictures of plates using software tools. The experimenters would generally take a picture of each plate they need to count and then analyse all the pictures (this can be done with a simple digital camera or even a webcam). Since it takes less than 10 seconds to take a single picture, as opposed to several minutes to count CFU manually, this approach generally saves a lot of time. In addition, it is more objective and allows extraction of other variables such as the size and colour of the colonies.[17]

  • OpenCFU[18] is a free and open-source program designed to optimise user friendliness, speed and robustness. It offers a wide range of filters and control as well as a modern user interface. OpenCFU is written in C++ and uses OpenCV for image analysis.[19]
  • NICE is a program written in MATLAB that provides an easy way to count colonies from images.[20][21]
  • ImageJ and CellProfiler: Some ImageJ macros[22] and plugins and some CellProfiler pipelines[23] can be used to count colonies. This often requires the user to change the code in order to achieve an efficient work-flow, but can prove useful and flexible. One main issue is the absence of specific GUI which can make the interaction with the processing algorithms tedious.

In addition to software based on traditional desktop computers, apps for both Android and iOS devices are available for semi-automated and automated colony counting. The integrated camera is used to take pictures of the agar plate and either an internal or an external algorithm is used to process the picture data and to estimate the number of colonies.[24][25][26][27]

Automated systems[edit]

Many of the automated systems are used to counteract human error as many of the research techniques done by humans counting individual cells have a high chance of error involved. Due to the fact that researchers regularly manually count the cells with the assistance of a transmitted light, this error prone technique can have a significant effect on the calculated concentration in the main liquid medium when the cells are in low numbers.[28]

An automated colony counter using image processing.

Completely automated systems are also available from some biotechnology manufacturers.[29][30] They are generally expensive and not as flexible as standalone software since the hardware and software are designed to work together for a specific set-up.[31] Alternatively, some automatic systems use the spiral plating paradigm.[32]

Some of the automated systems such as the systems from MATLAB allow the cells to be counted without having to stain them. This lets the colonies to be reused for other experiments without the risk of killing the microorganisms with stains. However, a disadvantage to these automated systems is that it is extremely difficult to differentiate between the microorganisms with dust or scratches on blood agar plates because both the dust and scratches can create a highly diverse combination of shapes and appearances.[33]

Alternative units[edit]

Instead of colony-forming units, the parameters Most Probable Number (MPN) and Modified Fishman Units (MFU)[34]can be used. The Most Probable Number method counts viable cells and is useful when enumerating low concentrations of cells or enumerating microbes in products where particulates make plate counting impractical.[35] Modified Fishman Units take into account bacteria which are viable, but non-culturable.

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Amann, R I; Ludwig, W; Schleifer, K H (1995). "Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation". Microbiological Reviews. 59 (1): 143–169. doi:10.1128/mr.59.1.143-169.1995. ISSN 0146-0749. PMC 239358. PMID 7535888.
  2. ^ Staley, James T.; Konopka, Allan (1985). "Measurement of In Situ Activities of Nonphotosynthetic Microorganisms in Aquatic and Terrestrial Habitats". Annual Review of Microbiology. 39 (1): 321–346. doi:10.1146/annurev.mi.39.100185.001541. ISSN 0066-4227.
  3. ^ Goldman, Emanuel; Green, Lorrence H (24 August 2008). Practical Handbook of Microbiology, Second Edition (Google eBook) (Second ed.). USA: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group. p. 864. ISBN 978-0-8493-9365-5. Retrieved 2014-10-16.
  4. ^ Breed RS, Dotterrer WD (May 1916). "The Number of Colonies Allowable on Satisfactory Agar Plates". Journal of Bacteriology. 1 (3): 321–31. doi:10.1128/JB.1.3.321-331.1916. PMC 378655. PMID 16558698.
  5. ^ Schug, Angela R.; Bartel, Alexander; Meurer, Marita; Scholtzek, Anissa D.; Brombach, Julian; Hensel, Vivian; Fanning, Séamus; Schwarz, Stefan; Feßler, Andrea T. (2020-12-01). "Comparison of two methods for cell count determination in the course of biocide susceptibility testing". Veterinary Microbiology. 251: 108831. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108831. PMID 33202368. S2CID 225308316.
  6. ^ Badieyan, Saeedesadat; Dilmaghani-Marand, Arezou; Hajipour, Mohammad Javad; Ameri, Ali; Razzaghi, Mohammad Reza; Rafii-Tabar, Hashem; Mahmoudi, Morteza; Sasanpour, Pezhman (2018-07-17). "Detection and Discrimination of Bacterial Colonies with Mueller Matrix Imaging". Scientific Reports. 8 (1): 10815. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29059-5. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 6050273. PMID 30018335.
  7. ^ Foladori, Paola; Laura, Bruni; Gianni, Andreottola; Giuliano, Ziglio (2007). "Effects of sonication on bacteria viability in wastewater treatment plants evaluated by flow cytometry—Fecal indicators, wastewater and activated sludge". Water Research. 41 (1): 235–243. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2006.08.021.
  8. ^ "Log10 Colony Forming Units per Gram". Titi Tudorancea Encyclopedia. Retrieved September 25, 2016.
  9. ^ Daniel Y. C. Fung (2009). "Viable Cell Counts". Bioscience International. Retrieved September 25, 2016.
  10. ^ Martin Cole (November 1, 2005). "Principles of microbiological testing: Statistical basis of sampling" (PDF). International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods (ICMSF). Archived from the original (PDF) on October 31, 2017. Retrieved September 25, 2016.
  11. ^ a b c "USP 61: Microbial Enumeration Tests" (PDF). United States Pharmacopeia. Retrieved 24 March 2015.[permanent dead link]
  12. ^ Whitmire, Jeannette M.; Merrell, D. Scott (2012), Houghton, JeanMarie (ed.), "Successful Culture Techniques for Helicobacter Species: General Culture Techniques for Helicobacter pylori", Helicobacter Species, Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 921, Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, pp. 17–27, doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-005-2_4, ISBN 978-1-62703-004-5, retrieved 2023-12-01
  13. ^ Reynolds, Jackie. "Serial Dilution Protocols". Archived from the original on 2015-11-17. Retrieved 2015-11-15.
  14. ^ Brugger, Silvio D.; Baumberger, Christian; Jost, Marcel; Jenni, Werner; Brugger, Urs; Mühlemann, Kathrin (2012-03-20). Bereswill, Stefan (ed.). "Automated Counting of Bacterial Colony Forming Units on Agar Plates". PLOS ONE. 7 (3): e33695. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033695. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3308999. PMID 22448267.
  15. ^ Khan, Arif ul Maula; Torelli, Angelo; Wolf, Ivo; Gretz, Norbert (2018-05-08). "AutoCellSeg: robust automatic colony forming unit (CFU)/cell analysis using adaptive image segmentation and easy-to-use post-editing techniques". Scientific Reports. 8 (1): 7302. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-24916-9. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 5940850. PMID 29739959.
  16. ^ Zhang, Louis (2022-11-05). "Machine learning for enumeration of cell colony forming units". Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art. 5 (1): 26. doi:10.1186/s42492-022-00122-3. ISSN 2524-4442. PMC 9637067. PMID 36334176.
  17. ^ Zhang, Louis (2022-11-05). "Machine learning for enumeration of cell colony forming units". Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art. 5 (1): 26. doi:10.1186/s42492-022-00122-3. ISSN 2524-4442. PMC 9637067. PMID 36334176.
  18. ^ [1]
  19. ^ Geissmann Q (2013). "OpenCFU, a new free and open-source software to count cell colonies and other circular objects". PLOS ONE. 8 (2): e54072. arXiv:1210.5502. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...854072G. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054072. PMC 3574151. PMID 23457446.
  20. ^ "NIST's Integrated colony enumerator (NICE)". Archived from the original on 2014-06-27. Retrieved 2017-07-13.[full citation needed]
  21. ^ Clarke ML, Burton RL, Hill AN, Litorja M, Nahm MH, Hwang J (August 2010). "Low-cost, high-throughput, automated counting of bacterial colonies". Cytometry Part A. 77 (8): 790–7. doi:10.1002/cyto.a.20864. PMC 2909336. PMID 20140968.
  22. ^ Cai Z, Chattopadhyay N, Liu WJ, Chan C, Pignol JP, Reilly RM (November 2011). "Optimized digital counting colonies of clonogenic assays using ImageJ software and customized macros: comparison with manual counting". International Journal of Radiation Biology. 87 (11): 1135–46. doi:10.3109/09553002.2011.622033. PMID 21913819. S2CID 25417288.
  23. ^ Vokes MS, Carpenter AE (April 2008). "Using CellProfiler for automatic identification and measurement of biological objects in images". Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. Chapter 14: Unit 14.17. doi:10.1002/0471142727.mb1417s82. ISBN 978-0471142720. PMC 4302752. PMID 18425761.
  24. ^ "Promega Colony Counter". App Store. Retrieved 2018-09-28.
  25. ^ "APD Colony Counter App PRO - Apps on Google Play". Retrieved 2018-09-28.
  26. ^ Austerjost, Jonas; Marquard, Daniel; Raddatz, Lukas; Geier, Dominik; Becker, Thomas; Scheper, Thomas; Lindner, Patrick; Beutel, Sascha (August 2017). "A smart device application for the automated determination of E. coli colonies on agar plates". Engineering in Life Sciences. 17 (8): 959–966. doi:10.1002/elsc.201700056. ISSN 1618-0240. PMC 6999497. PMID 32624845.
  27. ^ "CFU Scope". App Store. Retrieved 2018-09-28.
  28. ^ Jarvis, Basil (2016), "Errors associated with colony count procedures", Statistical Aspects of the Microbiological Examination of Foods, Elsevier, pp. 119–140, doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-803973-1.00007-3, ISBN 978-0-12-803973-1, retrieved 2023-12-01
  29. ^ "Colony Counters: Robotic Colony Counter - Plate Handler". Retrieved 2018-09-28.
  30. ^ "Fully Automatic Colony Counter by AAA Lab Equipment Video | LabTube". Retrieved 2018-09-28.
  31. ^ Clarke, Matthew L.; Burton, Robert L.; Hill, A. Nayo; Litorja, Maritoni; Nahm, Moon H.; Hwang, Jeeseong (2010). "Low‐cost, high‐throughput, automated counting of bacterial colonies". Cytometry Part A. 77A (8): 790–797. doi:10.1002/cyto.a.20864. ISSN 1552-4922. PMC 2909336. PMID 20140968.
  32. ^ Gilchrist, J. E.; Campbell, J. E.; Donnelly, C. B.; Peeler, J. T.; Delaney, J. M. (1973). "Spiral Plate Method for Bacterial Determination". Applied Microbiology. 25 (2): 244–252. doi:10.1128/am.25.2.244-252.1973. ISSN 0003-6919. PMC 380780. PMID 4632851.
  33. ^ Brugger, Silvio D.; Baumberger, Christian; Jost, Marcel; Jenni, Werner; Brugger, Urs; Mühlemann, Kathrin (2012-03-20). "Automated Counting of Bacterial Colony Forming Units on Agar Plates". PLOS ONE. 7 (3): e33695. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...733695B. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033695. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3308999. PMID 22448267.
  34. ^ Dehority, B A; Tirabasso, P A; Grifo, A P (1989). "Most-probable-number procedures for enumerating ruminal bacteria, including the simultaneous estimation of total and cellulolytic numbers in one medium". Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 55 (11): 2789–2792. doi:10.1128/aem.55.11.2789-2792.1989. ISSN 0099-2240. PMC 203169. PMID 2624460.
  35. ^ "Bacterial Analytical Manual: Most Probable Number from Serial Dilutions". United States Food and Drug Administration. October 2010.

Further reading[edit]