Community Trade Mark
||This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. (June 2012)|
A Community Trade Mark (CTM), from 23 March 2016, a European Union Trademark, is a trademark which is pending registration or has been registered in the European Union as a whole (rather than on a national level within the EU).
The CTM system creates a unified trademark registration system in Europe, whereby one registration provides protection in all member states of the EU. The CTM system is unitary in character. Thus, an objection against a CTM application in any member state can defeat the entire application, a CTM registration is enforceable in all member states.
The CTM system is administered by the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), which is located in Alicante, Spain (see also trade mark law of the European Union).
Character and advantages
The Community trade mark gives its proprietor a uniform right applicable in all Member States of the European Union on the strength of a single procedure which simplifies trade mark policies at European level. It fulfils the three essential functions of a trade mark at European level: it identifies the origin of goods and services, guarantees consistent quality through evidence of the company's commitment to the consumer, and is a form of communication, a basis for publicity and advertising.
The Community trade mark may be used as a manufacturer's mark, a mark for goods of a trading company, or service mark. It may also take the form of a collective trade mark: properly applied, the regulation governing the use of the collective trade mark guarantees the origin, the nature and the quality of goods and services by making them distinguishable, which is beneficial to members of the association or body owning the trade mark.
The Community trade mark is obtained by registration in the Register kept by OHIM. When registered, transferred or allowed to lapse, the effect of such action is EU-wide. It is valid for a period of 10 years and may be renewed indefinitely. The rules of law applicable to it are similar to those applied to national trade marks by the Member States. Companies will therefore find themselves in a familiar environment, just on a larger scale.
Another advantage are the fees. The initial cost of filing an application to register a CTM is much less than filing separate national applications in all EU member states (which currently number 28). For filing purposes, the economic advantage of using the CTM system increases according to the number of member states where a trademark owner uses or proposes to use its mark. If a trademark owner will only sell products or deliver services in fewer than three or four member states, consideration should be given to seeking registration in these countries rather than applying for a CTM.
However, the economic advantage of using the CTM system will quickly dissipate if an application meets a serious objection from OHIM. This is because although the applicant for a failed CTM application may attempt to salvage the situation by converting the application into one or more national applications, the applicant cannot recover the costs of filing the CTM application and must in effect repay to file in each country where the CTM application is converted.
In addition, the increasing size of the EU increases the probability that there will be third parties who consider that a CTM application conflicts with their trademark rights, and oppose the application accordingly.
The CTM concept originated in 1964 in a draft of a "Convention on European Trademark Law". However, it was not until 1980 that the first proposal for a regulation dealing with the CTM appeared. It was not until April 1st 1996 that the first CTM applications were processed and the register started.
Some critics[who?] of the dual CTM/national system have expressed doubts particularly with regard to confusion which they consider arises from maintaining two separate trademark registration systems. This is similar to criticism which been directed at the parallel existence of the Madrid Agreement and the Madrid Protocol.
However, others[who?] see the dual system as providing an effective solution to EU harmonisation issues which has continued to work well over a period of many years.
- Homepage of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (OHIM) in English
- Homepage of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (OHIM) in five languages (Spanish, German, English, French and Italian)
- European Communities Trade Mark Association (ECTA)
- Mańko, Rafał. "Trademark law in the European Union. Current legal framework and proposals for reform" (PDF). Library Briefing. Library of the European Parliament. Retrieved 4 July 2013. line feed character in
|title=at position 37 (help)