||This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. (July 2008)|
In a complementary monopoly, consent must be obtained from more than one agent in order to obtain the good. This effect was originally observed in Cournot. The leads to a reduction in surplus generated relative to an outright monopoly, if the two agents do not cooperate.
This can be seen in private toll roads where more than one operator controls a different section of the road. The solution is for one agent to purchase all sections of the road.
Complementary goods are a less extreme form of this effect. In this case, one good is still of value even if the other good is not obtained.
Consider a road between two towns where half of the road is owned by two agents. A customer must pass two toll booth in order to pass from one town to the other. Each agent sets the price of his toll booth.
Given a demand function,
The optimal price for a monopolist is
leading to revenue of
If both agents are independently setting their prices, then the Nash equilibrium is for each to set their price at
This leads to an increase in the total price to
and a decrease in total revenue to
The total revenue generated by the two owners is reduced and the price is increased. This means that both the owners and the users of the road are worse off than they would otherwise be.
Notes and references
- Cournot, Augustin (1897). Researches into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth. Macmillan Co.
|This economics-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|