Compromise of 1790

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The Compromise of 1790 was a compromise between Alexander Hamilton on the one hand and Thomas Jefferson and James Madison whereby Hamilton won the decision for the national government to take over and pay the state debts, while Jefferson and Madison obtained the national capital (District of Columbia) for the South. The compromise resolved the deadlock in Congress. Southerners were blocking the assumption of state debts by the treasury, thereby destroying the Hamiltonian program for building a fiscally strong nation state. Northerners rejected the proposal, much desired by Virginians, to locate the permanent national capital on the Virginia-Maryland border. The compromise made possible the passage of the Residence and Assumption Acts in July 1790. Historian Jacob Cooke says it is, "generally regarded as one of the most important bargains in American history, ranking just below the better known Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850."[1]


Politicians at both the federal and state level sought to break the legislative deadlock through unofficial negotiations. A number of clandestine meetings and political dinners were held in New York City – then serving as the nation's temporary capital – in the summer of 1790.[2]

Alexander Hamilton

The "dinner table bargain"[3][4] was a pivotal episode in the final stages of these compromise efforts. Based on an account given by former Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson, two years after the event, the "dinner"[5] was a private meeting between Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton and U.S. House of Representative member James Madison.[3] Shortly after the Assumption Bill failed for a second time in June in the House, Hamilton, despairing that his financial plan would be scuttled, appealed to the newly appointed Jefferson to apply his influence on the matter.[5][6] According to Jefferson's account, he arranged the dinner for the two officials at his residence in New York City on or about June 20, 1790. The meeting produced a political settlement on the "assumption" and "residency" crisis.

James Madison

Jefferson described the encounter between the men at his lodgings in New York City:

It ended in Mr. Madison's acquiescence in a proposition that the question [i.e., assumption of state debts] should be again brought before the house by way of amendment from the Senate, that he would not vote for it, nor entirely withdraw his opposition, yet he would not be strenuous, but leave it to its fate. It was observed, I forget by which of them, that as the pill would be a bitter one to the Southern states, something should be done to soothe them; and the removal of the seat of government to the [Potomac] was a just measure, and would probably be a popular one with them, and would be a proper one to follow the assumption.[7]
Thomas Jefferson

The key provision of Secretary Hamilton's First Report on the Public Credit won approval with the passage of the Assumption Bill, establishing the foundation for public credit.[8] The Residence Bill located the permanent capital in the agrarian states of Maryland and Virginia, the demographic center of the country at the time[9] rather than in a metropolitan and financial center such as New York City or Philadelphia.[8][10] Jefferson and Madison secured a lucrative debt adjustment for their state of Virginia from Hamilton, as part of the bargain.[11][12]

Hamilton, Madison, and Jefferson "as highly placed as they were, lacked the influence to determine by themselves the vote on two such controversial pieces of legislation" and the outcome was beyond the direct control of any single group or individual.[13]

The assumption issue[edit]

Historian Max M. Edling has explained how assumption worked. It was the critical issue; the location of the capital was a bargaining ploy. Hamilton proposed that the federal Treasury take over and pay off the all the debt that states had incurred to pay for the American Revolution. The Treasury would issue bonds that rich people would buy, thereby giving the rich a tangible stake in the success of the national government. Hamilton proposed to pay off the new bonds with revenue from a new tariff on imports. Jefferson originally approved the scheme, but Madison had turned him around by arguing that federal control of debt would consolidate too much power in the national government. Edling points out that after its passage in 1790, the assumption was accepted. Madison did try to pay speculators below 100%, but they were paid the face value of the state debts they held regardless of how little they paid for them. When Jefferson became president he continued the system. The credit of the U.S. was solidly established at home and abroad, and Hamilton was successful in signing up many of the bondholders in his new Federalist Party. Good credit allowed Jefferson's Treasury Secretary Albert Gallatin to borrow in Europe to finance the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, as well as to borrow to finance the War of 1812.[14]


In popular culture[edit]

The compromise is dramatized in the musical Hamilton by Lin-Manuel Miranda in the song "The Room Where It Happens".[15]

See also[edit]



  1. ^ Jacob E. Cooke, "The compromise of 1790." The William and Mary Quarterly: A Magazine of Early American History and Culture (1970): 524-545. in JSTOR
  2. ^ Ellis, 2000, p. 69
  3. ^ a b Ellis, 2000, p. 51
  4. ^ Burstein & Isenberg, 2010, p. 218
  5. ^ a b Ellis, 2000, p. 48
  6. ^ Staloff, 2005, p. 313
  7. ^ Ellis p 49
  8. ^ a b Ellis, 2000, p. 80
  9. ^ Ellis, 2000, p. 70, p. 79
  10. ^ Burstein & Isenberg, 2010, pp. 219–220
  11. ^ Ellis, 2000, pp. 96–97
  12. ^ Staloff, 2005, p. 73
  13. ^ Burstein & Isenberg, 2010, p. 218-19
  14. ^ Max M. Edling, "'So immense a power in the affairs of war': Alexander Hamilton and the restoration of public credit." William and Mary Quarterly 64#2 (2007): 287-326. in JSTOR
  15. ^ "The Room Where It Happens". Genius Lyrics. 

Cited in footnotes[edit]

  • Brock, W.R. 1957. The Ideas and Influence of Alexander Hamilton in Essays on the Early Republic: 1789–1815. Ed. Leonard W. Levy and Carl Siracusa. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1974.
  • Burstein, Andrew and Isenberg, Nancy. 2010. Madison and Jefferson. New York: Random House
  • Cooke, Jacob E. "The Compromise of 1790." William and Mary Quarterly 27 (October 1970): 523–545. in JSTOR
  • Ellis, Joseph J. 2000. Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation. Alfred A. Knopf. New York. ISBN 0-375-40544-5
  • Malone, Dumas and Rauch, Basil. 1960. Empire for Liberty: The Genesis and Growth of the United States of America. Appleton-Century Crofts, Inc. New York.
  • Staloff, Darren. 2005. Hamilton, Adams, Jefferson: The Politics of Enlightenment and the American Founding. Hill and Wang, New York. ISBN 0-8090-7784-1


  • Bordewich, Fergus M. The First Congress: How James Madison, George Washington, and a Group of Extraordinary Men Invented the Government (2016) on 1789-91.
  • Clinton, Joshua D., and Adam Meirowitz. "Testing explanations of strategic voting in legislatures: A reexamination of the compromise of 1790." American Journal of Political Science 48.4 (2004): 675-689.
  • Risjord, Norman K. "The Compromise of 1790: New Evidence on the Dinner Table Bargain." William and Mary Quarterly 33 (April 1976): 309–314. in JSTOR

External links[edit]