Computational thinking

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In education, computational thinking is a set of problem-solving methods that involve expressing problems and their solutions in ways that a computer could execute.[1]


The history of computational thinking dates back at least to the 1950s but most ideas are much older.[2] The term computational thinking was first used by Seymour Papert in 1980[3] and again in 1996.[4] Computational thinking can be used to algorithmically solve complicated problems of scale, and is often used to realize large improvements in efficiency.[5]

The phrase computational thinking was brought to the forefront of the computer science community as a result of an ACM Communications essay on the subject by Jeannette Wing. The essay suggested that thinking computationally was a fundamental skill for everyone, not just computer scientists, and argued for the importance of integrating computational ideas into other disciplines.[6]


The characteristics that define computational thinking are decomposition, pattern recognition / data representation, generalization/abstraction, and algorithms.[7][8] By decomposing a problem, identifying the variables involved using data representation, and creating algorithms, a generic solution results. The generic solution is a generalization or abstraction that can be used to solve a multitude of variations of the initial problem.

The "three As" Computational Thinking Process describes computational thinking as a set of three steps: abstraction, automation, and analysis.

Another characterization of computational thinking is the "three As" iterative process based on three stages:

  1. Abstraction: Problem formulation;
  2. Automation: Solution expression;
  3. Analyses: Solution execution and evaluation.[citation needed]

Connection to the "four Cs"[edit]

The four Cs of 21st century learning are communication, critical thinking, collaboration, and creativity. The fifth C could be computational thinking which entails the capability to resolve problems algorithmically and logically. It includes tools that produce models and visualize data.[9] Computational thinking is applicable across subjects beyond science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) which include the social sciences and language arts. Students can engage in activities where they identify patterns in grammar as well as sentence structure and use models for studying relationships.[10]

Since its inception, the 4 Cs have gradually gained acceptance as vital elements of many school syllabi. This development triggered a modification in platforms and directions such as inquiry, project-based, and more profound learning across all K-12 levels. Many countries have introduced computer thinking to all students. The United Kingdom has CT in its national curriculum since 2012. Singapore calls CT as “national capability”. Other nations like Australia, China, Korea, and New Zealand embarked on massive efforts to introduce computational thinking in schools.[11] In the United States, President Barack Obama created this program, Computer Science for All to empower this generation of students in America with the proper computer science proficiency required to flourish in a digital economy.[12] Computational thinking means thinking or solving problems like computer scientists. CT refers to thought processes required in understanding problems and formulating solutions. CT involves logic, assessment, patterns, automation, and generalization. Career readiness can be integrated into learning and teaching environments in multiple ways.[13]

In K-12 education[edit]

Jeannette Wing envisioned computational thinking becoming an essential part of every child's education.[6] However, since her article (published in 2006) integrating computational thinking into the K-12 curriculum has faced several challenges including the agreement on the definition of computational thinking.[14][15] Currently, computational thinking is broadly defined as a set of cognitive skills and problem solving processes that include (but are not limited to) the following characteristics:[15][16]

  • Using abstractions and pattern recognition to represent the problem in new and different ways
  • Logically organizing and analyzing data
  • Breaking the problem down into smaller parts
  • Approaching the problem using programmatic thinking techniques such as iteration, symbolic representation, and logical operations
  • Reformulating the problem into a series of ordered steps (algorithmic thinking)
  • Identifying, analyzing, and implementing possible solutions with the goal of achieving the most efficient and effective combination of steps and resources
  • Generalizing this problem-solving process to a wide variety of problems

Current integration computational thinking into the K-12 curriculum comes in two forms: in computer science classes directly or through the use and measure of computational thinking techniques in other subjects. Teachers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) focused classrooms that include computational thinking, allow students to practice problem-solving skills such as trial and error (Barr, et al., 2011).[17] Valerie Barr and Chris Stephenson describe computational thinking patterns across disciplines in a 2011 ACM Inroads article[14] However Conrad Wolfram has argued that computational thinking should be taught as a distinct subject.[18]

Center for Computational Thinking[edit]

Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh has a Center for Computational Thinking. The Center's major activity is conducting PROBEs or PROBlem-oriented Explorations. These PROBEs are experiments that apply novel computing concepts to problems to show the value of computational thinking. A PROBE experiment is generally a collaboration between a computer scientist and an expert in the field to be studied. The experiment typically runs for a year. In general, a PROBE will seek to find a solution for a broadly applicable problem and avoid narrowly focused issues. Some examples of PROBE experiments are optimal kidney transplant logistics and how to create drugs that do not breed drug-resistant viruses. [19]

Computational thinking resources[edit]

There are a handful of on-line institutions which provide curriculum, and other related resources to build and strengthen pre-college students with computational thinking, analysis and problem-solving. One prominent one is the Carnegie Mellon Robotics Academy. It offers training sessions for both pre-college students, as well as teachers. CMU's programs exercise instructional scaffolding methods via engineering process. There is also another online site named[20] offering similar resources.

As far as a physical facility, in Central New Jersey, there is a small institution, named Storming Robots, offering technology programs to Grade 4 to 12 with an emphasis on algorithmic and computational thinking via robotics projects throughout the school year. Students may follow its road map[21] starting from Grade 4 until they graduate to college.

Designed to increase the use of computational thinking,[22] was launched to provide problem-solving resources to various sectors in an effort to increase the use of computational thinking. The resources include ready-made courses and materials for professionals, colleges, schools, and students. The services also include advising policymakers and governments on education reform and curriculum development.


The concept of computational thinking has been criticized as too vague, as it's rarely made clear how it is different from other forms of thought.[2][23] Some computer scientists worry about the promotion of computational thinking as a substitute for a broader computer science education, as computational thinking represents just one small part of the field.[24] Others worry that the emphasis on Computational Thinking encourages computer scientists to think too narrowly about the problems they can solve, thus avoiding the social, ethical and environmental implications of the technology they create.[25][2]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Wing, Jeannette (2014). "Computational Thinking Benefits Society". 40th Anniversary Blog of Social Issues in Computing.
  2. ^ a b c Tedre, Matti; Denning, Peter J. (2016). "The Long Quest for Computational Thinking". Proceedings of the 16th Koli Calling Conference on Computing Education Research (PDF).
  3. ^ Papert, Seymour. Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books, Inc., 1980.
  4. ^ Papert, Seymour (1996). "An exploration in the space of mathematics educations". International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning. 1. doi:10.1007/BF00191473.
  5. ^ Computational thinking:
  6. ^ a b Wing, Jeanette M. (2006). "Computational thinking" (PDF). Communications of the ACM. 49 (3): 33. doi:10.1145/1118178.1118215.
  7. ^ "Introduction to computational thinking". BBC Bitesize. Retrieved 25 November 2015.
  8. ^ "Exploring Computational Thinking". Google for Education. Retrieved 25 November 2015.
  9. ^ "Should the 4 Cs of 21st century skills make room for one more?". Education Dive. Retrieved 2018-06-11.
  10. ^ "". Retrieved 2018-06-11. External link in |title= (help)[dead link]
  11. ^ "The 5th 'C' of 21st Century Skills? Try Computational Thinking (Not Coding) - EdSurge News". EdSurge. 2018-02-25. Retrieved 2018-06-11.
  12. ^ "CSforALL". Retrieved 2018-06-11.
  13. ^ "Future-forward: How to incorporate the 5th 'C' of 21st Century learning". eSchool News. 2017-10-25. Retrieved 2018-06-11.
  14. ^ a b Barr, Valerie; Stephenson, Chris (2011). "Bringing computational thinking to K-12: what is Involved and what is the role of the computer science education community?". Acm Inroads. 2.
  15. ^ a b Grover, Shuchi; Pea, Roy (2013). "Computational Thinking in K–12 A Review of the State of the Field". Educational Researcher. 42. doi:10.3102/0013189x12463051.
  16. ^ Stephenson, Chris; Valerie Barr (May 2011). "Defining Computational Thinking for K-12". CSTA Voice. 7 (2): 3–4. ISSN 1555-2128. CT is a problem solving process...
  17. ^ Barr, David; Harrison, John; Leslie, Conery (2011-03-01). "Computational Thinking: A Digital Age Skill for Everyone". Learning & Leading with Technology. 38 (6): 20–23. ISSN 0278-9175.
  18. ^ Computational thinking is the code to success Conrad Wolfram, The Times Educational Supplement
  19. ^ PROBE Experiments
  20. ^ "LEGO Engineering". Retrieved 30 Dec 2013.
  21. ^ "Roadmap for learning path". Retrieved 30 Dec 2013.
  22. ^ "Computational Thinking". Retrieved 2 Oct 2018.
  23. ^ Jones, Elizabeth. "The Trouble with Computational Thinking" (PDF). ACM. Retrieved 30 November 2016.
  24. ^ Denning, Peter J. (1 June 2009). "Beyond computational thinking". Communications of the ACM. 52 (6): 28. doi:10.1145/1516046.1516054.
  25. ^ Easterbrook, Steve (2014). "From Computational Thinking to Systems Thinking: A conceptual toolkit for sustainability computing". Proceedings of the 2nd international conference ICT for Sustainability. doi:10.2991/ict4s-14.2014.28.

External links[edit]