Concession (politics)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In politics, a concession is the act of a losing candidate publicly yielding to a winning candidate after an election after the overall result of the vote has become clear. Concession is not a legal mandate.

United States[edit]


Ronald Reagan receiving a concession phone call from Walter Mondale after the 1984 United States presidential election.

The first time in the United States that a candidate lost a presidential election and privately conceded was Federalist John Adams to Democratic-Republican Thomas Jefferson in 1800.[1][2] In 1860, Democrat Stephen Douglas conceded to Republican Abraham Lincoln with the words: 'Partisan feeling must yield to patriotism. I'm with you, Mr. President, and God bless you.'[1]

The first "concession telegram" occurred when William Jennings Bryan sent William McKinley two days after the 1896 US presidential election. Prior to that election results took many days and thus candidates maintained an air of detachment from the process.[3][4] The telegram was rather brief and read as follows:[5]

Lincoln, Neb., November 5.

Hon. Wm. McKinley, Canton, Ohio: Senator Jones has just informed me that the returns indicate your election, and I hasten to extend my congratulations. We have submitted the issue to the American people and their will is law.

W.J. Bryan

Over time, concession speeches were introduced aimed at the electorate, especially one's own supporters. These were first broadcast on the radio by Al Smith in 1928, on a newsreel by Wendell Willkie in 1940, and on live television by Adlai Stevenson II in 1952. As of November 2020, there have been 32 concession speeches over the course of 120 years.[5]


Democrats quietly watch John McCain's 2008 concession speech.

In modern U.S. elections (presidential or otherwise), a concession is usually a two-step process: first, the losing candidate makes a concession phone call to the winning candidate and congratulates them personally.[1] Second, the losing candidate makes a televised public speech, known as a concession speech, to their supporters, on an (improvised) podium surrounded by the candidate for the vice presidency, their spouses or other important relatives and friends.[6] The concession speech consists of four elements:

  1. The statement of defeat: an admission that the candidate has lost the election to their opponent, who is congratulated on their victory.[5]
  2. The call to unite: an expression of support for the victor's upcoming term in office, and a call for unity under their leadership, necessary after an often divisive and polarizing election campaign.[5]
  3. The celebration of democracy: a reflection on why democracy and the participation of millions of voters in the electoral process is important, and that their choice should be respected.[5]
  4. The vow to continue the fight: a reminder of the importance of the issues the candidate has raised during the campaign, and the policies their party advocates for. The candidate says that these remain important goals to strive toward, promises to continue fighting for them, and urges their supporters to do the same.[5]

A losing candidate usually thanks their supporters for their valiant efforts and points to the non-electoral successes of the campaign in building party strength and raising issues to attention that would not otherwise be in public discussion. It is also traditional, unless the campaign has been exceptionally bitter, to congratulate and wish well the winning candidate, perhaps even offering a parting word of advice.[7] The speech could be ultrashort or last for minutes, and there is variation in how lighthearted they present their loss, and how warmly they congratulate the winner; it depends on whatever the defeated candidate prefers.[6] In the broadcast age, the concession speech of a candidate for high office reaches a wide audience and is seen as the final swan song of a lost campaign.[citation needed] By publicly and honestly admitting defeat, the candidate is deemed to gain honor.[5]

Republican John McCain's 2008 concession speech to Democrat Barack Obama is frequently cited as a good example to follow.[6][2] “The American people have spoken, and they have spoken clearly," McCain said. "A little while ago, I had the honor of calling Senator Barack Obama to congratulate him on being elected the next president of the country that we both love."[8] Republican Richard Nixon's 1962 California gubernatorial concession speech is notorious for not being reconciliatory, but begrudging toward his winning rival, the Democrat Pat Brown.[1][2]

Timing of concession[edit]

Obama takes Romney's concession call.
Romney gets ready for his 2012 concession speech, cheered on by his supporters one last time.

Out of courtesy, the winner of the campaign usually waits for a concession speech, if one is forthcoming, before delivering the acceptance speech.[citation needed] A losing candidate commonly offers a private concession directly to the winning candidate, usually by telephone, before making a public announcement.[5]

In American history, the losing candidate usually made their concession speech a few hours after midnight when the outcome was clear.[6] It's possible for a candidate to believe they have already lost or to do their political allies a disservice by making their concession too early. When Jimmy Carter made his concession speech in 1980, he either forgot or ignored the fact that polling places on the West Coast were still open; many Democratic voters seeing or hearing about the concession speech were too demoralized to still bring out their vote on Carter and Democratic senatorial candidates, who possibly lost a seat due to this last-minute lower Democratic voter turnout.[6]

If the vote is relatively close, it can be unclear when it is appropriate for a losing candidate to concede an election. On election night, pressures from a media looking for news to report, an opposition campaign anxious to declare victory, and one's own campaign unwilling to concede defeat if there is any hope of a last-minute turnaround are all factors in the decision of the losing candidate.[citation needed]

One of the slowest concessions ever in American history was in 1916, when the counting took days and Republican Charles Evans Hughes was initially reported to be the winner by several newspapers, because he had a large lead on incumbent Democrat Woodrow Wilson. However, when all the votes were counted, Wilson had more. Some Republicans cried foul, but Hughes calmed his supporters, saying 'in the absence of absolute proof of fraud, no such cry should be raised to becloud the title of the next president of the United States'. After two weeks, Wilson's narrow win was confirmed, and Hughes sent him a gracious telegram with congratulations.[2]

It is exceedingly rare for a concession, once issued, to be retracted; such an event occurred in the United States 2000 presidential election, when Democratic candidate Al Gore, Jr. telephoned Republican George W. Bush on November 8 to concede the contest.[5][6] Gore was apparently unaware of the close vote count in the state of Florida, and when he realized it, he proceeded to cancel his concession address, and retracted his concession call.[5] After a legal challenge that lasted 35 days, in which the Supreme Court ruled that Bush had won, Gore conceded a second time on December 13, 2000, this time with a concession speech.[5] He began by saying, somewhat jokingly: 'Good evening. Just moments ago, I spoke with George W. Bush and congratulated him on becoming the 43rd President of the United States, and I promised him I wouldn't call him back this time.'[5][1]


Excerpts from Hillary Clinton's 2016 concession speech

A concession, usually in the form of a concession speech, is considered a matter of courtesy and a gracious celebration of American democracy that helps with the peaceful transition of power, although there is no legal or constitutional need for it.[2][5] However, when election campaigns have been very polarized and the race close, conceding one's loss was important in order to get the losing candidate's supporters to accept the outcome and ensure social and political stability in any form.[5] Failing to urge one's own supporters toward reconciliation will let embitterment remain between supporters of both candidates, who need to live and work together in the same country for the next four years under a president, whose office term is not fully accepted by almost half of the population.[6] This is why John McCain was commended for calming down his supporters who booed when he first mentioned the name of his opponent Barack Obama in his concession speech, and managed to have them applaud for their opponent later in his speech.[6]

Refusal to concede[edit]

Presidential elections[edit]

After losing the 1944 election, Thomas E. Dewey conceded publicly in a radio address the following morning, but declined to call or send a telegram to President Franklin D. Roosevelt. This irritated Roosevelt, who sent Dewey a telegram reading, "I thank you for your statement, which I heard over the air a few minutes ago."[9]

Donald Trump has been an exception to the tradition of concession in American presidential politics, refusing to concede defeat and declaring victory for himself despite having lost both the popular vote and electoral college in the 2020 United States presidential election. He has alleged that there has been electoral fraud or miscounts in close races which negatively impacted him, despite there being no evidence of this.[10][11] A candidate has the right to mount legal challenges against the electoral process if they have evidence that it was conducted improperly, and potentially they could thus subvert the outcome. If these legal challenges to the electoral processes fail and the losing candidate still refuses to concede, the winning candidate nevertheless starts their presidential term on January 20 (and if the losing candidate is the incumbent president, their term will end on the same day), in accordance with the Twentieth Amendment to the United States Constitution.[12] On January 7, 2021, in what some news outlets have regarded as a concession despite his speech still lacking any admission of defeat, Trump condemned the attack on the United States Capitol and proceeded to say that his focus is to ensure a smooth transition of power to the Biden administration (without mentioning Biden's name).[13][14][15]

If the incumbent presidential candidate refuses to concede the election, the General Services Administration (GSA) may delay the transition process, as it did following both the 2000 United States presidential election and the 2020 United States presidential election. The GSA has to "ascertain" the election in order to release funds, office space, briefings, and other government resources needed for a transition.[16]

Gubernatorial elections[edit]

As of 2020, Jim Ross Lightfoot has not yet conceded his loss in the 1998 Iowa gubernatorial election, won by Tom Vilsack.[17]

Senate elections[edit]

After losing the 2017 special election in Alabama, Roy Moore hasn't conceded defeat to Doug Jones.[18] On December 27, 2017, Moore filed a lawsuit to block Jones from being certified as the winner of the race.[19] However, the lawsuit was rejected by the Alabama Supreme Court, declaring Jones the winner.[20]

Other countries[edit]


Not all countries have a formality or tradition of concession speeches, especially not in multi-party systems, where there may be multiple candidates, and the election results are not necessarily as binary as in two-party systems, and sometimes candidates represent their parties more than themselves. For example, when the Parti Socialiste lost 5 seats in Parliament and became the second-largest Francophone party out of five in the 2007 Belgian federal election, party leader Elio Di Rupo described his concession on behalf of his party as follows: 'We had lost, and I have quickly acknowledged our defeat. I had never suffered an electoral defeat before, but I had been preparing for it, and I knew we would end up in the opposition benches. When I came into the television studio, I conceded our defeat. During earlier victories, I never humiliated the losers. That's just how democracy works: you win some, you lose some.'[21]

New Zealand[edit]

In the New Zealand political system, because of mixed-member proportional representation, it is difficult for one party to win enough seats to govern alone and there are examples of concession speeches not being given until coalitions are confirmed. These negotiations can take several days or even weeks. For example, in 2017 neither the New Zealand Labour Party or the New Zealand National Party had enough seats to form a government and both parties looked for a coalition with NZ First, a party led by Winston Peters. With almost 46% of the vote counted on election night it was looking promising for the National Party and their leader Bill English, was confident that he would form the coalition with NZ First and be able to govern.[22] On the night, however, the leader of the Labour Party, Jacinda Ardern said she was hoping for a better result and had phoned Bill English, with both agreeing that neither of them would decide the outcome.[23] The battle was close and early in the evening Ardern said she took responsibility for Labour's 10-point loss at that stage, but ended her address on a positive note, neither confirming or conceding.[24] Almost three weeks later, NZ First backed a Labour-led coalition. English immediately conceded and paid tribute to his opponent saying "Ms Ardern did a remarkable job in turning around the party after such a short time in the role, and said he hoped the incoming government took the opportunity provided by the 'pretty good shape' of the economy."[25] In 2020, the Ardern-led Labour Party did win enough seats to govern alone, and the leader of the National Party, Judith Collins, promptly rang Ardern and congratulated her on an "excellent result for the Labour Party."[26]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ a b c d e Jon Shelton (November 7, 2020). "Will Donald Trump respect tradition with a concession speech?". Deutsche Welle. Retrieved November 12, 2020.
  2. ^ a b c d e Elving, Ron (November 10, 2020). "The Tradition Of A Candidate Concession Is Far More Than Mere Courtesy". Retrieved November 11, 2020.
  3. ^ Onion, Rebecca (November 9, 2016). "When Did Losing Candidates Start Calling the Winner to Concede?". Slate. Retrieved November 9, 2016.
  4. ^ "6.4 Presidential Election Concession Speeches and Messages | The American Presidency Project". Retrieved January 3, 2021.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Joe Richman & Nellie Gilles (November 2, 2020). "How To Lose An Election: A Brief History Of The Presidential Concession Speech". Iowa Public Radio. NPR. Retrieved November 12, 2020.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h Hans Steketee (November 6, 2020). "Hoe geef je je nederlaag toe? Gracieus, verbitterd? Of: niet". NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch). Retrieved November 12, 2020.
  7. ^ Gallardo, Alfonso Myers (2014). "El consentimiento Político de los Perdedores: Su rol en la Democracia". Estudios sobre estado de derecho, democracia y gobernanza global / Coord. Por Alfonso Myers Gallardo, Gabriel Alejandro Martínez Hernández, Diego Armando Carvajal Briñez (in Spanish).
  8. ^ Shannon, Joel (November 10, 2020). "No presidential candidate in modern history has refused to concede, but there's no law that requires it". USA TODAY. Retrieved November 11, 2020.
  9. ^ "No modern presidential candidate has refused to concede. Here's why that matters". History & Culture. November 8, 2020. Retrieved November 14, 2020.
  10. ^ Corasaniti, Nick; Epstein, Reid J.; Rutenberg, Jim (November 11, 2020). "The Times Called Officials in Every State: No Evidence of Voter Fraud". The New York Times. Retrieved November 21, 2020.
  11. ^ "Two weeks on, no evidence of any significant fraud". Washington Post. November 17, 2020. Retrieved November 21, 2020.
  12. ^ Natasha Turak (November 12, 2020). "What if Trump never concedes? The Constitution will end his term, conservative lawyer John Yoo says". CNBC. Retrieved November 14, 2020.
  13. ^
  14. ^
  15. ^
  16. ^ Goodman, Ryan; Shaw, Kate (November 10, 2020). "The GSA's Blocking Biden Transition Team and the National Security Implications". Just Security. Retrieved November 11, 2020.
  17. ^ Henderson, O. KAY HENDERSON. "Meet the Press, November 29, 2020". NBC News. Retrieved November 29, 2020.
  18. ^ Editor-at-large, Analysis by Chris Cillizza, CNN (December 28, 2017). "Here's why Roy Moore will never concede". CNN Digital. Retrieved January 3, 2021.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link)
  19. ^ "Roy Moore sues to try to stop Alabama from naming Doug Jones winner of U.S. Senate seat". Retrieved January 3, 2021.
  20. ^ Shapiro, Rebecca; Fang, Marina (December 28, 2017). "Doug Jones Officially Declared Winner Of Alabama Senate Election After Judge Rejects Roy Moore Lawsuit". HuffPost. Retrieved January 3, 2021.
  21. ^ van de Woestyne, Francis (2011). Elio di Rupo: leven en visie (in Dutch). Tielt: Lannoo Meulenhoff. p. 84. ISBN 9789401401272. Retrieved November 12, 2020.
  22. ^ "New Zealand votes for conservatism and the status quo". The Conversation. September 24, 2017. Retrieved November 17, 2020.
  23. ^ "Election 2017: Jacinda Ardern 'hoped for better' after strong National result". stuff. September 24, 2017. Retrieved November 17, 2020.
  24. ^ "New Zealand Election 2017: Bill English and Jacinda Ardern battle it out to be Prime Minister". September 24, 2017. Retrieved November 17, 2020.
  25. ^ Boot, Sophie; McBeth, Paul (October 19, 2017). "Kiwi drops near five-month low as NZ First backs Labour-led coalition". NBR. Retrieved November 17, 2020.
  26. ^ "We will be back': Judith Collins delivers concession speech after massive defeat". Newstalk ZB. October 17, 2020. Retrieved November 17, 2020.