Connecticut Mastery Test

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The Connecticut Mastery Test, or CMT, is a test administered to students in grades 3 through 8. The CMT tests students in mathematics, reading comprehension, writing, and science (science was administered for the first time in March 2008). The other major standardized test administered to schoolchildren in Connecticut is the Connecticut Academic Performance Test, or CAPT, which is given in grade 10.

The CMT is graded on a scale from 1 to 5 in each area tested which are mathematics, reading, science (for only fifth grade and eighth grade) and writing. On this scale, 5 is considered "Advanced," 4 is considered "Goal," 3 is considered "Proficient," 2 is considered "Basic," and 1 is considered "Below basic."

Until the 2005-2006 school year the CMT was administered in the fall; now it is given in the spring.


Editing and Revising[edit]

This is the first portion of the CMT writing test. Students read passages that contain numerous spelling and grammar errors. After reading, they will answer multiple choice questions to correct the errors. It is completed in the writing test booklet with the Direct Assessment of Writing and is scored entirely by a computer. This test is sixty minutes long.

Direct Assessment of Writing[edit]

In this test, students have 45 minutes to write a paper on a designated topic. In third and fourth grade, the essay is a fictional narrative; in fifth and sixth it is an expository piece; in seventh and eighth grade it is a persuasive essay. It is scored by two trained professionals. Each reader scores it from one to six. The two scores are combined to make one holistic score. The state goal is 8.0 out of 12.

Degrees of Reading Power[edit]

Also known as the DRP, this is the first portion of the reading section. Students must read through passages which have blanks in them. They must then choose the correct answer to fill in the blank from a choice of options: a, b, c, d, or e. As the student reads on, he/she will find that the passages become more difficult to understand and may come to a point where he/she must guess the correct answer. Students must fill in 49 answers (seven questions per passage, seven passages) in the DRP section of the test booklets. The questions gradually get harder as the students go on. The workbook is not looked over by professionals. Instead, it is put through a machine. This test is 45 minutes long.

Reading Comprehension[edit]

This test requires students to read four passages and answer questions about what they just read. There are multiple choice questions as well as written responses, in which the students are given lines to write their answers on. These questions often involve personal connections, the reader's opinion on a topic, and other questions that do not have a definite correct answer. The multiple choice questions are machine-scored while the written responses are scored by professional readers who score it with a 0, 1, or 2, depending on how well the question was answered. The test is divided into 2 sessions (2 passages, 15 questions per session). Each session is 45 minutes long.


The mathematics portion of the CMT assesses students on skills and concepts they are expected to have learned by the time of the test. In grades three and four, there are two test sessions,[1] and in grades five through eight there are three.[2] The test consists of three formats: multiple choice, open-ended, and grid-in. For the multiple choice questions, students are provided with four possible answers to choose from. The open-ended questions require students to explain and show how they got to an answer. There are different rubrics used for scoring depending on the type of open-ended question.[3] The grid-in questions (grades five through eight only) require students to write their numerical response in boxes and then fill in corresponding bubbles below each number. All scores are reported by strand, of which there are 25.[4] Each test session is 60 minutes long.[5]

Debate-ability of Use[edit]

This test is regarded as 'useless' to most teachers in local high schools, since it shows a student's performance two years prior entering the high school. Other teachers find the data especially useful when used in multiple regression analysis of classroom activities. Data from the CAPT may be regressed on data from classroom spreadsheets after covarying for CMT results. Teachers may then focus on activities which are most closely associated with CAPT performance.

There are also many breaches that have been reported to the head-of-staff that include cell phones ringing, incorrect use of time, and filling in/correcting parts of the test that were either completed prior or have yet to be completed. It is also worth note that most students and teachers regard the essay section of the test as useless, since it gives the impression that it is created to mentally wear students down, rendering them almost incapable to grasp new ideas or concepts for the weeks that the test is administered.

There are many other issues and challenges that arise when administering the CMT's. "English Language Learners (ELL's) present a particular set of challenges, in that teachers must be able to provide instruction for the wide range of language skills that second language learners possess when they enter a classroom”. Teachers face the challenge of designing content instruction that meets both the needs and levels of ELL’s. “Many elementary and high school classroom teachers are not familiar with Specifically Designed Academic Instruction in English, a set of strategies that makes the regular curriculum for fluent speakers accessible to those learning the English language”[6] In a study that consisted of 29 participants, Anita Hernandez found that many of the teachers stated that they had very little knowledge of what to do when working with second language learners acquiring English.[6]

While many issues arise when educating such a diverse population, of particular concern is literacy. Currently data from the National Center for Education Statistics for reading, show that 73% of ELL children in the fourth grade score below the “basic” level on standardized assessments, indicating that a significant number did not have at least partial mastery of the skills needed for grade-level work.[7]

The issue of ELL students in the classroom is becoming more of a predominant issue. According to the National Education Association (NEA), the number of ELL students in United States classrooms has increased to five million and doubled in the last fifteen years. The numbers are expected to double again by the year 2015. While 8 out of 10 are Spanish speaking, there are over 100 other languages spoken by other ELL students. The National Education association has been calling on congress to make changes to standardized tests to accommodate this vast majority of students but currently no action has been taken.[citation needed] These students are expected to master content on a standardized test in a language that they cannot fluently speak or read. The pressure is put on teachers to help these students reach unrealistic goals that adversely affects their future success.

See also[edit]


  1. ^ "Connecticut Mastery Test Fourth Generation Grade 3 Test Examiner's Manual" (PDF). Connecticut Mastery Test. Connecticut State Department of Education. Retrieved 23 March 2011.
  2. ^ "Connecticut Mastery Test Fourth Generation Grade 8 Test Examiner's Manual" (PDF). Connecticut Mastery Test. Connecticut State Department of Education. Retrieved 23 March 2011.
  3. ^ "Rubrics For Scoring Open-Ended Items" (PDF). Connecticut Mastery Test. Connecticut State Department of Education. Retrieved 23 March 2011.
  4. ^ "Mathematics Handbook" (PDF). Connecticut Mastery Test. Connecticut State Department of Education. Retrieved 23 March 2011.
  5. ^ "Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT)". Connecticut Mastery Test. Connecticut State Department of Education. Retrieved 23 March 2011.
  6. ^ a b Hernandez, A.; Herter, R.; Wanat, S. (2008). "Perceived challenges in working with english learners: Meeting the professional development needs of teacher candidates and classroom teachers". The International Journal of Learning. 15 (2).
  7. ^ Farver, J.; Lonigan, C.; Eppe, S. (2009). "Effective early literacy skill development for young spanish-speaking english language learners: An experimental study of two methods". Child Development. 80 (3): 703–719. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01292.x. PMID 19489898.