Constantine Samuel Rafinesque

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Constantine Samuel Rafinesque
Rafinesque Constantine Samuel 1783-1840.png
Constantine Samuel Rafinesque
Born October 22, 1783
Galata, Constantinople, Ottoman Empire
Died September 18, 1840(1840-09-18) (aged 56)
Philadelphia
Nationality France
Fields biologist
Author abbrev. (botany) Raf.

Constantine Samuel Rafinesque-Schmaltz, as he is known in Europe (October 22, 1783 – September 18, 1840), was a nineteenth-century polymath born near Constantinople in the Ottoman Empire and self-educated in France. He traveled as a young man in the United States, ultimately settling in Ohio in 1815, where he made notable contributions to botany, zoology, and the study of prehistoric earthworks in North America. He also contributed to the study of ancient Mesoamerican linguistics, in addition to work he had already completed in Europe.

Rafinesque was eccentric, and is often portrayed as an "erratic genius".[1] He was an autodidact who excelled in various fields of knowledge, as a zoologist, botanist, writer and polyglot. He wrote prolifically on such diverse topics as anthropology, biology, geology, and linguistics, but was honored in none of these fields during his lifetime. Today, scholars agree that he was far ahead of his time in many areas. Among his theories was that ancestors of Native Americans had migrated by the Bering Sea from Asia to North America.[2][3]

Biography[edit]

Rafinesque was born on October 22, 1783[4] in Galata, a suburb of Constantinople.[5][6] His father F. G. Rafinesque was a French merchant from Marseilles; his mother M. Schmaltz was of German descent and born in Constantinople.[5] His father died in Philadelphia about 1793.[7] Rafinesque spent his youth in Marseilles,[5] and was mostly self-educated; he never attended university.[8][9] By the age of twelve, he had begun collecting plants for a herbarium.[10] By fourteen, he taught himself perfect Greek and Latin because he needed to follow footnotes in the books he was reading in his paternal grandmother's libraries. In 1802, at the age of nineteen, Rafinesque sailed to Philadelphia in the United States with his younger brother. They traveled through Pennsylvania and Delaware,[6] where he made the acquaintance of most of the young nation's few botanists.[11]

In 1805 Rafinesque returned to Europe with his collection of botanical specimens, and settled in Palermo, Sicily, where he learned Italian.[6][12] He became so successful in trade that he retired by age twenty-five and devoted his time entirely to natural history. For a time Rafinesque also worked as secretary to the American consul.[12] During his stay in Sicily, he studied plants and fishes,[4] naming many new discovered species of each.

Career in the United States[edit]

Rafinesque had a common-law wife. After their son died in 1815, he left her and returned to the United States. When his ship Union foundered near the coast of Connecticut, he lost all his books (50 boxes) and all his specimens (including more than 60,000 shells).[13] Settling in New York, Rafinesque became a founding member of the newly established "Lyceum of Natural History."[14] In 1817 his book Florula Ludoviciana was strongly criticized by fellow botanists, which caused his writings to be ignored. By 1818, he had collected and named more than 250 new species of plants and animals. Slowly he was rebuilding his collection of objects from nature.

In 1819 Rafinesque became professor of botany at Transylvania University in Lexington, Kentucky, where he also gave private lessons in French, Italian and Spanish.[15] He was loosely associated with John D. Clifford, a merchant who was also interested in the ancient earthworks which remained throughout the Ohio Valley. Clifford conducted archival research, seeking the origins of these mounds, and Rafinesque measured and mapped them. Some had already been lost to American development.

Rafinesque started recording all the new species of plants and animals he encountered in travels throughout the state. He was considered an erratic student of higher plants. In the spring of 1826, he left the university[16] after quarreling with its president.

He traveled and lectured in various places, and endeavored to establish a magazine and a botanic garden, but without success. He moved to Philadelphia, a center of publishing and research, without employment. He published The Atlantic Journal and Friend of Knowledge, a Cyclopædic Journal and Review,[17] of which only eight issues were printed (1832–1833). He also gave public lectures and continued publishing, mostly at his own expense.

Death[edit]

Rafinesque died of stomach and liver cancer in Philadelphia on September 18, 1840.[18] It has been speculated that the cancer may have been induced by Rafinesque's self-medication years before with a mixture containing maidenhair fern.[19] He was buried in a plot in what is now Ronaldson's Cemetery.[18] In March 1924 what were thought to be his remains were transported to Transylvania University and reinterred in a tomb under a stone inscribed, "Honor to whom honor is overdue."[20][21]

Work[edit]

Biology[edit]

Rafinesque published 6,700 binomial names of plants, many of which have priority over more familiar names.[22] The quantity of new taxa he produced, both plants and animals, has made Rafinesque memorable or even notorious among biologists.[23] The standard author abbreviation Raf. is used to indicate Rafinesque as the author when citing a botanical name.[24]

The Mule Deer is one of many species first named by Rafinesque.

Rafinesque applied to join the Lewis and Clark Expedition, but was twice turned down by Thomas Jefferson.[25] After studying the specimens collected by the expedition, he assigned scientific names to the black-tailed prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus), the White-footed Mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) and the mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus).

Walam Olum[edit]

In 1836 Rafinesque published his first volume of The American Nations. This included Walam Olum, a purported migration and creation narrative of the Lenape (also known by English speakers as the Delaware Indians). It told of their migration to the lands around the Delaware River. Rafinesque claimed he had obtained wooden tablets engraved and painted with indigenous pictographs, together with a transcription in the Lenape language. Based on this, he produced an English translation of the tablets' contents. Rafinesque claimed the original tablets and transcription were later lost, leaving his notes and transcribed copy as the only record of evidence. (In this period in New York, Joseph Smith claimed he had found golden tablets and had a vision that gave him the Book of Mormon, which he transcribed from the vision.)

For over a century after Rafinesque's publication, the Walam Olum was widely accepted by ethnohistorians as authentically Native American in origin. But, as early as 1849, when the document was republished by Ephraim G. Squier, Henry Rowe Schoolcraft, an ethnologist who had worked extensively in Michigan and related territories, wrote to Squier saying that he believed the document might be fraudulent.[26] In the 1950s the Indiana Historical Society published a "re-translation" of the Walam Olum, as "a worthy subject for students of aboriginal culture".[27]

Since the late 20th century, studies especially since the 1980s in linguistic, ethnohistorical, archaeological and textual analyses, suggest that the Walam Olum account was largely or entirely a fabrication. Scholars have described its record of "authentic Lenape traditional migration stories" as spurious.[28] After the publication in 1995 of David Oestreicher's thesis, The Anatomy of the Walam Olum: A 19th Century Anthropological Hoax, many scholars concurred with his analysis. They concluded that Rafinesque had been either the perpetrator, or perhaps the victim, of a hoax.[28] Other scholars, writers, and some among the Lenape continue to find the account plausible and support its authenticity.[28]

Study of prehistoric cultures[edit]

Examples of calculating the value of Mayan numerals

Rafinesque made a notable contribution to North American prehistory with his studies of ancient earthworks of the Adena and Hopewell cultures, especially in the Ohio Valley. He was the first to identify these as the "Ancient Monuments of America." He listed more than 500 such archaeological sites in Ohio and Kentucky.[29] Rafinesque never excavated;[30] rather, he recorded the sites visited by careful measurements, sketches, and written descriptions. Only a few of his descriptions were published, with his friend John D. Clifford's series "Indian Antiquities,” eight long letters in Lexington’s short-lived Western Review and Miscellaneous Magazine (1819-1820).[31] Clifford died suddenly in 1820, ending his contributions.

Rafinesque's work was used by others. For instance, he identified 148 ancient earthworks sites in Kentucky. All sites in Kentucky which were included by E. G. Squier and Davis in their notable Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley (1848), completed for the Smithsonian Institution, were first identified by Rafinesque in his manuscripts.[32]

Rafinesque also made contributions to Mesoamerican studies. The latter were based on linguistic data which he extracted from printed sources, mostly those of travelers. He designated as Taino, the ancient language of the Caribbean island of Hispaniola.[33] Others later also used the term to identify the ethnicity of indigenous Caribbean peoples.

Although mistaken in his presumption that the ancient Maya script was alphabetical in nature, Rafinesque was probably first to insist that studying modern Mayan languages could lead to deciphering the ancient script. In 1832 he was the first to partly decipher ancient Maya. He explained that its bar-and-dot symbols represent fives and ones, respectively.[34][35][36]

The genus Rafinesquia was named in Rafinesque's honor.

Legacy[edit]

  • In 1841 Thomas Nuttall named a new genus Rafinesquia after Rafinesque. He felt indebted to the naturalist, who had inspired his work and given Nuttall's Flora a positive review.[37] The genus now contains two species, Rafinesquia californica Nutt. (California Plumeseed or California Chicory) and Rafinesquia neomexicana A. Gray (Desert Chicory or Plumeseed).[38]
  • In 1892 James Hall and J. M. Clarke proposed the genus name Rafinesquina in honor of Rafinesque for a number of fossil brachiopod species[39] then belonging to genus Leptaena; the genus is now in the family Rafinesquinidae.

Notable publications[edit]

Atlantic Journal (1832–1833)

Correspondence[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Flannery 1998
  2. ^ Long 2005
  3. ^ Gilbert 1999
  4. ^ a b Belyi 1997
  5. ^ a b c Fitzpatrick 1911, p. 11
  6. ^ a b c Wikisource-logo.svg Wilson, James Grant; Fiske, John, eds. (1900). "Rafinesque, Constantine Samuel". Appletons' Cyclopædia of American Biography. New York: D. Appleton. 
  7. ^ Fitzpatrick 1911, p. 12
  8. ^ Discovering Lewis & Clark: biography of Rafinesque; accessed : November 17, 2010
  9. ^ "The oddest of characters", American Heritage, April 1985; accessed November 17, 2010.
  10. ^ Fitzpatrick 1911, p. 13
  11. ^ Fitzpatrick 1911, pp. 15–17
  12. ^ a b Fitzpatrick 1911, p. 19
  13. ^ Rafinesque, C. S. (1836). Life of Travels. pp. 46–49.  Cited in Fitzpatrick 1911, pp. 21–22.
  14. ^ Fitzpatrick 1911, pp. 22–24
  15. ^ Fitzpatrick 1911, pp. 27–28
  16. ^ Fitzpatrick 1911, p. 34
  17. ^ Fitzpatrick 1911, p. 38
  18. ^ a b Fitzpatrick 1911, p. 42
  19. ^ Ambrose 2010
  20. ^ Boewe 1987
  21. ^ Barefoot 2004, p. 78
  22. ^ Boewe 2005, p. 1
  23. ^ Boewe 2005, p. 2
  24. ^ "Rafinesque, Constantine Samuel (1783–1840)". Author Details. International Plant Names Index. Retrieved May 18, 2011. 
  25. ^ Warren 2004, p. 98
  26. ^ Jackson & Rose 2009
  27. ^ Walam Olum: or, Red Score, The Migration Legend of the Lenni Lenape or Delaware Indians. See Voegelin 1954
  28. ^ a b c Oestreicher 2005
  29. ^ Warren 2004, p. 91
  30. ^ Boewe 2000, p. xxiii
  31. ^ John D. Clifford, Constantine Samuel Rafinesque, John D. Clifford's Indian Antiquities, edited and annotated by Charles E. Boewe, Univ. of Tennessee Press, 2000
  32. ^ Boewe 2000, p. xxv
  33. ^ Hulme 1993
  34. ^ Constantine Rafinesque (1832) "Philology. Second letter to Mr. Champollion on the graphic systems of America, and the glyphs of Otolum or Palenque, in Central America – Elements of the glyphs," Atlantic Journal and Friend of Knowledge, 1 (2) : 40-44. From p. 42: "This page of Demotic has letters and numbers, these represented by strokes meaning 5 and dots meaning unities as the dots never exceed 4."
  35. ^ Houston, Stuart & Chinchilla Mazariegos 2001, p. 45
  36. ^ Chaddha 2008
  37. ^ Beidleman 2006, p. 139
  38. ^ Morhardt & Morhardt 2004, p. 71
  39. ^ Meyer & Davis 2009, p. 272

Bibliography[edit]

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]