Constantine Simonides

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Constantine Simonides (1820–1890), was a palaeographer and dealer of icons, known as a man of extensive learning, with significant knowledge of manuscripts and miraculous calligraphy. He surpassed his contemporaries in literary ability. Some paleographers say that he was the most versatile forger of the nineteenth century. The charge of forgery is unsubstantiated. [1]

Life[edit]

He was born on the small Greek island of Symi, in the southeastern Aegean Sea in 1820 (or in 1824), and died in Egypt of leprosy.

Simonides lived in the monasteries on Mount Athos between 1839 and 1841 and again in 1852, during which time he acquired some of the biblical manuscripts that he later sold. He produced a lot of manuscripts ascribed to Hellenistic and early Byzantine periods. He allegedly forged a number of documents and manuscripts and claimed they were the originals of the Gospel of Mark, as well as original manuscripts of poems of Homer. He sold some of these manuscripts to the King of Greece. Greek scholars exposed what some claimed to be forgeries quickly and he left Greece and traveled from country to country with his manuscripts.

He visited England between 1853 and 1855 and other European countries, and his literary activity was extraordinary.[2] Some of his works were published in Moscow, Odessa, in England,[3] and in Germany. He also wrote many other works which were never published.

From 1843 until 1856 he offered manuscripts purporting to be of ancient origin for sale all over Europe. Frederic G. Kenyon writes that Simonides created "a considerable sensation by producing quantities of Greek manuscripts professing to be of fabulous antiquity – such as a Homer in an almost prehistoric style of writing, a lost Egyptian historian, a copy of St. Matthew's Gospel on papyrus, written fifteen years after the Ascension (!), and other portions of the New Testament dating from the first century. These productions [...] were then exposed as forgeries."[4]

In 1854 and 1855 Simonides tried unsuccessfully to sell some manuscripts for the British Museum and the Bodleian Library. Thomas Phillipps was a less critical purchaser and bought for the Phillipps Library at Cheltenham some manuscripts. In 1855 he visited Berlin and Leipzig. He informed Wilhelm Dindorf that he owned a palimpsest of Uranius.[5]

On 13 September 1862, in an article of The Guardian, he claimed that he was the real author of the Codex Sinaiticus and that he wrote it in 1839.[6] According to him it was "the one poor work of his youth". According to Simonides, he visited Sinai in 1852 and saw the codex. Henry Bradshaw, a scholar, did not believe his claims.[7]

Simonides questioned many official scientific positions accepted by scholars. He did not respect any scholars. He interpreted Egyptian hieroglyphics in different ways from Champollion and other Egyptologists. He tried to prove that his method of interpreting Egyptian hieroglyphics was superior.[8] He placed the death of Irenaeus at 292 (c. 130 – c. 200). Also, in many other complicated questions he had his own, usually controversial, point of view, but after ascribing the authorship of the Codex Sinaiticus to himself, the rest of his credibility was destroyed by the British press.[citation needed]

New evidence has been uncovered related to the authenticity of Codex Sinaiticus by biblical researcher Peter D. Arvo. By cross referencing old newspapers of the time period, the means, motive, and opportunity have been documented for both Dr. Constantine Simonides and Dr. Constantine Tischendorf’s involvement for the creation and discovery of Codex Sinaiticus. This newly documented information has been collated and condensed to a single page of evidence, which includes hyperlinked references to scans of the original newspapers of the 1800s. [9]

The Artemidorus Papyrus[edit]

In 2006 a papyrus book-roll was exhibited at Turin which appeared to be part of Book II of the lost Geographical Descriptions of Artemidorus Ephesius. It was exhibited again in Berlin in 2008. It has been argued by Luciano Canfora that the manuscript is the work of Constantine Simonides.[10] Richard Janko also believes that the roll is a forgery.[11]

See also[edit]

Some of authentic manuscripts which were bought from Constantine Simonides

References[edit]

  1. ^ Falconer Madan, Books in manuscript : a short introduction to their study and use. With a Chapter on Records, London 1898, p. 124.
  2. ^ C. L. Fritzsche, Enthüllungen über den Simonides-dindorfschen Uranios (Leipzig 1856), p. 2 ff.
  3. ^ He edited in London facsimile of the Gospel of Mark. Facsimile was illustrated by him, and has an inscription, stating that the documents shown within, “date to the time of Christ when he (sic) lived upon Earth among (sic) man or men ..."
  4. ^ Kenyon, Frederick G. (1939). Our Bible and the Ancient Manuscripts (4th ed.). London: British Museum. p. 123.
  5. ^ Falconer Madan, Books in manuscript : a short introduction to their study and use. With a Chapter on Records, London 1898, p. 125.
  6. ^ Simonides, Constantine (1862-09-03). "THE SINAI MS. OF THE GREEK BIBLE".
  7. ^ McKitterick, David (1998) A history of Cambridge University Press, Volume 2: Scholarship and Commerce (1698-1872), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-30802-X, page 369.
  8. ^ Richard Janko, The Artemidorus Papyrus, Classical Review 59.2 (2009), p. 404.
  9. ^ "Codex Sinaiticus: Legitimate or Forgery? The Suspects". The Torchbearer Series. Retrieved 10 October 2020.
  10. ^ Peter Parsons, Forging Ahead: Has Simonides Struck Again?, TLS 22 February 2008, p 14.
  11. ^ Richard Janko, The Artemidorus Papyrus, Classical Review 59.2 (2009), pp. 403–410.

Sources[edit]

External links[edit]