Constructivism (psychological school)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

In psychology, constructivism refers to many schools of thought that, though extraordinarily different in their techniques (applied in fields such as education and psychotherapy), are all connected by a common critique of previous standard approaches, and by shared assumptions about the active constructive nature of human knowledge. In particular, the critique is aimed at the "associationist" postulate of empiricism, "by which the mind is conceived as a passive system that gathers its contents from its environment and, through the act of knowing, produces a copy of the order of reality."[1]:16

In contrast, "constructivism is an epistemological premise grounded on the assertion that, in the act of knowing, it is the human mind that actively gives meaning and order to that reality to which it is responding".[1]:16 The constructivist psychologies theorize about and investigate how human beings create systems for meaningfully understanding their worlds and experiences.[2]

In psychotherapy, for example, this approach could translate into a therapist asking questions that confront a client's worldview in an effort to expand his or her meaning-making habits. The assumption here is that clients encounter problems not because they have a mental disease but in large part because of the way they frame their problems, or the way people make sense of events that occur in their life.[3]

Constructivist psychology in education[edit]

Constructivist psychology when applied to education emphasizes that students are always engaged in a process of actively constructing meaning—a process which "the teacher can only facilitate or thwart, but not himself invent".[4] According to this perspective on teaching: "knowledge is uncertain; the learning process of knowledge is also the construction process of knowledge; students are the main body of learning activity and they construct knowledge on their own initiatives; teachers are the helpers and the drivers for students constructing knowledge."[5]:197

Jean Piaget's theory describes how children do not simply mimic everything that is part of the external environment, but rather that developing and learning is an ongoing process and interchange between individuals and their surroundings, a process through which individuals develop increasingly complex schemas.[6] According to Angela O'Donnell and colleagues, constructivism describes how a learner constructs knowledge via different concepts: complex cognition, scaffolding, vicarious experiences, modeling, and observational learning.[7] This makes students, teachers, the environment and anyone or anything else in which the student has interaction active participants in their learning.

Some constructivist theories[edit]

Personal construct theory[edit]

George Kelly, the creator of personal construct theory, was concerned primarily with the epistemic role of the observer in interpreting reality. He argued that the way we expect to experience the world alters how we feel about it and act.[8] In other words, we order ourselves by ordering our thoughts. The goal of his therapeutic approach was therefore to allow the client to explore their own minds, acting as a facilitator of the exploration of their own meanings, or "constructs".

Genetic epistemology[edit]

Main article: Genetic epistemology

Jean Piaget, the creator of genetic epistemology, argued that positions of knowledge are grown into; that they are not given a priori, as in Kant's epistemology, but rather that knowledge structures develop through interaction. Piaget's theory is ultimately falsificationist: "behaviour is the motor of evolution".[9] Piaget's approach to constructivism was further developed in neo-Piagetian theories of cognitive development.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Balbi, Juan (2008). "Epistemological and theoretical foundations of constructivist cognitive therapies: post-rationalist developments" (PDF). Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 1 (1). pp. 15–27. Retrieved 2010-10-19. 
  2. ^ Raskin, Jonathan D. (Spring 2002). "Constructivism in psychology: personal construct psychology, radical constructivism, and social constructionism" (PDF). American Communication Journal 5 (3). Retrieved 2009-02-07. 
  3. ^ Neimeyer, Robert A.; Raskin, Jonathan D., eds. (2000). Constructions of disorder: meaning-making frameworks for psychotherapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. ISBN 1557986290. OCLC 42009389. 
  4. ^ Kegan, Robert (1982). The evolving self: problem and process in human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. p. 255. ISBN 0674272307. OCLC 7672087. 
  5. ^ Jia, Qiong (April 2010). "A brief study on the implication of constructivism teaching theory on classroom teaching reform in basic education". International Education Studies 3 (2): 197–199. doi:10.5539/ies.v3n2p197. 
  6. ^ Piaget, Jean (1983). "Piaget's theory". In Mussen, Paul Henry; Carmichael, Leonard. Handbook of child psychology: formerly Carmichael's Manual of child psychology 1 (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 103––128. ISBN 0471090573. OCLC 9324435. 
  7. ^ O'Donnell, Angela M.; Reeve, Johnmarshall; Smith, Jeffrey K. (2012) [2007]. "Social learning theory, complex cognition, and social constructivism". Educational psychology: reflection for action (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 254–289. ISBN 9781118076132. OCLC 751719458. 
  8. ^ Kelly, George (1991) [1955]. The psychology of personal constructs. London; New York: Routledge in association with the Centre for Personal Construct Psychology. ISBN 0415037999. OCLC 21760190. 
  9. ^ Piaget, Jean (1978) [1976]. Behavior and evolution (1st American ed.). New York: Pantheon Books. p. 142. ISBN 0394418107. OCLC 3869418. 

Further reading[edit]

Constructivism in education[edit]

Constructivism in psychotherapy[edit]