Council for Responsible Genetics
This article needs additional citations for verification. (June 2019)
The Council for Responsible Genetics was founded in 1983 in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
|Founded at||Cambridge, Massachusetts|
An early voice concerned about the social and ethical implications of modern genetic technologies, CRG organized a 1985 Congressional Briefing and a 1986 panel of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, both focusing on the potential dangers of genetically engineered biological weapons. Francis Boyle was asked to draft legislation setting limits on the use of genetic engineering, leading to the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989.
CRG was the first organization to advance a comprehensive, scientifically based position against human germline engineering. It was also the first to compile documented cases of genetic discrimination, laying the intellectual groundwork for the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA).
The organization created both a Genetic Bill of Rights and a Citizen's Guide to Genetically Modified Food. Also notable are CRG's support for the "Safe Seeds Campaign" (for avoiding gene flow from genetically engineered to non-GE seed) and the organization of a US conference on Forensic DNA Databanks and Racial Disparities in the Criminal Justice System. In 2010 CRG led a successful campaign to roll back a controversial student genetic testing program at the University of California, Berkeley. In 2011, CRG led a campaign to successfully enact [CalGINA] in California, which extended genetic privacy and nondiscrimination protections to life, disability and long term care insurance, mortgages, lending and other areas.
CRG issued five anthologies of commentaries:
- Rights and Liberties in the Biotech Age edited by Sheldon Krimsky and Peter Shorett
- Race and the Genetic Revolution: Science, Myth and Culture
- Genetic Explanations: Sense and Nonsense edited by Krimsky and Jeremy Gruber
- Biotechnology in our Lives edited by Krimsky and Gruber
- The GMO Deception edited by Krimsky and Gruber
- Principles and projects
- The public must have access to clear and understandable information on technological innovations.
- The public must be able to participate in public and private decision making concerning technological developments and their implementation.
- New technologies must meet social needs. Problems rooted in poverty, racism, and other forms of inequality, according to CRG, cannot be remedied by technology alone.
|Cloning and Human Genetic Manipulation|
|Women and Biotechnology|
|Genetic Testing, Privacy and Discrimination|
|Biotechnology and Agriculture|
In 2007, CRG hosted a retreat to refresh the mission statement and determine goals for the future of the organization. The outcome was that CRG should:
- Explore and document developments in biotechnology through a holistic approach that considers science within a social, cultural, ethical, and environmental context.[who said this?]
- Serve as a global knowledge resource, providing information and education about the potential impact of new and emerging biotechnologies.[who said this?]
- Develop concrete policy solutions to address what CRG feels are emerging issues in biotechnology.[who said this?]
- Mobilize and collaborate with scientists and other organizations to inform the public and promote democratic control of science.[who said this?]
- Expose what CRG views as over-simplified and distorted claims regarding the role of genetics in human disease, development and behavior.[who said this?]
|Genetic Bill of Rights||a set of guidelines to aid in the understanding of CRG's viewpoint on the ethical, legal, social, and environmental implications of biotechnology, meant to foster discussion on the values CRG feels are at risk due to advancing genetic technologies|
|Race and Genetics||a project including briefing papers and community workshops on various areas where race and genetics intersect, such as racialized medicine, race in science, and racial profiling in DNA databases|
|Gene Myths||a series of articles disputing what CRG feels are exaggerated and misrepresented ideas about the power of genetic technologies|
|Forensic DNA||a discussion on the use and regulation of forensic DNA databases with concern for privacy and civil rights|
The pioneering contributions of CRG to public interest initiatives concerned with appropriate use of biotechnologies are recounted in the book Biotech Juggernaut: Hope, Hype, and Hidden Agendas of Entrepreneurial Bioscience (Routledge, 2019).
The CRG publishes Genewatch, America's first and (according to CRG in 2009) only magazine dedicated to monitoring biotechnology's social, ethical and environmental consequences. The publication covers a broad spectrum of issues, from genetically modified food to biological weapons, genetic privacy and discrimination, reproductive technology, and human cloning. Established in 1983, the publication won the Utne Independent Press Award for General Excellence in the category of newsletters in 2006.
- "Council for Responsible Genetics". Councilforresponsiblegenetics.org. Retrieved 2009-05-29.
- "Broadening Our Perspective". Ratical.org. Retrieved 2009-05-30.
- "Position Paper on Human Germ Line Manipulation Presented by Council for Responsible Genetics, Human Genetics Committee Fall, 1992". Human Gene Therapy. 4 (1): 35–37. 1993. doi:10.1089/hum.1993.4.1-35. PMID 8461382.
- "UC Berkeley Backs Off Gene-Test Program for Students". Bloomberg.com. 25 June 2019. Retrieved 25 June 2019.
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2012-09-05. Retrieved 2012-08-08.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- "Council for Responsible Genetics". Tufts Digital Library. Retrieved 2018-09-17.
- "Winner of the Utne Independent Press Award for General Excellence: Newsletters". Utne Reader. January 2007. Retrieved 2008-09-11.
- "Grant Search Results". Ford Foundation. Retrieved 2008-09-11.[permanent dead link]