Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act
Great Seal of the United States
Introduced in115th United States Congress
Introduced onJuly 24, 2017
Sponsored byEdward Royce (R- CA)
Citations
Public Law115–44
Legislative history
  • Introduced in the House as H.R. 3364 by Edward Royce on July 24, 2017
  • Passed the House on July 25, 2017 (419–3)
  • Passed the Senate on July 27, 2017 (98–2)
  • Signed into law by President Donald Trump on August 2, 2017

The Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act, CAATSA[1] (H.R. 3364, Pub.L. 115–44), is a United States federal law that imposed sanctions on Iran, North Korea, and Russia. The bill was passed on July 27, 2017, 98–2 in the Senate,[2] after having passed the House 419–3. On August 2, 2017, President Donald Trump signed it into law while stating that he believed the legislation was "seriously flawed".[3]

Introduction and passage in Congress[edit]

On 15 June 2017, the United States Senate voted 98 to 2 for the bill (an amendment to the underlying Iran sanctions bill), which was rooted in a bill introduced in January that year by a bipartisan group of senators over Russia's continued involvement in the wars in Ukraine and Syria and its alleged interference in the 2016 election; with regard to Russia, the bill was designed to expand the punitive measures previously imposed by executive orders and convert them into law.[4][5] The bill in the Senate incorporated the provisions of the Countering Russian Influence in Europe and Eurasia Act that was introduced in May 2017 by Senator Ben Cardin.[6][7]

An identical bill was introduced by Democrats in the United States House of Representatives on 12 July 2017. While the bill's text was unchanged from what had passed the Senate on 15 June, it was titled as House legislation to avoid procedural hurdles.[8] The bill, after being revised to address some of the Trump administration's concerns, passed in the House 419 to 3 on 25 July.[9] On 27 July, the bill was passed overwhelmingly by the Senate.[10]

Provisions[edit]

Countering Iran's Destabilizing Activities Act of 2017
  • This bill directs the President to impose sanctions against: (1) Iran's ballistic missile or weapons of mass destruction programs, (2) the sale or transfer to Iran of military equipment or the provision of related technical or financial assistance, and (3) Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and affiliated foreign persons.[11]
  • The President may impose sanctions against persons responsible for violations of internationally recognized human rights committed against individuals in Iran.[11]
  • The President may temporarily waive the imposition or continuation of sanctions under specified circumstances.[11]
Countering Russian Influence in Europe and Eurasia Act of 2017
  • The President must submit for congressional review certain proposed actions to terminate or waive sanctions with respect to the Russian Federation.[11]
  • Specified executive order sanctions against Russia shall remain in effect.[11]
  • The President may waive specified cyber- and Ukraine-related sanctions.[11]
  • The bill provides sanctions for activities concerning: (1) cyber security, (2) crude oil projects, (3) financial institutions, (4) corruption, (5) human rights abuses, (6) evasion of sanctions, (7) transactions with Russian defense or intelligence sectors, (8) export pipelines, (9) privatization of state-owned assets by government officials, and (10) arms transfers to Syria.[11]
  • The Department of State shall work with the government of Ukraine to increase Ukraine's energy security.[11]
  • The bill: (1) directs the Department of the Treasury to develop a national strategy for combating the financing of terrorism, and (2) includes the Secretary of the Treasury on the National Security Council.[11]
Korean Interdiction and Modernization of Sanctions Act
  • The bill modifies and increases the President's authority to impose sanctions on persons in violation of certain United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding North Korea.[11]
  • U.S. financial institutions shall not establish or maintain correspondent accounts used by foreign financial institutions to provide indirect financial services to North Korea.[11]
  • A foreign government that provides to or receives from North Korea a defense article or service is prohibited from receiving certain types of U.S. foreign assistance.[11]
  • The bill provides sanctions against: (1) North Korean cargo and shipping, (2) goods produced in whole or part by North Korean convict or forced labor, and (3) foreign persons that employ North Korean forced laborers.[11]
  • The State Department shall submit a determination regarding whether North Korea meets the criteria for designation as a state sponsor of terrorism.[11]

Regarding Russia, Section 241 of the Act required that "not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of State" submit to Congress a detailed report — with the option of containing a classified annex — that would include "identification of the most significant senior foreign political figures and oligarchs in the Russian Federation, as determined by their closeness to the Russian regime and their net worth" as well as an assessment of the relationship between such individuals and ″President Vladimir Putin or other members of the Russian ruling elite″. The section also called for an assessment of the "leadership structures and beneficial ownership" of Russian parastatal entities.[12]

Reactions[edit]

President of the United States[edit]

On the day President Donald Trump signed the bill into law, he issued two separate, simultaneous signing statements.[3][13] In the statement meant for Congress[14] he said: "While I favor tough measures to punish and deter aggressive and destabilizing behavior by Iran, North Korea, and Russia, this legislation is significantly flawed. In its haste to pass this legislation, the Congress included a number of clearly unconstitutional provisions" — such as restrictions on executive branch′s authority that limited its flexibility in foreign policy.[15][16] Among other things, the statement noted that the legislation ran afoul of the Zivotofsky v. Kerry ruling of the Supreme Court. The president appeared to indicate that he might choose not to enforce certain provisions of the legislation:[14] "My Administration will give careful and respectful consideration to the preferences expressed by the Congress in these various provisions and will implement them in a manner consistent with the President's constitutional authority to conduct foreign relations."[15] It also said: "Finally, my Administration particularly expects the Congress to refrain from using this flawed bill to hinder our important work with European allies to resolve the conflict in Ukraine, and from using it to hinder our efforts to address any unintended consequences it may have for American businesses, our friends, or our allies."[15]

The other statement by Donald Trump noted: "[T]he bill remains seriously flawed – particularly because it encroaches on the executive branch's authority to negotiate. Congress could not even negotiate a healthcare bill after seven years of talking. By limiting the Executive's flexibility, this bill makes it harder for the United States to strike good deals for the American people, and will drive China, Russia, and North Korea much closer together.[17]"

U.S. Department of State[edit]

U.S. State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert stated: "Since the enactment of the CAATSA legislation, we estimate that foreign governments have abandoned planned or announced purchases of several billion dollars in Russian defense acquisitions. Given the long timeframes generally associated with major defense deals, the results of this effort are only beginning to become apparent."[18]

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo warned Egypt against purchasing Russian Sukhoi Su-35, saying "We’ve made clear that if those systems were to be purchased, the CAATSA statute would require sanctions on the regime."[19]

U.S. Department of Defense[edit]

Assistant Secretary of Defense Randall Schriver stated: "We understand historical India-Russia relationship. ... On CAATSA, Mattis did plea for an exception for India, but I can’t guarantee a waiver will be used for future purchases."[20]

Iran[edit]

On August 2, 2017, Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi stated in an interview with state TV that, "In our view the nuclear deal has been violated and we will show an appropriate and proportional reaction to this issue,".[21]

North Korea[edit]

North Korean foreign ministry officials said that "US bid for imposing sanctions on different countries around the world is entirely outrageous leverage to meet its own interests"[22] and that " "sanctions bill" against the DPRK, Russia and Iran which recently passed the US Congress is prompting a growing international backlash", citing reactions by Russia, China, Venezuela, Germany, Austria and France.[23]

Russia[edit]

After the bill passed the Senate, on 28 July 2017, Russia's foreign ministry announced measures that were cast as a response to the bill passed by Congress, but also referenced the specific measures imposed against the Russian diplomatic mission in the U.S. by the Barack Obama administration at the end of 2016.[24] Russia demanded that the U.S. reduce its diplomatic and technical personnel in the Moscow embassy and its consulates in Saint Petersburg, Yekaterinburg and Vladivostok to 455 persons — the same as the number of Russian diplomats posted in the U.S. — by September 1; Russia's government would also suspend the use of a retreat compound and a storage facility in Moscow used by the US by August 1.[25][26] Shortly after, Russian president Vladimir Putin said that the decision had been taken by him personally and that 755 employees of the U.S. diplomatic mission must ″terminate their activity in the Russian Federation″.[27][28][25]

After the bill was signed, the Russian Foreign Ministry attributed the sanctions to "Russophobic hysteria" and reserved the right to take action if it decided to.[14] Russian prime minister Dmitry Medvedev wrote on August 2 that the law had ended hope for improving U.S.–Russia relations and meant "an all-out trade war with Russia." His message also said, "The American establishment has won an overwhelming victory over Trump. The president wasn't happy with the new sanctions, but he had to sign the bill."[29][30]

EU and EU member states[edit]

Angela Merkel criticized the draft of new sanctions against Russia that target EU–Russia energy projects.[31]

In mid-June 2017, Germany and Austria issued a joint statement that said the proposed bill heralded a "new and very negative quality in European-American relations" and that certain provisions affecting gas pipeline projects with Russia were an illegal threat to EU energy security.[32][33]

On July 26, 2017, France’s foreign ministry described the new U.S. sanctions as illegal under international law due to their extra-territorial reach.[34]

At the end of July 2017, the proposed law's Russia sanctions caused harsh criticism and threats of retaliatory measures on the part of the European Union President Jean-Claude Juncker.[35] Germany's minister for Economics and Energy Brigitte Zypries described the sanctions as illegal under international law and urged the European Union to take appropriate counter-measures.[36]

India[edit]

In October 2018, India inked the historic agreement worth US$5.43 billion with Russia to procure four S-400 Triumf surface-to-air missile defence system, the most powerful missile defence system in the world ignoring the CAATSA act. The U.S. threatened India with sanctions over India's decision to buy the S-400 missile defense system from Russia.[37]

According to the President of the U.S.-India Strategic Partnership Forum (USISPF), Mukesh Aghi:

Critics who think that India should avoid the S-400 purchase misread the situation. Simply put, sanctions would have a disastrous effect on U.S.-India relations for decades to come. In India’s eyes, the United States would once again be regarded as untrustworthy. Sanctions would push India closer to Russia and China at a time when India is reeling from the decision to withdraw from the Iran deal—Iran is India’s third largest supplier of crude oil.[38]

Two oil companies ordered crude oil from Iran for November ignoring CAATSA.[39][40] The United States threatened India with sanctions over India's decision to buy oil from Iran.[41]

Indonesia[edit]

According the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, "Indonesian officials privately admit the real problem is CAATSA, which would apply a variety of sanctions to individuals and organisations that engage in ‘transactions with the intelligence or defense sectors of the Russian Federation’. ... The willingness of the US to impose such sanctions, or whether any waiver might be obtained, has been at the forefront of security diplomacy between Washington and Jakarta in recent months."[42]

Turkey[edit]

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in Sochi, Russia, November 2017

In late 2017, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and Russian officials have signed an agreement worth of $US 2.5 billion for delivery of the S-400 air defence system units.[43] Secretary of State Mike Pompeo raised concerns over Turkey's S-400 deal with Russia,[44][45] but President Erdoğan and other Turkish officials rejected the U.S. threat of sanctions under the CAATSA over its purchase of S-400 missile systems citing existing international protocols and agreement forms mutually signed and agreed by Turkey and Russia and that the S-400 offer with Russia was a better deal than the Patriot System offered by US.[46][47]

Implementation[edit]

On 29 September 2017, president Donald Trump issued a presidential memorandum, which delegated certain functions and authorities under the Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act as well as the 2014 Ukraine Freedom Support Act, and the 2014 Support for the Sovereignty, Integrity, Democracy, and Economic Stability of Ukraine Act to the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Director of National Intelligence.[48][49]

Amendment of the relevant directives done by the U.S. Department of the Treasury on 29 September 2017 referred to the Countering Russian Influence in Europe and Eurasia Act of 2017 (CRIEEA) and further toughened the Sectoral Sanctions against Russia.[50][51]

On 11 October 2017, in a joint statement, Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Ben Cardin (D-Md.) questioned the Trump administration's commitment to the sanctions bill noting that the White House had "had plenty of time to get their act together" after missing an October 1 deadline to identify Kremlin-linked targets.[52]

President of the World Holocaust Forum Foundation (WHF) Viatcheslav Moshe Kantor is on the list of Russian "oligarchs" named in the CAATSA unclassified report.[53]

At the end of November 2017, Reuters reported that a U.S. government blacklist of persons likely to be sanctioned, albeit not automatically, was to be drawn up by the Treasury Department and sent to Congress by the end of January 2018; the prospect of being included in the list already had the entire Russian business elite concerned, while the Kremlin viewed the U.S. move as an attempt to turn Putin's allies against him weeks before the presidential election.[54] Daniel Fried, Coordinator for Sanctions Policy (January 2013–February 2017), in early December 2017 said that Congress's resolve on the Russia sanctions was sowing fear in Russia, the goal being to "freeze them out of the U.S. system, freeze them out of the dollar and pretty much make them radioactive."[55]

On 29 January 2018, the Trump administration submitted to Congress five reports as mandated by CAATSA, including those on Iran's missile programme, sanctioned persons of North Korea, and two versions (both classified and unclassified) of the report ″regarding senior political figures and oligarchs in the Russian Federation and Russian parastatal entities″.[1][56][57] The unclassified list published the following day by the Treasury Department contained names of 210 people, including 96 Russian tycoons close to president Vladimir Putin with wealth of $1 billion or more, as well as top Russian statespersons and officials, including Russian prime minister Dmitry Medvedev, but excluding Vladimir Putin, all information having been drawn from public sources.[58][57] The Treasury Department formally explained the legal significance of publishing names of the individuals and entities included in its 29 January 2018 report on Russia: ″This report is not a "sanctions list."″[59] Speaking to the Senate Banking Committee on 30 January, the Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said: "The intent was not to have sanctions by the delivery report last night. The intent was to do an extremely thorough analysis — it's hundreds of pages — and there will be sanctions that come out of this report."[60]

Major existing and planned natural gas pipelines supplying Russian gas to Europe. Germany imports 50% to 75% of its natural gas from Russia.[61]

On 15 March 2018, Mnuchin unveiled a series of sanctions, first time under CAATSA as well as Executive Order 13694, against various Russian entities and individuals, including the Russians indicted in Special Counsel investigation, the Main Intelligence Directorate, and the Federal Security Service.[62] Mnuchin issued a statement, saying: "The Administration is confronting and countering malign Russian cyber activity, including their attempted interference in U.S. elections, destructive cyber-attacks, and intrusions targeting critical infrastructure. These targeted sanctions are a part of a broader effort to address the ongoing nefarious attacks emanating from Russia. Treasury intends to impose additional CAATSA sanctions, informed by our intelligence community, to hold Russian government officials and oligarchs accountable for their destabilizing activities by severing their access to the U.S. financial system."[63][64]

In mid-May 2018, Senators Bob Menendez (D-N.J.), Mark Warner (D-VA), and Sherrod Brown (D-OH), in a letter addressed to the inspectors general of the State Department, Treasury Department and Intelligence Community, alleged that the Trump administration had failed to fully comply with the provisions of the CAATSA and requested investigations into that.[65][66]

On 20 September 2018, the U.S. government for the first time imposed secondary sanctions under CAATSA by sanctioning China's Equipment Development Department of the Central Military Commission and its director, Li Shangfu, for "engaging in significant transactions with persons" on the List of Specified Persons, namely for transactions that involved ″Russia's transfer to China of Su-35 combat aircraft and S-400 surface-to-air missile system-related equipment″.[67][68][69][70]

In January 2019, U.S. Ambassador to Germany Richard Grenell told Handelsblatt that European companies participating in the construction of Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline are "always in danger", because sanctions under the CAATSA are "always possible". The Trump administration has long opposed the Russian-backed Nord Stream 2 — a pipeline for delivering natural gas from Russia to Germany.[71] Within that context Grenell also sent letters to German companies involved in the construction of said Nord Stream 2, threatening sanctions.[72]

List of Russian nationals named in the CAATSA unclassified report[edit]

The list of "oligarchs" and businessmen submitted as part of one of the five reports delivered to Congress on 29 January 2018 included 96 names[73][53][58]

Although it was widely, and incorrectly, reported in the media that those on the list “may be subject to sanctions,”[74] the CAATSA Report itself made clear that it “in no way should be interpreted to impose sanctions on those individuals or entities”. It also specified that inclusion in the report “does not constitute the determination by any agency that any of those individuals or entities meet the criteria for designation under any sanctions program,” and in no way indicates that “the U.S. Government has information about the individual’s involvement in malign activities.”[75]

Shortly after the list was released, it was reported that the Treasury Department had simply copied it from the Forbes’ 2017 “World Billionaires” list: people on the Forbes list who had Russian heritage and a net worth of $1 billion or more had been indiscriminately included in the CAATSA Report. In its response to a lawsuit asserting that the compilation of the list was “arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to law,”[76] the Treasury Department has confirmed that it is “not challenging” the allegation that it had “simply republished” the Forbes billionaires list. [77]

Criticism[edit]

The senior fellow at Singapore's ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute wrote that "Washington's efforts to curb Moscow's global arms sales may have the unintended effect of obstructing some Southeast Asian countries' attempts to resist Beijing's relentless advances; they may even enhance China's influence."[67]

According to the Stratfor, "the CAATSA process could discourage Vietnam from further building its defense relationship with the United States, if only to avoid future compromises to its strategic autonomy. ... In today's world, middle powers are increasingly assertive and refuse to tie themselves to any single great power. The United States' reliance on the blunt tool of extraterritoriality could eventually backfire if it's not careful."[78]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b "Treasury Releases CAATSA Reports, Including on Senior Foreign Political Figures and Oligarchs in the Russian Federation". US Department of the Treasury. January 29, 2018.
  2. ^ "U.S. Senate: U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 115th Congress - 1st Session". www.senate.gov. Retrieved October 5, 2018.
  3. ^ a b Facing veto override on Russia sanctions, Trump's signing statement raises constitutional issues USA TODAY, August 2, 2017
  4. ^ Senate overwhelmingly passes new Russia and Iran sanctions WP, 15 June 2017.
  5. ^ Senate GOP, Dems agree on new sanctions on Russia AP, 13 June 2017.
  6. ^ "Countering Russian Influence in Europe and Eurasia Act of 2017 (S. 1221)". GovTrack.us. Retrieved October 5, 2018.
  7. ^ Benjamin, Cardin (June 6, 2017). "S.1221 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): Countering Russian Influence in Europe and Eurasia Act of 2017". www.congress.gov. Retrieved October 5, 2018.
  8. ^ Democrats introduce new bill on Russia and Iran sanctions Reuters, 12 July 2017.
  9. ^ Marcos, Cristina (July 25, 2017). "House passes Russia sanctions deal". The Hill. Retrieved July 25, 2017.
  10. ^ Putin: Russia promises retaliation as Senate passes sanctions bill The Guardian, 28 July 2017.
  11. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Edward, Royce (August 2, 2017). "H.R.3364 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act". www.congress.gov. Retrieved October 5, 2018.
  12. ^ H.R. 3364 - Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act // SEC. 241. REPORT ON OLIGARCHS AND PARASTATAL ENTITIES OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.
  13. ^ Note, Recent Signing Statement: President Trump Objects to Act Imposing Sanctions on Russia and Congressional Review of Presidential Waivers, 131 Harv. L. Rev. 674 (2017).
  14. ^ a b c Trump Signs Russian Sanctions Into Law, With Caveats The New York Times, August 2, 2017
  15. ^ a b c Statement by President Donald J. Trump on the Signing of H.R. 3364 The White House, August 2, 2017
  16. ^ Baker, Peter (August 2, 2017). "Trump Signs Russian Sanctions Into Law, With Caveats". The New York Times. The New York Times Company. Retrieved August 2, 2017.
  17. ^ Statement by President Donald J. Trump on Signing the “Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act” The White House, August 2, 2017
  18. ^ "US says no need for new Russia sanctions". France 24. January 30, 2018.
  19. ^ "Pompeo: Egypt would face sanctions over Russian Su-35s". Anadolu Agency. April 10, 2019.
  20. ^ "CAATSA: Will India receive waiver from US' Russia sanctions?". The Hindu. August 30, 2018.
  21. ^ Editorial, Reuters (August 2, 2017). "Iran says new U.S. sanctions violate nuclear deal, vows..." Reuters. Retrieved October 5, 2018.
  22. ^ US sanctions bid triggers a barrage of angry reaction The Pyongyang Times August 2, 2017
  23. ^ US Sanctions Racket Slammed Naenara, Korean Central News Agency August 2, 2017
  24. ^ Заявление Министерства иностранных дел Российской Федерации Russian Foreign Ministry, 28 July 2017.
  25. ^ a b Roth, Andrew (July 30, 2017). "Putin orders cut of 755 personnel at U.S. missions". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 5, 2017.
  26. ^ Russia expels US diplomats in tit-for-tat over sanctions FT, 28 July 2017.
  27. ^ Эксклюзивное интервью Владимира Путина: почему ответ России чувствителен для США Russia-24, 30 July 2017.
  28. ^ Putin confirms 755 US diplomatic staff must leave BBC, 30 July 2017.
  29. ^ "Russia's Medvedev Says U.S. Sanctions Bill Ends Hope For Better Ties". RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty. Retrieved October 5, 2018.
  30. ^ Медведев: ужесточением санкций США объявили России полноценную торговую войну TASS, August 2, 2017.
  31. ^ "Germany's Angela Merkel slams planned US sanctions on Russia". Deutsche Welle. 16 June 2017.
  32. ^ Berlin hits back at US move to tighten sanctions on Russia FT, 15 June 2017.
  33. ^ Amt, Auswärtiges. "Auswärtiges Amt - Außenminister Gabriel und der österreichische Bundeskanzler Kern zu den Russland-Sanktionen durch den US-Senat". Retrieved October 5, 2018.
  34. ^ "France says U.S. sanctions on Iran, Russia look illegal". Reuters. July 26, 2017.
  35. ^ Europe 'stands ready to act' if US sanctions on Russia affect its oil and gas supplies The Independent, 26 July 2017.
  36. ^ NEW RUSSIA SANCTIONS 'ILLEGAL' SAYS GERMANY, URGING EUROPE TO RETALIATE AGAINST U.S. Newsweek, 31 July 2017.
  37. ^ "India, facing sanctions for Russian arms deals, says it wants to pivot spending to the US". CNBC. May 23, 2019.
  38. ^ "Why Punishing India on Russia Would Be a Mistake for the United States". The Diplomat. May 17, 2018.
  39. ^ "S400 missile system: Why India wants to buy S-400 defence system from Russia | India News - Times of India".
  40. ^ "India to buy Iranian oil in Nov despite US sanctions: Pradhan - Times of India".
  41. ^ "US threatens India with CAATSA if it continues to purchase fuel from Iran". Yahoo News. October 12, 2018.
  42. ^ "Russia sanctions putting strain on US relationship with Indonesia". Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI). June 17, 2019.
  43. ^ Gumrukcu, Tuvan. "Turkey, Russia sign deal on supply of S-400 missiles". U.S. Retrieved June 28, 2018.
  44. ^ Editorial, Reuters. "Pompeo presses Turkey on S-400 missiles purchase from Russia". U.S. Retrieved June 28, 2018.
  45. ^ London, Lela (February 28, 2018). "US THREATENS Turkey over surface-to-air S-400 MISSILE DEAL with Russia". Daily Express. Retrieved June 28, 2018.
  46. ^ "Erdogan: No step back from S-400 deal with Russia". Al-Jazeera. June 4, 2019.
  47. ^ "Turkey preparing for possible U.S. sanctions over S-400s: minister". Reuters. May 22, 2019.
  48. ^ Presidential Memorandum for the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Director of National Intelligence The White House, September 29, 2017.
  49. ^ Office of the Federal Register (October 12, 2017). "Delegation of Certain Functions and Authorities under the Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act of 2017 to the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of Homeland Security" (PDF). Federal Register. Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration. Archived from the original on October 27, 2017. Retrieved October 28, 2017.
  50. ^ Ukraine-/Russia-related Sanctions (Sectoral Sanctions under Executive Order 13662) // OFAC FAQs: Other Sanctions Programs
  51. ^ США с 28 ноября ужесточат санкции в отношении банков и нефтегазовых компаний РФ Kommersant, 29 September 2017.
  52. ^ Policy, Emily Tamkin, (c) 2017, Foreign. "Leading lawmakers wonder why Trump Is dragging feet on Russia sanctions". chicagotribune.com. Retrieved October 13, 2017.
  53. ^ a b "Report to Congress Pursuant to Section 241 of the Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act of 2017 Regarding Senior Foreign Political Figures and Oligarchs in the Russian Federation and Russian Parastatal Entities" (PDF). January 29, 2018. Retrieved January 30, 2018.
  54. ^ For some Russian oligarchs, sanctions risk makes Putin awkward to know Reuters, 30 November 2017.
  55. ^ Who’s an Oligarch? Rich Russians Fret Over U.S. Sanctions Label 4 December 2017.
  56. ^ "Trump admin declines to impose new Russia sanctions". CNN. January 30, 2018.
  57. ^ a b Минфин США: "кремлевский доклад" содержит секретное приложение в дополнение к приложениям 1 и 2 (поименные СПИСКИ), NEWSru, 30 January 2018.
  58. ^ a b Editorial, Reuters (January 30, 2018). "U.S. names Kremlin outliers in 'telephone directory' sanctions report". Reuters U.K.
  59. ^ 552. Has the Treasury Department now sanctioned the individuals and entities included in its January 29, 2018 report on senior political figures, oligarchs, and parastatal entities of the Russian Federation? US Department of the Treasury.
  60. ^ "Mnuchin says new Russia-related sanctions forthcoming". The Washington Times. January 30, 2018.
  61. ^ "Trump: How much of Germany's gas comes from Russia?". BBC News. July 11, 2018.
  62. ^ Thompson, Leon (March 16, 2018). "U.S. sanctions Russian Federation for election meddling, hacking". The Africom. Retrieved March 16, 2018.
  63. ^ Easley, Jonathan (March 15, 2018). "Trump unveils new sanctions against Russia". The Hill. Retrieved March 16, 2018.
  64. ^ Treasury Sanctions Russian Cyber Actors for Interference with the 2016 U.S. Elections and Malicious Cyber-Attacks US Department of the Treasury, 15 March 2018.
  65. ^ Andrew Desiderio (May 18, 2018). "Senate Democrats Call For Multi-Agency Probe Into Russia Sanctions Delay". TheDailyBeast.com. Retrieved May 22, 2018.
  66. ^ Menendez, Warner, Brown Request Multiagency Review on Russia Sanctions Implementation 18 May 2018.
  67. ^ a b Storey, Ian (November 21, 2018). "US assault on Russian arms exports could misfire in Asia". Nikkei Asian Review.
  68. ^ US sanctions Chinese military for buying Russian weapons CNN, 21 September 2018.
  69. ^ U.S. sanctions China for buying Russian fighter jets, missiles Reuters, 20 September 2018.
  70. ^ CAATSA Section 231: "Addition of 33 Entities and Individuals to the List of Specified Persons and Imposition of Sanctions on the Equipment Development Department" U.S. Department of State, September 20, 2018.
  71. ^ "How the US could halt Nord Stream 2". Handelsblatt. January 7, 2019.
  72. ^ "U.S. warns German companies of possible sanctions over Russian pipeline". Reuters. January 13, 2019.
  73. ^ "U.S. Names Russian Oligarchs, But Says It's Not a Sanctions List". Bloomberg. January 30, 2018. Retrieved January 30, 2018.
  74. ^ See, e.g., Donna Borak, “US names Russian oligarchs in ‘Putin list’ but imposes no new sanctions,” CNN.com (Feb. 12, 2019), available at https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/29/politics/trump-russia-sanctions/index.html.
  75. ^ CAATSA Treasury List; see also Resource Center, OFAC FAQs: Other Sanctions Programs, Topic 552, available at https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/faqs/Sanctions/Pages/faq_other.aspx#552
  76. ^ See Complaint, Gapontsev v. U.S. Dept. of the Treasury, No. 1:18-cv-02826, in the United Stated District Court for the District of Columbia, available at https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.202127/gov.uscourts.dcd.202127.1.0.pdf; C. Ryan Barber, “DOJ Doesn’t Deny Treasury’s Russian ‘Oligarch’ List Was Copied From Forbes,” Law.com (Apr. 23, 2019), available at https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2019/04/23/doj-doesnt-deny-treasurys-russian-oligarch-list-was-copied-from-forbes/?slreturn=20190517130011.
  77. ^ C. Ryan Barber, “DOJ Doesn’t Deny Treasury’s Russian ‘Oligarch’ List Was Copied From Forbes,” Law.com (Apr. 23, 2019), available at https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2019/04/23/doj-doesnt-deny-treasurys-russian-oligarch-list-was-copied-from-forbes/?slreturn=20190517130011.
  78. ^ "With CAATSA, the U.S. is Trying to Make Russia Hurt". Stratfor. May 28, 2018.

External links[edit]