In the measurement of ionising radiation the counting efficiency is the ratio between the number of particles or photons counted with a radiation counter and the number of particles or photons of the same type and energy emitted by the radiation source.
Several factors affect the counting efficiency:
- The distance from the source of radiation
- The absorption or scattering of particles by the medium (such as air) between the source and the surface of the detector
- The detector efficiency in counting all radiation photons and particles that reach the surface of the detector
The accompanying diagram shows this graphically.
Radiation protection instruments
Large area scintillation counters used for surface radioactive contamination measurements use plate or planar radioactive sources as calibration standards. The Surface Emission Rate (SER), not the source activity, is used as a measure of the rate of particles emitted from the source of radiation. The SER is the true emission rate from the surface, which is usually different to the activity. This difference is due to self-shielding within the active layer of the source which will reduce the SER, or backscatter which will reflect particles off the backing plate of the active layer and will increase the SER. Beta particle plate sources usually have a significant backscatter, whereas alpha plate sources usually have no backscatter, but are easily self-attenuated if the active layer is made too thick.
Liquid scintillation counters
Counting efficiency varies for different isotopes, sample compositions and scintillation counters. Poor counting efficiency can be caused by an extremely low energy to light conversion rate, (scintillation efficiency) which, even optimally, will be a small value. It has been calculated that only some 4% of the energy from a β emission event is converted to light by even the most efficient scintillation cocktails.
Proportional counters and end-window Geiger-Muller tubes have a very high efficiency for all ionising particles that reach the fill gas. Nearly every initial ionising event in the gas will result in Townsend avalanches, and thereby an output signal. However the overall detector efficiency is largely affected by attentuation due to the window or tube body through which particles have to pass.
In the case of gamma photons the detection efficiency is more dependent upon the fill gas and gamma energy. Low energy photons will interact more with the fill gas than high energy photons.
- IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology (2nd ed.). 1997.
- Estimation of calibration factors for surface contamination monitoring instruments for different surfaces. Mike Woods and Stephen Judge. Pub NPL, teddington, UK
- "Counting efficiency and quenching". National Diagnostics. 2011. Retrieved April 6, 2013.
|Photon energy||n||1||count of photons n with energy Qp = h⋅c / λ.[nb 2]|
|Photon flux||Φq||count per second||s−1||T−1||photons per unit time, dn/dt with n = photon number.|
also called photon power.
|Photon intensity||I||count per steradian per second||sr−1⋅s−1||T−1||dn/dω|
|Photon radiance||Lq||count per square metre per steradian per second||m−2⋅sr−1⋅s−1||L−2⋅T−1||d2n/(dA cos(θ) dω)|
|Photon irradiance||Eq||count per square metre per second||m−2⋅s−1||L−2⋅T−1||dn/dA|
|Photon exitance||M||count per square metre per second||m−2⋅s−1||L−2⋅T−1||dn/dA|
|See also: Photon counting · SI · Radiometry · Photometry|