Courvoisier v. Raymond
|Courvoisier v. Raymond|
|Court||Colorado Supreme Court|
|Full case name||Auguste Courvoisier v. Edwin S. Raymond|
|Decided||September 21, 1896|
|Citation(s)||23 Colo. 113 (1896)
47 P. 284
|Prior action(s)||Appeal from District Court, Arapahoe County|
|Unanimous opinion by Hayt|
|Judge(s) sitting||Charles D. Hayt
Luther M. Goddard
Courvoisier v. Raymond, 23 Colo. 113 (1896), was a case decided by the Colorado Supreme Court that affirmed the use of a reasonableness standard when determining the validity of a mistaken self-defense.
Courvoisier was a jewelry store owner, and he was awoken in the middle of the night when robbers tried to break into his store. He retrieved his revolver and chased them outside. Raymond was a Denver police officer who began to approach Courvoisier, and Courvoisier shot him. Courvoisier said that he mistook Raymond for a robber, but the trial court found for Raymond.
The Colorado Supreme Court reversed the decision for Raymond because of faulty jury instructions in the trial court. The trial court failed to give the instruction that Courvoisier should not be held liable if his mistake that Raymond was a robber was reasonable given the circumstances.
- Henderson, J.A. et al. The Torts Process, Seventh Edition. Aspen Publishers, New York, NY: 2007, p. 78
- Henderson, p. 76
- Henderson, p. 78
|This article relating to case law in the United States, or its constituent jurisdictions is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|