Sample points from a bivariate Gaussian distribution with a standard deviation of 3 in roughly the lower left-upper right direction and of 1 in the orthogonal direction. Because the x and y components co-vary, the variances of and do not fully describe the distribution. A covariance matrix is needed; the directions of the arrows correspond to the eigenvectors of this covariance matrix and their lengths to the square roots of the eigenvalues.
Intuitively, the covariance matrix generalizes the notion of variance to multiple dimensions. As an example, the variation in a collection of random points in two-dimensional space cannot be characterized fully by a single number, nor would the variances in the and directions contain all of the necessary information; a matrix would be necessary to fully characterize the two-dimensional variation.
The covariance matrix of a random vector is typically denoted by or .
Nomenclatures differ. Some statisticians, following the probabilist William Feller in his two-volume book An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, call the matrix the variance of the random vector , because it is the natural generalization to higher dimensions of the 1-dimensional variance. Others call it the covariance matrix, because it is the matrix of covariances between the scalar components of the vector .
Both forms are quite standard, and there is no ambiguity between them. The matrix is also often called the variance-covariance matrix, since the diagonal terms are in fact variances.
The matrix of regression coefficients may often be given in transpose form, , suitable for post-multiplying a row vector of explanatory variables rather than pre-multiplying a column vector . In this form they correspond to the coefficients obtained by inverting the matrix of the normal equations of ordinary least squares (OLS).
A covariance matrix with all non-zero elements tells us that all the individual random variables are interrelated. This means that the variables are not only directly correlated, but also correlated via other variables indirectly. Often such indirect, common-mode correlations are trivial and uninteresting. They can be suppressed by calculating the partial covariance matrix, that is the part of covariance matrix that shows only the interesting part of correlations.
If two vectors of random variables and are correlated via another vector , the latter correlations are suppressed in a matrix
The partial covariance matrix is effectively the simple covariance matrix as if the uninteresting random variables were held constant.
Covariance matrix as a parameter of a distribution
Applied to one vector, the covariance matrix maps a linear combination c of the random variables X onto a vector of covariances with those variables: . Treated as a bilinear form, it yields the covariance between the two linear combinations: . The variance of a linear combination is then , its covariance with itself.
where the last inequality follows from the observation that is a scalar.
Conversely, every symmetric positive semi-definite matrix is a covariance matrix. To see this, suppose is a symmetric positive-semidefinite matrix. From the finite-dimensional case of the spectral theorem, it follows that has a nonnegative symmetric square root, which can be denoted by M1/2. Let be any column vector-valued random variable whose covariance matrix is the identity matrix. Then
where the complex conjugate of a complex number is denoted ; thus the variance of a complex random variable is a real number.
If is a column vector of complex-valued random variables, then the conjugate transpose is formed by both transposing and conjugating. In the following expression, the product of a vector with its conjugate transpose results in a square matrix called the covariance matrix, as its expectation::p. 293
where denotes the conjugate transpose, which is applicable to the scalar case, since the transpose of a scalar is still a scalar. The matrix so obtained will be Hermitianpositive-semidefinite, with real numbers in the main diagonal and complex numbers off-diagonal.
For complex random vectors, another kind of second central moment, the pseudo-covariance matrix (also called relation matrix) is defined as follows. In contrast to the covariance matrix defined above Hermitian transposition gets replaced by transposition in the definition.
If and are centred data matrices of dimension and respectively, i.e. with n columns of observations of p and q rows of variables, from which the row means have been subtracted, then, if the row means were estimated from the data, sample covariance matrices and can be defined to be
or, if the row means were known a priori,
These empirical sample covariance matrices are the most straightforward and most often used estimators for the covariance matrices, but other estimators also exist, including regularised or shrinkage estimators, which may have better properties.
In covariance mapping the values of the or matrix are plotted as a 2-dimensional map. When vectors and are discrete random functions, the map shows statistical relations between different regions of the random functions. Statistically independent regions of the functions show up on the map as zero-level flatland, while positive or negative correlations show up, respectively, as hills or valleys.
In practice the column vectors , and are acquired experimentally as rows of samples, e.g.
where is the i-th discrete value in sample j of the random function . The expected values needed in the covariance formula are estimated using the sample mean, e.g.
where the angular brackets denote sample averaging as before except that the Bessel's correction should be made to avoid bias. Using this estimation the partial covariance matrix can be calculated as
where the backslash denotes the left matrix division operator, which bypasses the requirement to invert a matrix and is available in some computational packages such as Matlab.
Figure 1: Construction of a partial covariance map of N2 molecules undergoing Coulomb explosion induced by a free-electron laser. Panels a and b map the two terms of the covariance matrix, which is shown in panel c. Panel d maps common-mode correlations via intensity fluctuations of the laser. Panel e maps the partial covariance matrix that is corrected for the intensity fluctuations. Panel f shows that 10% overcorrection improves the map and makes ion-ion correlations clearly visible. Owing to momentum conservation these correlations appear as lines approximately perpendicular to the autocorrelation line (and to the periodic modulations which are caused by detector ringing).
Fig. 1 illustrates how a partial covariance map is constructed on an example of an experiment performed at the FLASHfree-electron laser in Hamburg. The random function is the time-of-flight spectrum of ions from a Coulomb explosion of nitrogen molecules multiply ionised by a laser pulse. Since only a few hundreds of molecules are ionised at each laser pulse, the single-shot spectra are highly fluctuating. However, collecting typically such spectra, , and averaging them over produces a smooth spectrum , which is shown in red at the bottom of Fig. 1. The average spectrum reveals several nitrogen ions in a form of peaks broadened by their kinetic energy, but to find the correlations between the ionisation stages and the ion momenta requires calculating a covariance map.
In the example of Fig. 1 spectra and are the same, except that the range of the time-of-flight differs. Panel a shows , panel b shows and panel c shows their difference, which is (note a change in the colour scale). Unfortunately, this map is overwhelmed by uninteresting, common-mode correlations induced by laser intensity fluctuating from shot to shot. To suppress such correlations the laser intensity is recorded at every shot, put into and is calculated as panels d and e show. The suppression of the uninteresting correlations is, however, imperfect because there are other sources of common-mode fluctuations than the laser intensity and in principle all these sources should be monitored in vector . Yet in practice it is often sufficient to overcompensate the partial covariance correction as panel f shows, where interesting correlations of ion momenta are now clearly visible as straight lines centred on ionisation stages of atomic nitrogen.
Two-dimensional infrared spectroscopy employs correlation analysis to obtain 2D spectra of the condensed phase. There are two versions of this analysis: synchronous and asynchronous. Mathematically, the former is expressed in terms of the sample covariance matrix and the technique is equivalent to covariance mapping.
^Eaton, Morris L. (1983). Multivariate Statistics: a Vector Space Approach. John Wiley and Sons. pp. 116–117. ISBN0-471-02776-6.
^ abW J Krzanowski "Principles of Multivariate Analysis" (Oxford University Press, New York, 1988), Chap. 14.4; K V Mardia, J T Kent and J M Bibby "Multivariate Analysis (Academic Press, London, 1997), Chap. 6.5.3; T W Anderson "An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis" (Wiley, New York, 2003), 3rd ed., Chaps. 2.5.1 and 4.3.1.
^Lapidoth, Amos (2009). A Foundation in Digital Communication. Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-0-521-19395-5.
^L J Frasinski "Covariance mapping techniques" J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.49 152004 (2016), open access
^ abO Kornilov, M Eckstein, M Rosenblatt, C P Schulz, K Motomura, A Rouzée, J Klei, L Foucar, M Siano, A Lübcke, F. Schapper, P Johnsson, D M P Holland, T Schlatholter, T Marchenko, S Düsterer, K Ueda, M J J Vrakking and L J Frasinski "Coulomb explosion of diatomic molecules in intense XUV fields mapped by partial covariance" J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.46 164028 (2013), open access
^I Noda "Generalized two-dimensional correlation method applicable to infrared, Raman, and other types of spectroscopy" Appl. Spectrosc.47 1329–36 (1993)