A coverage is the digital representation of some spatio-temporal phenomenon. Coverages play an important role in geographic information systems, geospatial content and services, GIS data processing, and data sharing.
A coverage is a special kind of geographic feature, with the distinguishing characteristics that other features have one particular value associated (such as a road number, which remains constant over all the road's extent) whereas a coverage typically conveys different values at different locations.
A coverage is represented by its "domain" (the universe of extent) and a number of range of values representing the coverage's value at each defined location. For example, a satellite image derived from remote sensing might record varying degrees of light pollution. Aerial photography, land cover data, and digital elevation models all provide coverage data. Generally, a coverage can be multi-dimensional, such as 1-D sensor timeseries, 2-D satellite images, 3-D x/y/t image time series or x/y/z geo tomograms, or 4-D x/y/z/t climate and ocean data.
Coverages represent digital geospatial information representing space/time-varying phenomena. OGC Abstract Topic 6 - which is identical to ISO 19123 - defines an abstract model of coverages. As such, it is not a suitable basis for implementations: many implementations are conceivable which all conform to this abstract model, but are not interoperable. This coverage model is concretized to the level of interoperability by the OGC standard GML 3.2.1 Application Schema - Coverages (often referred to as GMLCOV) which in turn is based on the Geography Markup Language (GML) 3.2, an XML grammar written in XML Schema for the description of application schemas as well as the transport and storage of geographic information.
The European legal framework for a unified Spatial Data Infrastructure, INSPIRE, in its Annex II and III relies on the OGC definitions of coverages as well, but modifies them in places in a way making them less compatible and interoperable with the OGC standard. For example, components of the coverage concept are selectively recombined into new, different definitions of a coverage.
Formally, in GMLCOV AbstractCoverage is a subtype of AbstractFeature (indicating its close relation). An abstract coverage consists of the following components:
- coverage domain: the extent where valid values are available;
- range set: the set of values ("pixels", "voxels") the coverage consists of, together with their locations
- range type: a type definition of the range set values
- metadata: a slot where any kind of metadata can be added
This abstract coverage is refined into several concrete coverage types, which can be instantiated, for example:
- gridded coverages:
- GridCoverage: a regular, equispaced grid which is not spatially referenced (like a raster image which has no geo coordinates associated)
- RectifiedGridCoverage: a regular, equispaced grid which is spatially referenced (like a satellite image which does have geo coordinates associated)
- ReferenceableGridCoverage: a grid which is not necessarily equispaced (like satellite image time series where images do not arrive at regular time intervals, or curvilinear grids following river estuaries)
- multi-feature coverages:
- MultiPointCoverage: sets of values associated with points located in space/time ("point clouds")
- MultiCurveCoverage: sets of values associated with curves located in space/time (such as trajectories)
- MultiSurfaceCoverage: sets of values associated with surfaces located in space/time (such as iso-surfaces)
- MultiSolidCoverage: sets of values associated with solids located in space/time (such as CAD objects)
Among the special cases which can be modelled by coverages are
- set of Thiessen polygons, used to analyse spatially distributed data such as rainfall measurements
- triangulated irregular network (TIN), often used for terrain models
As coverages are conceptually defined through GML, a natural representation is GML itself (such as for sensor time series). However, this is not mandatory: any of a series of data formats can be used to encode a coverage, such as GeoTIFF, NetCDF, HDF-EOS, or NITF.
As some of these encoding formats are not capable of incorporating all metadata making up a coverage, GMLCOV foresees a multipart MIME encoding (see Figure) where the first component encodes the coverage description (domain extent, range type, metadata, etc.) and the second part consists of the range set "payload" using some encoding format.
In Web services following the open OGC standards, coverages can be used by various service types:
- Web Coverage Service which offers a simple access protocol for coverage subsetting, as well as optional advanced functionality
- Web Coverage Processing Service which offers a raster query language for ad hoc processing and filtering
- Web Feature Service (although coverages can only be served as a whole, making it unwieldy in face of the often high-volume coverages, like satellite maps)
- Web Processing Service which allows publishing any kind of algorithm through an advanced remote procedure call style protocol
- Sensor Web Enablement, due to the GMLCOV use of the SWE Common standard
Industry Terminology: GIS format
Historically, "coverage" is the term typically applied to the legacy Arc/INFO format developed by ESRI. The Coverage model at that time was a revolutionary concept, extending CAD formats into more spatially aware data that featured linked attributes. Coverages processed using the BUILD and CLEAN commands are 2D planar datasets that maintain topological information, thus a polygon "knows" which segments of its perimeter it shares with adjacent polygons. Due to the lack of processing power in computing at the time of its development[when?], the Coverage model employs indexed binary files to store spatial and attribute data separately as opposed to utilizing a RDBMS.
- Topic 6 - Schema for coverage geometry and functions, OGC 07-011
- OGC GML Application Schema - Coverages, OGC 09-146r2
- OpenGIS Geography Markup Language (GML) Encoding Standard, OGC 07-036
- Bröring, Arne; Johannes Echterhoff; Simon Jirka; Ingo Simonis; Thomas Everding; Christoph Stasch; Steve Liang; Rob Lemmens (2011). "New Generation Sensor Web Enablement". Sensors, Volume 11, Number 3. pp. 2652–2699.
- Zeiler, Michael. Modeling Our World, The ESRI Guide to Geodatabase Design. ESRI Press, 1999. ISBN 1-879102-62-5
- Baumann, P.; Jucovschi, C.; Stancu-Mara, S.: Efficient Map Portrayal Using a General-Purpose Query Language (A Case Study). DEXA 2009, August 31 - September 04, 2009, Vienna, Austria, Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, LNCS 5690, pp. 153-163
- Jucovschi, C., Baumann, P., Stancu-Mara, S.: Speeding up Array Query Processing by Just-In-Time Compilation. IEEE Intl Workshop on Spatial and Spatiotemporal Data Mining (SSTDM-08), Pisa, Italy, 15 December 2008, pp. 408 - 413