Criticism of NASCAR

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing (NASCAR) is the sanctioning body for the Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series, the Xfinity Series and the Camping World Truck Series. NASCAR also oversees a number of regional racing series, including the Whelen Modified Tour, and the Whelen All-American Series. In its role, NASCAR sanctions over 1,500 races at over 100 tracks in 39 states, Canada, Mexico, and Europe.

Similar to other professional leagues and sanctioning bodies, NASCAR has been the target of criticism on various topics, from various sources. Some critics note the significant differences between today's NASCAR vehicles and true "stock cars".[1] As NASCAR has made moves to improve its national appeal, it has begun racing at new tracks, and ceased racing at some traditional ones, a sore spot for the traditional fan base.

Others frequently cite the dominance of the France family in NASCAR's business structure, policies, and decision making. Recently, the increased number of Cup drivers competing consistently in the Xfinity Series races has been hotly debated. Most recently, NASCAR has been challenged on the types and frequency of caution flags, with some critics suggesting the outcome of races is being manipulated,[2][3][4] and that the intention is not safety, as NASCAR claims, but closer racing.

Another general area of criticism, not only of NASCAR but other motorsports as well, includes questions about fuel consumption,[5] emissions and pollution, and the use of lead additives in the gasoline.

Technology differing from "stock" or production[edit]

Mark McFarland (88) spins at Bristol Motor Speedway, while Kenny Wallace (22) and Ashton Lewis Jr. (25) pass to the inside during a Busch Series event.

The technologies used in "stock cars" bear little resemblance to modern street vehicles. Modern NASCAR vehicles share very few attributes of the commercial models with which they are associated; for example, the production Chevrolet Monte Carlo weighs nearly the same as the NASCAR Chevy Monte Carlo, with the NASCAR vehicle having a cast-iron eight-cylinder engine driving the rear wheels, whereas the production car has an aluminum alloy front-wheel-drive V6 , though some model years were powered by a V8 driving the rear wheels. In 2012 the cars switched over from a carburetor fuel system to electronic fuel injection.[6]

Supporters note that this is a modern condition: when NASCAR first started in 1948, the race cars were indeed production vehicles, but the safety and performance needs of modern racing have required custom-built race cars. Supporters also note that the strict equipment rules place less emphasis on getting a technological advantage, and thus more emphasis on individual driver skill. All of NASCAR's series also run on spec tires made by certain tire manufacturers such as Goodyear and American Racer. Some suggest that this discourages tire competition and development, which they further assert has led to the absence of rain/wet condition tires, and to races (such as the 2005 UAW-GM Quality 500) where tires seem to self-destruct.[7] The lack of tire competition has also helped lead to a drop in the number of new winners; in 1994 when Hoosier Racing Tire participated the sport saw three new winning drivers (Sterling Marlin, Jimmy Spencer, and Jeff Gordon) and the competitive elevation of drivers such as Ward Burton and his brother Jeff.

In 2008, a series of meetings was held in Indianapolis between NASCAR officials and Detroit automakers. According to Autoextremist magazine, automakers demanded the use of Pony cars, in stock bodywork dimensions, on Cup Series races by 2010, to help sales in the showroom; using direct fuel-injection, overhead cams and E85 fuel instead of gasoline.[8] E85 fuels were rejected by NASCAR[9] and the dubiousness of promotional claims about them have limited their appeal.[10] Other demands were largely rejected, as they reflected an unrealistic view of racing as a technology exercise despite decades of banning of technological items throughout motorsports such as Wankel engines, turbines (used at Indianapolis in the 1960s), and traction control, as well as the continued effectiveness (and relative ease of policing) of NASCAR's antiquated carburation and pushrod technology.[neutrality is disputed]

The Nationwide Series Car of Tomorrow platform, which went full-time in 2011, featured "pony cars" which were different for each make. The next generation of cars for the Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series featured "unprecedented cooperation" between the manufacturers and NASCAR. The already released 2013 Ford Fusion and 2013 Toyota Camry look much closer to their showroom counterparts than the Car of Tomorrow. NASCAR introduced E15 fuel full-time in 2011 through a partnership with Sunoco and American Ethanol. NASCAR also made the switch to Electronic Fuel Injection for the Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series in 2012 through a partnership with McLaren.

Business structure and decision-making policies[edit]

Since its founding in 1947 by William France Sr., the overall NASCAR organization has been majority owned by the France family, ensuring that the family controls a majority of the revenue that the sport generates. NASCAR is also criticized for its reluctance to promote some aspects of safety that it would have to pay for (e.g., traveling safety crew),[11][12] and other allegedly monopolistic aspects such as merchandising and race-track ownership. The case for a traveling safety crew was never credibly made by NASCAR critics[neutrality is disputed]; it revolved around citing the use of traveling safety crews by IndyCar racing, but no case was made that the in-house track safety crews used by NASCAR were in any way inferior in performance to the traveling crew of IndyCar.

In addition, due to its influence and lack of drivers' say, NASCAR has been described as a "benevolent dictatorship," with a top-heavy command structure that tends to keep dissenters in line.[13][14] Examples of such influence included the cancellation of the Speed Channel television show Pit Bull (which frequently criticized many of NASCAR's decisions and policies and enjoyed modest ratings), frequent use of the vague "detrimental to NASCAR" rule, and the creation of rules on whim, especially during a race. NASCAR has taken to penalizing drivers in recent years, with fines, point penalties, and lap penalties in races for drivers or mechanics who use obscene language in interviews to the media.[15]

Because of Fox Sports' heavy affiliation with NASCAR, a fair amount of the network's programming is NASCAR-related.

Driver competition in multiple series[edit]

2009 Nationwide Series car of Cup Series regular Kyle Busch, who won the Nationwide Series championship that year

NASCAR has long allowed drivers to compete in as many series and events as they like, with few restrictions. However, in recent years, many Cup Series drivers have competed in and dominated the lower tier Xfinity Series races on a regular basis, earning Cup drivers the nickname "Buschwhackers" (derived from the 1984–2007 sponsorship of NASCAR's second-highest series by Busch Beer). The situation is compounded by the close timing of the races in the two series: a typical NASCAR weekend has a Xfinity race on Saturday followed by a Cup race on Sunday at the same track. Some have wondered why "major league" Cup drivers are allowed to compete in the "minor league" races with such frequency, and whether Xfinity is an adequate developmental series. Sportswriter Bob Margolis noted that much of this is due to the similarities between the cars used in the two series (they are mostly alike except for the engines and the wheelbase), and the desire for Cup drivers to get as much practice time as possible to learn about the track and car setup before the main race.[16]

In the aforementioned 2008 meetings between NASCAR and Detroit automakers, the automakers also called for the Xfinity Series to become strictly a developmental series, with Cup drivers prohibited from running in the junior series.[8] The request was rejected at that time. However, in late 2010, media reports began to indicate that NASCAR may institute a slightly modified version of this rule for 2011, with Cup drivers allowed to run in Xfinity races but not to compete for the series championship.[17] In January 2011, confirmed this, adding that drivers will now be allowed to compete for the championship in only one national series in a given season, a change that also affects the Truck Series.[18]

Although many claim that the added track time gained by running a Xfinity or Truck Series race helps drivers during the Cup Series race, any positive effects are not seen in final championship standings. For example, during his run of 5 consecutive Cup Series Championships, Jimmie Johnson ran only 3 Busch/Nationwide races in 2006, 1 each in 2007 and 2008, and none in 2009 or 2010. Another example is the 2009 season, where Kyle Busch won the Nationwide Series championship but failed to qualify for the 2009 Cup Series Chase.

On October 2016, NASCAR announced new participation guidelines for its three national series, limiting the amount of Xfinity Series and Truck Series races that full-time drivers in its premier series will be allowed to compete in, starting in 2017.[19]

Environmental effects[edit]

Fuel consumption[edit]

NASCAR fuel supply truck in 2010

According to NASCAR, about 6,000 U.S. gallons (~22,700 litres) of fuel are consumed during a typical Cup Series weekend.[20] For the 2006 season, which included 36 points races, the total for the season would have been 216,000 U.S. gallons (818,000 litres). One environmental critic recently estimated NASCAR's total fuel consumption across all series at 2 million U.S. gallons (7.57 million litres) of gas for one season.[21]

At race speeds, Cup Series cars get 2 to 5 miles per gallon.[20][21][22] Consumption under caution can be estimated at 14-18 mpg, based on comparable engines generally available to the public. The rate of fuel consumption tends to be the same regardless of the actual speeds of the cars, as teams change gear ratios for each race to ensure that the engine always operates in its optimum power band; however, the fuel mileage will vary for each race, depending on the maximum speeds attained.

The fuel consumption criticism dates to 1974 and the energy crisis; NASCAR responded by showing data that racing was far less consumptive of fuel than regular air travel, etc.[citation needed]

Emissions and pollution[edit]

The consumption figures above provide no insight on environmental impact in terms of emissions. NASCAR vehicles are generally unregulated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, and in particular, they have no mufflers, catalytic converters or other emissions control devices. However, some local short tracks which run under NASCAR sanction require certain emissions control devices. Many short tracks run mufflers in compliance with noise ordinances at some tracks; in the early years of the Camping World Truck Series, some races were held at venues which required mufflers, a requirement still used in NASCAR's K&N Pro Series (East and West) and Whelen (North and South) Modified Tours.

NASCAR continued to use lead additives in its race gasoline until the 2007 Auto Club 500 at California Speedway on February 25,[23] which led to concerns about the health of those exposed to the fumes of the cars (fans and residents living near the race tracks). Lead is a well-known environmental risk, but the performance needs of race engines (in particular, the high compression ratios and sustained/repeated operation at high rpm and load) once made it difficult to switch to unleaded fuel.

In the United States, the commercial use of leaded fuel has been phased out since the early 1970s, when catalytic converters were required to be installed on new cars, making unleaded fuel a requirement (leaded fuel will destroy a catalytic converter). The sale of leaded fuel has been mostly banned in the US since 1996, but exemptions exist for auto racing, aircraft, farm and marine equipment.

NASCAR eventually took steps to eliminate the need for leaded fuels. In 1998, NASCAR and then-fuel supplier Tosco (Now ConocoPhillips, the company that produces the Union 76 brand of fuel) conducted an unsuccessful test of unleaded fuel in selected Busch Series races. In July 2006, in the first in a four-week test run of unleaded fuel, the first race since 1998 to run unleaded gasoline, known as Sunoco 260 GT Plus, a commercially available racing fuel, was held during a Busch race at the Gateway International Raceway in Madison, Illinois. The testing in July 2006 was successful with no suspected engine failures or malfunctions from the new fuel. In October 2006, NASCAR stated its intention to transition to unleaded fuel in all three top series (Craftsman, Busch and Cup) in 2007, starting with the Auto Club 500.

During the first race in which unleaded fuel was used, there were a number of engine failures during the race, leading many to believe that the unleaded fuel is to be blamed. The drivers who encountered failures include Dale Earnhardt, Jr. and Martin Truex Jr. of Dale Earnhardt, Inc. and Kasey Kahne of Evernham Motorsports. The engine failures of both Earnhardt and Truex were attributed in part to the lack of a lead additive, but also to centrifugal force causing improper distribution of oil between the left and right sides of the engine. Evernham Motorsports has not disclosed the reason behind Kahne's engine failure.

The 2008 season marked the first season all 36 races used unleaded racing fuel.

2011 marked one of the largest “green initiatives” in the fifty plus year history of NASCAR when all fuel sources were to include Ethanol in a blend called E15.[24] One unintended consequence of the conversion was higher horsepower and therefore slightly lower fuel economy. It is argued however, that the reduction in fuel economy and the resultant increase in fuel use may offset any environmental impact savings by reduced emissions. Although not connected to the fuel blend, a new “Dry Break” self-venting fuel supply can was also adopted in part for safety (reduced the number of people working on the racecar during a pit stop) but also in part to reduce the amount of fuel spilled during a pit stop, which has both environmental and safety implications. The reduced fuel spillage is negligible at best when observing a pit stop as fuel spills are common and during competition there is no real method to determine with any certainty the volume of fuel lost.[citation needed]

In 2012 a complete technology change and shift in thinking occurred when NASCAR switched the Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series to fuel injection from the current carburetor. Arguments have been made about increased efficiency; however, race teams will work to ensure they take advantage of the additional horsepower and efficiency to increase speeds so any improvement in efficiency may be lost to competition.

Participation of non-American manufacturers[edit]

A Gen-5 car body with Toyota Camry decals.

NASCAR's early history included several foreign manufacturers, such as Aston Martin, Austin-Healey, Citroën, Jaguar, MG, Morgan, Porsche, Renault, and Volkswagen.[25] At a 1954 road race in Linden, New Jersey, Jaguar cars finished first, fourth, fifth and sixth.[26]

As a matter of policy, NASCAR restricted entry to American car makers from the 1960s until 2004, when Toyota was allowed to enter the NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series with the Toyota Tundra. The restriction was relaxed in recognition of the fact that the Tundra, while Japanese in origin, is built in the United States. Commentators have also noted that the "American" cars are often built or assembled in Canada and Mexico. As of the 2018 season and the introduction of the Gen-6 car, all of the cars including, the Chevrolet Camaro, Toyota Camry and Ford Fusion (soon will be the Mustang) are assembled in the United States, but, the Ford Fusion is also built in Mexico as well as the United States. Some fans have complained about the entry of a foreign manufacturer into what is perceived as an American sport, while drivers and owners have expressed concern that Toyota's deep pockets, and stated willingness to spend, may increase costs for other teams as well.[27] Also, since NASCAR vehicles are only painted to look like production cars and are team-built, the "American-built" regulation can be considered obsolete.

NASCAR announced in 2006 the addition of Toyota to both the Busch Series and NASCAR Cup Series for the 2007 season. Toyota supported three Cup teams in a total of seven cars in 2007. As of the 2017 season, drivers that compete in the Toyota Camry include Joe Gibbs Racing drivers Kyle Busch, Daniel Suarez, Denny Hamlin, and Matt Kenseth; BK Racing drivers Joey Gase, Gray Gaulding, and Corey LaJoie; and Furniture Row Racing drivers Erik Jones and Martin Truex, Jr..

Four Camrys qualified for and ran in the 2007 Daytona 500, becoming the first foreign make to compete in a Cup Series race since the British-made MG in 1962. However, Toyota's debut was marred by a cheating scandal involving owner/driver Michael Waltrip.[28]

It should also be noted Dodge, and its parent company Chrysler,[29] were owned by Daimler-Benz, a German company, during the period in question when Toyota entered the fray, and is currently held by Fiat, an Italian company.[30] However, as of 2013–present, Dodge no longer competes in NASCAR, however a possible return has been rumored.[31]

Criticism of tracks[edit]

Changes in traditional tracks[edit]

Las Vegas Motor Speedway

In 1965 90.9% of the NASCAR schedule was in the South Region of the US and it stayed above 70% until 1989. The Northeast Region started out with a high percentage of races in the early NASCAR years, but from the 1960s until the mid 1980s contained 10% or less of the schedule. The Midwest Region had 21.1 % of the races in 1950, but many years before 1970 had no races. The NASCAR schedule had usually contained a few races in the West Region but never more than 10% until the late 1990s. From the late 1990s, and into the early 2000s, a number of new tracks were built and became part of the NASCAR schedule, in places such as South Florida, Chicagoland, the Dallas–Fort Worth Metroplex, the Northeast, and the Los Angeles area. This is part of a publicized trend to make NASCAR a more national sport rather than a regional sport. Today the South Region makes up only 50% of the NASCAR schedule, while the Northeast Region has 19.4%, the Midwest Region has 16.7%, And the West Region has 13.9% of the schedule. A consequence of NASCAR maintaining its current 36-race schedule is that the inclusion of these new tracks in the schedule results in some of the more traditional tracks in the Southeast no longer hosting races. Examples include: North Wilkesboro Speedway which is no longer a part of the NASCAR schedule, and North Carolina Speedway which held its last Cup race in 2004 after being in operation for nearly 40 years. Traditionalist fans argue that this slow attrition away from tracks in those states where stock car racing began causes the sport to move away from its roots, and from uniquely styled tracks to those of a more "cookie-cutter" design. 36.1% (13 Races) of the Races today are on what fans call "cookie-cutter" Tracks ( Which include: Charlotte, Texas, Atlanta (Since its re-design in mid 1997), Las Vegas, Michigan, California, Kansas and Chicagoland Compared to the 12.9% (4 Races) in 1996. Before NASCAR cut the number of races down for the 1972 season, Tracks under 1 mile made up more than 55% of the races. After the changes for the 1972 season Tracks under 1 mile made up only 29% of the races in 1972 and then had 10 races, around 33% of the races, until the mid 1980s. After losing 2 races at Nashville in 1985 and 2 races at North Wilkesboro after 1996 the NASCAR schedule had only 17.6% of races under 1 mile. Tracks with a length between 0.5 and under 1 mile had the highest percentage of the schedule from NASCAR's first season in 1949 until the mid 1990s when tracks between 1.000-1.499 miles equaled them in percentage. Tracks between 1.000-1.499 miles had the most races in the late 1990s until 1.5-1.999 miles Tracks passed them in the early to mid 2000's after the lose of races at Rockingham and Darlington. Today 1.5-1.999 miles Tracks have over 30% of the races. The counterargument is that these "traditional" venues are in markets whose support for racing had long declined – Darlington failed to sell out races until it was cut to one date in 2005 while North Wilkesboro had no infrastructure and little ability to expand beyond 50,000 seats, and Rockingham failed to sell out its races for over five years.

The 2008 NASCAR-Detroit meetings also saw two automakers call for the addition of at least two new road races. One of these manufacturers also favored reducing the total number of races by at least four while at the same time increasing the number of road races from its current two to at least four. The most obvious way to achieve these goals would be to reduce the number of tracks that host two events a year.[8] These demands were rejected.

Decline of road courses[edit]

Since the seventies, NASCAR has increasingly focused its emphasis on oval courses. Many racing fans consider this a key detriment to NASCAR, deriding drivers and the sport as "a bunch of hillbillies driving in circles for 3 hours."[32] Previously, some races were held on road courses, but by 1990 only two road courses were in use: Sonoma Raceway, and Watkins Glen International. This can be explained by the decrease in handling ability over the course of the vehicles' development. Also notable is the establishment of NASCAR layouts at Sonoma and Watkins Glen. The former omits the Carousel section of the layout while the latter omits the Boot, again due to handling issues. Recently, the Xfinity Series has begun using Road America, initially due to the loss of the Milwaukee Mile from its schedule. Starting in 2013 the Xfinity Series began racing at Mid-Ohio Sports Car Course due to the loss of Circuit Gilles Villeneuve. In 2013, the Camping World Truck Series began racing at Canadian Tire Motorsports Park, marking the first time in 13 years the Truck Series visited a road course.[33] As of 2017 due to the popularity[34] NASCAR has been adding more road courses to the championship season schedule with races also taking place in rain.[35][36][37]

Manipulating the outcome of races[edit]

The flagman displaying the checkered flag with a complete set of stock car racing flags

NASCAR uses a race event called "caution", triggered at the discretion of the race administrators, in which drivers are limited to certain maneuvers. The general purpose of this event is to reduce risk when track conditions deteriorate (for instance, if there is debris on the track, one or more cars crash and emergency vehicles and tow trucks need to be on track, or a car spins and is given the opportunity to catch up with the field). One side-effect of this event is that the cars tend to bunch up.

The number of cautions per race in the Cup Series has increased from 7.4 in 2001 to 9.6 in 2007 (an increase of almost 30%), while the number of actual crashes per race has only increased from 5.6 to 6.7 (an increase of about 20%).[38] This is likely due to increased caution periods for cleaning debris from the track. Fans and competitors alike speculate whether some of these cautions are for cleaning actual debris or are being used to keep the cars tightly packed in an effort to boost fan interest. An unnecessary caution at the appropriate time could affect a driver’s strategy and the outcome of the race.

In April 2007, driver Tony Stewart said on his own radio show, "It's like playing God. They can almost dictate the race instead of the drivers doing it…I don't know that they've run a fair race all year." Stewart also made references to professional wrestling institutions such as WWE, which have long been known for scripting matches.

In an unrelated interview, driver Matt Kenseth said, "There's for sure entertainment cautions, there's no doubt about that, but we're in the entertainment business and you're going to get some of that and group the field every once in a while." Driver and commentator, Kyle Petty, said, "We're in the entertainment business, if they want to throw a caution every 40 laps to keep everybody bunched up, so the fans have a better experience, more cautions, the better."[39]

Attraction of drivers from other series[edit]

In recent years, drivers from road racing and open wheel racing series have joined NASCAR either full-time or part-time. Also, many drivers are often promoted to the extent that their road racing past is almost forgotten. An example of this is IndyCar Series champion Tony Stewart, whose NASCAR success has far surpassed his time in IndyCar.

Despite this, however, many NASCAR drivers do participate in road racing. Former road racers Max Papis and Australian driver Marcos Ambrose occasionally participated in the NASCAR-affiliated Rolex Sports Car Series along with several NASCAR regulars such as Jimmie Johnson and Kurt Busch. Many other road racers have occasionally returned to road racing, such as Formula One driver Juan Pablo Montoya and IndyCar driver Dario Franchitti. Usually, these drivers participate in the 24 Hours of Daytona, likely due to the venue being owned by NASCAR.

Race car drivers participating in different styles of racing is not unusual, however. Mario Andretti competed in both open wheel and NASCAR racing. Many drivers in the 1950s and 1960s often changed between Formula One, sports cars, and sometimes NASCAR.

Number of races[edit]

The schedule of NASCAR typically includes over twice as many events as most racing series. Also dominant in NASCAR is the repeated use of major venues such as Daytona or Talladega, whereas other series seldom use one venue more than once (although the former Rolex Sports Car Series often used Daytona and Watkins Glen twice each, one for the endurance race and one for a standard-length race). This can be explained by the races being a major headliner, as well as the venues having very few other major series use the venue (only NASCAR, IndyCar, and IMSA use ovals, with IMSA typically using only three or so per season).

See also[edit]


  1. ^ "News & Media". Retrieved 30 August 2017.
  2. ^ "Skinner joins Stewart in exposing NASCAR manipulation". Archived from the original on February 24, 2012. Retrieved 2012-08-03.
  3. ^ Yeazell, David. "Jimmie Johnson and Jeff Gordon: Did NASCAR Manipulate Phoenix Results?". Retrieved 30 August 2017.
  4. ^ "Does NASCAR manipulate its races in any way?". Archived from the original on February 24, 2012. Retrieved 2012-08-03.
  5. ^ "NASCAR a waste of resources". 2008-06-04. Retrieved 2012-08-03.
  6. ^ "NASCAR EFI". Retrieved 18 June 2012.
  7. ^ Report on tires at 2005 UAW-GM Quality 500
  8. ^ a b c De Lorenzo, Peter M. (2008-08-06). "Fumes #457 – The Detroit Three get down to the business of NASCAR". Retrieved 2009-06-12.
  9. ^ "Biofuels or Bio-Fools?". Retrieved 2012-08-03.
  10. ^ Contributor, Quora (2012-07-25). "The Ethanol Trap". Retrieved 2012-08-03.
  11. ^ CBS Archived October 17, 2007, at the Wayback Machine.
  12. ^ "KC Breaking News, Sports, Weather & More - & The Kansas City Star". Retrieved 30 August 2017.
  13. ^ O'Keefe, Brian (2005-09-05). "CNN Money Magazine (online)". Retrieved 2012-08-03.
  14. ^ USA Today, June 20, 2005
  15. ^ Archived December 13, 2007, at the Wayback Machine.
  16. ^ "". Retrieved 2012-08-03.
  17. ^ Blount, Terry (November 23, 2010). "The best and worst of 2010". Retrieved November 24, 2010.
  18. ^ Rodman, Dave (January 11, 2011). "NASCAR drivers must elect championships in '11". Retrieved January 11, 2011.
  19. ^ Albert, Zack (October 26, 2016). "New participation guidelines put limits in place for 2017". Retrieved October 26, 2016.
  20. ^ a b Finney, Mike (January 2, 2006). "Like the cars, fuel goes fast in NASCAR". The (Wilmington, Del.) News Journal. Retrieved 2007-11-19.
  21. ^ a b Gerard, Jean. "Motor Madness: Gas Guzzling is Business as Usual at NASCAR". E/The Environmental Magazine. Retrieved 2007-11-18.
  22. ^ Servino, Natale. "NASCAR goes green? New tracks touted as good for the planet". Earth Island Journal. Archived from the original on 2007-10-13. Retrieved 2007-11-19.
  23. ^ Bob Passrock (October 21, 2006). "Nextel Cup going to unleaded fuel in 2007". Retrieved 2007-06-17.
  24. ^ Dave Rodman, NASCAR.COM (2011-01-22). "Fill 'er up: Teams off and running with E15 fuel - Jan 22, 2011". Nascar.Com. Retrieved 2012-08-03.
  25. ^ Magrath, Mike. "NASCAR Fans, Be Careful When You Talk "Tradition"". Retrieved 2012-08-03.
  26. ^ "Statistically Speaking: Road warriors - NASCAR - Yahoo! Sports". Retrieved 2012-08-03.
  27. ^ A year after disastrous start, Toyota making inroads at Daytona - NASCAR - Yahoo! Sports Archived February 15, 2008, at the Wayback Machine.
  28. ^ "Apologetic Waltrip nearly quit Daytona - Motor Sports -". MSNBC. 2007-02-16. Retrieved 2012-08-03.
  29. ^ "Daimler-Benz and Chrysler Merge". Retrieved 2012-08-03.
  30. ^ USA Today. June 3, 2011 Missing or empty |title= (help)
  31. ^ NBC Sports. January 31, 2017 Missing or empty |title= (help)
  32. ^ "Golden Tate says NASCAR drivers aren't athletes, hears it from racing fans | ProFootballTalk". Retrieved 2012-08-03.
  33. ^ "Canada to Host Truck Race in 2013". Motor Racing Network. 2012-11-16. Retrieved 2013-09-12.
  34. ^ "Fans demand more road courses and NASCAR knows it". Retrieved 30 August 2017.
  35. ^ "2018 NASCAR schedule: Charlotte playoff race will be on road course". 23 May 2017. Retrieved 30 August 2017.
  36. ^ Schrader, Stef. "NASCAR Finally Adds A Road Course To The Playoffs". Retrieved 30 August 2017.
  37. ^ Schrader, Stef. "This Wet NASCAR Road Course Battle Will Completely Melt Your Brain". Retrieved 30 August 2017.
  38. ^ USAToday"2007 NASCAR Crash Data" Retrieved Dec. 22, 2007
  39. ^ Archived 2008-01-10 at the Wayback Machine. "DESPAIN: My Take on Phantom Cautions" Retrieved Dec. 22, 2007

External links[edit]