Culture and Conflict in the Middle East

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Culture and Conflict in the Middle East is a 2008 book by Philip Carl Salzman, a professor of Anthropology at McGill University.

Culture and Conflict is an attempt to understand Middle Eastern politics and society as an outcome of the fact that tribal organization central to Arab culture.[1]

Content[edit]

According to Salzman, tribes conceptualized as the descendants of a common ancestor on the male line, will combine their resources with other closely related relatives against more distant ones, and the whole tribe will then stand together against outsiders. This tribal framework renders it nearly impossible to have a constitution or a regime of law and order, thereby "generating a society where all groups are on an equal basis." Tribal members "are loyal only to their groups." [2]

Tribal loyalties are said by one commentator drawing on Salzman’s work to “ create a complex pattern of tribal autonomy and tyrannical centralism that obstructs the development of constitutionalism, the rule of law, citizenship, gender equality, and the other prerequisites of a democratic state. Not until this archaic social system based on the family is dispatched can democracy make real headway in the Middle East.” [3]

Reviews[edit]

Stanley Kurtz called Culture and Conflict “a major event: the most penetrating, reliable, systematic, and theoretically sophisticated effort yet made to understand the Islamist challenge the United States is facing in cultural terms.” [4]

Academic reviews can be expected, but are usually published two to three years after a book’s publication.

Influence[edit]

Writing in The New York Times, David Brooks drew on Salzman’s work to argue that “many Middle Eastern societies are tribal. The most salient structure is the local lineage group. National leaders do not make giant sacrifices on behalf of the nation because their higher loyalty is to the sect or clan. Order is achieved not by the top-down imposition of abstract law. Instead, order is achieved through fluid balance of power agreements between local groups.” [5] Culture and conflict is cited for its explanation of one of the “obstacles” blocking “individual freedoms, civil rights, political participation, popular sovereignty, equality before the law, and representative elections” in Arab lands.[3]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Scholar: Tribalism Rules in Iran, Iraq and Syria, by Michelle Mostovy-Eisenberg, Jewish Exponent, February 7, 2008 [1]
  2. ^ Scholar: Tribalism Rules in Iran, Iraq and Syria, by Michelle Mostovy-Eisenberg, Jewish Exponent, February 7, 2008 [2]
  3. ^ a b A Democratic Islam? - article by Daniel Pipes
  4. ^ I and My Brother Against My Cousin, Is Islam the best way to understand the war on terror? well i really don't think it is. Tribalism may offer a clearer view of our enemies' motivations, by Stanley Kurtz , 04/14/2008, Volume 013, Issue 29 [3]
  5. ^ “A Network of Truces,” David Brooks, The New York Times, April 8, 2008