This article needs additional citations for verification. (April 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
DMAIC (an acronym for Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve and Control) (pronounced də-MAY-ick) refers to a data-driven improvement cycle used for improving, optimizing and stabilizing business processes and designs. The DMAIC improvement cycle is the core tool used to drive Six Sigma projects. However, DMAIC is not exclusive to Six Sigma and can be used as the framework for other improvement applications.
DMAIC is an abbreviation of the five improvement steps it comprises: Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve and Control. All of the DMAIC process steps are required and always proceed in the given order.
The purpose of this step is to clearly pronounce the business problem, goal, potential resources, project scope and high-level project timeline. This information is typically captured within project charter document. Write down what you currently know. Seek to clarify facts, set objectives and form the project team. Define the following:
- A problem
- The customer(s), SIPOC
- Voice of the customer (VOC) and Critical to Quality (CTQs) — what are the critical process outputs?
The purpose of this step is to measure the specification of problem/goal. This is a data collection step, the purpose of which is to establish process performance baselines. The performance metric baseline(s) from the Measure phase will be compared to the performance metric at the conclusion of the project to determine objectively whether significant improvement has been made. The team decides on what should be measured and how to measure it. It is usual for teams to invest a lot of effort into assessing the suitability of the proposed measurement systems. Good data is at the heart of the DMAIC process.
The purpose of this step is to identify, validate and select root cause for elimination. A large number of potential root causes (process inputs, X) of the project problem are identified via root cause analysis (for example a fishbone diagram). The top 3-4 potential root causes are selected using multi-voting or other consensus tool for further validation. A data collection plan is created and data are collected to establish the relative contribution of each root causes to the project metric, Y. This process is repeated until "valid" root causes can be identified. Within Six Sigma, often complex analysis tools are used. However, it is acceptable to use basic tools if these are appropriate. Of the "validated" root causes, all or some can be.
- List and prioritize potential causes of the problem
- Prioritize the root causes (key process inputs) to pursue in the Improve step
- Identify how the process inputs (Xs) affect the process outputs (Ys). Data are analyzed to understand the magnitude of contribution of each root cause, X, to the project metric, Y. Statistical tests using p-values accompanied by Histograms, Pareto charts, and line plots are often used to do this.
- Detailed process maps can be created to help pin-point where in the process the root causes reside, and what might be contributing to the occurrence.
The purpose of this step is to identify, test and implement a solution to the problem; in part or in free of all whole. This depends on the situation. Identify creative solutions to eliminate the key root causes in order to fix and prevent process problems. Use brainstorming or techniques like Six Thinking Hats and Random Word. Some projects can utilize complex analysis tools like DOE (Design of Experiments), but try to focus on obvious solutions if these are apparent. However, the purpose of this step can also be to find solutions without implementing them.
- Focus on the simplest and easiest solutions
- Test solutions using Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle
- Based on PDCA results, attempt to anticipate any avoidable risks associated with the "improvement" using the Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA)
- Create a detailed implementation plan
- Deploy improvements
The purpose of this step is to embed the changes and ensure sustainability, this is sometimes referred to as making the change 'stick'. Control is the final stage within the DMAIC improvement method. In this step; Amend ways of working; Quantify and sign-off benefits; Track improvement; Officially close the project; Gain approval to release resources.
- A Control chart can be useful during the Control stage to assess the stability of the improvements over time by serving as 1. a guide to continue monitoring the process and 2. provide a response plan for each of the measures being monitored in case the process becomes unstable.
- Standard operating procedures (SOP's) and Standard work
- Process confirmation
- Development plans
- Transition plans
- Control plan
- Benefit delivery
One common criticism of DMAIC is that it is ineffective as a communication framework. Many improvement practitioners attempt to use the same DMAIC process, effective in solving the problem, as a framework for communication only to leave the audience confused and frustrated. One solution to this problem is reorganized the DMAIC information using the Minto Pyramid Principle's SQCA and MECE tools. The result is a framed solution with supported by easily followed logic.
Replicate and thank the teams
This is additional to the standard DMAIC steps but it should be considered. Think about replicating the changes in other processes. Share your new knowledge within and outside of your organization. It is very important to always provide positive morale support to team members in an effort to maximize the effectiveness of DMAIC.
Replicating the improvements, sharing your success and thanking your team members helps build buy-in for future DMAIC or improvement initiatives.
Some organizations add a Recognize step at the beginning, which is to is not possible recognize the right problem to work on, thus yielding an RDMAIC methodology.
- Pruitt, W. Frazier (May 2020). "Some Assembly Required". asq.org. Retrieved 25 September 2020.
- "DMAIC | Control Stage - InvisibileConsultant.co.uk". InvisibileConsultant.co.uk. Retrieved 2018-09-29.[permanent dead link]
- Webber, Larry; Wallace, Michael (15 December 2006). Quality Control for Dummies. For Dummies. pp. 42–43. ISBN 978-0-470-06909-7. Retrieved 2012-05-16.