From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The idea of the daimonic typically means quite a few things: from befitting a demon and fiendish, to be motivated by a spiritual force or genius and inspired. As a psychological term, it has come to represent an elemental force which contains an irrepressible drive towards individuation. As a literary term, it can also mean the dynamic unrest that exists in us all that forces us into the unknown, leading to self-destruction and/or self-discovery.


The root of the word has a referent from daiomai, which is translated as something like to divide or to lacerate.[1]

Marie-Louise von Franz delineated the term daiomai (see ref.), and indicates that its usage is specifically when someone perceived an occurrence which they attributed to the influence of a divine presence, amongst the examples provided by Franz, are from attributing to a daimon the occurrence of a horse becoming or being startled.[2]

According to another source, the term is thought to have originated with the Greeks, by way of Latin—dæmon: "spirit", derived from Greek "δαίμων" (daimon, gen. daimonos): "lesser god, guiding spirit, tutelary deity",[3] a meaning which is attested to elsewhere.

History of usage[edit]

For the Minoan (3000-1100 BC) and Mycenaean (1500-1100 BC), "daimons" were seen as attendants or servants to the deities, possessing spiritual power. Later, the term "daimon" was used by writers such as Homer (8th century BC), Hesiod, and Plato as a synonym for theos, or god. Some scholars, like van der Leeuw, suggest a distinction between the terms: whereas theos was the personification of a god (e.g. Zeus), daimon referred to something indeterminate, invisible, incorporeal, and unknown.[4]

During the period in which Homer was alive, people believed ailments were both caused and cured by daimons.[2]

Heraclitus Of Ephesus, who was born about 540 B.C., [5] wrote:

ēthos anthropōi daimōn

— Diels fragment 119 (in Agamben & Heller-Roazen 1999) [1]

which is translated as, the character (ēthos) of a human (anthropōi) is the daimōn, or sometimes the character of a person is Fate, and the variation An individuals character is their fate (idem "Man's character is his fate").[1][6][7]

Aeschylus mentions the term Daimon in his play Agemmemnon, written during 458 B.C. [1][8][9][10]

Socrates thought the daimones to be gods or the children of gods.[11][12]

The pre-Socratic Greek philosopher Empedocles (5th century BC) later employed the term in describing the psyche or soul. Similarly, those such as Plutarch (1st century AD) suggested a view of the daimon as being an amorphous mental phenomenon, an occasion of mortals to come in contact with a great spiritual power.[4] Plutarch wrote De genio Socratis.[13][14]

The earliest pre-Christian conception of daimons or daimones also considered them ambiguous—not exclusively evil. But while daimons may have initially been seen as potentially good and evil, constructive and destructive, left to each man to relate to—the term eventually came to embody a purely evil connotation, with Xenocrates perhaps being one of the first to popularize this colloquial use.[4]


In psychology, the daimonic refers to a natural human impulse within everyone to affirm, assert, perpetuate, and increase the self to its complete totality. If each Self undergoes a process of individuation, an involuntary and natural development towards individual maturity and harmony with collective human nature, then its driver is the daimonic, the force which seeks to overcome the obstacles to development, whatever the cost—both guide and guardian. Rollo May writes that the daimonic is "any natural function which has the power to take over the whole person... The daimonic can be either creative or destructive, but it is normally both... The daimonic is obviously not an entity but refers to a fundamental, archetypal function of human experience -- an existential reality".[15] The daimonic is seen as an essentially undifferentiated, impersonal, primal force of nature[16] which arises from the ground of being rather than the self as such.[15]

The demands of the daimonic force upon the individual can be unorthodox, frightening, and overwhelming. With its obligation to protect the complete maturation of the individual and the unification of opposing forces within the Self, the inner urge can come in the form of a sudden journey (either intentional or serendipitous), a psychological illness, or simply neurotic and off-center behavior. Jung writes, "The daimon throws us down, makes us traitors to our ideals and cherished convictions — traitors to the selves we thought we were."[17] Ultimately, it is the will of man to achieve his humanity, but since parts of his humanity may be deemed unacceptable and disowned, its demands are too often resisted. It is no wonder Yeats described it as that "other Will". Confrontation with the daimonic can be considered similar to "shadow-work".

Common threads of the daimonic concept

The psychologist Rollo May conceives of the daimonic as a primal force of nature which contains both constructive and destructive potentialities, but ultimately seeks to promote totality of the self.[16] May introduced the daimonic to psychology[16] as a concept designed to rival the terms 'devil' and 'demonic'. He believed the term demonic to be unsatisfactory because of our tendency, rooted in Judeo-Christian mythology, to project power outside of the self and onto devils and demons. The daimonic is also similar to Jung's shadow, but is viewed as less differentiated. A pitfall of the Jungian doctrine of the shadow is the temptation to project evil onto this relatively autonomous 'splinter personality' and thus unnecessarily fragment the individual and obviate freedom and responsibility. Finally, by comparison to Freud's death instinct (Thanatos), the daimonic is seen as less one-sided.

While similar to several other psychological terms, noteworthy differences exist. The daimonic is often improperly confused with the term demonic.

In literature[edit]

The journey from innocence to experience is not an idea that originated with this term; rather the Hero's Journey is a topic older than literature itself. But the daimonic subsequently became a focus of the English Romantic movement in the 18th and 19th centuries.[citation needed]

In the diagram, the common threads of the daimonic concept are identified. Typically, the daimonic tale centers around the Solitary, the central character of the story, who usually is introduced in innocence, wealth, and often arrogance. However, under the masks of control and order lies a corruption and unconscious desire towards disintegration. Some event, either external or internal, leads the character towards some type of isolation where he is forced to confront his daimons.

The fall or descent (from hubris) into the liminal world where light and dark meet is usually very dramatic and often torturing for the hero and the audience alike, and comes in myriad forms. In the depths, in hitting bottom, he ultimately discovers his own fate and tragedy (catharsis), and in a final climax is either broken or driven towards rebirth and self-knowledge. The glory of the daimonic is in humble resurrection, though it claims more than it sets free as many foolish men are drawn into its vacuum never to return. As Stefan Zweig writes, the hero is unique for "he becomes the daimon's master instead of the daimon's thrall". The daimonic has been, and continues to be, a great source of creativity, inspiration, and fascination in all forms of art.

See also[edit]


  1. ^ a b c d G Agamben, D Heller-Roazen. Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy (p.117) Meridian : crossing aesthetics. Stanford University Press, 1999 ISBN 0804732787. Retrieved 2015-04-24. 
  2. ^ a b SA Diamond (ed. DA. Leeming, K Madden, S Marlan). Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion: L-Z (p.197). Springer Science & Business Media, 26 Oct 2009 ISBN 038771801X. Retrieved 2015-04-24. 
  3. ^ D Harper - Etymology Online. http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=demon
  4. ^ a b c Diamond, Stephen (1999). Anger, Madness, and the Daimonic: the Psychological Genesis of Violence, Evil, and Creativity. Albany: State University of New York Press. ISBN 0-7914-3076-6. 
  5. ^ AF Beavers - Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers (p.487) (edited by T Hockey, K Bracher, M Bolt, V Trimble, J Palmeri, R Jarrell, Jordan D. Marché, F. Jamil Ragep) Springer Science & Business Media, 18 Sep 2007 ISBN 0387304002 [Retrieved 2015-04-24](ed. also this)
  6. ^ ES. Casey - Remembering, Second Edition: A Phenomenological Study (p.355 - Note 15 of Chapter 12) Indiana University Press, 15 Sep 2009 (2nd edition) ISBN 0253114314 [Retrieved 2015-04-24]
  7. ^ Professor Wolfe - Heraclitus: Aletheia and Logos (Adair 11)[Retrieved 2015-04-24]
  8. ^ The Prometheus and Agamemnon of Aeschylus (p.146)[Retrieved 2015-04-24](lines 1535-1543 read " Thou dreadful Daimon, that dost smite so sore the twofold house of the Tantalidæ, Steeling each women's heart and hand with mettle male, That they the manliest parts have planned, Causing my heart with grief to fail, Like the night-crow thou seemest to me perched on the corse to stand, The death-hymn croaking with unearthly glee....." italics mine)
  9. ^ Robert Browning -The Agamemnon of Aeschylus, La Saisiaz, Etc. (p.51) Wildside Press LLC, 2008 ISBN 1434470504 [Retrieved 2015-04-24](ed. starting with KLUTAIMNESTRA " And if of these troubles,there should be enough - we may assent - By the Daimon's heavy heel unfortunately stricken ones!...")
  10. ^ Aeschylus (Translated by E. D. A. Morshead) - Agamemnon The Internet Classics Archive MIT (mit.edu) [Retrieved 2015-04-24]
  11. ^ C.D.C. Reeve - Blindness and Reorientation: Problems in Plato's Republic (p.2) Oxford University Press, 17 Jan 2013 ISBN 0199934436 [|Retrieved 2015-04-24]
  12. ^ R Kraut - Reason and Religion in Socratic Philosophy (edited by ND. Smith JF. Miller, P Woodruff Thompson) Oxford University Press, 23 Oct 2000 ISBN 0195350928 [Retrieved 2015-04-24]
  13. ^ De Genio Socratis by Plutarch the Loeb Classical Library edition, 1959 (University of Chicago)[Retrieved 2015-04-24](verification)
  14. ^ Plutarch, (DA Russell - translator) - On the Daimonion of Socrates: Human Liberation, Divine Guidance and Philosophy Volume 16 of SAPERE. Scripta antiquitatis posterioris ad ethicam religionemque pertinentia Mohr Siebeck, 2010 ISBN 3161501373 [Retrieved 2015-04-24](first source)
  15. ^ a b Rollo May, Love and Will, ISBN 0-393-01080-5. p. 123–124.
  16. ^ a b c Zweig, C. & Abrams, J. (1991). Meeting the Shadow. Tarcher: Los Angeles.
  17. ^ C.G. Jung, Symbols of Transformation (New York: Pantheon, 1956), p. 357.